Re: Apache+tomcat Integration....Confused....

2002-04-29 Thread Michael Delamere

1) mod_web_app is AFAIK barely beta, however the most stable for apache2.

2) mod_jk2 is being heavily developed right now and will not be replaced by
mod_webapp in the near future.


This was posted in the tomcat-dev list this morning:

[...]
However I do think we should somehow document better what's
happening - many people have the strange impression that
webapp is going to replace jk.
[...]

bye Michael Delamere



- Original Message -
From: Vinay Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:00 AM
Subject: RE: Apache+tomcat IntegrationConfused


 As far as I know -


 1) mod_webapp is latest and will continue to evolve
 2) mod_jk will not see any future enhancements and will have only bug
fixes
 3) sticky session load balancing works fantastically on solaris (8) with
 mod_jk (BIG PLUS)
 4) for load balancing with mod_webapp you have to use external s/w piece
 like mod_backhand etc


 Vinay
 -Original Message-
 From: Zineddine Reggani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 1:35 PM
 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 Subject: Apache+tomcat IntegrationConfused


 I am running Apache on Win2k and trying to use Apache with Tomcat. What
 should I choose mod_jk, mod_webapp or mod_proxy?  And what are the
 advantages/disadvantages of these implementation?




--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Apache+tomcat Integration....Confused....

2002-04-29 Thread costinm

On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Vinay Singh wrote:

 As far as I know -
 
 
 1) mod_webapp is latest and will continue to evolve

It's development started the 'latest', true.

 2) mod_jk will not see any future enhancements and will have only bug fixes

That's completely false. mod_jk has a stable version that is frozen
( mod_jk1 ), and a development branch where the enhancements are made
( mod_jk2 ). You should use the stable branch until jk2 is ready,
or jk2 if you want to contribute to the development of the next 
version.

Costin


--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Apache+tomcat Integration....Confused....

2002-04-28 Thread Vinay Singh

As far as I know -


1) mod_webapp is latest and will continue to evolve
2) mod_jk will not see any future enhancements and will have only bug fixes
3) sticky session load balancing works fantastically on solaris (8) with
mod_jk (BIG PLUS)
4) for load balancing with mod_webapp you have to use external s/w piece
like mod_backhand etc


Vinay
-Original Message-
From: Zineddine Reggani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 1:35 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Apache+tomcat IntegrationConfused


I am running Apache on Win2k and trying to use Apache with Tomcat. What
should I choose mod_jk, mod_webapp or mod_proxy?  And what are the
advantages/disadvantages of these implementation?