[tor-relays] 申请

[龚明福]

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Want to help test 'Sandbox 1'? (Linux only)

[nusenu]

John Ricketts:
> I will shortly.  All of my relays or just one?

Maybe start with one and if it runs without any issues or negative
impact for a week proceed with the rest, but whatever you feel
comfortable with.

thanks!


-- 
https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
https://twitter.com/nusenu_



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Want to help test 'Sandbox 1'? (Linux only)

[John Ricketts]

I will shortly.  All of my relays or just one?

> On Jun 25, 2017, at 13:21, nusenu  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm aiming to enable tor's 'Sandbox' feature by default on Debian based
> relays starting with the next release of ansible-relayor [1].
> 
> Before doing so I'd like to collect some feedback from tor relay
> operators willing to test this feature.
> 
> If you
> - run tor 0.3.0.x >= 0.3.0.8
> - are on Linux
> - willing to report proplems
> 
> it would be greate if you could add the following line to your torrc
> configuration file:
> 
> Sandbox 1
> 
> 
> Ideally you have also a system monitoring in place that tells you
> whether this config change has any impact (i.e. on CPU or bandwidth).
> 
> 
> [1] https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor
> 
> -- 
> https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
> https://twitter.com/nusenu_
> 
> 
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

[tor-relays] Want to help test 'Sandbox 1'? (Linux only)

[nusenu]

Hi,

I'm aiming to enable tor's 'Sandbox' feature by default on Debian based
relays starting with the next release of ansible-relayor [1].

Before doing so I'd like to collect some feedback from tor relay
operators willing to test this feature.

If you
- run tor 0.3.0.x >= 0.3.0.8
- are on Linux
- willing to report proplems

it would be greate if you could add the following line to your torrc
configuration file:

Sandbox 1


Ideally you have also a system monitoring in place that tells you
whether this config change has any impact (i.e. on CPU or bandwidth).


[1] https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor

-- 
https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
https://twitter.com/nusenu_




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Fedora/EPEL tor package: missing security update

[nusenu]

Hello Jamie,

there has been a tor release on 2017-06-08 [1] containing a security fix
 that did not reach fedora/epel yet.

Would be great if you could update the tor package in fedora/epel to
distribute the fixed version to RH/CentOS/Fedora users.

thanks,
nusenu

[1]
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-announce/2017-June/000131.html
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461276

> Our tor version is a bit old compared to the ones you listed. Do you
> know what the correct repo is that we should be using for Tor for
> CentOS/RedHat ?




-- 
https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
https://twitter.com/nusenu_



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] torservers.net relays Family

[nusenu]

Moritz Bartl:
> On 21.06.2017 20:05, nusenu wrote:
>>> Our MyFamily statements are badly out of
>>> sync. Will fix this next week.
>> you are still putting tor users at risk
>> https://nusenu.github.io/OrNetStats/
> 
> I thought I fixed it before my trip, but something went wrong with the
> update script. Should be good now -- all relays that we directly have
> control over are in one family now. (There are a bunch of 3rd party
> relays that contain our contact info without us being responsible for
> them...).

Thanks for updating MyFamily!

Is this relay one of yours as well or is someone else using your contact
address?

https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/4A0C3E177AF684581EF780981AEAF51A98A6B5CF

-- 
https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
https://twitter.com/nusenu_



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Performance, profiling

[nusenu]

Nick Mathewson:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 7:58 AM, nusenu  wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sebastian Urbach:
>>> I could not find anything wrong and checked:
>>>
>>> https://metrics.torproject.org/torperf.html
>>>
>>> Is it just me or does that looks like a major Performance Downgrade for
>>> the whole Network since 0.3.0.x was introduced ?
>>
>> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/metrics-team/2017-June/000386.html
> 
> 
> That said, we rely on operator-submitted profiles to keep Tor relay
> performance from regressing.  If anybody has time to profile a relay
> using the steps in doc/HACKING/HelpfulTools.md, that would rock.

direct URL for the lazy:
https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/tree/doc/HACKING/HelpfulTools.md#n145

The referenced pad in line 149
https://pad.riseup.net/p/profiling-tor
is empty: " WARNING: This pad will be DELETED if 30 days go by with no
edits"

https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/tree/doc/HACKING/HelpfulTools.md#n149

-- 
https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
https://twitter.com/nusenu_



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Performance

[nusenu]

Sebastian Urbach:
> I could not find anything wrong and checked:
> 
> https://metrics.torproject.org/torperf.html
> 
> Is it just me or does that looks like a major Performance Downgrade for
> the whole Network since 0.3.0.x was introduced ? 

https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/metrics-team/2017-June/000386.html



-- 
https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
https://twitter.com/nusenu_



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

[tor-relays] Performance

[Sebastian Urbach]

Dear list,

I noticed a higher CPU load on my Exit since i recently upgraded from 
0.2.9.x to 0.3.0.x and thought maybe it is just a matter of tweaking the 
config for 0.3.0.


I could not find anything wrong and checked:

https://metrics.torproject.org/torperf.html

Is it just me or does that looks like a major Performance Downgrade for the 
whole Network since 0.3.0.x was introduced ? Looks to me like roughly 50% 
or more loss of Performance depending on the File size.


Was that to be expected for 0.3.0.x ?
--
Sincerely yours / M.f.G. / Sincères salutations

Sebastian Urbach

---
Those who surrender freedom for security will
not have, nor do they deserve, either one.
---
Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)


___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays