Re: Re[2]: Tomcat 5 for production?
Did you contact whomever wrote the app that you are trying to run to ask if it is supported on Tomcat 5x? You might want to do that before getting on the this list and dispensing advise regarding the stability of Tomcat. If you're not a J developer [sic] and the app works perfectly on version 4, why are you trying to upgrade to version 5? The goal/mission for Tomcat is to be in 100% compliance with the Servlet/JSP specs, not to maintain backward compatibility with every app written for it. If the specs shift or become more specific, the next version of tomcat will will change to accommodate them. It's then up to the application developers to ensure that their apps are spec compliant if they want them to continue to run on current releases. On Thursday 22 January 2004 10:14 pm, you wrote: Yeah, but I have upgraded to 18 and I still have this memory problem. Why? I've tried to use one scientific server-based application, which documentation recommends to use Apache Tomcat. And its doesnt work well (sometimes tomcat doesnt respond to requests, sometimes shows 500). So I've reinstalled on thesame server Apache but with Jboss and I dont have any problem till now. In this case I dont care which purposes have the server, this application must work;) And the real problem, I think - in version 5, because 4 (which engine uses Jboss) works perfectly. But who knows... Hello, Ben. You wrote: BS JBoss uses Tomcat as it's servlet engine. BS They server two different purposes. BS There was a memory leak fixed in 5.0.18. Other than that Tomcat 5x is very BS solid. It's been out of beta for over a month. BS On Tuesday 20 January 2004 07:25 pm, you wrote: Tomcat 5.0.18 more stable than 16, but it still have a lot of errors and bugs. If somebody will ask me I will recommend Jboss for the same purposes. Hello, Katz. 19 2004 ., 5:54:18 you wrote: KG Hi; KG I am a bi confused. KG It the current release of 5.0.16 stable a production ready release? KG If not, when could we expect a tomcat 5.x which is ready for production. KG P.S: when I say ready for production I think of non beta and ok with KG licensing. (never mind the bugs) KG Thanks in advance. BS - BS To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BS For additional commands, e-mail: BS [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: Tomcat 5 for production?
Hello, Remy. You right. The memory leak isnt significant. As I find out now from other people - its have a normal limits. About errors - I will speak with my boss - I have idea to do that, but for now I dont have rights. The other thing - somebody must to know at least basics of the Geomatica Webserver architecture - than I can explain whats happens exactly. I am really dont understand why it happens because all other servlets works fine with Apache Tomcat. But since I have a first error 500 when I've tryed to use it with our Webserver -its doesnt work well. I reinstall everything, I have start it and - it has happend again. While Apache hangs up - our application works perfectly like nothing happens. Thanks. 23 2004 ., 8:02:57 you wrote: RM Candyman wrote: Sorry, my mistake. In my case SOMETIMES I have errors with 5.18 which i doesnt have with Jboss3. SOMETIMES it doesnt repond, and SOMETIMES it has an Internal error in one request, but in with the next try it works perfectly. Ive tryed reinstall it and reconfigure more than 5 times without any success. So for now I am using Jboss. Maybe I am wrong, but I have problems with 18 - thats all. RM This is not very conclusive ... RM You should post some of the errors you get, maybe that will help. RM On a general note, TC 5 is very close to 4.1 architecture wise. There RM can be oversights, such as that memory leak caused by JMX statistics, RM but I don't think there will be too many of these. -- Sincerely yours, Candyman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: Tomcat 5 for production?
Yeah, but I have upgraded to 18 and I still have this memory problem. Why? I've tried to use one scientific server-based application, which documentation recommends to use Apache Tomcat. And its doesnt work well (sometimes tomcat doesnt respond to requests, sometimes shows 500). So I've reinstalled on thesame server Apache but with Jboss and I dont have any problem till now. In this case I dont care which purposes have the server, this application must work;) And the real problem, I think - in version 5, because 4 (which engine uses Jboss) works perfectly. But who knows... Hello, Ben. You wrote: BS JBoss uses Tomcat as it's servlet engine. BS They server two different purposes. BS There was a memory leak fixed in 5.0.18. Other than that Tomcat 5x is very BS solid. It's been out of beta for over a month. BS On Tuesday 20 January 2004 07:25 pm, you wrote: Tomcat 5.0.18 more stable than 16, but it still have a lot of errors and bugs. If somebody will ask me I will recommend Jboss for the same purposes. Hello, Katz. 19 2004 ., 5:54:18 you wrote: KG Hi; KG I am a bi confused. KG It the current release of 5.0.16 stable a production ready release? KG If not, when could we expect a tomcat 5.x which is ready for production. KG P.S: when I say ready for production I think of non beta and ok with KG licensing. (never mind the bugs) KG Thanks in advance. BS - BS To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BS For additional commands, e-mail: BS [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: Tomcat 5 for production?
Sorry, my mistake. In my case SOMETIMES I have errors with 5.18 which i doesnt have with Jboss3. SOMETIMES it doesnt repond, and SOMETIMES it has an Internal error in one request, but in with the next try it works perfectly. Ive tryed reinstall it and reconfigure more than 5 times without any success. So for now I am using Jboss. Maybe I am wrong, but I have problems with 18 - thats all. Hello, Jeanfrancois. 20 2004 ., 23:28:49 you wrote: JA Candyman wrote: Tomcat 5.0.18 more stable than 16, but it still have a lot of errors and bugs. JA He! before making such statement, can you dress a list of lot of errors JA and bugs? Your statement is completely wrong. There is not a lot of JA errors and bugs: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDemail1=emailtype1=substringemailassigned_to1=1email2=emailtype2=substringemailreporter2=1bugidtype=includebug_id=changedin=votes=chfieldfrom=chfieldto=Nowchfieldvalue=product=Tomcat+5short_desc=short_desc_type=allwordssubstrlong_desc=long_desc_type=allwordssubstrbug_file_loc=bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstrkeywords=keywords_type=anywordsfield0-0-0=nooptype0-0-0=noopvalue0-0-0=cmdtype=doitorder=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time JA -- Jeanfrancois If somebody will ask me I will recommend Jboss for the same purposes. Hello, Katz. 19 2004 ., 5:54:18 you wrote: KG Hi; KG I am a bi confused. KG It the current release of 5.0.16 stable a production ready release? KG If not, when could we expect a tomcat 5.x which is ready for production. KG P.S: when I say ready for production I think of non beta and ok with KG licensing. (never mind the bugs) KG Thanks in advance. JA - JA To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] JA For additional commands, e-mail: JA [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Sincerely yours, Candyman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
