Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 67, Issue 12

[grarpamp]

On 8/5/16, Flipchan  wrote:
> [bad netiquette]

When replying to digests...
- At minimum, change the subject to the original subject.
Optimally also include proper header threading.
Repliers should subscribe to per message distribution instead.
- Delete all content from the original except some minimum
needed to establish context to which you are replying,
instead of spamming out longquotes of already said longtext.
- Reply inline below each piece of context to which you are
replying, instead of top posting.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

[tor-relays] [PATCH] debian package upgrade restart issue

[nusenu]

> When upgrading, all running tor instances are stopped (not restarted, as 
> expected)

This might be your root-cause as well?

https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/issues/72

I'm generating instance names based on IP addresses_ORport (so they
contain "." and "_") and are therefore filtered by the generator.

Is it acceptable to add "." and "_" to the whitelist?

(patches attached)
23c23
< if echo "x$name" | grep -q '[^a-zA-Z0-9]' ||
---
> if echo "x$name" | grep -q '[^a-zA-Z0-9._]' ||
63c63
< if echo "x$name" | grep -q '[^a-zA-Z0-9]' ||
---
> if echo "x$name" | grep -q '[^a-zA-Z0-9._]' ||


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays