RE: Jvmroute and worker names?

2003-08-14 Thread Angus Mezick
Does JVMRoute HAVE to be unique if you have session clustering?  I know
it has to be unique to have session affinity without clustering.  I want
apache to roundrobin the requested within a group of tomcats that have
clustered sessions.  Hmm, lots of expirements :)
--Angus

 -Original Message-
 From: Eric J. Pinnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:52 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: RE: Jvmroute and worker names?
 
 
 Yes, it remembers which engine sent which jvmroute.  It will 
 return the
 session to that same engine as long as that engine is up.
 
 I don't think the workers names have anything to do with the jvmroute.
 They can be different.  The jvmroute names have to be unique 
 across all
 engines that are in the load balanced cluster.
 
 -e
 
 On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Angus Mezick wrote:
 
  Yup, I guess this is more of a JK2 question.  Does it remember which
  server returned which jvmroute? Or does jk2 use the worker 
 name somehow.
  All examples have them being the same so it is slightly confusing.
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Eric J. Pinnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:40 AM
   To: Tomcat Users List
   Subject: Re: Jvmroute and worker names?
  
  
   Hi,
  
   jvmroute names don't equate to the names of the workers in
   your properties
   file.  basically all jvmroute does is tack that name on 
 the end of the
   session id so the connector knows what tomcat to send the
   session to in a
   loadbalanced env.  It's sticky that way.
  
   I'm not sure about the clustering but I had always thought
   that jvmroutes
   had to be unique.  That way it wouldn't mistake one server
   for the other.
  
   -e
  
   On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Angus Mezick wrote:
  
Does the name of the JvmRoute in server.xml have to equal
   the name of
the host in worker2.properties when linking apache and 
 tomcat to get
proper session affinity?
   
Can I have 4 tomcats, each paired together with session
   clustering and
identical jvmroutes and then have apache use session
   affinity to send
requests correctly to each cluster of 2 tomcats?
   
Sorry for the crosspost.  Didn't even get a nibble on users
   yesterday so
I am assuming this is deep withing the app.
   
Angus Mezick
GuideStar - Philanthropic Research Inc.
427 Scotland St.
Williamsburg, Virginia 23185
PHONE: (757)299-4631 x35  FAX:(757)229-8912
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.guidestar.org http://www.guidestar.org
   
   
   
 -
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   
   
  
   
 -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For additional commands, e-mail: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 
  
 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Jvmroute and worker names?

2003-08-14 Thread Eric J. Pinnell
Hi,

jvmroute names don't equate to the names of the workers in your properties
file.  basically all jvmroute does is tack that name on the end of the
session id so the connector knows what tomcat to send the session to in a
loadbalanced env.  It's sticky that way.

I'm not sure about the clustering but I had always thought that jvmroutes
had to be unique.  That way it wouldn't mistake one server for the other.

-e

On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Angus Mezick wrote:

 Does the name of the JvmRoute in server.xml have to equal the name of
 the host in worker2.properties when linking apache and tomcat to get
 proper session affinity?

 Can I have 4 tomcats, each paired together with session clustering and
 identical jvmroutes and then have apache use session affinity to send
 requests correctly to each cluster of 2 tomcats?

 Sorry for the crosspost.  Didn't even get a nibble on users yesterday so
 I am assuming this is deep withing the app.

 Angus Mezick
 GuideStar - Philanthropic Research Inc.
 427 Scotland St.
 Williamsburg, Virginia 23185
 PHONE: (757)299-4631 x35  FAX:(757)229-8912
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.guidestar.org http://www.guidestar.org

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Jvmroute and worker names?

2003-08-14 Thread Angus Mezick
Yup, I guess this is more of a JK2 question.  Does it remember which
server returned which jvmroute? Or does jk2 use the worker name somehow.
All examples have them being the same so it is slightly confusing.

 -Original Message-
 From: Eric J. Pinnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:40 AM
 To: Tomcat Users List
 Subject: Re: Jvmroute and worker names?
 
 
 Hi,
 
 jvmroute names don't equate to the names of the workers in 
 your properties
 file.  basically all jvmroute does is tack that name on the end of the
 session id so the connector knows what tomcat to send the 
 session to in a
 loadbalanced env.  It's sticky that way.
 
 I'm not sure about the clustering but I had always thought 
 that jvmroutes
 had to be unique.  That way it wouldn't mistake one server 
 for the other.
 
 -e
 
 On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Angus Mezick wrote:
 
  Does the name of the JvmRoute in server.xml have to equal 
 the name of
  the host in worker2.properties when linking apache and tomcat to get
  proper session affinity?
 
  Can I have 4 tomcats, each paired together with session 
 clustering and
  identical jvmroutes and then have apache use session 
 affinity to send
  requests correctly to each cluster of 2 tomcats?
 
  Sorry for the crosspost.  Didn't even get a nibble on users 
 yesterday so
  I am assuming this is deep withing the app.
 
  Angus Mezick
  GuideStar - Philanthropic Research Inc.
  427 Scotland St.
  Williamsburg, Virginia 23185
  PHONE: (757)299-4631 x35  FAX:(757)229-8912
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  www.guidestar.org http://www.guidestar.org
 
  
 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Jvmroute and worker names?

2003-08-14 Thread Eric J. Pinnell
Yes, it remembers which engine sent which jvmroute.  It will return the
session to that same engine as long as that engine is up.

I don't think the workers names have anything to do with the jvmroute.
They can be different.  The jvmroute names have to be unique across all
engines that are in the load balanced cluster.

-e

On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Angus Mezick wrote:

 Yup, I guess this is more of a JK2 question.  Does it remember which
 server returned which jvmroute? Or does jk2 use the worker name somehow.
 All examples have them being the same so it is slightly confusing.

  -Original Message-
  From: Eric J. Pinnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:40 AM
  To: Tomcat Users List
  Subject: Re: Jvmroute and worker names?
 
 
  Hi,
 
  jvmroute names don't equate to the names of the workers in
  your properties
  file.  basically all jvmroute does is tack that name on the end of the
  session id so the connector knows what tomcat to send the
  session to in a
  loadbalanced env.  It's sticky that way.
 
  I'm not sure about the clustering but I had always thought
  that jvmroutes
  had to be unique.  That way it wouldn't mistake one server
  for the other.
 
  -e
 
  On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Angus Mezick wrote:
 
   Does the name of the JvmRoute in server.xml have to equal
  the name of
   the host in worker2.properties when linking apache and tomcat to get
   proper session affinity?
  
   Can I have 4 tomcats, each paired together with session
  clustering and
   identical jvmroutes and then have apache use session
  affinity to send
   requests correctly to each cluster of 2 tomcats?
  
   Sorry for the crosspost.  Didn't even get a nibble on users
  yesterday so
   I am assuming this is deep withing the app.
  
   Angus Mezick
   GuideStar - Philanthropic Research Inc.
   427 Scotland St.
   Williamsburg, Virginia 23185
   PHONE: (757)299-4631 x35  FAX:(757)229-8912
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   www.guidestar.org http://www.guidestar.org
  
  
  -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]