Re: [ANN] Tomcat sources moved to Subversion

[Jim Jagielski]

Just a quick reminder: if you want to track HEAD, then you would
checkout trunk.

For example:

  svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/connectors/trunk/  
tomcat-connectors


would create a tomcat-connectors directory that stores the
development HEAD. If you skip appending the '/trunk/'
to the URL, you get a LARGE tree, with HEAD, all branches
and tags. For those new to SVN, this may be confusing.

On Oct 5, 2005, at 9:27 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:


Hi,
FYI, the Tomcat source code has been moved to Apache's Subversion  
(SVN)
repository.  The old CVS repositories are now locked down: they can  
still be
used for checking out code, but no further work will be done in  
them.  For

details on how to work with SVN, please see
http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html.  Please note that  
we are still

verifying some of the build scripts to make sure they work in the new
structure.  Thanks,

Yoav

--- Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 21:17:10 -0400
From: Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Re: CVS-SVN Schedule

On 10/2/05, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Mark Thomas wrote:


Mladen Turk wrote:


Can somebody make a firm statement on the timings?
1. Until when (Date:Hour:Minute) commits could be done
2. Wen the CVS will be locked for commit (same format)



This is now set for Wednesday 5th October 2005 at 8pm US Eastern  
time.

It should be completed by 11pm US Eastern time.



All done :)

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/connectors/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/jasper/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/container/catalina/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/container/tc5/

svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/connectors/
jakarta-tomcat-connectors
svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/jasper/ jakarta- 
tomcat-jasper

svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/container/catalina/
jakarta-tomcat-catalina
svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/container/tc5/
jakarta-tomcat-5

I'll keep checking email and the jira entry on and off tonight in  
case

there are problems. CVS is locked down, all commits should goto
tomcat-dev, Mark's modification scripts are all successfully run and
read/write is set to anyone in tomcat (in the asf-authorization file
that Remy can edit).

Hen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Ajp12 vs Ajp13

[Jim Jagielski]

Tim O'Neil wrote:
 
 At 04:37 PM 5/30/2001 +0100, you wrote:
 I'm confused.
 When editing the server.xml file to use Ajp13 support
 should I delete the AJP12 support or leave it in?
 
 
 You have to leave ajp12 in because tomcat uses it in its
 wind down procedure, at least in 3.x versions. You can
 run everything else on 13 though. I do.
 

I'm considering a patch to allow ajp13 to handle the wind-down
as well. Security-wise, it's much better for ajp13 to be able to
do it, but StopTomcat.java has ajp12 hardwired

-- 
===
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
  Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

Re: Ajp12 vs Ajp13

[Jim Jagielski]

Scratching an itch... I've heard a number of resistant movements
in wider TC acceptance due to the fact that the shutdown procedure
is as open as it is, even using the 'inet' hack to ensure a local
command.

Tim O'Neil wrote:
 
 At 02:19 PM 5/30/2001 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
 I'm considering a patch to allow ajp13 to handle the wind-down
 as well. Security-wise, it's much better for ajp13 to be able to
 do it, but StopTomcat.java has ajp12 hardwired
 
 So Jim- in 4.0 and beyond setting p13 to that task wasn't
 in the must-do category? Curious as to why...
 
 


-- 
===
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
  Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.