Re: Topband: Query?
using http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/options/topband you can also set your mail delivery to no delivery then read using the archives while you are gone http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/topband/ then edit your settings to again deliver after you return no need to unsubscribe GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 7/4/2012 7:45 AM, donov...@starpower.net wrote: Allan, You can terminate your Topband account and catch up by reviewing the archive at: http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/topband Establish a new Topband subscription when you return. 73 Frank W3LPL Original message Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 7:51:35 -0400 From: all...@dejazzd.com Subject: Topband: Query? To: topband@contesting.com Does anyone know if I can look up the topband@contesting.com e-mails or get them in bulk when I request them? I belong to many groups and unless I look at their e-mails a few times a day they rapidly fill my screens. I'll be away for an extended length of time without e-mail access and I am worried that my in- box will get filled completely. Thanks 73 Allan W2TN ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Topband: small rx loops and ferrite
Since the topic of ferrite seems to be at the top of the lists focus I'd like to ask about what ferrite mix to use at the feed of a small rx loop I have built this is NOT a shielded loop with the break in the shield half way around the loop I made the loop out of the 2 turns of 5/8 inch hardline I had available the circumference is about 12' I am using only the shield as a continuous 2 turn loop for the feedline I just attached a 50 ohm coax with the coax center to one end of the hardline shield and the coax shield to the other end of the hardline shield it worked fine for what I wanted in the sense that it allowed me to null some thunderstorm crash noise during the Summer Stew allowing me to diversity receive with my outside vertical on my K3 (it even works on 80m and 40m, so the toroid needs to work 160m-40m) however the pattern is not symmetrical (I think this is due to the unbalanced 15' of direct coax feedline?) so I think my next step would be to use a toroid as a balun with each end of the hardline loop attached by a couple of turns on the toroid and maybe twice that many turns on the other side of the toroid going to my 15 feet of 50 ohm coax to the rig I might later get around to building a preamp for it but for now all I want to do is add the toroid in the hopes that it will maybe make the pattern more symmetrical if I understand this correctly I am wanting to use a broadband coupling FTxx-xx ferrite core rather than a narrow high Q like I would get with powdered iron Txx-xx core I have an FT240-31, as well as FT37-61, and a FT50-61 on hand in my part bin. they were left overs from an order from Tony at http://partsandkits.com/toroids.php I used all the hard line I had on hand so different lengths, configurations etc etc etc is not my question, for now... I just want to know what mix toroid I need to use between this loop and the coax feed to it I was planing on 4 turns on the primary and 16 turns on the secondary my reasoning being that might also give me a little signal increase as well? perhaps later I might get into the matching aspects of this experiment but I had plenty of signal strength using the coax directly with the loop setting in my 'other room' of my ground floor apartment I just thought it would be nice to have a symmetrical pattern rather than the odd ball one I have now -- GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: Laird ferrites
Tom, you might also wish to reread ZR's comment before you accuse him of accusing on4un of lying and trying to mislead ZR's statement imo simply says: ON4UN's *SOURCES* may have been misleading to protect *THEIR* commercial endeavors quote ON4UN's book is minimally useful since his sources dont reveal the details and appear to deliberately have misleading statements at times. Probably to protect their commercial endeavors. /quote GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 7/2/2012 9:07 PM, Tom W8JI wrote: ON4UN's book is minimally useful since his sources dont reveal the details and appear to deliberately have misleading statements at times. Probably to protect their commercial endeavors. It is not good fellowship, or good manners, to accuse someone as helpful as ON4UN of intentionally lying or misleading people. John, ON4UN, is genuinely helpful to people, and does the best job he can collecting, understanding, and sorting data. What he publishes might not be perfect, but at least he makes an effort to put hundreds and hundreds of hours into a book to encourage people, rather than sitting around insulting other people. 73 Tom ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: Summer Stew Results...
I ended up with 12 contacts for the whole night not to shabby for 6w ERP from a 7' tall Hi-Q Screwdriver @ 20' w/16 radials ea 13' long. Out of the 12 contacts, 2 were ~400km, 2 were ~600km, 4 were ~1100km, 1 was ~1700km, and 3 were over 2000km. I basically worked every one I could hear, with the exception of a few (4-5) that I heard answering other folks cq's, but never heard them anywhere calling cq themselves. -- GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 6/17/2012 8:15 PM, Jim F. wrote: I operated about 2 hours in the Stew but enjoyed it to the max. Congratulations to the very patient operators ( esp. N4IS) who copied W1FMR/QRP. I was impressed with the N4IS receiving antenna seen on QRZ.com and his 1/4 wave vertical. Stations that copied my 5w. signal: K2TTT234.4 mi W6XR277.7 mi K1GQ38.7 mi NO3M452.5 mi VE3TA465.5 mi K1ZO 71.0 mi K2CBI192.0 mi VE9HF292.7 mi W2XL 180.2 mi AB1OD 118.5 mi W3GH477.1 mi N4IS 1287.8 mi N4PN986.7 mi VE3OSZ284.2 mi K1LT 650.0 mi N3QE427.0 mi K7CS438.5 mi TX/RX antenna is an inv. L with misc. length radials and progressing slowly on a (K2AV and W0UCE) FCP. 73, Jim / W1FMR - NH ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: Summer Stew Results...
translated into miles :-) KB5NJD 245mi WD5R 640mi N7DF 244mi K7CA 800mi N03M1308mi N0TT 650mi W5XZ 359mi KG7H1448mi N3RN1090mi K9YC1321mi NM5S 361mi KI0I 593mi GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 6/17/2012 9:17 PM, Sam Morgan wrote: I ended up with 12 contacts for the whole night not to shabby for 6w ERP from a 7' tall Hi-Q Screwdriver @ 20' w/16 radials ea 13' long. Out of the 12 contacts, 2 were ~400km, 2 were ~600km, 4 were ~1100km, 1 was ~1700km, and 3 were over 2000km. I basically worked every one I could hear, with the exception of a few (4-5) that I heard answering other folks cq's, but never heard them anywhere calling cq themselves. -- GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 6/17/2012 8:15 PM, Jim F. wrote: I operated about 2 hours in the Stew but enjoyed it to the max. Congratulations to the very patient operators ( esp. N4IS) who copied W1FMR/QRP. I was impressed with the N4IS receiving antenna seen on QRZ.com and his 1/4 wave vertical. Stations that copied my 5w. signal: K2TTT234.4 mi W6XR277.7 mi K1GQ38.7 mi NO3M452.5 mi VE3TA465.5 mi K1ZO 71.0 mi K2CBI192.0 mi VE9HF292.7 mi W2XL 180.2 mi AB1OD 118.5 mi W3GH477.1 mi N4IS 1287.8 mi N4PN986.7 mi VE3OSZ284.2 mi K1LT 650.0 mi N3QE427.0 mi K7CS438.5 mi TX/RX antenna is an inv. L with misc. length radials and progressing slowly on a (K2AV and W0UCE) FCP. 73, Jim / W1FMR - NH ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: Receiving loops
oops, did I forget to mention my S-9 24/7 noise floor, my bad -- GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 6/16/2012 9:46 AM, Sam Morgan wrote: you want to talk alligators try a 7' tall vertical @ 20' as your only TX/RX antenna and a bottom floor apartment, where I might try a 6' loop if I can build it in the next few hours, hi hi gud luck Tim GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 6/16/2012 8:28 AM, Shoppa, Tim wrote: I want to try a new receiving antenna for the summer Stew Perry. Last winter was my first foray onto 160M and I really felt like an alligator. I could work everyone I could hear, with just 100W. I think that means I need a better receive antenna. If you look at my score in the winter Stew Perry I think I did great QSO-number wise, but my average distance was very poor, I'm guessing typical alligator. ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: Stew Perry, Summer Edition, less than 24 hours away!
slightly OT I'm looking for a link to a web site that will show me a continuous map covering the time from now through when the Stew Perry is over. Why? I'm trying to decide whither to run QRP or LOW power my decision will be determined by what the map shows as far as what part of the states are predicted to have thunderboomers or not during the night time hours of the Stew -- GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 6/15/2012 12:39 PM, Brian Moran wrote: 160meters. 14 operating hours. Starts at 1500z tomorrow. http://jzap.com/k7rat/stew.html -Brian N9ADG ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: Stew Perry, Summer Edition, less than 24 hours away!
the closest I have found is this *STATIC* map forecast for 48 hours out that's 8pm Sat. night what I was hoping for was a map similar to this that was moving through time (scrolling) from now through Sunday 1500z you have seen radar maps that show the last 4-8 hours to now I'm looking for a forecast display, like that covering from now through the end of the Stew Perry or really just covering where and how bad the storms will be from sunset Sat. through sunrise Sun. of the Stew Perry P.S. I have DX Atlas and also VOA Prop I'm not really looking for the daylight/dark times nor the rf propagation guestimates I'm trying to figure out if I want to run 5w QRP which for me means 300mw ERP or 100w LOW power which for me would mean 6w ERP if there are going to be major thunderstorm weather over most of the US then I might as well run 6w and forget the 300mw QRP attempt -- GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 6/15/2012 6:22 PM, Sam Morgan wrote: slightly OT I'm looking for a link to a web site that will show me a continuous map covering the time from now through when the Stew Perry is over. Why? I'm trying to decide whither to run QRP or LOW power my decision will be determined by what the map shows as far as what part of the states are predicted to have thunderboomers or not during the night time hours of the Stew -- GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 6/15/2012 12:39 PM, Brian Moran wrote: 160meters. 14 operating hours. Starts at 1500z tomorrow. http://jzap.com/k7rat/stew.html -Brian N9ADG ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: Stew Perry, Summer Edition, less than 24 hours away!
http://www.intellicast.com/National/Surface/Forecast48.aspx GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 6/15/2012 9:18 PM, Sam Morgan wrote: the closest I have found is this *STATIC* map forecast for 48 hours out that's 8pm Sat. night what I was hoping for was a map similar to this that was moving through time (scrolling) from now through Sunday 1500z you have seen radar maps that show the last 4-8 hours to now I'm looking for a forecast display, like that covering from now through the end of the Stew Perry or really just covering where and how bad the storms will be from sunset Sat. through sunrise Sun. of the Stew Perry P.S. I have DX Atlas and also VOA Prop I'm not really looking for the daylight/dark times nor the rf propagation guestimates I'm trying to figure out if I want to run 5w QRP which for me means 300mw ERP or 100w LOW power which for me would mean 6w ERP if there are going to be major thunderstorm weather over most of the US then I might as well run 6w and forget the 300mw QRP attempt -- GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 6/15/2012 6:22 PM, Sam Morgan wrote: slightly OT I'm looking for a link to a web site that will show me a continuous map covering the time from now through when the Stew Perry is over. Why? I'm trying to decide whither to run QRP or LOW power my decision will be determined by what the map shows as far as what part of the states are predicted to have thunderboomers or not during the night time hours of the Stew -- GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 6/15/2012 12:39 PM, Brian Moran wrote: 160meters. 14 operating hours. Starts at 1500z tomorrow. http://jzap.com/k7rat/stew.html -Brian N9ADG ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK . ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: Home Depot LED bulb interference.
brand name and model numbers would be helpful please GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 4/5/2012 10:21 AM, Jim F. wrote: I bought two LED 40 watt equivalent 110V. light bulbs from Home Depot that use only 9 watts of power, for $9.99 ea. They seemed like a good deal but cause noise interference on 160m and the FM radio band. (I did not try other bands.) I like the bulbs but best use them away from your radio station and have someone turn them off and on while monitoring your favorite frequencies/bands. 73, jim / W1FMR ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Topband: new 160m propagation prediction software
the following is an excerpt from the ARLP013 Propagation de K7RA From Tad Cook, K7RA Seattle, WA March 30, 2012 quote Q-up Now has a fascinating new set of real-time propagation tools at http://www.q-upnow.com/, developed by a team associated with the Utah State University Space Weather Center (http://spaceweather.usu.edu/) in Logan, Utah. They use a real-time model of the ionosphere called GAIM (Global Assimilation of Ionospheric Measurements) which is updated every 15 minutes with 10,000 global TEC (Total Electron Content) measurements to simulate the F layers. Then they use the ABBYNormal Model (see http://gcmd.nasa.gov/records/abbyNormal.html) to model the D and E layers, and the two models are combined to give a complete representation of the global ionosphere. On the first page you will see NVIS maps for Near Vertical Incidence Skywave propagation. These are not quite ready yet, and currently the maps shown are several days old. Most interesting is the HF Availability (http://www.q-upnow.com/hf-availability) area in which you can model real-time propagation for the frequency of your choice between any two points and beyond out to the antipodes. You can use latitude/longitude coordinates, but I found it easiest to just copy grid square data from callsign servers such as http://www.qrz.com. This tool also works on 160 meters, which the propagation prediction programs that many of us use do not. Of course the major difference with this tool is that it tells you what the propagation should be over any path right now, but they are planning on offering a predictive tool. /quote -- GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Topband: K3 specific 'how to hear through static crashes?'
On 3/27/2012 11:50 AM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote: Clues to what to do with a K3? I'm also interested in what other K3 owners are doing to combat our summer time static crash receive problems? My situation is such that my TX and RX antenna are the same, so, I am NOT asking about various Low Noise antennas used with their K3s just interested in the AGC and AF/RF gain and ATT settings Specifically with their K3 configuration settings for AGC DCY HLD PLS SLP THR -S and -F are something I can try here TIA -- GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: July Stew Perry Please!!!!
I know I tried very hard to participate last year, mother nature had it in for us here in WTX DM91sk if you check that list there were only two '5's listed one was in MS the other in KY but I'll for sure give it another try this year any Stew Perry test, any time, QRPers will be there if thunderstorms permit that is P.S. if you are a QRPer you know the Stew Perry is the ONLY contest 160m or anywhere, that we are treated with any respect by the rest of hamdom. You have it we will come! Nuff said -- GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 3/18/2012 12:01 PM, Tree wrote: Think of the June Stew as an activity night. No weekend is going to be without conflicts - but maybe the die hard 160 types will show up and hand out some QSOs. Here are the results from last year: http://web.jzap.com/k7rat/SummerStew2011.txt The top QSO total was 94 QSOs. Not a lot - but more than you would have worked on most other evenings.:-) This was the first running of the event - so hopefully, there will be a bit more activity the second time. ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: TB season
are there any plans for a Jine Stew Perry this year? last year it was on 1500Z, Jun 18 to 1500Z, Jun 19, 2011 GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 3/16/2012 10:09 AM, DAVID CUTHBERT wrote: I think we need a July contest. Dave WX7G ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: Propagation last evening
I started about dark_30 here in West Texas all I could hear was 4 other TX stations calling CQ First I tried them with 5w, I wanted to work the contest QRP no responses so I went up to 100w, still nothing so I watched some TV until about 10pm lots of (stateside) stations all over the band by now again no responses to my attempts to answer their CQ's, again with 100w. all the stations I heard were in states I had worked b4 when running QRP in the previous CW contests conclusion reached I will not be wasting my time in any 160m SSB contests either you can't be heard unless you run a kw or ssb ops aren't listening for anything down in the weeds that isn't received on a beverage pointed away from the US or doesn't have an exotic call sign tisk tisk, their loss, but not to worry its the 1st weekend of the NASCAR season c all you cw ops again for the mid year Stew Perry -- GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 2/25/2012 1:07 PM, chacuff wrote: Anyone care to comment on last evenings propagation for the CQ SSB contest? From the deep south there just was no DX going on. Spots were very slim as well... I'd be curious what others experienced... Cecil K5DL ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: Operations...
I'll probably get many saying the following just isn't true but I can't ever (last 5 yrs) remember hearing a cw ragchew on 160m all I ever hear is the big gun CQ DXer's on CW and being antenna/power limited, using the same TX antenna for RX I never even hear who they are talking to. I did manage the T32C guys, but that was a credit to their excellent operating skills and RX antennas! I do often participate in a morning SSB group that covers much of WTX of course I have to run the amp to do that, but that's ok and I have made two JT65 contacts in the last 2 weeks (new mode for me) that about covers my 160m ops from my city apartment in WTX. YMMV -- GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 12/21/2011 8:07 AM, Bill Cromwell wrote: Hi, I have been slowly wading into the 160 meter CW waters since the Stew. I'm retired and don't really have a schedule. I am up early mornings...listening well before sunrise at oh dark thirty and sometimes in the evenings. I sometimes do hear other hams on 160 calling for DX from the US or on SSB. I presently have only CW capability on 160. I have been calling CQ more and it occurred to me to look at the reverse beacon network. There were no hits this morning after calling from 12:35Z to 12:45Z and again from 13:15Z to 13:30Z (just around local sunrise) after taking the big dog for a walk. I looked at the list of stations and found only two of them covering 160 and neither in North America. I would have been thrilled to hit their receivers with my 35 watts but no real surprise there. I was at 1809 and 1808 when I called. Maybe their receivers were set for some other part of the band..perhaps for DX. snip anyway. I know from the Stew that my station is getting results. I'll be trying a call early mornings and into the evenings as many days as I can to try and find the most productive times. I'm not a DX hound but I have certainly enjoyed chewing the rag with DX hams. 73, Bill KU8H ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: Noise problem question
I haven't built or used one, yet but I have often thought it might be a good idea to put a laser on one, kinda like pointing a weapon with a laser GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 12/21/2011 4:04 PM, W2PM wrote: I have used one which the ARRL RF lab brought down here to address a very serious problem. We were able to identify the BOLT on the insulators where arcing was coming from, photograph it, attach both the audio file and the spectral display unique to each offender and the power company still reneged. Until FCC saw this and that was the end of the power company resistance. Problem fixed. Those devices are not easy to aim however. You need a steady hand and lots of patience. On Dec 21, 2011, at 4:10 PM, John G3PQAg3...@onetel.com wrote: On 12/18/2011 2:36 PM, Dave W5UN wrote: I'm looking for input from someone who has experienced a similar situation as I describe below. About 3 months ago I began experiencing severe noise on top band. It's a constant white noise which begins to drop off above 2.5 mHz, On 12/20/2011 2:30 PM, David Raymond wrote: Jon. . .great advice, particularly about going to higher frequencies as you get closer to the noise source. We've spent considerable time chasing noise at our contest station. I addition to using RF we also use a high range audio device with a highly directional dish antenna which listens in the 20 - 40 KHz range. It is an excellent tool to have in the arsenal when you get in close (say, 100 yards or so). You can usually pinpoint the noise right down to the specific insulator, lightning arrestor, etc. In some cases it would be worth borrowing one. 73. .. Dave W0FLS (Jon, AA1K): tnx info Dave where can those be had? For those who wish to build an ultrasonic detector (or in the absence of DX locate bats!) an article was published by ARRL in 2006 http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Technology/PLN/Ultrasonic_Pinpointer.pdf I have built a couple of this design using the Far Circuits pcb and they work well, needs a small parabolic dish and piezo electric detector at its focal point. Also I should mention that Jerry K4SAV has designed some improvements in sensistivity and mixing if needed. re. Dave's noise problem, it sounds bad , not the usual switchmode etc. we suffer on 160m.. Any progress Dave? 73 John G3PQA ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Topband: QRN forecast conditions for Saturday night's Stew Perry
Maybe there is hope for this year's (lack of) thunderstorm conditions. I was trying to decide if I will be running QRP or Low power and ran across this forecast. DAY 2 CONVECTIVE OUTLOOK NWS STORM PREDICTION CENTER NORMAN OK 1124 AM CST FRI DEC 16 2011 VALID 171200Z - 181200Z ...NO SVR TSTM AREAS FORECAST... http://www.spc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/outlook/day2otlk.html Yippie, QRP 5w out of the rig 300mw off the antenna it is. -- GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: Balun Design FCP XFMR Broken Link Repaired.
just add the ail on the end of the broken link in your browser GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 12/15/2011 3:55 PM, Wayne Kline wrote: Nope Still Broke Wayne W3EA From: w0...@nc.rr.com To: topband@contesting.com Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:47:42 -0500 Subject: Topband: Balun Design FCP XFMR Broken Link Repaired. http://www.balundesigns.com/servlet/the-108/1-cln-1-High-Isolation-balun/Det ail The link in my previous e-mail was broken - this one works - Sorry Gang. See you in SP this weekend. 73, Jack ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: An observation about Topband contesting technique
since I have a very weak signal (24w ERP from a 7' tall vertical) when I get ask for a repeat of my call I send it again at the original speed but 90% of the time I end up having to repeat more than once and them may even have to reduce my speed to ~13wpm then I finally have my call copied perhaps what you are running into is someone who is tired of the 3-4 intermediate attempts at normal speeds and just cuts to the chase and reduces speed to get it done more quickly? -- GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 12/4/2011 7:41 PM, Steven Raas wrote: Here is one thing that REALLY irks me ( any contest definitely not TB specific ) I cq.. I get a weak reply.. I send ? or __? or w/e i need to.. and they CHANGE THEIR SPEED..or they slow down from 25 WPM to 10 wpm..REALLY? I wouldn't CQ @ a WPM that I couldn't copy a call @ 99,1 % of the time @ the same speed with a marginal to light signal ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: cq 160
I run into that problem they just keep calling without space between cq's. often myself. My guesses are, they are either not even listening, just trying to keep their claim to that frequency by the never ending cq's. I say it that way, because they don't seem to even leave enough space between their never ending, automated cq's, to even hear a station if they was one attempting to answer. Or maybe they have some really good directional antennas and are listening towards some part of the globe I'm not on, hi hi. Then again it could be their receive capabilities are being limited by QRN/QRM that I can't hear. But it is pretty upsetting when you have waited until the big gun stations are in bed, so you will not have to compete with them in the pileups, and can hear the station calling cq so well, and yet it seems your answers to their endless calls are being ignored. You are not alone Jimmy. GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 12/3/2011 4:38 PM, james soto wrote: Been testing the inverted L that i install few weeks ago.last night work couple caribbean stations and also few north american .band been pretty noisy at this end.but this morning was less noisy. work few VE and north america pretty easy , i just run 100 watts( no amplifier ). I notice that few north american station with real good signal here (kp2 - st croix), were not copying they just keep calling without space between cq's. kp2bh/ kp2dx jimmy ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: 160m antenna test
I have had some questions about what frequency(s) I plan to operate I usually do SP, since I doubt my abilities to hold a frequency with 300mw I considered trying to set a range, maybe the some where around the QRP frequencies 1810 1812 but if I remember correctly the band tends to fill up from the bottom up and many of the big guns tend to hang out there staking claim on those frequencies...? I also considered doing SP most of the time and selecting a frequency(s) like 1810 to 1812 and trying to find a run frequency there at certain times like perhaps @ 15 and 45 past the hour? I'm open for suggestions how I might get the most out of the band in the times from SS -1hr to SR +2-3 hrs ? TIA -- GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 10/21/2011 2:03 PM, Sam Morgan wrote: For those wishing to give their RX antennas a real world test I will be operating QRP in the Pre Stew Perry this weekend, from DM91, central West Texas, San Angelo to be specific. Now for the added treat, my 5w qrp signal, will be transmitted from a 7' tall Hi-Q 6/160 antenna, mounted @ 20' with 16 radials, ea 13' long. At the claimed 6% efficiency, that means my ERP should be about 300mw. Operating times will be from SS -1hr to SR +2-3 hrs or about 2300 UTC Sat - 1600 UTC Sun a couple of hrs sleep may be optional depends if the contacts go dead after 3-4am local CDT 8-9 UTC Good luck, hope to be in your logs by contests end on Sunday P.S. how active the results of this Pre Stew Perry are, will help decide if I will operate QRP 5w x %6=300mw or 100w x 6%=6w in the Stew Perry it's great to give out the QRP/s times 4 contact points, but if the number of QSO's is so low, as to be boring... (pun intended, hi hi) I may have to opt for running as a big gun QRO 100w x 6%=6w tx signal in the November Stew Perry and only be worth 2 contact points. your log entry will help decide, TIA ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Re: Topband: Topband report - QRN extreme
noise, you want to talk noise.? http://pages.suddenlink.net/k5oai/2011-rfi-noise.html GB 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 1/6/2011 11:57 PM, Mark Lunday wrote: Wow, the QRN is deafening. I can hear F5IN at his sunrise 599 to 10 over, but the static is jumping to 20 over on my inverted L. Never heard anything this extreme in winter. It's bad on 40 and 80 also. Obviously due to the geo storm in progress. I will be putting up my very first beverage this weekend. Hoping that it is less susceptible to this type of QRN. Mark Lunday WD4ELG ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK