RE: an question about jk2 lbfactor

2004-03-31 Thread Greg . Cope
Sorry You are quite right, more eloquently explained here:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-user&m=106862366704663&w=2

Greg

> -Original Message-
> From: Aadi Deshpande [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 31 March 2004 15:54
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: an question about jk2 lbfactor
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I don't think that is correct. From the mod_jk documentation :
> 
> "Using the worker's load-balancing factor, perform weighed-round-robin
> load balancing where high lbfactor means stronger machine 
> (that is going
> to handle more requests)"
> 
> I would assume that mod_jk2 retains the same semantics as mod_jk.
> 
> 
> If all the requests are going to a single machine, i would 
> check to make
> sure that your tomcatId in your workers2.properties matches 
> the jvmRoute
> of the engine that you're trying to connect to.
> 
> hth,
> -a
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> >Yes.
> >
> >Lower LB factor means more requests go to that server.
> >
> >Greg
> >
> >  
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: moch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: 31 March 2004 10:31
> >>To: tomcat-user
> >>Subject: an question about jk2 lbfactor
> >>
> >>
> >>hi all,
> >>
> >>what's the jk2's properties value "lbfactor " really mean?
> >>
> >>I have set up a cluster by apache + jk2 + tomcat5, it has 
> >>2 node, I want tomcat1 to process all request and tomcat2 
> >>just as an backup. so I
> >>set tomcat1's lbfactor=100 and tomcat2's lbfactor=0, but almost all
> >>request go to tomcat2. 
> >>
> >>Had I set lb_factor wrong? 
> >>
> >>Thanks for any help. 
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> -
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >-
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: an question about jk2 lbfactor

2004-03-31 Thread Aadi Deshpande
Hi,

I don't think that is correct. From the mod_jk documentation :

"Using the worker's load-balancing factor, perform weighed-round-robin
load balancing where high lbfactor means stronger machine (that is going
to handle more requests)"

I would assume that mod_jk2 retains the same semantics as mod_jk.


If all the requests are going to a single machine, i would check to make
sure that your tomcatId in your workers2.properties matches the jvmRoute
of the engine that you're trying to connect to.

hth,
-a

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>Yes.
>
>Lower LB factor means more requests go to that server.
>
>Greg
>
>  
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: moch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: 31 March 2004 10:31
>>To: tomcat-user
>>Subject: an question about jk2 lbfactor
>>
>>
>>hi all,
>>
>>what's the jk2's properties value "lbfactor " really mean?
>>
>>I have set up a cluster by apache + jk2 + tomcat5, it has 
>>2 node, I want tomcat1 to process all request and tomcat2 
>>just as an backup. so I
>>set tomcat1's lbfactor=100 and tomcat2's lbfactor=0, but almost all
>>request go to tomcat2. 
>>
>>Had I set lb_factor wrong? 
>>
>>Thanks for any help. 
>>
>>  
>>
>>-
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: an question about jk2 lbfactor

2004-03-31 Thread Greg . Cope
Yes.

Lower LB factor means more requests go to that server.

Greg

> -Original Message-
> From: moch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 31 March 2004 10:31
> To: tomcat-user
> Subject: an question about jk2 lbfactor
> 
> 
> hi all,
> 
> what's the jk2's properties value "lbfactor " really mean?
> 
> I have set up a cluster by apache + jk2 + tomcat5, it has 
> 2 node, I want tomcat1 to process all request and tomcat2 
> just as an backup. so I
> set tomcat1's lbfactor=100 and tomcat2's lbfactor=0, but almost all
> request go to tomcat2. 
> 
> Had I set lb_factor wrong? 
> 
> Thanks for any help. 
> 
>   
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



an question about jk2 lbfactor

2004-03-31 Thread moch
hi all,

what's the jk2's properties value "lbfactor " really mean?

I have set up a cluster by apache + jk2 + tomcat5, it has 2 node, I want tomcat1 
to process all request and tomcat2 just as an backup. so I
set tomcat1's lbfactor=100 and tomcat2's lbfactor=0, but almost all
request go to tomcat2. 

Had I set lb_factor wrong? 

Thanks for any help. 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]