Re: [tor-relays] [tor-talk] 33c3 and tor?

[Nicolas Braud-Santoni]

On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 08:56:04AM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 02:37:19PM +0100, fatal wrote:
> > And will there be a tor relay operators meetup?
> 
> [...]
> I think there is no separate relay operators meeting, so relay
> operators are welcome in this workshop space too.

I was made to spontaneously organise one (after I asked a certain
Moritz if there would be one) on day 3 (Thursday), 10pm :

  https://events.ccc.de/congress/2016/wiki/Session:Tor_Relays_Operators_Meetup


We currently have hall C.2, which can host ~50 people, but I will try
to organise a larger venue based on the success of tomorrow's meetup.


Best, and hoping to see you there,

  nicoo


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Some problems with new Exit Node

[niftybunny]

Yes. Even with your own name server this will happen. You will get used to it, 
ignore it :)

Markus


> On 27 Dec 2016, at 22:59, Alan  wrote:
> 
> So I bit the bullet and started running an Exit Node (Andromeda), still
> early days with a few problems, namely:-
> 
> # It hasn't been given a Stable flag yet.
> # Some problem with dns resulting in  [WARN] eventdns: All nameservers
> have failed - i've switched the dns to 8.8.8.8, only seen that error once
> since
> # The Consensus Weight was gaining nicely and reached over 7,000 but now
> has dive bombed to just 20, with that the speed dropped from ~50mbps to
> ~5mbps
> 
> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/FDB4FC238F13E7FEC99D025DB8B89A636EFC1EBC
> 
> Is this all normal or something i've overlooked?
> 
> Alan
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

[tor-relays] Some problems with new Exit Node

[Alan]

So I bit the bullet and started running an Exit Node (Andromeda), still
early days with a few problems, namely:-

# It hasn't been given a Stable flag yet.
# Some problem with dns resulting in  [WARN] eventdns: All nameservers
have failed - i've switched the dns to 8.8.8.8, only seen that error once
since
# The Consensus Weight was gaining nicely and reached over 7,000 but now
has dive bombed to just 20, with that the speed dropped from ~50mbps to
~5mbps

https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/FDB4FC238F13E7FEC99D025DB8B89A636EFC1EBC

Is this all normal or something i've overlooked?

Alan
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

[Rana]

Speaking of guards, could someone come with a theory pf what happened here 

 ? The IP is static, the relay exists for 18 days and has Stable flag since 
maybe 2 weeks, the measured bandwidth -153 KB/s - exactly equals the bandwidth 
limit in torrc for 2 weeks now. What could explan the sudden catastrophic drop 
in bandwidth after linear if not exponential growth? This article 
  describes exactly 
this pattern but the drop occurs when a Guard flag is awarded. In this case, no 
guard fag. Any ideas?
 
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of 
balbea16
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2016 5:05 PM
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP
 
Hi There 
I evaluated some relays with newly assigned (red) guard flags. All of them had 
already the stable flag assigned. And (so far I could see) all of them had 
(almost) static IP addresses. In my case, this may be the reason why I don't 
get a guard flag. My ISP changes it every 24 hours. However, I'd be fine with 
"just" operating a fast middle node. 
I will keep an eye on this. 
Mike
 
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic IP

[balbea16]

Hi There I evaluated some relays with newly assigned (red) guard flags. All of 
them had already the stable flag assigned. And (so far I could see) all of them 
had (almost) static IP addresses. In my case, this may be the reason why I 
don't get a guard flag. My ISP changes it every 24 hours. However, I'd be fine 
with "just" operating a fast middle node. I will keep an eye on this. Mike
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

[tor-relays] TransPort: Convert iptables to pf _ nat

[Felix]

scrub in all
nat pass on $ext_if from $NET_JAIL to any -> $IP_PUB
rdr pass on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $IP_PUB port $PORT_TOR_JAIL ->
$IP_JAIL_TOR port $PORT_TOR_JAIL


That looks good.

There is no "pass out quick" or "pass out on" statement?


Sure, there is.
pass out on $ext_if proto { tcp udp icmp } all modulate state


Remove 'pass' form 'nat pass' if the packet shall flow through the 'pass 
out' rule after 'nat'. Otherwise it will pass out without respect to any 
rule.


[] https:// www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=pf.conf&sektion=5#end

--
imho, looking forward to 33C3 :)
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays