Re: [topbraid-users] Re: Customize behavior of TreeDataProvider arg:onSelect
Jack; For general information on how forms work in SWA applications, including TopBraid EVN, you can see the SWA help pages from Composer by going to Help SWA Help/Examples. Section 3 is about Forms. Beneath the example that states "Personal Details of Robert F. Kennedy" is a couple of key paragraphs on using ui:instanceView form definitions with SWA applications. In particular, I suspect the following sentence s may be useful to you: " This in turn will insert a title (the name of the resource), and then use ui:resourceView with matchId="form" to find the most suitable form definition for the resource. In other words, if you want your form layout to be used, put ui:id="form" as an attribute to the ui:instanceView definition." -- Scott On 7/21/2014, 1:27 PM, Jack Hodges wrote: I believe that I am talking about the EVN editor. As I mentioned, I defined a ui:instanceView on a specific class, and gave it a higher priority than anything that shows up in rdfs:Resource, but it doesn't get selected and doesn't even show up in the pull down of possible views. I wonder if maybe I am still confused about how views are selected but thought that topbraid would only traverse up the hierarchy if it didn't find a ui:instanceView close to the class. In this case I have defined the ui:instanceView one level up from the class. Jack On Sunday, July 20, 2014 4:19:54 PM UTC-7, Holger Knublauch wrote: On 7/21/2014 1:22, Jack Hodges wrote: 3. It would be nice to have an undo history. The current undo seems to be a toggle (most current action). Most editors these days keep some history of actions that can be undone and that would be most helpful. Thanks for your feedback. On your item above, I don't quite understand what you mean. For example when I change an rdfs:label via TBC from "Label1" to "Label2" to "Label3" and then press undo, it will walk the whole change history backwards, not just toggle. So maybe you are talking about the Undo implemented in EVN? That is indeed just a toggle, because performing an "undo" will in fact create a forward entry in the teamwork change history. Holger -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include Enterprise Vocabulary Network (EVN), TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Insight, SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN. To post to this group, send email to topbraid-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group TopBraid Suite Users, the topics of which include Enterprise Vocabulary Network (EVN), TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Insight, SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN. To post to this group, send email to topbraid-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TopBraid Suite Users group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[topbraid-users] Anyone know this error: foo is not a URI node ???
I have been getting a bunch of these, related to SWP views. I am not doing anything special. My SWP SPARQL queries, and the views, test out fine in test cases and live, when they load. I also get a lot of timeouts on the views. Very weird, and frustrating. Also, when these errors occur, it seems as though topbraid is caching a lot of memory because the memory footprint grows to the max I have allocated and then it churns away on something, using a lot of cycles, until I give up and close the application. Before all of this happens it is 'fine'. Jack java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: 2b5e2a05:14759872fc6:3920 is not a URI node at com.hp.hpl.jena.graph.Node.getURI(Node.java:240) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.functions.internal.EncodeURLFunction.run(EncodeURLFunction.java:36) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.control.internal.CreateLinkControlElement.addArg(CreateLinkControlElement.java:65) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.control.internal.CreateLinkControlElement.addArgs(CreateLinkControlElement.java:56) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.control.internal.CreateLinkControlElement.run(CreateLinkControlElement.java:174) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:530) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:546) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodesFromPrototype(SWPEngine.java:601) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:525) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.control.internal.ElseControlElement.run(ElseControlElement.java:26) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:530) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:546) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:546) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.control.internal.IfControlElement.run(IfControlElement.java:25) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:530) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.control.internal.ForEachControlElement.run(ForEachControlElement.java:77) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:530) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:546) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:546) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:546) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:546) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodesFromPrototype(SWPEngine.java:601) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:525) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.control.internal.GroupControlElement.run(GroupControlElement.java:20) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:530) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodesFromPrototype(SWPEngine.java:601) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:525) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at
Re: [topbraid-users] Anyone know this error: foo is not a URI node ???
Looks like your code is calling ui:encodeURL for a blank node. This is not possible, so you'd need to surround that code with a ui:if or a SPARQL IF. Maybe you have code that iterates over all resources in the graph, including blank nodes of SPIN, SWP or OWL definitions. Holger On 7/22/2014 6:32, Jack Hodges wrote: I have been getting a bunch of these, related to SWP views. I am not doing anything special. My SWP SPARQL queries, and the views, test out fine in test cases and live, when they load. I also get a lot of timeouts on the views. Very weird, and frustrating. Also, when these errors occur, it seems as though topbraid is caching a lot of memory because the memory footprint grows to the max I have allocated and then it churns away on something, using a lot of cycles, until I give up and close the application. Before all of this happens it is 'fine'. Jack java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: 2b5e2a05:14759872fc6:3920 is not a URI node at com.hp.hpl.jena.graph.Node.getURI(Node.java:240) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.functions.internal.EncodeURLFunction.run(EncodeURLFunction.java:36) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.control.internal.CreateLinkControlElement.addArg(CreateLinkControlElement.java:65) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.control.internal.CreateLinkControlElement.addArgs(CreateLinkControlElement.java:56) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.control.internal.CreateLinkControlElement.run(CreateLinkControlElement.java:174) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:530) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:546) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodesFromPrototype(SWPEngine.java:601) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:525) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.control.internal.ElseControlElement.run(ElseControlElement.java:26) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:530) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:546) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:546) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.control.internal.IfControlElement.run(IfControlElement.java:25) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:530) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.control.internal.ForEachControlElement.run(ForEachControlElement.java:77) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:530) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:546) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:546) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:546) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:546) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodesFromPrototype(SWPEngine.java:601) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:525) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:489) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.addChildNodes(SWPEngine.java:289) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.control.internal.GroupControlElement.run(GroupControlElement.java:20) at org.topbraid.spin.swp.engine.SWPEngine.createNodes(SWPEngine.java:530) at
[topbraid-users] SPIN as a W3C Standard
Dear users, There has recently been renewed interest in making SPIN a W3C standard recommendation, and we would like to gather community feedback that could shape such a W3C working group. We would also like to encourage members of the SPIN user community to participate in the future working group. _Summary of the work to date and the current status:_ As some of you may know, TQ had submitted SPIN as a Member Submission [1] in 2011. Meanwhile we made further useability improvements to SPIN within TopBraid and made the open source SPIN API [2] available without strings attached so that it can be more widely used. Recently, the W3C began a process of forming a new working group on RDF Shapes [3]. The charter of this working group is to define a language to represent constraints that describe the structure of RDF graphs. We agree that this is an important topic, especially given that the current OWL standard cannot be used for that purpose due to the open world assumption. But we disagree and have concerns (shared by others) with the draft mission statement which proposes to use a completely new language called ShEx as its starting point. For the last 6 to 12 months ShEx has been an RD project. It has no vendor support, no customers and no users. It introduces new semantics and a new syntax. SPIN, on the other hand, has already been in practical use for many years, is supported by professional tools, has significant real life production implementations, aligns better with SPARQL and covers more use cases than the competing proposals. Furthermore, we strongly believe that adding yet another new language to the Semantic Web stack will make adoption more difficult and create confusion. As SPIN is based on SPARQL, it would be a more natural way of evolving and building on the existing stack of standards. As the proposed draft of the working group missions statement began to circulate more widely this month in the Semantic Web community, a lively discussion has started with a strong support for SPIN as the basis for the new standard and push back against introducing completely new language. With this, the mission statement for the working group is now being revised. _Request:_ We would like to hear from this community who would be interested in helping TopQuadrant make SPIN an official W3C standard recommendation. W3C working groups are driven by the participating organizations, so the more people we can get behind SPIN, the more likely will be an outcome that meets our collective needs. This is also an opportunity to shape the future direction of SPIN (and make some clean-up), and of course a chance to contribute to an official standard, which always looks good on a resume ;) If you are interested, please either contact me directly or continue this thread here. Regards Holger (on behalf of TQ) [1] http://www.w3.org/Submission/spin-overview/ [2] http://topbraid.org/spin/api/ [3] http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/charter -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group TopBraid Suite Users, the topics of which include Enterprise Vocabulary Network (EVN), TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Insight, SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN. To post to this group, send email to topbraid-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups TopBraid Suite Users group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
