Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters

2015-10-22 Thread Gary Smith 
Hear Hear!

Gary
KA1J

> I vote you take your contentious attitude somewhere else MIKE DURKIN
> 
> Cecil
> K5DL
> 
> Sent using recycled electrons.
> 
> > On Oct 20, 2015, at 1:07 AM, MIKE DURKIN  wrote:
> > 
> > Come on Bill ...  did i say you did ?
> >> also-- I did not put forth any opinion about ADC or SDR.
> > 
> > Now, you said that you always read well written info from Tom, I didn't see 
> > that structure ... 
> > Id like to know what SDR was so poor.
> > 
> > SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM ... (with a guys voice trying to sound like a old 
> > woman) Flying Circus any one?
> > 
> > 
> >> From: bayc...@mediacombb.net
> >> To: patriot...@msn.com; topband@contesting.com
> >> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
> >> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:52:15 -0500
> >> 
> >> Mike--
> >> It is obvious that you do not know who Tom is.
> >> and-- the word SPAM followed by six exclamation points IS an expletive. 
> >> also-- I did not put forth any opinion about ADC or SDR.
> >> Bill--W4BSG
> >> 
> >> -Original Message- 
> >> From: MIKE DURKIN
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 12:07 AM
> >> To: topband@contesting.com
> >> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
> >> 
> >> If i must 
> >> 
> >> Tom never mentioned what type of SDR would be wiped out by moderate 
> >> signals 
> >> ...
> >> 
> >> That in its self has three problems ...
> >> 
> >> NO filtering? (should this be called -- comparing apples to apples, not 
> >> apples to turds)
> >> poor ADC (real cheap soundcard 8bit)?
> >> insanely bad phase error in the nearby transmitter OR the wonderfull SDR 
> >> that he built.
> >> 
> >> Nearly the entire email was lamented as a setup for a flame war by simply 
> >> omitting details ... that is not the actions of a good engineering radio 
> >> operator ... hence ... SPAM. -- it was a showing off the effort put into 
> >> the 
> >> SDR i guess.
> >> 
> >> And i worry about you Bill  the word "SPAM" being an expletive in your 
> >> vocabulary ...
> >> 
> >> I think of many responses on here to ADC overload as this -- 
> >> 
> >> When dealing with a computer .. the quality of work/info put into it will 
> >> have the same ratio that you will get out of it -- qubed.
> >> 
> >> how many samples per second are true overload  and i mean overload --  
> >> not phase error -- if you don't know the difference you really shouldn't 
> >> put 
> >> forth an opinion as truth.
> >> 
> >> That video that was posted in this discussion(awhile ago) did point out 
> >> the 
> >> difference quite well and understandable by almost anyone .. check it out, 
> >> if not again.
> >> 
> >> Not sure if i should really send this .. but, what the hell.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> From: bayc...@mediacombb.net
> >>> To: patriot...@msn.com; topband@contesting.com
> >>> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:41:41 -0500
> >>> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> -Original Message- 
> >>> From: MIKE DURKIN
> >>> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 10:47 AM
> >>> To: topband@contesting.com
> >>> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
> >>> 
> >>> SPAM !!
> >>> 
> >>> Mike--
> >>> Can you explain this opinion?
> >>> In my experience, almost anything Tom takes the trouble to publish is well
> >>> thought-out and worth reading. Your expletive puzzles me.
> >>> Bill--W4BSG
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> ---
> >>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> >>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >>> 
> >>> _
> >>> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> >> 
> >> _
> >> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> ---
> >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> > 
> > _
> > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> 




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Topband: Sked

2015-10-22 Thread Marco Quijada 
Hello:
 Tonight i will be on the air in 80 meters all night :-)   also if
someone need sked on 160 please fell to free to make a sked.

73,  CE1TBN
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters

2015-10-22 Thread Doug Renwick 
Ahhh, the social justice warriors (SJW) have arrived.  What do we do with
them?
Doug 

-Original Message-

Hear Hear!

Gary
KA1J

> I vote you take your contentious attitude somewhere else MIKE DURKIN
> 
> Cecil
> K5DL
> 
> Sent using recycled electrons.
> 
> > On Oct 20, 2015, at 1:07 AM, MIKE DURKIN  wrote:
> > 
> > Come on Bill ...  did i say you did ?
> >> also-- I did not put forth any opinion about ADC or SDR.
> > 
> > Now, you said that you always read well written info from Tom, I didn't
see that structure ... 
> > Id like to know what SDR was so poor.
> > 
> > SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM ... (with a guys voice trying to sound like a old
woman) Flying Circus any one?
> > 
> > 
> >> From: bayc...@mediacombb.net
> >> To: patriot...@msn.com; topband@contesting.com
> >> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
> >> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:52:15 -0500
> >> 
> >> Mike--
> >> It is obvious that you do not know who Tom is.
> >> and-- the word SPAM followed by six exclamation points IS an expletive.

> >> also-- I did not put forth any opinion about ADC or SDR.
> >> Bill--W4BSG
> >> 
> >> -Original Message- 
> >> From: MIKE DURKIN
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 12:07 AM
> >> To: topband@contesting.com
> >> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
> >> 
> >> If i must 
> >> 
> >> Tom never mentioned what type of SDR would be wiped out by moderate
signals 
> >> ...
> >> 
> >> That in its self has three problems ...
> >> 
> >> NO filtering? (should this be called -- comparing apples to apples, not

> >> apples to turds)
> >> poor ADC (real cheap soundcard 8bit)?
> >> insanely bad phase error in the nearby transmitter OR the wonderfull
SDR 
> >> that he built.
> >> 
> >> Nearly the entire email was lamented as a setup for a flame war by
simply 
> >> omitting details ... that is not the actions of a good engineering
radio 
> >> operator ... hence ... SPAM. -- it was a showing off the effort put
into the 
> >> SDR i guess.
> >> 
> >> And i worry about you Bill  the word "SPAM" being an expletive in
your 
> >> vocabulary ...
> >> 
> >> I think of many responses on here to ADC overload as this -- 
> >> 
> >> When dealing with a computer .. the quality of work/info put into it
will 
> >> have the same ratio that you will get out of it -- qubed.
> >> 
> >> how many samples per second are true overload  and i mean overload
--  
> >> not phase error -- if you don't know the difference you really
shouldn't put 
> >> forth an opinion as truth.
> >> 
> >> That video that was posted in this discussion(awhile ago) did point out
the 
> >> difference quite well and understandable by almost anyone .. check it
out, 
> >> if not again.
> >> 
> >> Not sure if i should really send this .. but, what the hell.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> From: bayc...@mediacombb.net
> >>> To: patriot...@msn.com; topband@contesting.com
> >>> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:41:41 -0500
> >>> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> -Original Message- 
> >>> From: MIKE DURKIN
> >>> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 10:47 AM
> >>> To: topband@contesting.com
> >>> Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters
> >>> 
> >>> SPAM !!
> >>> 
> >>> Mike--
> >>> Can you explain this opinion?
> >>> In my experience, almost anything Tom takes the trouble to publish is
well
> >>> thought-out and worth reading. Your expletive puzzles me.
> >>> Bill--W4BSG
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> ---
> >>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> >>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >>> 
> >>> _
> >>> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> >> 
> >> _
> >> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> ---
> >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> > 
> > _
> > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> 




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband