Re: Native2: proposed interface change

[jean-frederic clere]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> One of the goals of the new native connector is to provide better
> interfaces and support for different transports.
> 
> What I would like is to clarify ( and simplify ) the relation
> between the 3 objects that are involved in the transport:
> - worker
> - endpoint
> - channel
> in order to have less duplicated code and more flexibility.
> 
> The proposal is:
> - move service() from endpoint_t to worker_t.
> - move get_endpoint() from worker_t and done() from endpoint_t to
> channel_t.
> - move processCallbacks() from workerEnv_t to channel_t.
> 
> What we acomplish by that:
> - channel will be the only object dealing with message transport
> ( regardless of the message format ). JNI which uses a different
> protocol will be a normal channel like any other.
> 
> - worker will only implement service() ( the actual action ), using
> delegation to channel or a different mechanism. A worker can
> implement a different protocol ( like warp ), or do anything else -
> it still have the same flexibility, just that the code will be much
> simpler since it'll delegate instead of duplicate.
> 
> - endpoint is specific and managed by channel, and represents a
> (single) connection between java and C.
> 
> Worker remains the 'central' object, controlling how the request is
> forwarded. We just move the overhead of managing specific connections
> to channel, which is handling the transport.
> 
> What I want is to make the C code implement the
> same abstractions with the java side and to get JNI to use the
> same transport abstraction.
> 
> What do you think ? Henri, JFC, Kevin - I hope for an quick answer :-)

+1 I have to find more time for it ;-))

> 
> Costin
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> For additional commands, e-mail: 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: Native2: proposed interface change

[GOMEZ Henri]

>> What do you think ? Henri, JFC, Kevin - I hope for an quick 
>answer :-)

>it sounds like you're heading towards a good deal of symmetry 
>between the
>java and c code, which is definitely good :)

Yes, and you got my +1 also :)

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: Native2: proposed interface change

[Kevin Seguin]

> 
> What I want is to make the C code implement the
> same abstractions with the java side and to get JNI to use the
> same transport abstraction.
> 
> 
> What do you think ? Henri, JFC, Kevin - I hope for an quick answer :-)
> 

it sounds like you're heading towards a good deal of symmetry between the
java and c code, which is definitely good :)

+1

-kevin.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: