Re: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2
So, I was waiting for all of the changes before trying to recompile for NetWare and the current in_addr_t changes are causing Metrowerks to complain. I should have tried it as soon as it checked in, but wanted to try building with all of the changes. Sorry :-(. I'm trying to resolve it now so that we don't have to go through this after you grab a release. I'll hurry. Mike Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/4/2003 1:57:52 PM Henri Gomez wrote: Glenn Nielsen a écrit : FYI, I have put building a test mod_jk 1.2.5 source distribution on hold pending Henri's work on IPV6. Henri, please let me know when you think we are ready for another test source dist. We may add the configure stuff to determine if in_addr_t is available. I'll take a look at it right now. BTW, IPV6 will be added in 1.2.6 (or later), so don't delay release for it OK, so are we ready for a test source release? Glenn -- Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /* Spelin donut madder| MOREnet System Programming | * if iz ina coment. | Missouri Research and Education Network | */ | -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: in_addr_t and NetWare (was in_addr_t and Linux 2.2)
Ok, I've committed the fix the has the exception for NetWare. I tried a bunch of different things and this was the only thing that work for all of the webserver on NetWare (Netscape, Apache 1.3, and Apache 2.0). Glenn, where did you learn such patience:-)? Thanks for keeping this moving forward. Mike Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/5/2003 8:24:52 AM So, I was waiting for all of the changes before trying to recompile for NetWare and the current in_addr_t changes are causing Metrowerks to complain. I should have tried it as soon as it checked in, but wanted to try building with all of the changes. Sorry :-(. I'm trying to resolve it now so that we don't have to go through this after you grab a release. I'll hurry. Mike Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/4/2003 1:57:52 PM Henri Gomez wrote: Glenn Nielsen a écrit : FYI, I have put building a test mod_jk 1.2.5 source distribution on hold pending Henri's work on IPV6. Henri, please let me know when you think we are ready for another test source dist. We may add the configure stuff to determine if in_addr_t is available. I'll take a look at it right now. BTW, IPV6 will be added in 1.2.6 (or later), so don't delay release for it OK, so are we ready for a test source release? Glenn -- Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /* Spelin donut madder| MOREnet System Programming | * if iz ina coment. | Missouri Research and Education Network | */ | -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in_addr_t and Linux 2.2
FYI, in_addr_t is not defined on Redhat 6.2 which use kernel 2.2 and glibc 2.1. Should we also fix this case ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2
- Original Message - From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:51 AM Subject: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2 FYI, in_addr_t is not defined on Redhat 6.2 which use kernel 2.2 and glibc 2.1. And I thought myself a caveman for using RH 7.x ;-). I'd prefer that this is handled by special defines in the autoconf script. Should we also fix this case ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments. In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2
Bill Barker a écrit : - Original Message - From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:51 AM Subject: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2 FYI, in_addr_t is not defined on Redhat 6.2 which use kernel 2.2 and glibc 2.1. And I thought myself a caveman for using RH 7.x ;-). Some old production systems are still in RH 6.2 ;) And I was still using RH 7.2 on my developpment machine 5 weeks ago I'd prefer that this is handled by special defines in the autoconf script. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2
FYI, I have put building a test mod_jk 1.2.5 source distribution on hold pending Henri's work on IPV6. Henri, please let me know when you think we are ready for another test source dist. Thanks, Glenn Henri Gomez wrote: FYI, in_addr_t is not defined on Redhat 6.2 which use kernel 2.2 and glibc 2.1. Should we also fix this case ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2
Glenn Nielsen a écrit : FYI, I have put building a test mod_jk 1.2.5 source distribution on hold pending Henri's work on IPV6. Henri, please let me know when you think we are ready for another test source dist. We may add the configure stuff to determine if in_addr_t is available. I'll take a look at it right now. BTW, IPV6 will be added in 1.2.6 (or later), so don't delay release for it - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2
Henri Gomez a écrit : Glenn Nielsen a écrit : FYI, I have put building a test mod_jk 1.2.5 source distribution on hold pending Henri's work on IPV6. Henri, please let me know when you think we are ready for another test source dist. We may add the configure stuff to determine if in_addr_t is available. I'll take a look at it right now. BTW, IPV6 will be added in 1.2.6 (or later), so don't delay release for it I take a look at configure.in and if I know how to see if inet_pton exist via AC_CHECK_FUNCS, I don't know how to determine for in_addr_t. Jean-Frederic may help us here since it's our resident configure guru - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2
Henri Gomez wrote: Glenn Nielsen a écrit : FYI, I have put building a test mod_jk 1.2.5 source distribution on hold pending Henri's work on IPV6. Henri, please let me know when you think we are ready for another test source dist. We may add the configure stuff to determine if in_addr_t is available. I'll take a look at it right now. BTW, IPV6 will be added in 1.2.6 (or later), so don't delay release for it OK, so are we ready for a test source release? Glenn -- Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /* Spelin donut madder| MOREnet System Programming | * if iz ina coment. | Missouri Research and Education Network | */ | -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
