Re: Newest JK commits
NormW wrote: Missed a patch perhaps? A build on Apache 2.1 shows symbols F_GETFL, F_SETFL as undefined and a text search through the JTC source tree finds the only references in jk_connect.c Norm Seems that we are missing header on Netware. IMO the F_GETFL/F_SETFL are defined inside nks/fsio.h, correct? I have added the needed header to jk_global.h. Can you check that? If it still doesn't compile can you figure out the needed header files. MT. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Newest JK commits
Mladen Turk wrote: NormW wrote: Missed a patch perhaps? A build on Apache 2.1 shows symbols F_GETFL, F_SETFL as undefined and a text search through the JTC source tree finds the only references in jk_connect.c Norm Seems that we are missing header on Netware. IMO the F_GETFL/F_SETFL are defined inside nks/fsio.h, correct? I have added the needed header to jk_global.h. Can you check that? If it still doesn't compile can you figure out the needed header files. MT. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Good evening, From a 'quick' check, F_GETFL and F_SETFL are in fcntl.h, and can get passed the previous error by just adding fcntl.h on its own at the same place you did (seems errno.h isn't required at this point, but so far I'm just trying a build with 2.1). However, I now get the following error: Generating Release\mod_jk_link.opt Linking Release/mod_jk.nlm ### mwldnlm Linker Error: # Undefined symbol: 'jk_map_free' # referenced from 'jk_apr_pool_cleanup' in mod_jk.o # referenced from 'jk_apr_pool_cleanup' in mod_jk.o # referenced from 'jk_apr_pool_cleanup' in mod_jk.o A text search of the jtc source tree fails to find any reference to where this is definded, which from its prefix, I assume is supposed to be in there somewhere... Norm - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Newest JK commits
NormW wrote: # Undefined symbol: 'jk_map_free' A text search of the jtc source tree fails ... Yep, sorry, mea culpa. I have broken the build reverting Jean-Frederic's latest patches map_free - jk_map_free. I have extended it's idea and prefixed all map_xxx function with jk namespace. Regards, Mladen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Newest JK commits
NormW wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
NormW wrote:
Missed a patch perhaps?
A build on Apache 2.1 shows symbols F_GETFL, F_SETFL as undefined and
a text search through the JTC source tree finds the only references
in jk_connect.c
Norm
Seems that we are missing header on Netware.
IMO the F_GETFL/F_SETFL are defined inside nks/fsio.h, correct?
I have added the needed header to jk_global.h. Can you check that?
If it still doesn't compile can you figure out the needed header
files.
MT.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Good evening,
From a 'quick' check, F_GETFL and F_SETFL are in fcntl.h, and can get
passed the previous error by just adding fcntl.h on its own at the
same place you did (seems errno.h isn't required at this point, but so
far I'm just trying a build with 2.1).
However, I now get the following error:
Generating Release\mod_jk_link.opt
Linking Release/mod_jk.nlm
### mwldnlm Linker Error:
# Undefined symbol: 'jk_map_free'
# referenced from 'jk_apr_pool_cleanup' in mod_jk.o
# referenced from 'jk_apr_pool_cleanup' in mod_jk.o
# referenced from 'jk_apr_pool_cleanup' in mod_jk.o
A text search of the jtc source tree fails to find any reference to
where this is definded, which from its prefix, I assume is supposed to
be in there somewhere...
Norm
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
So goes another day.
Greetings,
Attached are two diff's that, along with the jk_map_free{} updates now
let mod_jk build for apache 1.3.33, 2.0.52 and 2.1.
1. The fcntl.h is needed for both apache 1.3 (using CLIB) and 2.x using
LibC, and there is a fcntl.h accessible in both libraries. The error.h
proved to be unrequired AFAICT and the patch removes it.
2. The uint32_t appears, AFAICT, only referenced within the Apache2
build, where most references use apr_uint32_t... so patch 2 to jk_md5.h
provides an alternate (same) definiton normally exported in the Apache2
build but only makes this available when not using LIBC, ie when
building Apache 1.3.
The built nlm's were 'trialed' on a NetWare platform and no problems
access Tomcat were experienced during a brief test.
Prudence suggests a more experienced NetWare peron might want to check
these patches over, but for the moment at least, these seem to work.
Norm
jk_global.h
--- jk_global.h.orig2004-11-09 20:17:04.0 +1100
+++ jk_global.h 2004-11-10 10:44:21.0 +1100
@@ -65,14 +65,13 @@
#include unistd.h
#if defined(NETWARE) defined(__NOVELL_LIBC__)
#include novsock2.h
-#include nks/fsio.h
-#include nks/errno.h
#define __sys_socket_h__
#define __netdb_h__
#define __netinet_in_h__
#define HAVE_VSNPRINTF
#define HAVE_SNPRINTF
#endif
+#include fcntl.h
#include netdb.h
#include netinet/in.h
#include sys/socket.h
jk_md5.h
--- jk_md5.h.orig 2004-11-09 06:24:25.0 +1100
+++ jk_md5.h2004-11-10 10:28:52.0 +1100
@@ -60,8 +60,12 @@
#ifdef WIN32
typedef DWORD JK_UINT4;
#else
+#if defined(NETWARE) !defined(__NOVELL_LIBC__)
+typedef unsigned long int JK_UINT4;
+#else
typedef uint32_t JK_UINT4;
#endif
+#endif
/* MD5 context. */
typedef struct
--- jk_md5.h.orig 2004-11-09 06:24:25.0 +1100
+++ jk_md5.h2004-11-10 10:28:52.0 +1100
@@ -60,8 +60,12 @@
#ifdef WIN32
typedef DWORD JK_UINT4;
#else
+#if defined(NETWARE) !defined(__NOVELL_LIBC__)
+typedef unsigned long int JK_UINT4;
+#else
typedef uint32_t JK_UINT4;
#endif
+#endif
/* MD5 context. */
typedef struct
--- jk_global.h.orig2004-11-09 20:17:04.0 +1100
+++ jk_global.h 2004-11-10 10:44:21.0 +1100
@@ -65,14 +65,13 @@
#include unistd.h
#if defined(NETWARE) defined(__NOVELL_LIBC__)
#include novsock2.h
-#include nks/fsio.h
-#include nks/errno.h
#define __sys_socket_h__
#define __netdb_h__
#define __netinet_in_h__
#define HAVE_VSNPRINTF
#define HAVE_SNPRINTF
#endif
+#include fcntl.h
#include netdb.h
#include netinet/in.h
#include sys/socket.h
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Newest JK commits
Hi, Cool. Are you planning a JK release soon? Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com -Original Message- From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 9:05 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Newest JK commits Hi all, I've done some JK commits that I've been testing for a long time. The major addition is socket timeout that was missing, causing couple of minutes delays on some platforms if tomcat was down. Also I've back ported the load balance algorithm from proxy_balancer, that actually does what it should. For example the A:lb_factor=5 and B:lb_factor=1 will now give five times more requests to host A. I have also changed one very misleading directive (socket_timeout) to recycle_timeout. The socket_timeout directive is now what it should be (the timeout for the socket), while the recycle_timeout is the inactive socket timeout. I have also revert Jean-Frederic's latest map_free changes (by mistake). Further more IMO we should prefix all public functions using jk_. That's about it. I have tested all patches on unix and win32. What I'd like to see is if I broke something on AIX (Henry ?) and Netware (Norm, Guenter?) Cheers, MLaden. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Newest JK commits
Mladen Turk wrote: Hi all, I've done some JK commits that I've been testing for a long time. The major addition is socket timeout that was missing, causing couple of minutes delays on some platforms if tomcat was down. Also I've back ported the load balance algorithm from proxy_balancer, that actually does what it should. For example the A:lb_factor=5 and B:lb_factor=1 will now give five times more requests to host A. I have also changed one very misleading directive (socket_timeout) to recycle_timeout. The socket_timeout directive is now what it should be (the timeout for the socket), while the recycle_timeout is the inactive socket timeout. Have you updated the docs for the lb_factor and socket_timeout changes? I have also revert Jean-Frederic's latest map_free changes (by mistake). Further more IMO we should prefix all public functions using jk_. That's about it. I have tested all patches on unix and win32. What I'd like to see is if I broke something on AIX (Henry ?) and Netware (Norm, Guenter?) Cheers, MLaden. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Newest JK commits
