Apache 2.0.47+ jk2.0.4 + tomcat 5.0.24 - Error registering Catalina
We get this occasionally on startup... INFO: Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8080 Sep 30, 2004 3:29:25 PM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init INFO: JK2: ajp13 listening on /0.0.0.0:8009 Sep 30, 2004 3:29:25 PM org.apache.jk.server.JkMain start INFO: Jk running ID=0 time=1/42 config=/usr/local/tomcat/conf/jk2.properties Sep 30, 2004 3:29:25 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina start INFO: Server startup in 9779 ms Sep 30, 2004 3:29:39 PM org.apache.commons.modeler.Registry registerComponent SEVERE: Error registering Catalina:type=GlobalRequestProcessor,name=jk javax.management.InstanceAlreadyExistsException: Catalina:type=GlobalRequestProcessor,name=jk at mx4j.server.MBeanServerImpl.register(MBeanServerImpl.java:1123) at mx4j.server.MBeanServerImpl.registerImpl(MBeanServerImpl.java:1054) at mx4j.server.MBeanServerImpl.registerMBeanImpl(MBeanServerImpl.java:1002) at mx4j.server.MBeanServerImpl.registerMBean(MBeanServerImpl.java:978) at org.apache.commons.modeler.Registry.registerComponent(Registry.java:871) at org.apache.commons.modeler.Registry.registerComponent(Registry.java:1088 ) at org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.decodeRequest(HandlerRequest.java:45 6) at org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.invoke(HandlerRequest.java:350) at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.invoke(ChannelSocket.java:694) at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.processConnection(ChannelSocket.java: 626) at org.apache.jk.common.SocketConnection.runIt(ChannelSocket.java:807) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool .java:644) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:568) Sep 30, 2004 3:29:39 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest decodeRequest WARNING: Error registering request Then we see sig 11 in apache error_log [Thu Sep 30 15:29:40 2004] [notice] child pid 8066 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) Anyone else seen this? How did you solve the problem? Thanks, -Dave David E. Muller Sr. Configuration Mgr. Overture Performance Marketing Overture - a Yahoo! Company 760-476-6406 O 760-458-2714 M [EMAIL PROTECTED] david_muller_cld (Yahoo! Messenger)
RE: Memory Settings On Tomcat
Peter, Do you have more specifics on this? ...TC5 has the new status servlet, which will tell you how much heap is actually in use currently. I've been using the /manager and jmxpoxy app URL's but I can't find anything which has heap info in it. What am I missing? /manager/list /manager/serverinfo /manager/jmxproxy etc. http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/manager-howto.html Thanks, -Dave -Original Message- From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 8:12 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Memory Settings On Tomcat if you can upgrade to tomcat5, I would recommend it. the reason I suggest this is TC5 has the new status servlet, which will tell you how much heap is actually in use currently. the JVM will not release memory back to the OS that is true. in terms of performance the biggest indicator of poor performance is the rate at which the heap grows and the frequency of full GC. Applications that are well behaved should result in regular intervals of full GC. Poor performing applications wiill cause erratic and frequent full GC. Even if you can't upgrade to TC5, it might be worth it to d/l and install it. Once you have it installed, you can use JMeter to view the server load and the memory usage pattern. I hope that helps. peter Michael Duffy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I recently had a problem with a Windoze server hanging up due to memory problems. I've got Tomcat 4.1.29 installed to run as a service under JDK 1.4.1_05 on this Windows 2000 server. The Tomcat memory settings on startup are -Xms64m and -Xmx1024m. The server has 512MB of physical RAM installed. The Windoze task manager says Tomcat is sitting at ~128MB of memory. My understanding is that Java's garbage collection will reclaim heap-allocated memory to the JVM, but not necessarily to the OS. Is this true? What this means is that a Windoze server admin could look at the task manager and see a large memory usage for Tomcat, but that doesn't necessarily reflect Tomcat's current usage. It's more like a high water mark on a pier: it'll show the highest value that Tomcat has used, but the real value will be lower if the garbage collector runs and the tide goes out. If you read a lot of objects into session you could end up with a big high water mark. The application is a JSP front end with a single controller servlet that interacts with an Oracle database. The only data members in the servlet are some read-only map that are initialized on startup. There are some session data that are maintained for certain user requests, but the rest are all stateless request/response. The server admin is saying that the problem is Windoze memory management. When a new process starts up outside of Tomcat, it could be that memory isn't reachable, and the new process hangs. We're going to increase the virtual page size on Windoze and change the startup settings for the Tomcat service to -Xms256m and -Xmx1536m. So my questions are: (1) Is my understanding of the interaction between the JVM and OS memory management correct? (2) Are there any other tuning settings for Tomcat that I need to look at? Thanks - % __ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
our findings with Apache2.0.47/Modjk2/Tomcat4.1.29/IBMJDK1.4.1 and sig 11s
I have seen numerous postings about sig 11 problems with few remedies so here is one I
hope helps someone. We put together a huge matrix of Java, Tomcat, Apache and OS
parameters and finally worked around a jdk bug.
Under fairly heavy load (7-8 transactions/s) we were getting sig 11s with the Sun JDK
1.4.2_02. We weren't getting much in the way of stack traces to try to track down the
problem so we switched to IBM JDK 1.4.1. We ended up having to turn JIT optimzation
off like this in the tomcat startup.
export JITC_COMPILEOPT=NALL{org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/Ascii}{parseInt}
also did extensive analysis of garbage collection with these two entries in JAVA_OPTS
-Xgcpolicy:optavgpause -verbosegc
first one seems similar to Sun's conncurrent gc - 2nd one for logging each gc
One thing which helped us find it was cranking the ConnectionTimeout down to 1s in the
Tomcat server.xml.
We will probably revist the Sun jdk at some point.
-Dave
David E. Muller
Configuration Manager
Overture Services, Inc.
www.overture.com
Office: 760.476.6406
Mobile: 760.458.2714
RE: Tomcat/JVM heap dump
It is fixed? How? Details please! -Dave -Original Message- From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 5:55 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat/JVM heap dump Howdy, I see you already have this solved, which is good. These past three months or so have seen an unprecedented amount of issues reported with RedHat on this list ;( Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics -Original Message- From: Sunitha Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 5:32 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Tomcat/JVM heap dump Hey folks, Any pointers on this? thanks, Using CATALINA_TMPDIR: /jakarta-tomcat-4.1.29/temp Using JAVA_HOME: /opt/j2sdk_nb/j2sdk1.4.2 # # HotSpot Virtual Machine Error, Internal Error # Please report this error at # http://java.sun.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi # # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.4.2-b28 mixed mode) # # Error ID: 4F533F4C494E55580E43505001C9 # Heap at VM Abort: Heap Another exception has been detected while we were handling last error. Dumping information about last error: ERROR REPORT FILE = (N/A) PC= 0x3fe87a88 SIGNAL= 11 FUNCTION NAME = (N/A) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RH9 fixes sig 11 with Apache2/Tomcat4/JVM1.4X/RH8??
Hello all, Can anyone please confirm or deny rumors that moving from RH8 to RH9 fixes random Sig 11 crashes when an Apache2/Tomcat4/JVM1.4X app is loaded? We have gone through a huge matrix of heap sizes, stack sizes, connectors, connector settings, hyperthreading off, etc. with jvm gcverbose on and still get sig 11's at random places when we load our app. This is with BOTH the IBM 1.4.1 JDK and the Sun 1.4.2_02 JDK. We have upgraded RH 8 with the latest OS patches. If anyone has found this and can point to a specific lib that would be even better. Thanks, -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 2:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Signal 11 causing Tomcat crash I've seen similar things with Java. Are all the java related patches for the OS applied. We recently have a similar issue with Solaris 2.8 and Java and applying the relevant patches cured it. File a bug report with Sun/IBM? Greg -Original Message- From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 November 2003 21:38 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Signal 11 causing Tomcat crash Jim Goodspeed wrote: Unfortunately we have also tried Sun's JVM and are experiencing the same Signal 11 errors (I've included two snippets of the Sun error - same error as the IBM Sig 11, just in a different format). Sometimes the dump specifies the library in question, other times it does not. Thanks, Jim An unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM. Unexpected Signal : 11 occurred at PC=0x1 Function=[Unknown.] Library=(N/A) An unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM. Unexpected Signal : 11 occurred at PC=0x59DF83B0 Function=(null)+0x59DF83B0 Library=/usr/IBMdb2/V7.1/lib/libdb2.so.1 Are you sure that the driver version and fixpack match the server? DB2 can do funny things when this is not the case. See for example: http://dbforums.com/arch/39/2002/9/515834 Phil - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RH9 fixes sig 11 with Apache2/Tomcat4/JVM1.4X/RH8??
2X Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz with hyperthreading on Downloaded binaries for Apache2.0.47 modjk2 RH Linux 8 - Linux 2.4.18-14smp #1 SMP Wed Sep 4 12:34:47 EDT 2002 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux IBM JDK 1.4.1 We tried LD_KERNEL_ASSUME=2.2.5 on Sun JVM but it didn't seem to have an effect. We are now crashing instead a socket in tomcat/modjk2 which is using native code. -Dave -Original Message- From: Oscar Carrillo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:03 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: RH9 fixes sig 11 with Apache2/Tomcat4/JVM1.4X/RH8?? What's your hardware? Are you running multiple processors? Do you compile your own Apache2 and mod_jk/mod_jk2? Have you tried compiling your own kernel from the more recent sources. Kernel 2.4 had some shaky releases and RedHat8 fell in the middle of it. Kernel 2.4.22 is the latest. Have you tried setting the environment variable: LD_KERNEL_ASSUME=2.2.5? Oscar On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, David Muller wrote: Hello all, Can anyone please confirm or deny rumors that moving from RH8 to RH9 fixes random Sig 11 crashes when an Apache2/Tomcat4/JVM1.4X app is loaded? We have gone through a huge matrix of heap sizes, stack sizes, connectors, connector settings, hyperthreading off, etc. with jvm gcverbose on and still get sig 11's at random places when we load our app. This is with BOTH the IBM 1.4.1 JDK and the Sun 1.4.2_02 JDK. We have upgraded RH 8 with the latest OS patches. If anyone has found this and can point to a specific lib that would be even better. Thanks, -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 2:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Signal 11 causing Tomcat crash I've seen similar things with Java. Are all the java related patches for the OS applied. We recently have a similar issue with Solaris 2.8 and Java and applying the relevant patches cured it. File a bug report with Sun/IBM? Greg -Original Message- From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 November 2003 21:38 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Signal 11 causing Tomcat crash Jim Goodspeed wrote: Unfortunately we have also tried Sun's JVM and are experiencing the same Signal 11 errors (I've included two snippets of the Sun error - same error as the IBM Sig 11, just in a different format). Sometimes the dump specifies the library in question, other times it does not. Thanks, Jim An unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM. Unexpected Signal : 11 occurred at PC=0x1 Function=[Unknown.] Library=(N/A) An unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM. Unexpected Signal : 11 occurred at PC=0x59DF83B0 Function=(null)+0x59DF83B0 Library=/usr/IBMdb2/V7.1/lib/libdb2.so.1 Are you sure that the driver version and fixpack match the server? DB2 can do funny things when this is not the case. See for example: http://dbforums.com/arch/39/2002/9/515834 Phil - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat/JVM heap dump
Any more info on this? What libs? What rpm? -Dave -Original Message- From: Deepak Parbhoo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 3:22 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat/JVM heap dump I recall a similar problem on redhat 8.0. It had something to do with the libs. The issue was fixed on RH9 though. Sunitha Kumar wrote: RedHat- Linux Deepak Parbhoo wrote: What OS are you using? Sunitha Kumar wrote: Hey folks, Any pointers on this? thanks, Using CATALINA_TMPDIR: /jakarta-tomcat-4.1.29/temp Using JAVA_HOME: /opt/j2sdk_nb/j2sdk1.4.2 # # HotSpot Virtual Machine Error, Internal Error # Please report this error at # http://java.sun.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi # # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.4.2-b28 mixed mode) # # Error ID: 4F533F4C494E55580E43505001C9 # Heap at VM Abort: Heap Another exception has been detected while we were handling last error. Dumping information about last error: ERROR REPORT FILE = (N/A) PC= 0x3fe87a88 SIGNAL= 11 FUNCTION NAME = (N/A) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Signal 11 causing Tomcat crash
we have verified that in certains cases (deploying new war file, how tomcat was stopped previously, etc.) that restarting tomcat 4.1.27 without first deleting the work directory and removing the CONTENTS of the temp directory (not the temp directory) itself will cause a sig 11. Since we have started deleting the work and contents of temp we have had no sig 11 crashes. This is with 2 different apps. -Dave -Original Message- From: jerome moliere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 7:21 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Signal 11 causing Tomcat crash Jim Goodspeed wrote: Unfortunately we have also tried Sun's JVM and are experiencing the same Signal 11 errors (I've included two snippets of the Sun error - same error as the IBM Sig 11, just in a different format). Sometimes the dump specifies the library in question, other times it does not. another hint: what about ULIMITS on your machine ? I guess that your Linux box uses a bash shell ? JDK 1.4 had clever bugs with ulimit settings, may be your release had such problems too... but please check memory , motherboard temperature so on... HTH Jerome -- Auteur cahier du programmeur Java tome 2 - Eyrolles 10/2003 http://www.editions-eyrolles.com/php.informatique/index.php3?xd=d12eccd83077cb3683315026cd3b7586 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes
We have removed the environment variable export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 since it didn't seem to solve the problem upon further scrutiny of the release notes may not even be applicable to our case (not using glibc 2.2). and are now deleting the /work and /temp directories (as well as /webapps/ourappname) after stopping tomat to deploy a new war file. This seems to have fixed the crashes... -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 1:00 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes I have the same problem but with JDK 1.4.1. Tomcat crashes on W32 without errors, I'm sure someone of you will think is W32..., but I'm not Do you run it on on a XEON processor ? Scrive David Muller [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Found this GLIBC 2.2 / Linux 2.4 users should also define an environment variable: export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 in http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt.diff? r1=1.79r2=1.81 Going to add this to see if this fixes our unreproducible crashes. -Dave -Original Message- From: Phillip Qin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 12:21 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes I tried j2sdk1.4.2_02 + apache2 + tomcat 4.1.29 + connector 4.1.24 under Debian 3.0, I didn't get any error. I didn't even re-compile my webapps. Are you sure you have a clean environment after you switched to jdk 1.4.2_02? -Original Message- From: David Muller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: November 10, 2003 1:29 PM To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes not sure what b28 is - sounds like an older one (1.4.2_01 maybe?) than I am using java.vm.version : 1.4.2_02-b03 http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/ReleaseNotes.html -Dave -Original Message- From: Steph Richardson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 8:38 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes Sorry, not sure which build 1.4.2_02 but I am happily running Tomcat 4.1.27 on Linux RH 9 Win 2K Server SP4, both with Sun's Java 1.4.2-b28 -Original Message- From: David Muller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 11:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes Anyone else finding problems with tomcat and the latest j2sdk (1.4.2_02)? We think we may need to go back to 1.4.2_01. -Dave David E. Muller Configuration Manager Overture Services, Inc. www.overture.com Office: 760.476.6406 Mobile: 760.458.2714 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes
Anyone else finding problems with tomcat and the latest j2sdk (1.4.2_02)? We think we may need to go back to 1.4.2_01. -Dave David E. Muller Configuration Manager Overture Services, Inc. www.overture.com Office: 760.476.6406 Mobile: 760.458.2714
RE: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes
Linux RH 8 -Original Message- From: Phillip Qin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 8:34 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes Which OS? -Original Message- From: David Muller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: November 10, 2003 11:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes Anyone else finding problems with tomcat and the latest j2sdk (1.4.2_02)? We think we may need to go back to 1.4.2_01. -Dave David E. Muller Configuration Manager Overture Services, Inc. www.overture.com Office: 760.476.6406 Mobile: 760.458.2714 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes
Nov 8, 2003 3:17:40 PM org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol init INFO: Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on port 8080 Starting service Tomcat-Standalone Apache Tomcat/4.1.27 Nov 8, 2003 3:17:41 PM FinalizerInit FinalizerInit INFO: Priority set to Thread.MAX_PRIORITY Unexpected Signal : 11 occurred at PC=0x4031DCFE Function=(null)+0x4031DCFE Library=/usr/local/j2sdk/j2sdk1.4.2_02/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so NOTE: We are unable to locate the function name symbol for the error just occurred. Please refer to release documentation for possible reason and solutions. Current Java thread: at java.lang.Throwable.fillInStackTrace(Native Method) - locked 0x44e36c68 (a java.lang.NullPointerException) at java.lang.Throwable.init(Throwable.java:180) at java.lang.Exception.init(Exception.java:29) at java.lang.RuntimeException.init(RuntimeException.java:32) at java.lang.NullPointerException.init(NullPointerException.java:36) [error occured during error reporting] Another exception has been detected while we were handling last error. Dumping information about last error: ERROR REPORT FILE = (N/A) PC= 0x4031dcfe SIGNAL= 11 FUNCTION NAME = (N/A) OFFSET= 0x4031DCFE LIBRARY NAME = /usr/local/j2sdk/j2sdk1.4.2_02/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so Please check ERROR REPORT FILE for further information, if there is any. Good bye. -Original Message- From: Phillip Qin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 8:47 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes What errors did you get? Have you verified your JAVA_HOME? -Original Message- From: David Muller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: November 10, 2003 11:43 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes Linux RH 8 -Original Message- From: Phillip Qin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 8:34 AM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes Which OS? -Original Message- From: David Muller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: November 10, 2003 11:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes Anyone else finding problems with tomcat and the latest j2sdk (1.4.2_02)? We think we may need to go back to 1.4.2_01. -Dave David E. Muller Configuration Manager Overture Services, Inc. www.overture.com Office: 760.476.6406 Mobile: 760.458.2714 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes
not sure what b28 is - sounds like an older one (1.4.2_01 maybe?) than I am using java.vm.version : 1.4.2_02-b03 http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/ReleaseNotes.html -Dave -Original Message- From: Steph Richardson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 8:38 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes Sorry, not sure which build 1.4.2_02 but I am happily running Tomcat 4.1.27 on Linux RH 9 Win 2K Server SP4, both with Sun's Java 1.4.2-b28 -Original Message- From: David Muller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 11:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes Anyone else finding problems with tomcat and the latest j2sdk (1.4.2_02)? We think we may need to go back to 1.4.2_01. -Dave David E. Muller Configuration Manager Overture Services, Inc. www.overture.com Office: 760.476.6406 Mobile: 760.458.2714 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes
Found this GLIBC 2.2 / Linux 2.4 users should also define an environment variable: export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 in http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt.diff?r1=1.79r2=1.81 Going to add this to see if this fixes our unreproducible crashes. -Dave -Original Message- From: Phillip Qin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 12:21 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes I tried j2sdk1.4.2_02 + apache2 + tomcat 4.1.29 + connector 4.1.24 under Debian 3.0, I didn't get any error. I didn't even re-compile my webapps. Are you sure you have a clean environment after you switched to jdk 1.4.2_02? -Original Message- From: David Muller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: November 10, 2003 1:29 PM To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes not sure what b28 is - sounds like an older one (1.4.2_01 maybe?) than I am using java.vm.version : 1.4.2_02-b03 http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/ReleaseNotes.html -Dave -Original Message- From: Steph Richardson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 8:38 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes Sorry, not sure which build 1.4.2_02 but I am happily running Tomcat 4.1.27 on Linux RH 9 Win 2K Server SP4, both with Sun's Java 1.4.2-b28 -Original Message- From: David Muller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 11:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tomcat 4.1.27 with jvm 1.4.2_02=crashes Anyone else finding problems with tomcat and the latest j2sdk (1.4.2_02)? We think we may need to go back to 1.4.2_01. -Dave David E. Muller Configuration Manager Overture Services, Inc. www.overture.com Office: 760.476.6406 Mobile: 760.458.2714 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
