RE: mod_jk, mod_jk2 URI spaces

2002-07-31 Thread Mladen Turk

 Now I propose that we make something like _not_ URI space 
 filtering. Meaning that one could be able to serve every 
 .html file through TC except for the /*/some_space/ location. 
 Right now we are checking and hoping that the TC will accept 
 the context, and then we forget that immediately. I propose 
 that we make the map_to_storage two way (If the TC accepts it 
 and then checking if the Apache configuration rejects it).
 
 Does that make any sense?
 

After I read my mail, it doesn't make sense even for me :)

For example (what I have in mind) using mod_jk:

JkMount /examples/*
(This  will map /examples URI space and everything belonging to the
/examples will be served by the TC).

JkNotMount /examples/*.gif
JkNotMount /examples/*.jpg

(This  will map /examples URI space and everything will be served by the
TC except the gif and jpg files).


MT.



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: mod_jk, mod_jk2 URI spaces

2002-07-31 Thread costinm

On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Mladen Turk wrote:

  Now I propose that we make something like _not_ URI space 
  filtering. Meaning that one could be able to serve every 
  .html file through TC except for the /*/some_space/ location. 
  Right now we are checking and hoping that the TC will accept 
  the context, and then we forget that immediately. I propose 
  that we make the map_to_storage two way (If the TC accepts it 
  and then checking if the Apache configuration rejects it).
  
  Does that make any sense?
  
 
 After I read my mail, it doesn't make sense even for me :)

I actually understood the orginal mail, it's not that bad 
( i.e. I've written worse messages :-)


 For example (what I have in mind) using mod_jk:
 
 JkMount /examples/*
 (This  will map /examples URI space and everything belonging to the
 /examples will be served by the TC).
 
 JkNotMount /examples/*.gif
 JkNotMount /examples/*.jpg
 
 (This  will map /examples URI space and everything will be served by the
 TC except the gif and jpg files).

+1

The goal is to have tomcat serve dynamic content and apache static
content, respecting as strictly as possible the web.xml semantic.

Anything that helps that goal is good.

However, I would like to see this in jk2 - JkMount is going
to be deprecated and there is the issue of supporting multiple
servers ( it won't be trivial to fix iis/nes in jk1.2 to support
the same thing ). Plus jk1.2 is stable and close to a release.


Costin


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: mod_jk, mod_jk2 URI spaces

2002-07-31 Thread Bojan Smojver

On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 23:55, Mladen Turk wrote:
  Now I propose that we make something like _not_ URI space 
  filtering. Meaning that one could be able to serve every 
  .html file through TC except for the /*/some_space/ location. 
  Right now we are checking and hoping that the TC will accept 
  the context, and then we forget that immediately. I propose 
  that we make the map_to_storage two way (If the TC accepts it 
  and then checking if the Apache configuration rejects it).

This above sentence is confusing. You probably meant configuration
options as a series of include/exclude switches, rsync style.

 After I read my mail, it doesn't make sense even for me :)
 
 For example (what I have in mind) using mod_jk:
 
 JkMount /examples/*
 (This  will map /examples URI space and everything belonging to the
 /examples will be served by the TC).
 
 JkNotMount /examples/*.gif
 JkNotMount /examples/*.jpg
 
 (This  will map /examples URI space and everything will be served by the
 TC except the gif and jpg files).

I see your point here. You are running a setup where anything not
specifically targeted for Apache goes to Tomcat. As long as this doesn't
affect current situation (and I don't see how it would) where I can set
up that Tomcat only gets what's not specifically targeted for Apache,
I'm +1. This would make mod_jk configuration really flexible.

Bojan

PS. Given 1.2.0 is due for a release when Henri comes back from holidays
(in about 2 weeks time), are you planning the patches for this before of
after the release?


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: mod_jk, mod_jk2 URI spaces

2002-07-31 Thread Mladen Turk

 -Original Message-
 From: Bojan Smojver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:00 AM
 To: Tomcat Dev List
 Subject: RE: mod_jk, mod_jk2 URI spaces
 
 This above sentence is confusing. You probably meant 
 configuration options as a series of include/exclude 
 switches, rsync style.


Yes something like that.
This will allow to serve the compiled applications and still deliver the
static context from those locations, overlaying Apache URI space (if
set) over already resolved TC uri space. 
Well, at least the configuration will be IMHO easier.

 
 PS. Given 1.2.0 is due for a release when Henri comes back 
 from holidays (in about 2 weeks time), are you planning the 
 patches for this before of after the release?
 

After 1.2.0, If I figure out how to do that cross-server.
I'll make that for jk2 first, I hope :).

MT.


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: mod_jk, mod_jk2 URI spaces

2002-07-31 Thread Bojan Smojver

Cool!

Bojan

Quoting Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

  -Original Message-
  From: Bojan Smojver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:00 AM
  To: Tomcat Dev List
  Subject: RE: mod_jk, mod_jk2 URI spaces
  
  This above sentence is confusing. You probably meant 
  configuration options as a series of include/exclude 
  switches, rsync style.
 
 
 Yes something like that.
 This will allow to serve the compiled applications and still deliver
 the
 static context from those locations, overlaying Apache URI space (if
 set) over already resolved TC uri space. 
 Well, at least the configuration will be IMHO easier.
 
  
  PS. Given 1.2.0 is due for a release when Henri comes back 
  from holidays (in about 2 weeks time), are you planning the 
  patches for this before of after the release?
  
 
 After 1.2.0, If I figure out how to do that cross-server.
 I'll make that for jk2 first, I hope :).
 
 MT.
 
 
 --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]