Re: [tor-bugs] #20841 [Applications/Tor Browser Sandbox]: Come up with a better way of keeping the bridges in sync.

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#20841: Come up with a better way of keeping the bridges in sync.
--+-
 Reporter:  yawning   |  Owner:  yawning
 Type:  enhancement   | Status:  closed
 Priority:  Medium|  Milestone:
Component:  Applications/Tor Browser Sandbox  |Version:
 Severity:  Normal| Resolution:  wontfix
 Keywords:|  Actual Points:
Parent ID:| Points:
 Reviewer:|Sponsor:
--+-
Changes (by yawning):

 * status:  new => closed
 * resolution:   => wontfix


Comment:

 There is no better way, short of writing a fragile script or convincing
 the browser people to not store bridges as a series of javascript calls
 with hardcoded params.

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

[tor-bugs] #20841 [Applications/Tor Browser Sandbox]: Come up with a better way of keeping the bridges in sync.

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#20841: Come up with a better way of keeping the bridges in sync.
--+-
 Reporter:  yawning   |  Owner:  yawning
 Type:  enhancement   | Status:  new
 Priority:  Medium|  Milestone:
Component:  Applications/Tor Browser Sandbox  |Version:
 Severity:  Normal|   Keywords:
Actual Points:|  Parent ID:
   Points:|   Reviewer:
  Sponsor:|
--+-
 Since `sandboxed-tor-browser` doesn't use `torlauncher`, bridges contained
 in `bridge_prefs.js` need to be kept in sync with the json file that it
 uses for that information (`bridges.json`).

 This can and is being done by hand, but it's tedious and annoying, so this
 should be automated somehow.

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs