Re: [tor-dev] archive.is alternative for CFC addon

2016-10-09 Thread Jeff Burdges
On Sat, 2016-10-01 at 14:35 +0200, ban...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Since there were plans to use this service to circumvent Cloudflare 
> CAPTCHAs and now its behind Cloudflare itself (it requires users to 
> execute JS to access content) what alternative is planned for the 
> upcoming CFC addon?

There is a previous exchange on this list that looks relevant : 

On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 12:59 -0700, David Fifield wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 06:06:18PM +, Yawning Angel wrote:
> > I'll probably add support for other (user-configurable?) cached 
> > content providers when I have time.  The archive.is person doesn't 
> > seem to want to respond to e-mail, so asking them to optionally 
> > not set X-F-F, seems like it'll go absolutely nowhere.
> 
> This is some kind of meta-archive service. Their about page lists many
> web archives (some of the specialized):
> http://timetravel.mementoweb.org/about/
> http://www.mementoweb.org/guide/quick-intro/




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev


[tor-dev] archive.is alternative for CFC addon

2016-10-01 Thread bancfc
Since there were plans to use this service to circumvent Cloudflare 
CAPTCHAs and now its behind Cloudflare itself (it requires users to 
execute JS to access content) what alternative is planned for the 
upcoming CFC addon?



***

PS. My username was around long before this addon and is not related to 
it in any way.

___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev