Re: [PROPOSAL] Splitting docs for JK2

[Henri Gomez]

Costin Manolache wrote:
> Mladen Turk wrote:
> 
> 
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>
>>>+0 (Ok but can't help right now)
>>
>>Could you check:
>>
>>http://jakarta.apache.org/~mturk/docs/
> 
> 
> Looks good. Can you check in ? 
> 
> Henri: would you mind if we remove the reference to ajp14 ? 

My little proposal baby ?

> I thought we decided we'll stick with ajp13 and just add new 
> message types for the extra functions - so we should at 
> least rename it to 'future extensions to ajp13'.

So I will rename it to 'proposed extensions for ajp13'



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: [PROPOSAL] Splitting docs for JK2

[Costin Manolache]

Mladen Turk wrote:

>> -Original Message-
>> From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> 
>> +0 (Ok but can't help right now)
> 
> Could you check:
> 
> http://jakarta.apache.org/~mturk/docs/

Looks good. Can you check in ? 

Henri: would you mind if we remove the reference to ajp14 ? 
I thought we decided we'll stick with ajp13 and just add new 
message types for the extra functions - so we should at 
least rename it to 'future extensions to ajp13'.

In particular the config stuff should be also changed - to match
with the current jk2 api ( i.e. generic get/set, etc ). All functionality
can be added in some extra components - without affecting the current
stability ( too much ), so if someone has time we can move this to
 a TODO list for future releases.

-- 
Costin



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: [PROPOSAL] Splitting docs for JK2

[Henri Gomez]

Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I propose that we split the:
> 
> 1. configtc.xml to the 2 documents:
>   a. configtc.xml
>   b. configtcex.xml (having the examples section)
> 
> 2. configweb.xml to the 3 (or perhaps more) documents:
>   a. configweb.xml (having intro and config section)
>   b. configwebcom.xml (having components section)
>   This could be even splitted by the component level.
>   c. configwebex.xml (having examples section)
> 
> The reason?
> IMO the files are too big (not even having half the context they
> should), and are allready segmented by bookmarks.

+0 (Ok but can't help right now)




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: