Re: Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu.
I my very limited experience with digital 160, I have found that I have to run more than the usual power for such, since I am using a very poor inverted L antenna for transmit. That said, with 50 watts I have managed to work 7 countries, in 2 continents. And that is with limited operating time. 73 es DX Art W1AER On 3/17/2017 2:38 PM, Pete Rimmel N8PR wrote: I have to disagree with some of what has been said about how much power to run using JT65. JT65 is a LOW SIGNAL mode, NOT a LOW POWER mode. We run 1500 watts into 20+ dB gain antennas on 2 meters for EME. Signals coming back from the moon vary between –10 and –29 dB Why limit yourself on 160 meters? When JT65 HF was just getting started on 160, I called CQ on 160 using 1 KW+ and Andre, V51B, sent me an eMail that he heard me –23, but I did not hear him. The difference? He was calling me with 100 watts or less, and I was using 1 KW+ into a full 1/4 wave vertical with 32 radials under it. My receive antenna is a Waller Flag which can rotate between H Pol and V Pol. -23 is a low signal, even though I was running close to the legal limit. SO... What is best, to run 50 watts and work no one or run power and be heard, even if only –23? You tell me. 73, PeteR N8PR With DXCC+ on both 160 and 2 meters. (and every band in between except 60) _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband -- Art Roberts W1AER Tariffville, CT FN31ov JT9 and JT65 _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu.
I have to disagree with some of what has been said about how much power to run using JT65. JT65 is a LOW SIGNAL mode, NOT a LOW POWER mode. We run 1500 watts into 20+ dB gain antennas on 2 meters for EME. Signals coming back from the moon vary between –10 and –29 dB Why limit yourself on 160 meters? When JT65 HF was just getting started on 160, I called CQ on 160 using 1 KW+ and Andre, V51B, sent me an eMail that he heard me –23, but I did not hear him. The difference? He was calling me with 100 watts or less, and I was using 1 KW+ into a full 1/4 wave vertical with 32 radials under it. My receive antenna is a Waller Flag which can rotate between H Pol and V Pol. -23 is a low signal, even though I was running close to the legal limit. SO... What is best, to run 50 watts and work no one or run power and be heard, even if only –23? You tell me. 73, PeteR N8PR With DXCC+ on both 160 and 2 meters. (and every band in between except 60) _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu.
While watching the waterfall for "spreading" on 160 and 80, Lee I've seen similar "results." My operating "mode"now is: 160: 25 to 30 watts set wid no ALC "ficker" 80: 30 to 50 watts set wid no 'flicker' Note: I run the 'mike input' control to a high enuff input I'll need to "back of" the alc adjust control (on the main screen, right hand side) to get the 'power out' indicator on the KX3 power 'down to' the final output number/value I've settled on. I have worked VKs and JAs on 160 and 80 with these settings. 72/73 de Jim Rodenkirch K9JWV From: Topband on behalf of KX4TT via Topband Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 7:05 AM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu. I've used 100 watts on 160 - by accident, as I forgot to turn down the drive - I discovered that decoding can be a real problem at high power levels. I've seen signals from a station 30 miles (50 km) away that wouldn't decode because of spreading. I believe the main goal is to have little or no ALC action on your transmission; Therefore, I will run up to 50W on 160 and even 80, but with zero ALC indication (I adjust the audio levels down to just under any ALC deflection). On 40 and up, I stick to 20W most of the time (occasionally 30W)...JT modes are great for 160, but I still prefer CW, the original digital mode... -) 73 es GUD DX de Lee KX4TT Citando Jorge Diez - CX6VM : > Hello > > so how much power to use in JT65 on 160 mts for DX ? > > 15-25 watts in OK on high bands, but how much pwr people are using on > 160 mts? > > thanks, > Jorge > _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu.
Brian Pease wrote: > JT-65 is a QRP mode, like WSPR where I use10W. High power can ruin it for > everyone else. Read the documentation. > It is NOT a QRP mode, it is a weak signal mode, not the same thing. On 160 often a QRO mode to give a weak signal at the other end. I usually use 40w to an inefficient antenna on 160. If necessary I up the power to legal maximum. -- Brian D G3VGZ _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu.
JT-65 is a QRP mode, like WSPR where I use10W. High power can ruin it for everyone else. Read the documentation. On 3/17/2017 8:36 AM, Lennart m wrote: I do not agree with you Pedro. More is not always better. Use no more than you need. JT65 allows more noise than does CW, thus one doesn’t need as much power. 73 Len SM7BIC -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] För CT1EKD Skickat: den 17 mars 2017 12:50 Till: topband@contesting.com Ämne: Re: Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu. Hi Jorge Hi Jorge JT65 is no diferent from CW or SSB, more power is better...use no more than 50% of your amplifier power, if you have an extra fan use it on top of your amplifier.. Pedro - ct1ekd Citando Jorge Diez - CX6VM : Hello so how much power to use in JT65 on 160 mts for DX ? 15-25 watts in OK on high bands, but how much pwr people are using on 160 mts? thanks, Jorge 2015-09-12 14:51 GMT-03:00 Jim Brown : On Sat,9/12/2015 7:33 AM, Mike Waters wrote: How much of this was JT9? Is it ALL JT65? It's all JT65. Notice all the CQs going unanswered. Except for the Ukraine station, those EU stations all had pretty good signals at your QTH, good enough that some of the guys in W1/W2 should have copied them if they had decent ears. One of the issues with JT65 and JT9 is that many stations using it are running QRP into wet strings, and they can't hear. A year or so ago, I ran a sked with a guy in ND or SD running 20W or so. I copied him just fine, but had to crank the amp to 400W to get him to hear me. The quality of the A/D converter also matters a lot. A good outboard sound card will decode 10-12 dB further down into the noise than the sound cards built into most computers. 73, Jim K9YC _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband -- 73, Jorge CX6VM/CW5W _Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu.
I've used 100 watts on 160 - by accident, as I forgot to turn down the drive - I discovered that decoding can be a real problem at high power levels. I've seen signals from a station 30 miles (50 km) away that wouldn't decode because of spreading. I believe the main goal is to have little or no ALC action on your transmission; Therefore, I will run up to 50W on 160 and even 80, but with zero ALC indication (I adjust the audio levels down to just under any ALC deflection). On 40 and up, I stick to 20W most of the time (occasionally 30W)...JT modes are great for 160, but I still prefer CW, the original digital mode... -) 73 es GUD DX de Lee KX4TT Citando Jorge Diez - CX6VM : > Hello > > so how much power to use in JT65 on 160 mts for DX ? > > 15-25 watts in OK on high bands, but how much pwr people are using on > 160 mts? > > thanks, > Jorge > _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu.
I do not agree with you Pedro. More is not always better. Use no more than you need. JT65 allows more noise than does CW, thus one doesn’t need as much power. 73 Len SM7BIC -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] För CT1EKD Skickat: den 17 mars 2017 12:50 Till: topband@contesting.com Ämne: Re: Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu. Hi Jorge Hi Jorge JT65 is no diferent from CW or SSB, more power is better...use no more than 50% of your amplifier power, if you have an extra fan use it on top of your amplifier.. Pedro - ct1ekd Citando Jorge Diez - CX6VM : > Hello > > so how much power to use in JT65 on 160 mts for DX ? > > 15-25 watts in OK on high bands, but how much pwr people are using on > 160 mts? > > thanks, > Jorge > > 2015-09-12 14:51 GMT-03:00 Jim Brown : >> On Sat,9/12/2015 7:33 AM, Mike Waters wrote: >>> How much of this was JT9? Is it ALL JT65? >> >> It's all JT65. >> >> Notice all the CQs going unanswered. Except for the Ukraine station, >> those EU stations all had pretty good signals at your QTH, good >> enough that some of the guys in W1/W2 should have copied them if they had >> decent ears. >> >> One of the issues with JT65 and JT9 is that many stations using it >> are running QRP into wet strings, and they can't hear. A year or so >> ago, I ran a sked with a guy in ND or SD running 20W or so. I copied >> him just fine, but had to crank the amp to 400W to get him to hear me. >> >> The quality of the A/D converter also matters a lot. A good outboard >> sound card will decode 10-12 dB further down into the noise than the >> sound cards built into most computers. >> >> 73, Jim K9YC >> >> _ >> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband > > -- > 73, > Jorge > CX6VM/CW5W > _Topband Reflector Archives - > http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu.
Hi Jorge Hi Jorge JT65 is no diferent from CW or SSB, more power is better...use no more than 50% of your amplifier power, if you have an extra fan use it on top of your amplifier.. Pedro - ct1ekd Citando Jorge Diez - CX6VM : Hello so how much power to use in JT65 on 160 mts for DX ? 15-25 watts in OK on high bands, but how much pwr people are using on 160 mts? thanks, Jorge 2015-09-12 14:51 GMT-03:00 Jim Brown : On Sat,9/12/2015 7:33 AM, Mike Waters wrote: How much of this was JT9? Is it ALL JT65? It's all JT65. Notice all the CQs going unanswered. Except for the Ukraine station, those EU stations all had pretty good signals at your QTH, good enough that some of the guys in W1/W2 should have copied them if they had decent ears. One of the issues with JT65 and JT9 is that many stations using it are running QRP into wet strings, and they can't hear. A year or so ago, I ran a sked with a guy in ND or SD running 20W or so. I copied him just fine, but had to crank the amp to 400W to get him to hear me. The quality of the A/D converter also matters a lot. A good outboard sound card will decode 10-12 dB further down into the noise than the sound cards built into most computers. 73, Jim K9YC _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband -- 73, Jorge CX6VM/CW5W _Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu.
Hello so how much power to use in JT65 on 160 mts for DX ? 15-25 watts in OK on high bands, but how much pwr people are using on 160 mts? thanks, Jorge 2015-09-12 14:51 GMT-03:00 Jim Brown : > On Sat,9/12/2015 7:33 AM, Mike Waters wrote: > >> How much of this was JT9? Is it ALL JT65? >> > > It's all JT65. > > Notice all the CQs going unanswered. Except for the Ukraine station, those > EU stations all had pretty good signals at your QTH, good enough that some > of the guys in W1/W2 should have copied them if they had decent ears. > > One of the issues with JT65 and JT9 is that many stations using it are > running QRP into wet strings, and they can't hear. A year or so ago, I ran > a sked with a guy in ND or SD running 20W or so. I copied him just fine, > but had to crank the amp to 400W to get him to hear me. > > The quality of the A/D converter also matters a lot. A good outboard sound > card will decode 10-12 dB further down into the noise than the sound cards > built into most computers. > > 73, Jim K9YC > > _ > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband > -- 73, Jorge CX6VM/CW5W _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu.
I have had many across the pond WSPR reports over the years. I'll have to give JT65 a try as well. Mike va3mw On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Mike Waters wrote: > Thanks, Jim. Maybe I'll stick with WSPR, at least for awhile. Per the Sept. > 10 thread about VK2KRR, there seems to be some 160m activity on that mode. > > I've enjoyed WSPR in the past, but the Linux version of the software I was > using at the time would crash at odd intervals. Hopefully, downloading the > latest version will solve that. > > I do have a good sound card. It's an older Creative Labs PCI card, but it's > proven to be as good as they get for digging the weakest signals out of the > noise. > > 73, Mike > www.w0btu.com > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Jim Brown > wrote: > > > On Sat,9/12/2015 7:33 AM, Mike Waters wrote: > > > >> How much of this was JT9? Is it ALL JT65? > >> > > > > It's all JT65. > > > > Notice all the CQs going unanswered. ... many stations using it are > > running QRP into wet strings, and they can't hear. > > ... The quality of the A/D converter also matters a lot. A good outboard > > sound card will decode 10-12 dB further down into the noise than the > sound > > cards built into most computers. > > > _ > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband > _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu.
Thanks, Jim. Maybe I'll stick with WSPR, at least for awhile. Per the Sept. 10 thread about VK2KRR, there seems to be some 160m activity on that mode. I've enjoyed WSPR in the past, but the Linux version of the software I was using at the time would crash at odd intervals. Hopefully, downloading the latest version will solve that. I do have a good sound card. It's an older Creative Labs PCI card, but it's proven to be as good as they get for digging the weakest signals out of the noise. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Jim Brown wrote: > On Sat,9/12/2015 7:33 AM, Mike Waters wrote: > >> How much of this was JT9? Is it ALL JT65? >> > > It's all JT65. > > Notice all the CQs going unanswered. ... many stations using it are > running QRP into wet strings, and they can't hear. > ... The quality of the A/D converter also matters a lot. A good outboard > sound card will decode 10-12 dB further down into the noise than the sound > cards built into most computers. > _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu.
On Sat,9/12/2015 7:33 AM, Mike Waters wrote: How much of this was JT9? Is it ALL JT65? It's all JT65. Notice all the CQs going unanswered. Except for the Ukraine station, those EU stations all had pretty good signals at your QTH, good enough that some of the guys in W1/W2 should have copied them if they had decent ears. One of the issues with JT65 and JT9 is that many stations using it are running QRP into wet strings, and they can't hear. A year or so ago, I ran a sked with a guy in ND or SD running 20W or so. I copied him just fine, but had to crank the amp to 400W to get him to hear me. The quality of the A/D converter also matters a lot. A good outboard sound card will decode 10-12 dB further down into the noise than the sound cards built into most computers. 73, Jim K9YC _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu.
I think a majority of it is JT65A, but as guys discover that JT9 uses so much less frequency they will migrate to it soon. There is a lot of activity every night so come join us. I recently worked VP8ALJ in Falkland Island with 40 watts and I never did that on 160m CW/SSB 73 W7JW -Original Message- From: Mike Waters Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 10:33 AM To: topband Subject: Re: Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu. How much of this was JT9? Is it ALL JT65? 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Re: Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu.
How much of this was JT9? Is it ALL JT65? 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu.
0108 -17 0.4 1234 # CQ K2QQ FN03 ~U. States 0110 -18 0.4 1230 # KC2YIL K2QQ -08 0112 -17 0.4 1225 # KC2YIL K2QQ RRR 0114 -18 0.4 1225 # KC2YIL K2QQ 73 0123 -7 0.4 1756 # CQ N2GZ FN31 ~U. States 0125 -5 0.4 1755 # WB4JWM N2GZ -16 0127 -8 0.2 1755 # WB4JWM N2GZ RRR 0128 -20 0.3 1045 # K9AAN KW2Y FN23 0129 -6 0.2 1754 # CQ N2GZ FN31 ~U. States 0130 -19 0.3 1045 # K9AAN KW2Y R-18 0131 -6 0.4 1754 # CQ N2GZ FN31 ~U. States 0132 -18 0.3 1045 # K9AAN TU 73 0133 -4 0.4 1754 # KX4P N2GZ -08 0135 -21 0.6 623 # CQ KC2YIL FN31 ~U. States 0135 -3 0.4 1754 # KX4P N2GZ RRR 0137 -23 0.4 623 # CQ KC2YIL FN31 ~U. States 0137 -2 0.4 1754 # CQ N2GZ FN31 ~U. States 0138 -20 0.3 1161 # CQ WU2M FN23 ~U. States 0139 -5 0.4 1754 # CQ N2GZ FN31 ~U. States 0140 -19 0.3 1161 # KX4P WU2M -13 0141 -19 0.5 620 # WB4JWM KC2YIL -15 0141 -6 0.4 1754 # WA9THI N2GZ -14 0142 -17 0.3 1161 # KX4P WU2M 73 0143 -19 0.5 620 # GD 2CU AGN 73 0143 -13 0.3 1013 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0143 -4 0.4 1754 # WA9THI N2GZ RRR 0145 -9 0.6 1013 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0145 -5 0.4 1754 # CQ N2GZ FN31 ~U. States 0146 -16 0.3 1161 # CQ WU2M FN23 ~U. States 0147 -10 0.5 1013 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0147 -6 0.5 1752 # N2MGT N2GZ -02 0149 -7 0.5 1013 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0149 -5 0.4 1752 # N2MGT N2GZ RRR 0150 -21 0.4 1503 # CQ KC2YIL FN31 ~U. States 0151 -8 0.5 1013 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0153 -7 0.4 1013 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0155 -5 0.5 1013 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0157 -5 0.2 1014 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0159 -6 0.5 1013 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0201 -3 0.5 1013 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russi 0203 -4 0.5 1013 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0204 -20 0.4 1264 # CQ K1CF FN43 ~U. States 0205 -3 0.6 1013 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0207 -4 0.6 1013 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0209 -2 0.4 1013 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0211 -3 0.5 1014 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0213 -3 0.5 904 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0215 -3 0.3 903 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0217 -5 0.5 904 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0219 -4 0.4 904 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0221 -4 0.8 904 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0223 -5 0.7 904 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0225 -5 0.5 904 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0227 -4 0.5 904 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0229 -6 0.5 904 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0230 -13 0.3 1580 # K4BX N3JXB FN20 0232 -7 0.5 904 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0232 -14 0.3 1580 # K4BX N3JXB R-09 0234 -8 0.5 904 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0234 -12 0.3 1580 # K4BX RR TU73 0236 -8 0.2 904 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0236 -19 0.1 1514 # CQ UT9LC KN89 !Ukraine 0237 -9 0.3 821 # K9AAN N3JXB FN20 0238 -10 0.2 904 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0238 -19 0.2 1514 # CQ UT9LC KN89 !Ukraine 0239 -12 0.3 821 # K9AAN N3JXB R-18 0240 -11 0.3 904 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0240 -19 0.2 1514 # CQ UT9LC KN89 !Ukraine 0241 -10 0.3 821 # TU JOHN 73 0242 -13 0.5 904 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0242 -15 0.2 1514 # CQ UT9LC KN89 !Ukraine 0244 -14 0.5 904 # CQ UA3DPM DX !E. Russia 0256 -6 0.8 1182 # CQ EW8W KO42 !Belarus 0258 -5 0.8 1182 # CQ EW8W KO42 !Belarus 0300 -4 0.8 1182 # CQ EW8W KO42 !Belarus 0302 -6 0.8 1181 # CQ EW8W KO42 !Belarus 0303 -15 0.4 1011 # CQ K1CF FN43 ~U. States 0304 -5 0.8 1181 # CQ EW8W KO42 !Belarus 0306 -16 0.4 1011 # CQ K1CF FN43 ~U. States 0306 -7 0.9 1181 # CQ EW8W KO42 !Belarus 0310 -15 0.4 1011 # CQ K1CF FN43 ~U. States 0318 -16 0.2 1284 # CQ IK4ADE JN54 !Italy 0320 -15 0.1 1284 # CQ IK4ADE JN54 !Italy 0333 -11 0.8 1284 # CQ IK4ADE JN54 !Italy 0335 -10 0.2 1284 # CQ IK4ADE JN54 !Italy 0343 -11 0.3 1284 # CQ IK4ADE JN54 !Italy 0345 -14 0.6 1284 # CQ IK4ADE JN54 !Italy 0347 -12 0.7 1284 # CQ IK4ADE JN54 !Italy 0357 -16 0.5 1284 # CQ IK4ADE JN54 !Italy 0359 -12 0.5 1284 # CQ IK4ADE JN54 !Italy 0401 -12 0.6 1284 # CQ IK4ADE JN54 !Italy 0403 -10 0.5 1284 # CQ IK4ADE JN54 !Italy 0405 -8 0.6 1284 # CQ IK4ADE JN54 !Italy 0407 -8 0.5 1284 # CQ IK4ADE JN54 !Italy 0409 -11 0.4 1284 # CQ IK4ADE JN54 !Italy 0414 -13 0.4 1284 # CQ IK4ADE JN54 !Italy 0416 -11 0.5 1292 # DO1AT IK4ADE -09 0418 -12 0.5 1292 # DO1AT IK4ADE RRR 0420 -10 0.4 1292 # DO1AT IK4ADE 73 0450 -19 0.9 1072 # CQ KF8YO EM88 ~U. States 0454 -19 0.9 1072 # CQ KF8YO EM88 ~U. States 0634 -9 0.3 1207 # CQ KA8G EN80 ~U. States 0636 -14 0.5 1207 # CQ KA8G EN80 ~U. States 0652 -8 0.5 1211 # CQ K2QQ FN03 ~U. States 0654 -9 0.5 1211 # CQ K2QQ FN03 ~U. States 0731 -9 0.3 1355 # CQ NC2O FM06 ~U. States 0733 -11 0.5 1355 # CQ NC2O FM06 ~U. States 0735 -10 0.5 1355 # CQ NC2
