RE: Bit off topic : What happened to RedHat?

2003-11-19 Thread Wade Chandler
In reference to c I'd like to point people to:
Fedora.redhat.com/about/objectives.html  look at number 7.

I think people are getting confused by the new direction and the use of
the words release and update.

Wade

-Original Message-
From: Gerald Henriksen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:08 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bit off topic : What happened to RedHat?


On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:54:01 +1100, you wrote:

Hi, does anyone know what happened to RedHat, its mailing list and 
forum?

They are all still available through the Red Hat website.

You can also check out http://fedora.redhat.com for more info about the
new distribution Red Hat is putting out.

Haven't used it for a while and it seems they are no more. Also, I run 
JVM and TC4 on RH7.1 kernel 2.4.2 and thinking about RH9, but someone 
said that's the last version and there won't be a
*stability* version coming out after that.

Red Hat is splitting into 2 product lines:

1) Red Hat Enterprise Linux.  Available on a subscription bases in both
Workstation and Server versions.  Errata updates available for 5 years
after release.  While Red Hat does not offer binary releases of the
Enterprise Line for download they do go beyond the package license
requirements and offer the source RPMS for download is you can if you
desire simply compile them to create your own version.

2) Fedora Linux.  This is the replacement for the old Red Hat Linux
line, and Fedora Core 1 is equivalent to Red Hat 10 (the testing process
for FC1 actually started out as the beta for RH10).  There are 3 big
changes with Fedora:

a) the name.  Purpose of this is to allow for 3rd parties to make cd's,
etc and distribute them (trademark law prohibited 3rd party making of
Red Hat cdroms and calling them Red Hat when selling them).

b) they will be a lot more aggressive in adding in new software/releases
on a more flexible schedule (ie. releases won't necessarily be 6 months
apart anymore, they will be determined by developments in the Linux
community and not on shifting boxes in the retail channel.  This means
that binary compatibility between releases is no longer guaranteed.

c) given b) support for bug fixes is dramatically shortened.  While Red
Hat 7.* lasted for years support is now for 3 months after the following
release of Fedora.  So support for Fedora Core 1 will end 3 months after
the release of Fedora Core 2.  This makes Fedora unsuitable for most
commercial uses.

Also, rumour has it RH8 is full of bugs ? Can someone share their 
experience please ?

Red Hat 8 errata ends at the end of December and so should not even be
considered.  The big change in Red Hat 8 that caused some minor problems
for some people was the move to gcc 3.2

Red Hat 9 has errata support until end of March 2004 and is very similar
to Red Hat 8 (major change was the addition of NPTL).


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bit off topic : What happened to RedHat?

2003-11-18 Thread Christopher Schultz
Hi, does anyone know what happened to RedHat?
 Haven't used it for a while and it seems they are no more.

Yeah, they decided to stop giving away their operating system under the 
name RedHat. RH 9 is the last one. You can still purchase RedHat 
Enterprise, of course. They're not going out of business, just changing 
the way they do business. And since they are legally required to give it 
away in some form of another (it is a derivative work), they have 
created the Fedora project (http://fedora.redhat.com/). Apparently, 
reviews of the Core 1, released just recently, where pretty weak.

Also, I run JVM and TC4 on RH7.1 kernel 2.4.2 and thinking about RH9,
but someone said that's the last version and there won't be a
*stability* version coming out after that.
You should upgrade to *anything* from RH 7.1. I assume that you have the 
oops, we hosed glibc RPM upgrade already. RH 7.1 was probably the 
worst release of RH ever. I've used 7.3 on many servers running 
Java/Tomcat apps, and it does just fine. RH 8 and RH 9 were pretty much 
desktop releases, designed to work with more hardware and have nicer 
GUIs. Assuming that you're running a server, there's very little 
difference between 7.3, 8.0, and 9. Of course, the newer ones have newer 
kernels, but in general you can upgrade those yourself.

Also, rumour has it RH8 is full of bugs?
This isn't my experience, but I don't use a lot of the stuff that comes 
with RH. Pretty much just the raw network stuff and bash. :)

One reason to go with RH 9 is the fact that it will be supported for a 
bit longer: RH 8.0 and earier will lose support (that is, RPM patches) 
on 31 December of this year. RH 9 will survive until April 2004.

Or, you could bail on RH and go with another Distro. Feel free to start 
a flame war by asking which one :)

-chris

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Bit off topic : What happened to RedHat?

2003-11-18 Thread Ben Souther
Or, you could bail on RH and go with another Distro. Feel free to start 
a flame war by asking which one :)
Please don't.  :-o

RH 7.3 has been a rock for us.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Bit off topic : What happened to RedHat?

2003-11-18 Thread Goehring, Chuck Mr., RCI - San Diego



Rumor was they were not going to allow free downloading of binaries.  They have 
launched http://fedora.redhat.com as an open source project.  It has binaries under a 
different naming/numbering scheme.  I expect they will shut down ftp.redhat.org to the 
public.  So, they may be stopping/re-organizing public forums as well.

Don't know anything more.

Chuck

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 9:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bit off topic : What happened to RedHat?


Hi, does anyone know what happened to RedHat, its mailing list and
forum?
Haven't used it for a while and it seems they are no more.
Also, I run JVM and TC4 on RH7.1 kernel 2.4.2 and thinking about RH9,
but someone said that's the last version and there won't be a
*stability* version coming out after that.
Also, rumour has it RH8 is full of bugs ? Can someone share their
experience please ?
can anyone shed some light please.
TIA:-)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bit off topic : What happened to RedHat?

2003-11-18 Thread achana



Thanks. Since they are servers (Apache + TC4 + database setup) , most
are custom installs without the bloat ware. 
In any case, BSD-Unix is *my* only other acceptable choice, so there's
no flame war ;-)
I've not come across anyone willing to stick his neck out on NT/W2000
$erver running Apache and TC4.
Think I might just splurge and *buy* a copy of RH9.

And now this is very strange indeed: I was asked to implement a WLAN,
and after some research, I found that 3Com does *not support*
Linux/Unix, I got it from the local-presales. On the other hand Linksys
is very proud of the ease with which people can integrate their wireless
routers with Linux...
Is this your experience ?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bit off topic : What happened to RedHat?

2003-11-18 Thread Christopher Schultz

Think I might just splurge and *buy* a copy of RH9.
Well, there's no reason to buy it, unless you want to pay RedHat extra 
to support it for you (which they might do). You can still get the RH 
iso images online, right?

And now this is very strange indeed: I was asked to implement a WLAN,
and after some research, I found that 3Com does *not support*
Linux/Unix, I got it from the local-presales. On the other hand Linksys
is very proud of the ease with which people can integrate their wireless
routers with Linux...
Is this your experience ?
I have never had a problem with 3Com or Linksys hardware. Excuse my 
ignorance, but what do you mean by 'WLAN'? IS this hardware different 
from standard 100baseT etnernet?

-chris



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Bit off topic : What happened to RedHat?

2003-11-18 Thread achana

 I have never had a problem with 3Com or Linksys hardware. Excuse my
 ignorance, but what do you mean by 'WLAN'? IS this hardware different
 from standard 100baseT etnernet?

Wireless LAN IEEE802.11b/g operating at 2.4GHz spectrum and effective up
to a distance of 100meters @ 54mbps, in this instance, it is the only
solution. I'm not sure about attenuation.
Think of total isolation and insulation.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bit off topic : What happened to RedHat?

2003-11-18 Thread Gerald Henriksen
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:54:01 +1100, you wrote:

Hi, does anyone know what happened to RedHat, its mailing list and
forum?

They are all still available through the Red Hat website.

You can also check out http://fedora.redhat.com for more info about
the new distribution Red Hat is putting out.

Haven't used it for a while and it seems they are no more.
Also, I run JVM and TC4 on RH7.1 kernel 2.4.2 and thinking about RH9,
but someone said that's the last version and there won't be a
*stability* version coming out after that.

Red Hat is splitting into 2 product lines:

1) Red Hat Enterprise Linux.  Available on a subscription bases in
both Workstation and Server versions.  Errata updates available for 5
years after release.  While Red Hat does not offer binary releases of
the Enterprise Line for download they do go beyond the package license
requirements and offer the source RPMS for download is you can if you
desire simply compile them to create your own version.

2) Fedora Linux.  This is the replacement for the old Red Hat Linux
line, and Fedora Core 1 is equivalent to Red Hat 10 (the testing
process for FC1 actually started out as the beta for RH10).  There are
3 big changes with Fedora:

a) the name.  Purpose of this is to allow for 3rd parties to make
cd's, etc and distribute them (trademark law prohibited 3rd party
making of Red Hat cdroms and calling them Red Hat when selling them).

b) they will be a lot more aggressive in adding in new
software/releases on a more flexible schedule (ie. releases won't
necessarily be 6 months apart anymore, they will be determined by
developments in the Linux community and not on shifting boxes in the
retail channel.  This means that binary compatibility between releases
is no longer guaranteed.

c) given b) support for bug fixes is dramatically shortened.  While
Red Hat 7.* lasted for years support is now for 3 months after the
following release of Fedora.  So support for Fedora Core 1 will end 3
months after the release of Fedora Core 2.  This makes Fedora
unsuitable for most commercial uses.

Also, rumour has it RH8 is full of bugs ? Can someone share their
experience please ?

Red Hat 8 errata ends at the end of December and so should not even be
considered.  The big change in Red Hat 8 that caused some minor
problems for some people was the move to gcc 3.2

Red Hat 9 has errata support until end of March 2004 and is very
similar to Red Hat 8 (major change was the addition of NPTL).


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bit off topic : What happened to RedHat?

2003-11-18 Thread Gerald Henriksen
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:51:27 -0500, you wrote:

created the Fedora project (http://fedora.redhat.com/). Apparently, 
reviews of the Core 1, released just recently, where pretty weak.

At least one review was picked apart on slashdot for many inaccuracies
that led to an extremely flawed review.

Fedora Core 1 is basically Red Hat 9 with a bump to gcc 3.3, Gnome
2.4, and exec-shield.  In other words no real major changes if you are
already used to Red Hat 8 or 9.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bit off topic : What happened to RedHat?

2003-11-18 Thread Gerald Henriksen
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 23:07:49 -0500, you wrote:

 There are 3 big changes with Fedora:

Forgot, one more major change that hasn't yet show results but likely
will be Fedora Core 2 or 3.

The community is now actively participating in the development of
Fedora Linux and work has begun to support it on non-IA32 platforms.
Active work is being done on PowerPC and AMD64 versions of Fedora.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]