Re: How to disable AutoDeploy in Tomcat 4.1.29 ?

2004-03-10 Thread Ankur Shah
suviswan wrote:

Hi
   I have tried changing autoDeploy=false in server.xml. But it's 
not
working. It's still discovering the
web applicatios under webapps directory.
   Any ideas ?
 

Try setting the deployOnStartup property to false in your host 
definition. Look at section Automatic Application Deployment in tomcat 
docs for more info on this:

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/config/host.html#Automatic%20Application%20Deployment

regards,
-- Ankur
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: virtual host in tomcat 4?

2004-03-09 Thread Ankur Shah
SH Solutions wrote:

Hi

 

So if I add the following somewhere in my server.xml file the user that
   

types www.aa.com will be pointed to
http://myipaddress:8080/webapps/aa/index.jsp?
No.
As I have already said, there is NOTHING, you can to to archieve this.
 

Yes he can. If the hosting company for aa.com is kind enough to allow 
him to URI forward his domain to http://myipaddress:8080 or 8443 (that 
is if he has port 8443 visible from outside, which I think he said he 
does.), he'll almost get what he wants.

-- Ankur

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Tomcat monitor plugin Prototype

2004-03-09 Thread Ankur Shah
Peter Lin wrote:

well I've managed to get a rough prototype coded and working. I don't want to check it into JMeter's CVS yet, since the code is still ugly and needs to be cleaned up. I'm planning on posting it on my system tonight. Anyone interested in testing it and giving me feedback?

it would really help for people to give it a shot and kick the tires a bit.

once it's cleaned up and more stable, I will check it into JMeter's CVS.

 

I would like to give it a shot, as well. Are you going to post the URL 
to the binary (?) on your system later tonight?

Keep up the good work,
-- Ankur
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: virtual host in tomcat 4?

2004-03-09 Thread Ankur Shah
SH Solutions wrote:

Hi

 

Yes he can. If the hosting company for aa.com is kind enough to allow him
   

to URI forward his domain to http://myipaddress:8080 or 8443 (that is if
he has port 8443 visible from outside, which I think he said he does.),
he'll almost get what he wants.
Which would in fact be what I called to have an reverse proxy outside the
firewall.
 

There is definitly nothing you can do (apart of putting your tomcat 
or a remote proxy outside of your filewall).

I wasn't sure you meant the same thing, but if you did, then OK :)

-- A

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[OT] Re: virtual host in tomcat 4?

2004-03-09 Thread Ankur Shah
Forte, Graham wrote:

This is getting a little off-topic, but here goes:

I think I need to take baby steps.
My goal right now is to be able to access my development machine from
another machine on the LAN.
Right now I have to type the following to access my dev machine from another
LAN box: http://myMachineName:8080/myWebApp/logon.jsp
I want to(baby steps) be able to access it by the following:
Step 1: http://myMachineName/myWebApp/logon.jsp  (NO PORT)
 

Have your sys admin open up port 80 on your box or redirect traffic from 
port 80 to port 8080 (like Steffan suggested)


Step 2: http://myMachineName/logon.jsp(NO APP ROOT)
 

Add logon.jsp to your ROOT context

Step 3: http://myMachineName/(NO PAGE URL)
 

Modify the welcome-file directive for your ROOT context to include 
logon.jsp

Step 4: www.myNewDomain.com
I will have only one web site running on this machine and I(my company) will
be hosting it.
 

Modify myNewDomain.com's DNS to point to your system or rinse, wash, 
repeat as necessary.

Good luck,
-- Ankur
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [OT] Re: Process Died | Production

2004-03-03 Thread Ankur Shah
Christopher Schultz wrote:

I've experienced even more random crashes (SEGV). It turned out to 
be bad memory (or bus), and it only showed up under pretty heavy 
load. :(  
This is a little OT, but just out of curiosity, has anybody been 
successful in gaining root/tomcat/whatever-uid shell by capitalizing 
on a JVM's (not necessarily tomcat's) core dump? I've always wondered 
if that was possible. I know its extremely hard (impossible?) to 
consistently overflow JVM's stack, but has it ever been done?


I've never heard of anything like this before.

However, Java's stack is not what gets overflowed, here. IF the JVM 
goes down, it's the JVM code that faults, not the Java code itself. 
Java's stack and heap are pretty far away from anything that's executing.

Notice I said overflowing of the JVM's stack not Java's (bytecode) 
stack. I am well aware of the fact that you can't smash a Java stack 
- that's just how the language is architected.

-- A

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[OT] Re: Process Died | Production

2004-03-02 Thread Ankur Shah
Christopher Schultz wrote:

I've had the displeasure of experiencing a Tomcat JVM core
dump
on me not too long ago (in a multi-user development environment,
fortunately) on a Sparc/Solaris box. It turned out to be due to
insufficient swap memory in the system. I didn't see any
OutOfMemoryExceptions raised prior to the crash, so it wasn't that
obvious, but the top command came to the rescue in the end.


Good one ;)  It reminds of another time, where I had internal crashes
occurring due to a low limit of file descriptors (ulimit -a will show
you the limits).  That one was frustrating ;)  I'm sure many people on
this list of horror stories with seemingly random crashes...


I've experienced even more random crashes (SEGV). It turned out to be 
bad memory (or bus), and it only showed up under pretty heavy load. :(

This is a little OT, but just out of curiosity, has anybody been 
successful in gaining root/tomcat/whatever-uid shell by capitalizing on 
a JVM's (not necessarily tomcat's) core dump? I've always wondered if 
that was possible. I know its extremely hard (impossible?) to 
consistently overflow JVM's stack, but has it ever been done? 

-- A

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Process Died | Production

2004-03-01 Thread Ankur Shah
Shapira, Yoav wrote:

Yeah, I've encountered internal crashes, as I imagine many others on the
list have.  In my case it was due to missing Solaris OS patches.  The
hs_err produced by the JVM when it has an internal crash sometimes says
things like could not allocate font package xxx which is a hint to a
badly installed JDK.
Other people on Linux have had internal crashes with the wrong thread
library configured, or the wrong kernel version.  You can search the
archives for all this information.  It's more an art than a science to
debug these, and that can be frustrating.
 

I agree. I've had the displeasure of experiencing a Tomcat JVM core dump 
on me not too long ago (in a multi-user development environment, 
fortunately) on a Sparc/Solaris box. It turned out to be due to 
insufficient swap memory in the system. I didn't see any 
OutOfMemoryExceptions raised prior to the crash, so it wasn't that 
obvious, but the top command came to the rescue in the end.

-- Ankur

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Tomcat and SSL: problem with expiration of VeriSign Global Server ID Intermediate Root

2004-03-01 Thread Ankur Shah
Jörn Böckenkamp wrote:

It IS easy when you're using a self-signed cert, but I have to
use one from VeriSign and I don't think that I can regenerate the
VeriSign cert with a new date :-)
 

Did you try importing the new certificate directly into the user's 
keystore? For example, if you run the service as root , you'll have to 
remove the old certificate and import the new one into /.keystore (in 
UNIX of course) with alias 'tomcat'. I'd recommend you backup the 
keystore file before you make any changes to it. Also, restart the 
server after you make the change, so TC starts up with the new certificate.

HTH,
-- Ankur
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Very Very Slow performance of Tomcat - Connection Pool Dies

2004-02-20 Thread Ankur Shah
Harry Mantheakis wrote:

If your firewall drops idle connections after some time, you will need
to tune a couple of settings.
   

In your sysctl settings for the Apache machine, set your tcp keepalive
time to a value lower than the drop time of your firewall.
   



I have a very strict firewall policy on my Linux box - using iptables. Only
port 80 packets get through. Nothing else.
Does that have something to do with my problem? Is there an ICMP port that I
need to open up?
 

It does sound more like a firewalling issue. I'd doubt its the iptables, 
though, unless you have squid running on your Linux box ? Also, do you 
connect to the Oracle DB through VPN or another secure link? I know of 
many corporate VPN servers, Proxies set up by default to drop 
connections inactive for a specific amount of time, which is more or 
less what you're seeing.

To corroborate this, I would set up a simple TCP server on the Linux box 
with an open connection to the Oracle backend and leave it open and see 
if I'd get similar results.

-- A

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: include files

2004-02-12 Thread Ankur Shah
...and if you're a windowz fanatic, you still have hope. You can 
download a copy of touch from:

ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/Services/TechNet/samples/ps/win98/Reskit/FILE/

(TOUCH.EXE, is what you're looking for)

or you could simply install Cygwin, the greatest unix emulator on the 
face of this planet! (Sorry, couldn't resist)

Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:

The touch command is on Unix OS'es. It hasn't got anything to do with
tomcat. What it does is it updates (among other things) the last modified
attribute
of a file, but in your case the purpose is (at least if my head is screwed
on right)
to trigger Tomcat into detecting a file change in the work directory, hence
doing a reload.
If I got the Tomcat bit wrong, shoot at the bright red target on my
forehead :)
Yiannis.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Daly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 February 2004 14:50
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: include files
thanks.

do i delete the name of the app under tomcat, for example 
work/Standalone/localhost/Website ?  and all the $... files and the two 
directories -  Help and WEB-INF under this directory ?

what is the touch cmd ?  i cant find it in my wrox tomcat book ?

cheers

chris
 

snip

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [OT] Re: JavaScript Doubt

2004-01-26 Thread Ankur Shah
Shapira, Yoav wrote:

Howdy,

  

Is it really necessary to include a 20-line legal disclaimer in a 20
character long response?



I'm a fan of mailing list etiquette, but in defense of this poster, many
companies add disclaimers to outgoing messages without knowledge,
(explicit) consent, or control of the individual sender.

Yoav Shapira
  

Not to extend this thread any further than it really should, but I can
understand if the legal disclaimer is appended by  the  company outside
the control of the employee sending the email, though, I'm unsure if
that's done without the knowledge of the sender.

Either way, adding terms of confidentiality to a message is a little
redundant when the mail is sent to a public mailing list, IMO.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Tomcat und SSL

2004-01-26 Thread Ankur Shah
Unless you've resolved the issue recently, both URIs come up fine for
me. Tested on Mozilla 1.6b and IE 6.0

Lars Schreiber wrote:

Hi

thanks for help and for confidene to my english knowledge :-)
in order that you understand my problem.. i have prepared a link for you

https://test.extremewebs.de:8443/test/StatusServlet

if im use the link over the mod_jk2 he works fine

https://test.extremewebs.de/test/StatusServlet

but here ist the problem, as soon as put html form tags or links etc to my
servlet the server response a information about unsecure parts on my
website.

i dont have find any good solution to work with apache and tomcat together
someone dont work

if anybody here to explain me step to step how to setup a apache with ssl
and a conector to tomcat with ssl ?

Thanks

  


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: error-page for exception-code

2004-01-26 Thread Ankur Shah
Merrill Cornish wrote:

 I originally had errorPage declarations at the top of all my JSP
 pages, which worked.  Then I heard about the error-page element in
 web.xml.  So I replaced all of the individual errorPage declarations
 with:

  error-page
exception-typejava.lang.Exception/exception-type
location/errorPage.jsp/location
  /error-page

 in my application's web.xml, and it worked fine.  Next I tried

  error-page
exception-code404/exception-code
location/login.jsp/location
  /error-page

 to intercept bad URLs and redirect them to the login page.  However,
 THIS does not work.  Bad URLs just get the standard Tomcat 404 error
 page as always.  I've Googled the problem and found it doesn't work
 for me, but it DOES work for me, but it does NOT work for me, and
 so on.  Is there some secret here? (I'm running 5.0.18.)

 Merrill

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Replace the exception-code with the error-code tag and you'll be in
business.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [OT] Prohibited Content

2004-01-26 Thread Ankur Shah
Philipp Taprogge wrote:

 Ha... just got another one... if complained about my message having
 different SMTP-To: and MIME-To: headers. I am not sure if that's
 what you got as well.

I'm getting the same error from a Symantic server, specifically hosted
by the leds.com domain. Its due to the fact that I relay  the emails
from a different SMTP server than my default mail domain.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [OT] installing new java jdk

2004-01-26 Thread Ankur Shah
Try the following URI under wget to see if that works for you:

http://tinyurl.com/yugvm

Its the download link to the J2SDK 1.4.2 RPM.

Adam Hardy wrote:

 That trick with wget didn't work for me because wget complained it
 couldn't run the https protocol. Is there a wget that will run https?
 I'll check it out.

 On 01/26/2004 04:54 PM Philipp Taprogge wrote:

 Hi!

 Adam Hardy wrote:

 If I go to my webserver with a linux shell and use Lynx, the
 download page at java.sun.com gets truncated.

 wget and curl don't work either because they're not interactive so
 you can't click on the 'accept terms' submit button.



 This is a problem I often run into as well. Although there are ways
 to get the sun download page to work with curl, I have not yet
 figured them out. Easiest is is fact to download the sdk from another
 machine and ftp/scp it to your server.
 There is another way that might work: go to the sun page from your
 desktop-machine, click your way through past the license terms and
 then let wget fetch _exactly_ whatever link your browser provides for
 the download. I have used that one successfully, but only with
 machines that are NATted through the same router.

 HTH
 Phil


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[OT] Re: JavaScript Doubt

2004-01-23 Thread Ankur Shah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 as already said..pls maintain list protocols...

 Pavan Kumar
 Tata Consultancy Services
 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Website: http://www.tcs.com

[Redundant disclaimer snipped]

which, BTW includes the following section from the Netiquette Guidelines
(RFC 1855)



- If you include a signature keep it short.  Rule of thumb
  is no longer than 4 lines.  Remember that many people pay for
  connectivity by the minute, and the longer your message is,
  the more they pay.

Is it really necessary to include a 20-line legal disclaimer in a 20 character long 
response?


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: JSP not reloading

2003-12-23 Thread Ankur Shah
A few things to try here:
1. What happens when you access your JSPs directly through tomcat (port
8080?). Do you get the same result?
2. What happens when you do $touch foo.jsp? Does your server pick up
the changes, then?
3. Did you try upgrading to 5.0.16? *duck*

Mike Curwen wrote:

Alright, I've tried upgrading to 4.1.29.  The exact same behaviour is
occuring with this version as well!
 
I'm kinda desperate here... developing under these conditions is
negative fun.  

Someone just give me a hint! Anything!!  :)


  

-Original Message-
From: Mike Curwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JSP not reloading


Hi everyone,

This has been covered before, I know.  But there doesn't seem 
to be a common agreement on what the problem (and therefore 
solution) is. 
 
Our Tomcat 4.1.24 instance has spontaneously decided to no 
longer recognize JSP changes! I say spontaneously, because we 
were running fine, in production, a number of different 
sites.  As it happens, a couple of these sites are getting 
'tweaked'.. and so there are a large number of 'small 
changes' being made to the JSP pages. And as of Thursday last 
week, here's what we're observing...
 
From the 'ok' state, we can get away with making one change to a JSP
page.  Then we click refresh in the browser, and see the 
change we made. For every subsequent change to the JSP, the 
change is NOT reflected in the browser.  That page is now 
considered in the 'not ok' state.  We go for lunch, or come 
back the next day.  If we make a change, it is recognized. 
(So the page was back in the 'ok' state)... but like before 
lunch, or yesterday, after that one change, it's back to the 
'bad' state.  

This applies to JSPs invoked from the address bar, AND 
through a JSP Include on the server-side. Even after 
'touching' the parent JSP, the 'included' one still appears 
as the 'old' version.

The ugly hack:  If my JSP is called foo.jsp, I edit foo.jsp 
for my changes.  Then in a command line window I type cp 
foo.jsp fooX.jsp (where X is an ever increasing integer). And 
then I call fooX.jsp from the browser. 

To ugly fix: We must stop Tomcat, clear the work directory's 
folder for that web app, and restart.  Then we're back to 
every page in the 'ok' state for just one change.

There have been *zero* configuration changes to any of 
httpd.conf, workers.proprties and server.xml files in the 
timeframe of when it all went south.

It's not the 4.1.27 reloading issue.
We're on the internal network, there is no proxy caching.
It's not browser caching. 
It's not a server timestamp out of sync.

Here's one thing of interest: One of the contexts that is 
under development has the reloadable=true in its Context 
entry. The other does not.  But that aside, BOTH of these web 
apps were reliably picking up changes, up until last week. 
(Does reloadable have anything to do with JSP's or just items 
under WEB-INF ?)

 
Slackware 9
Apache 2.0.45
Tomcat 4.1.24
JK (not sure of version)


Has anyone run into this behaviour??  Is there a FAQ or 
google page covering this?

I know this little bug has been around in some form or 
another for quite some time. Here's one entry: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg


99927.html


I'm thinking I'll have to try upgrading to 4.1.29.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: JSP not reloading

2003-12-23 Thread Ankur Shah
Mike Curwen wrote:

3. Did you try upgrading to 5.0.16? *duck*



no, we're not wanting to use 5.0 until (probably) 5.1.  There's nothing
we need from the new servlet spec.

  

I didn't mean for you to switch over to 5.x for good (If you didn't want
to, that is). I just wanted to see if you experienced the same problems
with 5.x, and if you did, then I'd bet the problem is with the settings
on your box and not  directly  related to Tomcat.You won't have to set
up the new server entirely, just unpack, start it with the default
configuration, and test it out with a simple JSP in the examples context.

-- Ankur

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: JSP not reloading

2003-12-23 Thread Ankur Shah
Also, If you're still open to ideas, what happens when you do this with
your old/new server:
1. You make changes in a different (examples) context?
2. Do you get a 404 (File not found) error if you move foo.jsp to fooX.jsp?

Mike Curwen wrote:

  

-Original Message-
From: Ankur Shah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 12:15 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: JSP not reloading


A few things to try here:
1. What happens when you access your JSPs directly through 
tomcat (port
8080?). Do you get the same result?



same (bad) result

  

2. What happens when you do $touch foo.jsp? Does your server pick up
the changes, then?



no

  

3. Did you try upgrading to 5.0.16? *duck*



no, we're not wanting to use 5.0 until (probably) 5.1.  There's nothing
we need from the new servlet spec.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: TC5 + SSL: Keystore password bound to default changeit?

2003-12-09 Thread Ankur Shah
Remy Maucherat wrote:

 Baer Peter Christoph Alexander wrote:

 Hi!

 I have a question about something, I observe, but don't
 want to believe... ;-)

 Tomcat 5 can use my keystore, but only if the password is
 changeit, the default password. Now, the docs say, one
 should use this, but with TC 4.0.6 it was possible to
 change it. Is the password hard coded in TC 5?


 I didn't test that particular feature myself, but I believe this works
 ok.
 The way connectors parameters (and in particular SSL parameters) are
 defined changed in TC 5.0.x. Look there:
 http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/config/coyote.html
 There's the SSL howto also.

Also, you might want to make sure that the password of your *target key*
matches your keystore password. I'm not sure how that plays out in
tomcat world, but I can see that to be a problem if the server assumes
the key's password to be the same as that of the keystore.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: SSL problem with TC 5.0.16

2003-12-08 Thread Ankur Shah
Are you able to query your keystore
(D:\ourwebapp\certificate\keystore) using the specified password from
the command-line?

For instance, what happens when you do this?:

c:\%JAVA_HOME%/bin/keytool -list -keystore
D:\ourwebapp\certificate\keystore -storepass yeahsure

I just downloaded TC 5.0.16, configured SSL and ran it with no problems,
FWIW.

Baer Peter Christoph Alexander wrote:

Yes, we set keystorePass to what we entered when
creating the keystore. 

Below are the Connectors from our server.xml.
Do you see anything wrong, here? Something,
that was ok with TC 4.0.6, but is no longer valid
for TC 5.0.16?

   Thanks in advance!

   Alex

snip
Connector
   acceptCount=100
   connectionTimeout=3
   debug=0
   disableUploadTimeout=true 
   enableLookups=true
   maxSpareThreads=75
   maxThreads=150
   minSpareThreads=25
   port=8080
   redirectPort=8443
   scheme=https
   secure=yes
/
!-- Define a SSL Coyote HTTP/1.1 Connector on port 8443 --
Connector
   acceptCount=100
   debug=0
   disableUploadTimeout=true
   enableLookups=false
   maxSpareThreads=75
   maxThreads=150
   minSpareThreads=25
   port=8443
   scheme=https
   secure=true
   Factory
   clientAuth=false
   keystoreFile=D:\ourwebapp\certificate\keystore
   keystorePass=yeahsure
   protocol=TLS
   /
/Connector
!-- Define a Coyote/JK2 AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 --
Connector
   debug=0
   enableLookups=false
   port=8009
   protocol=AJP/1.3
   redirectPort=8443
/
/snip

  

-Original Message-
From: Luc Foisy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 5:53 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: SSL problem with TC 5.0.16


Did you set keystorePass?

-Original Message-
From: Baer Peter Christoph Alexander 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 11:49 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: SSL problem with TC 5.0.16


Hi,

before you start throwing eggs and tomatoes at me:
I *have* searched the mailing list archive before
posting this message... ;-)


I just installed Tomcat 5.0.16. Now we want to
migrate an application from TC 4.0.6 to it.
For this we need to run TC with SSL.
However, there's apparently a mistake in our
SSL configuration. After adapting server.xml
for our webapp, we see the following startup
error message:

snip
INFO: Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on port 8080
08.12.2003 17:01:45 org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol start
SCHWERWIEGEND: Error starting endpoint
java.io.IOException: Keystore was tampered with, or password 
was incorrect
at
sun.security.provider.JavaKeyStore.engineLoad(JavaKeyStore.java:748)
at java.security.KeyStore.load(KeyStore.java:652)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.jsse.JSSESocketFactory.getStore(JSSESocket
Factory.java:295)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.jsse.JSSESocketFactory.getKeystore(JSSESoc
ketFactory.java:259)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.jsse.JSSE14SocketFactory.getKeyManagers(JS
SE14SocketFactory.java:172)
/snip

Following the docs, we checked the password
and we have also created quite a few new
keystores and put there paths into the
keystoreFile attribute of the Factory
tag.

In TC5 even the old keystore with the
original certificate of our application
is rejected.

Has anybody seen this before? Can you provide
some hint, what the problem could be caused
by? We can rule out the things mentioned in
the docs, I think!

Thanks in advance!

  Regards
  Alex

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]