RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release
-Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:26 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release I'd like to propose releasing 4.0.4 beta 2 within a few days (friday at the earliest, next tuesday at the latest). This release will include bugfixes (the list is in the usual release notes document in CVS) as well as the inclusion of the Coyote binaries (conditional to the results of the vote below). The Coyote connector will *not* be enabled by default, but will appear commented out in the default server.xml configuration file. I also plan to make a Coyote 1.0 beta 4 at the same time, to pick up the bugfixes and minor improvements in the Tomcat adaptors. Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 release: ballot +1 [ ] I support the release, and I will help +0 [X] I support the release -0 [ ] I don't support the release -1 [ ] I'm against the release because: /ballot Inclusion of the Coyote binaries: ballot +1 [X] Yes -1 [ ] No /ballot My vote is +1 for both. Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-dev- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release
Remy Maucherat wrote: I'd like to propose releasing 4.0.4 beta 2 within a few days (friday at the earliest, next tuesday at the latest). This release will include bugfixes (the list is in the usual release notes document in CVS) as well as the inclusion of the Coyote binaries (conditional to the results of the vote below). The Coyote connector will *not* be enabled by default, but will appear commented out in the default server.xml configuration file. I also plan to make a Coyote 1.0 beta 4 at the same time, to pick up the bugfixes and minor improvements in the Tomcat adaptors. Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 release: ballot +1 [ ] I support the release, and I will help +0 [ ] I support the release -0 [ ] I don't support the release -1 [ ] I'm against the release because: /ballot Inclusion of the Coyote binaries: ballot +1 [ ] Yes -1 [ ] No /ballot My vote is +1 for both. Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have to commit and retest things (PR6982) and properties problems with Coyote as soon as I am thru +1 for both. Cheers Jean-frederic -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release
I have to commit and retest things (PR6982) and properties problems with Coyote as soon as I am thru +1 for both. Ok. Properties means message strings ? If so, yes, I'd say it needs to be improved. Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: below). The Coyote connector will *not* be enabled by default, but will appear commented out in the default server.xml configuration file. +1 on enabling it by default, commenting out the old connector. I also plan to make a Coyote 1.0 beta 4 at the same time, to pick up the bugfixes and minor improvements in the Tomcat adaptors. Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 release: ballot +1 [X] I support the release, and I will help +0 [ ] I support the release -0 [ ] I don't support the release -1 [ ] I'm against the release because: /ballot Inclusion of the Coyote binaries: ballot +1 [X] Yes -1 [ ] No /ballot Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release
Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 release: ballot +1 [X] I support the release, and I will help +0 [ ] I support the release -0 [ ] I don't support the release -1 [ ] I'm against the release because: /ballot Inclusion of the Coyote binaries: ballot +1 [X] Yes -1 [ ] No /ballot My vote is +1 for both. Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release
+1 on both. Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 16:25:50 -0800 From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600. Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal Delivered-to: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm X-Spam-Rating: localhost.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Id: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev.jakarta.apache.org I'd like to propose releasing 4.0.4 beta 2 within a few days (friday at the earliest, next tuesday at the latest). This release will include bugfixes (the list is in the usual release notes document in CVS) as well as the inclusion of the Coyote binaries (conditional to the results of the vote below). The Coyote connector will *not* be enabled by default, but will appear commented out in the default server.xml configuration file. I also plan to make a Coyote 1.0 beta 4 at the same time, to pick up the bugfixes and minor improvements in the Tomcat adaptors. Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 release: ballot +1 [ ] I support the release, and I will help +0 [ ] I support the release -0 [ ] I don't support the release -1 [ ] I'm against the release because: /ballot Inclusion of the Coyote binaries: ballot +1 [ ] Yes -1 [ ] No /ballot My vote is +1 for both. Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release
below). The Coyote connector will *not* be enabled by default, but will appear commented out in the default server.xml configuration file. +1 on enabling it by default, commenting out the old connector. I didn't propose to do that, because, although the new connector appears robust and stable, there's the risk that it would have new bugs, or, even worse, (re)introduce some security problems. I took great care of adding all the URL normalization code from the old connector, so that it shouldn't happen, but I'd say it would still be a significant risk to make it the default without some extensive beta period. Since there will be such a beta period for 4.1, I think it is a lot safer to postpone making it the default for now. Comments ? Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: below). The Coyote connector will *not* be enabled by default, but will appear commented out in the default server.xml configuration file. +1 on enabling it by default, commenting out the old connector. I didn't propose to do that, because, although the new connector appears robust and stable, there's the risk that it would have new bugs, or, even worse, (re)introduce some security problems. I took great care of adding all the URL normalization code from the old connector, so that it shouldn't happen, but I'd say it would still be a significant risk to make it the default without some extensive beta period. Since there will be such a beta period for 4.1, I think it is a lot safer to postpone making it the default for now. Comments ? The code is clearly better and cleaner than the old connector, that means more maintainable and easier to fix and review - if there's any problem. And cleaner code is usually more secure :-) But I agree it's safer to do it gradually, however I hope 4.0.5 and 3.3.2 will have coyote as the default connector. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release
Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 release: +1 (rpms) Inclusion of the Coyote binaries: ballot +1 [X] Yes -1 [ ] No /ballot I'd like to have Coyote source instead -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release
Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 release: ballot +1 [ ] I support the release, and I will help +0 [ ] I support the release -0 [ ] I don't support the release -1 [ ] I'm against the release because: /ballot +0 Inclusion of the Coyote binaries: ballot +1 [ ] Yes -1 [ ] No /ballot +1 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 / Coyote 1.0 Beta 4 release
Tomcat 4.0.4 Beta 2 release: ballot +1 [ ] I support the release, and I will help +0 [X] I support the release -0 [ ] I don't support the release -1 [ ] I'm against the release because: /ballot Inclusion of the Coyote binaries: ballot +1 [X] Yes -1 [ ] No /ballot -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
