Topband: Laser distance meters

2021-06-05 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist

I am considering replacing my 100 meter tape measures with
a Bosch GLM400CL laser distance meter to use for laying out
my next 160 meter circular array.  I am wondering if anyone
has any experience with this model or any other models that
work to a range of 100 meters.  (That spec eliminates the vast
majority of meters).  How important are accessories like
tripods and target cards?

73
Rick N6RK
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Skewed path on 6m. (for those who also work 6m....)

2021-06-05 Thread W3HKK


Been hearing Don, VE9XX a lot lately. Worked him a couple days ago
beaming at 70 degrees.
Today he was strongest at 15 degrees ( from central Ohio.) I tried
five times to point the 5 el yagi at anywhere between 0 and 90 degrees
but always heard him best at 15 degrees .

BTW, Don reports many US-Europe qsos on 6m in the mornings, especially
involving the Midwest, where I live ( central OH), but Ive yet to hear
across the pond this season.

Don also reports JAs FB copy in the mornings. Here, nada.

Maybe one day my ship will come in.

-From:
topband-requ...@contesting.com
To: topband@contesting.com
Cc: 
Sent: Saturday June 5 2021 12:02:07PM
Subject: Topband Digest, Vol 222, Issue 3

 Send Topband mailing list submissions to
 topband@contesting.com

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
 /> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
 topband-requ...@contesting.com

 You can reach the person managing the list at
 topband-ow...@contesting.com

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than "Re: Contents of Topband digest..."

 Today's Topics:

 1. Re: Interesting observation and comment (Skewed Path Vs.
 Horizontal/Vertical Polarization) (Bill Tippett)

 --

 Message: 1
 Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2021 08:53:27 -0400
 From: Bill Tippett 
 To: topband 
 Subject: Re: Topband: Interesting observation and comment (Skewed
Path
 Vs. Horizontal/Vertical Polarization)
 Message-ID:

 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

 23 years ago (!) I wrote:

 K9LA wrote:

 >*And another thing that clouds the issue - many of our antennas have
a *
 >*response to the other polarization. For example, Beverages respond
to *
 >*horizontal polarization off the side. *

 Very true! In fact, noticing signals on my Beverage system that
 were skewed by 90 degrees was usually a clue to check my dipole!
 When this happened, the dipole would often (but not always) be
 the best antenna. The exception to this was when signals traversing
 the Auroral zone were skewed by disturbances (K index 4+). Usually
 this sort of skewing would shift signals by less than 30 degrees in
 azimuth but some really large disturbances would cause shifts up to
 90 degrees! But that's another story and a completely different
 propagation mechanism.

 Back to the present, since nearly all horizontal antennas are low (in
 wavelengths),

 there is no way to determine azimuths (since high angles equate to
 omnidirectional).

 Only a Horizontal Waller Flag up >100' can to that, and these would
be
 low horizontal

 angles, not high angles.

 I put up an Inverted-V on my 30m tower in January 2004 in order to
 have a "high-angle" antenna for those cases when we have that type of
 propagation. The *blue *plot below shows the elevation pattern. It
 turns out that 30m is about the optimum height to maximize radiation
 straight up (7.14 dBi at 90 degrees), which was my goal for this
 antenna. The other plot is a quasi-4 square which shows low angle
 vertical polarization angles for comparison.

 
http://web.archive.org/web/20191102091231/http://users.vnet.net/btippett/new_page_10.htm
 />

 73, Bill W4ZV

 --

 Subject: Digest Footer

 ___
 Topband mailing list
 Topband@contesting.com
 http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
 />

 --

 End of Topband Digest, Vol 222, Issue 3
 ***

_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Interesting observation and comment (Skewed Path Vs. Horizontal/Vertical Polarization)

2021-06-05 Thread Bill Tippett
23 years ago (!) I wrote:

K9LA wrote:

>*And another thing that clouds the issue - many of our antennas have a *
>*response to the other polarization.  For example, Beverages respond to *
>*horizontal polarization off the side.  *

Very true!  In fact, noticing signals on my Beverage system that
were skewed by 90 degrees was usually a clue to check my dipole!
When this happened, the dipole would often (but not always) be
the best antenna.  The exception to this was when signals traversing
the Auroral zone were skewed by disturbances (K index 4+).  Usually
this sort of skewing would shift signals by less than 30 degrees in
azimuth but some really large disturbances would cause shifts up to
90 degrees!  But that's another story and a completely different
propagation mechanism.

Back to the present, since nearly all horizontal antennas are low (in
wavelengths),

there is no way to determine azimuths (since high angles equate to
omnidirectional).

Only a Horizontal Waller Flag up >100' can to that, and these would be
low horizontal

angles, not high angles.


I put up an Inverted-V on my 30m tower in January 2004 in order to
have a "high-angle" antenna for those cases when we have that type of
propagation.  The *blue *plot below shows the elevation pattern.  It
turns out that 30m is about the optimum height to maximize radiation
straight up (7.14 dBi at 90 degrees), which was my goal for this
antenna.  The other plot is a quasi-4 square which shows low angle
vertical polarization angles for comparison.

http://web.archive.org/web/20191102091231/http://users.vnet.net/btippett/new_page_10.htm


73,  Bill  W4ZV
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector