DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35461] - bad request http 400 using mod_jk 1.2.13. After downgrading to 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.5 the problems have gone. Problems occur again after using the combination Apache Webserver 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.10
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-18 20:52 --- Same problem here. Please let us know how we can help debugging that issue. Thanks Alex -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35461] - bad request http 400 using mod_jk 1.2.13. After downgrading to 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.5 the problems have gone. Problems occur again after using the combination Apache Webserver 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.10
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-19 00:48 --- (In reply to comment #10) Same problem here. Please let us know how we can help debugging that issue. Thanks Alex It's pretty clear what is happening: mod_jk isn't sending the POST body before the Tomcat-configured connectionTimeout has been reached. What isn't clear is why. In the first dump example, the worker in the JSESSIONID cookie isn't in the list (there are also some decoding problems, but they shouldn't affect Tomcat). In the second dump example, mod_jk has decided to send the request to a different worker than the one in the cookie for some reason. Otherwise, they are perfectly normal POST request records. Probably, somebody is going to have to be able to reproduce this with 'JkLogLevel debug' (or even 'JkLogLevel trace' :) to get some idea why the POST body wasn't sent. As an aside, Tomcat 5.5.11+ won't have this particular error, but it is also extremely unlikely to actually work. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35461] - bad request http 400 using mod_jk 1.2.13. After downgrading to 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.5 the problems have gone. Problems occur again after using the combination Apache Webserver 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.10
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-07 20:18 --- I am getting the exact same problem. When will this be fixed? Is there a new release slated soon? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35461] - bad request http 400 using mod_jk 1.2.13. After downgrading to 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.5 the problems have gone. Problems occur again after using the combination Apache Webserver 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.10
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-02 14:05 --- Created an attachment (id=15844) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15844action=view) workers.properties from mod_jk configuration -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35461] - bad request http 400 using mod_jk 1.2.13. After downgrading to 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.5 the problems have gone. Problems occur again after using the combination Apache Webserver 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.10
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-02 14:07 --- Created an attachment (id=15845) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15845action=view) modjk directives -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35461] - bad request http 400 using mod_jk 1.2.13. After downgrading to 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.5 the problems have gone. Problems occur again after using the combination Apache Webserver 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.10
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-02 14:09 --- I have attached our workers.properties file and a file jk.conf including the directives. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35461] - bad request http 400 using mod_jk 1.2.13. After downgrading to 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.5 the problems have gone. Problems occur again after using the combination Apache Webserver 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.10
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-02 14:29 --- (In reply to comment #3) Hmm, This seems like you are using 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' with GET request. Can you post the full mod_jk log from the beggining of the transaction to the end for that request. There must be some errors in ajp protocol, either setting timeout too low or forbidding post requests. Hello, I have sent attachements concerning workers.properties an directives. Our application is using webservers running behind a loadbalancer. Therefore it is a little bit difficult to find the exact statement that matches the stack trace of the tomcat. But there some stack traces in our Tomcats logfile and I will sent a you a typical error sequence from a modjk log file [Mon Aug 01 18:56:03 2005] [info] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1178): Socket 7 is not connected any moreajp_service::jk_ajp_common.c (1749): Sending request to tomcat failed, recoverable operation attempt=1 [Mon Aug 01 18:54:17 2005] [info] jk_open_socket::jk_connect.c (444): connect to 145.228.205.181:16008 failed with errno=111 [Mon Aug 01 18:54:17 2005] [info] ajp_connect_to_endpoint::jk_ajp_common.c (889): Failed opening socket to (145.228.205.181:16008) with (errno=111) [Mon Aug 01 18:54:17 2005] [info] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1248): Error connecting to the Tomcat process. [Mon Aug 01 18:54:17 2005] [info] ajp_service::jk_ajp_common.c (1749): Sending request to tomcat failed, recoverable operation attempt=2 [Mon Aug 01 18:54:17 2005] [info] jk_open_socket::jk_connect.c (444): connect to 145.228.205.181:16008 failed with errno=111 [Mon Aug 01 18:54:17 2005] [info] ajp_connect_to_endpoint::jk_ajp_common.c (889): Failed opening socket to (145.228.205.181:16008) with (errno=111) [Mon Aug 01 18:54:17 2005] [info] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1248): Error connecting to the Tomcat process. [Mon Aug 01 18:54:17 2005] [info] ajp_service::jk_ajp_common.c (1749): Sending request to tomcat failed, recoverable operation attempt=3 [Mon Aug 01 18:54:17 2005] [error] ajp_service::jk_ajp_common.c (1758): Error connecting to tomcat. Tomcat is probably not started or is listening on the wrong port. worker=ASTPPRMB failed [Mon Aug 01 18:54:17 2005] [info] service::jk_lb_worker.c (662): service failed, worker ASTPPRMB is in error state [Mon Aug 01 18:55:09 2005] [info] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1178): Socket 7 is not connected any more (errno=-1) [Mon Aug 01 18:55:09 2005] [info] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1202): Error sending request. Will try another pooled connection [Mon Aug 01 18:55:09 2005] [info] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1225): All endpoints are disconnected or dead [Mon Aug 01 18:55:09 2005] [info] ajp_service::jk_ajp_common.c (1749): Sending request to tomcat failed, recoverable operation attempt=1 [Mon Aug 01 18:55:53 2005] [info] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1178): Socket 13 is not connected any more (errno=-1) [Mon Aug 01 18:55:53 2005] [info] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1202): Error sending request. Will try another pooled connection [Mon Aug 01 18:55:53 2005] [info] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1225): All endpoints are disconnected or dead [Mon Aug 01 18:55:53 2005] [info] ajp_service::jk_ajp_common.c (1749): Sending request to tomcat failed, recoverable operation attempt=1 [Mon Aug 01 18:55:09 2005] [info] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1178): Socket 7 is not connected any more (errno=-1) [Mon Aug 01 18:55:09 2005] [info] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1202): Error sending request. Will try another pooled connection [Mon Aug 01 18:55:09 2005] [info] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1225): All endpoints are disconnected or dead [Mon Aug 01 18:55:09 2005] [info] ajp_service::jk_ajp_common.c (1749): Sending request to tomcat failed, recoverable operation attempt=1 [Mon Aug 01 18:55:53 2005] [info] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1178): Socket 13 is not connected any more (errno=-1) [Mon Aug 01 18:55:53 2005] [info] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1202): Error sending request. Will try another pooled connection [Mon Aug 01 18:55:53 2005] [info] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1225): All endpoints are disconnected or dead [Mon Aug 01 18:55:53 2005] [info] ajp_service::jk_ajp_common.c (1749): Sending request to tomcat failed, recoverable operation attempt=1 [Mon Aug 01 18:55:57 2005] [info] ajp_process_callback::jk_ajp_common.c (1384): Connection aborted or network problems [Mon Aug 01 18:55:57 2005] [info] ajp_service::jk_ajp_common.c (1731): Receiving from tomcat failed, because of
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35461] - bad request http 400 using mod_jk 1.2.13. After downgrading to 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.5 the problems have gone. Problems occur again after using the combination Apache Webserver 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.10
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35461] - bad request http 400 using mod_jk 1.2.13. After downgrading to 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.5 the problems have gone. Problems occur again after using the combination Apache Webserver 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.10
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-01 10:36 --- Hello, thank you very much for your help so far. We have now installed newest mod_jk version (1.2.14) but the bug still exists. Does the newest version include the bugfix already ? If yes it would be very kind if you would reinvestigate: 29.07.2005 15:55:00 org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest invoke SCHWERWIEGEND: Error decoding request java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out at java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Native Method) at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:129) at java.io.BufferedInputStream.fill(BufferedInputStream.java:218) at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read1(BufferedInputStream.java:256) at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:313) at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.read(ChannelSocket.java:598) at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.receive(ChannelSocket.java:535) at org.apache.jk.common.JkInputStream.receive(JkInputStream.java:247) at org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.decodeRequest (HandlerRequest.java:500) at org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.invoke(HandlerRequest.java:352) at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.invoke(ChannelSocket.java:743) at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.processConnection (ChannelSocket.java:675) at org.apache.jk.common.SocketConnection.runIt(ChannelSocket.java:866) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run (ThreadPool.java:683) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) 12 34 02 f2 02 04 00 08 48 54 54 50 2f 31 2e 31 | .4.?HTTP/1.1 00 00 2b 2f 63 6f 6d 6d 6f 6e 2f 63 75 73 74 6f | ..+/common/custo 6d 65 72 2f 62 6f 75 6e 64 61 72 79 2f 6c 6f 67 | mer/boundary/log 69 6e 5a 69 70 63 6f 64 65 52 48 2e 64 6f 00 00 | inZipcodeRH.do.. 0d 31 39 35 2e 39 33 2e 36 30 2e 31 30 35 00 ff | .195.93.60.105.? ff 00 0f 77 77 77 2e 70 72 65 6d 69 65 72 65 2e | ?..www.premiere. 64 65 00 00 50 00 00 0c a0 01 00 a4 69 6d 61 67 | de..P...?..?imag 65 2f 67 69 66 2c 20 69 6d 61 67 65 2f 78 2d 78 | e/gif, image/x-x 62 69 74 6d 61 70 2c 20 69 6d 61 67 65 2f 6a 70 | bitmap, image/jp 65 67 2c 20 69 6d 61 67 65 2f 70 6a 70 65 67 2c | eg, image/pjpeg, 20 61 70 70 6c 69 63 61 74 69 6f 6e 2f 78 2d 73 | application/x-s 68 6f 63 6b 77 61 76 65 2d 66 6c 61 73 68 2c 20 | hockwave-flash, 61 70 70 6c 69 63 61 74 69 6f 6e 2f 6d 73 77 6f | application/mswo 72 64 2c 20 61 70 70 6c 69 63 61 74 69 6f 6e 2f | rd, application/ 76 6e 64 2e 6d 73 2d 65 78 63 65 6c 2c 20 61 70 | vnd.ms-excel, ap 70 6c 69 63 61 74 69 6f 6e 2f 76 6e 64 2e 6d 73 | plication/vnd.ms 2d 70 6f 77 65 72 70 6f 69 6e 74 2c 20 2a 2f 2a | -powerpoint, */* 00 a0 03 00 0d 67 7a 69 70 2c 20 64 65 66 6c 61 | .?...gzip, defla 74 65 00 a0 04 00 02 64 65 00 00 0d 43 61 63 68 | te.?...de...Cach 65 2d 43 6f 6e 74 72 6f 6c 00 00 08 6e 6f 2d 63 | e-Control...no-c 61 63 68 65 00 a0 08 00 03 31 36 31 00 a0 07 00 | ache.?...161.?.. 21 61 70 70 6c 69 63 61 74 69 6f 6e 2f 78 2d 77 | !application/x-w 77 77 2d 66 6f 72 6d 2d 75 72 6c 65 6e 63 6f 64 | ww-form-urlencod 65 64 00 a0 09 00 43 4a 53 45 53 53 49 4f 4e 49 | ed.?..CJSESSIONI 44 3d 33 38 44 31 41 46 42 43 32 39 33 30 30 31 | D=38D1AFBC293001 46 42 33 45 44 37 44 31 41 45 35 43 32 33 38 39 | FB3ED7D1AE5C2389 37 43 2e 41 53 54 50 50 52 4d 42 3b 20 63 6f 6f | 7C.ASTPPRMB; coo 6b 69 65 63 68 65 63 6b 3d 31 00 a0 0b 00 0f 77 | kiecheck=1.?...w 77 77 2e 70 72 65 6d 69 65 72 65 2e 64 65 00 a0 | ww.premiere.de.? 0c 00 08 6e 6f 2d 63 61 63 68 65 00 a0 0d 00 3a | ...no-cache.?..: 68 74 74 70 3a 2f 2f 77 77 77 2e 70 72 65 6d 69 | http://www.premi 65 72 65 2e 64 65 2f 63 6f 6d 6d 6f 6e 2f 63 75 | ere.de/common/cu 73 74 6f 6d 65 72 2f 62 6f 75 6e 64 61 72 79 2f | stomer/boundary/ 6c 6f 67 69 6e 52 48 2e 64 6f 00 a0 0e 00 53 4d | loginRH.do.?..SM 6f 7a 69 6c 6c 61 2f 34 2e 30 20 28 63 6f 6d 70 | ozilla/4.0 (comp 61 74 69 62 6c 65 3b 20 4d 53 49 45 20 36 2e 30 | atible; MSIE 6.0 3b 20 41 4f 4c 20 39 2e 30 3b 20 57 69 6e 64 6f | ; AOL 9.0; Windo 77 73 20 4e 54 20 35 2e 31 3b 20 53 56 31 3b 20 | ws NT 5.1; SV1; 2e 4e 45 54 20 43 4c 52 20 31 2e 31 2e 34 33 32 | .NET CLR 1.1.432 32 29 00 00 03 56 69 61 00 00 6d 48 54 54 50 2f | 2)...Via..mHTTP/ 31 2e 31 20 28 56 65 6c 6f 63 69 74 79 2f 31 2e | 1.1 (Velocity/1. 31 2e 31 20 5b 75 53 63 4d 73 20 66 20 70 20 65 | 1.1 [uScMs f p e 4e 3a 74 20 63 43 4d 70 20 73 20 5d 29 2c 20 48 | N:t cCMp s ]), H 54 54 50 2f 31 2e 30 20 66 72 72 2d 61 64 30 33 | TTP/1.0 frr-ad03 5b 43 33 35 44 33 43 36 39 5d 20 28 54 72 61 66 | [C35D3C69] (Traf 66 69 63
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35461] - bad request http 400 using mod_jk 1.2.13. After downgrading to 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.5 the problems have gone. Problems occur again after using the combination Apache Webserver 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.10
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-01 11:08 --- Hmm, This seems like you are using 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' with GET request. Can you post the full mod_jk log from the beggining of the transaction to the end for that request. There must be some errors in ajp protocol, either setting timeout too low or forbidding post requests. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35461] - bad request http 400 using mod_jk 1.2.13. After downgrading to 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.5 the problems have gone. Problems occur again after using the combination Apache Webserver 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.10
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-01 20:33 --- You should also attach your mod_jk configuration (workers.properties and Jk-directives from httpd.conf) as well as the connector configuration from server.xml. This way we can check your timeout settings etc. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35461] - bad request http 400 using mod_jk 1.2.13. After downgrading to 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.5 the problems have gone. Problems occur again after using the combination Apache Webserver 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.10
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-03 10:57 --- Fixed in the CVS by using a shutdown on the socket. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35461] - bad request http 400 using mod_jk 1.2.13. After downgrading to 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.5 the problems have gone. Problems occur again after using the combination Apache Webserver 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.10
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|bugs@httpd.apache.org |tomcat- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Component|Other Modules |Native:JK Product|Apache httpd-2.0|Tomcat 5 Version|2.0.54 |5.0.28 -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35461] - bad request http 400 using mod_jk 1.2.13. After downgrading to 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.5 the problems have gone. Problems occur again after using the combination Apache Webserver 1.3.33 and mod_jk 1.2.10
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35461 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