Jess Holle wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: I've done some JK commits that I've been testing for a long time. Have you updated the docs for the lb_factor and socket_timeout changes? That's the thing I'm planing for the all next week. I would like to rewrite the entire JK docs using Tomcat's style and build process. Also we should make clear what we are going to support (making JK2 as unsupported), advertising new mod_proxy and proxy_ajp, etc. MT. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Newest JK commits
Mladen Turk wrote: Jess Holle wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: I've done some JK commits that I've been testing for a long time. Have you updated the docs for the lb_factor and socket_timeout changes? That's the thing I'm planing for the all next week. I would like to rewrite the entire JK docs using Tomcat's style and build process. Also we should make clear what we are going to support (making JK2 as unsupported), advertising new mod_proxy and proxy_ajp, etc. Style is well and good, but the clarity around JK2, etc, is priceless! -- Jess Holle - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Newest JK commits
Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, Cool. Are you planning a JK release soon? I'd like to clear the JK logging first, cleaning everything that's misleading and confusing. I personally added few stuff to JK loggs and have no idea for what :). Also I really like to make sure the docs are in sync with the software itself. So, IMO we should plan the release by the end of this month. MT. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Newest JK commits
I'll try on Linux, no AIX around. Could try to make a OS/400 build also :) On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 15:33:26 +0100, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, Cool. Are you planning a JK release soon? I'd like to clear the JK logging first, cleaning everything that's misleading and confusing. I personally added few stuff to JK loggs and have no idea for what :). Also I really like to make sure the docs are in sync with the software itself. So, IMO we should plan the release by the end of this month. MT. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Newest JK commits
Henri Gomez wrote: I'll try on Linux, no AIX around. Could try to make a OS/400 build also :) Weel, if it's EBCDIC then OK :). Cheers, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Newest JK commits
OS/400 is EBCDIC On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 16:52:43 +0100, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: I'll try on Linux, no AIX around. Could try to make a OS/400 build also :) Weel, if it's EBCDIC then OK :). Cheers, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: Newest JK commits
Could we drop all these accounts with autoresponder, it's borring On 8 Nov 2004 10:54:53 EST, Autoresponder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello. To contact MusicLab Support please visit http://www.musiclab.com/support/contact.htm page, fill-in the appropriate fields and click the Send Message button. Thank you! MusicLab Autoresponder. P.S. Please don't forget to check your computer for [EMAIL PROTECTED] virus with Symantec virus removal tool (http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/FixSbigF.exe). You can read more about this virus here: http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Newest JK commits
Mladen Turk wrote: Hi all, I've done some JK commits that I've been testing for a long time. The major addition is socket timeout that was missing, causing couple of minutes delays on some platforms if tomcat was down. Also I've back ported the load balance algorithm from proxy_balancer, that actually does what it should. For example the A:lb_factor=5 and B:lb_factor=1 will now give five times more requests to host A. I have also changed one very misleading directive (socket_timeout) to recycle_timeout. The socket_timeout directive is now what it should be (the timeout for the socket), while the recycle_timeout is the inactive socket timeout. I have also revert Jean-Frederic's latest map_free changes (by mistake). Further more IMO we should prefix all public functions using jk_. That's about it. I have tested all patches on unix and win32. What I'd like to see is if I broke something on AIX (Henry ?) and Netware (Norm, Guenter?) Cheers, MLaden. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Good morning, Missed a patch perhaps? A build on Apache 2.1 shows symbols F_GETFL, F_SETFL as undefined and a text search through the JTC source tree finds the only references in jk_connect.c Norm - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
