Re: [tor-relays] bwauths doesn't reach reliable my relay
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 09/30/2017 06:59 PM, dawuud wrote: > > btw you just wrote sent an encrypted message to a public mailing > list. i don't see the point in doing this, maybe is was an > accident? > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 02:47:35PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: > My fault, I just wanted to sign it, sry. - -- Toralf PGP C4EACDDE 0076E94E -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iI0EAREIADUWIQQaN2+ZSp0CbxPiTc/E6s3eAHbpTgUCWc/NqBccdG9yYWxmLmZv ZXJzdGVyQGdteC5kZQAKCRDE6s3eAHbpTjl+AP40N/bMgIGexOm2eY4Hf5+O4kaS BOdPRkA39FpfH5iGagD+JOWzyU64qlKlUJvT5xGg7+2br7qGjjIHd+7ttQyG9Kc= =trx3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] bwauths doesn't reach reliable my relay
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 09/29/2017 06:02 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > In the mean while I got a reasonable bw back. And again , one relay is at bw=20 (fropm about 60,000) whereas the other (same hardware, just different ip and port) has bw=3000. Both have nearly identical configs (in fact, parts of the config file are the same). - -- Toralf PGP C4EACDDE 0076E94E -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iIwEAREIADUWIQQaN2+ZSp0CbxPiTc/E6s3eAHbpTgUCWc/NcxccdG9yYWxmLmZv ZXJzdGVyQGdteC5kZQAKCRDE6s3eAHbpTrooAPY3bBxXN7ljV7jmoex21TGcJdxT 6e/DRO6pP+H06BkhAP4z9VIU64xzt/bENvgeFKUUH7fk9+xtaxbQK2HROJiS0Q== =j0P7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] bwauths doesn't reach reliable my relay
btw you just wrote sent an encrypted message to a public mailing list. i don't see the point in doing this, maybe is was an accident? On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 02:47:35PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] About relay size
FWIW I run a 100TB (150mbps) exit and am convinced that this size provides better quality exit connectivity than the highest ranked monster bandwidth relays. The biggest relays attract the greatest blacklist treatment due to the volume of abuse emanating from them. As a user of Tor I frequently observe connection attempts commencing with a handful of top-rated relays, only to work down to a mid-bandwidth relay such as mine before successfully completing. For this reason I would like to see the exit selection algorithm bias somewhat away from relays rated over 5. Is annoying to wait 30 seconds for the discovery of a usable path. Hard 100mbps connections will be easier to manage than the 100TB class of service, as the latter is usually over a 1GB link with a FUP (fair use policy) associated with it and extravagant surcharges for exceeding the limit. >Hi Tor list, > >I'm already running a small exit node (100Mbps bandwidth) and I'm ready >to spend more money on it, so have a question for you guys : > >Is it better if I run other small ones (100Mbps too) or only 1 big exit >relay (1 Gbps) ? What's best for the network stability/security ? > >Thanks a lot > >IPonU ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] bwauths doesn't reach reliable my relay
-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE- Charset: utf-8 hQQOA9vCYl42+L0WEA//VFaxE6QcaoO0VzW4rkSlbceYTu7yPgBX1u80HWJwGvVB 4Wv/Wk0YpaKl2FKQvo0tU01021f8Qf9e3cHDHeu7DcxTb6TDkOGE3M6BYZndGFz+ 6d7sWe2E2kUXQQpZbjjvsjSqIE1r/OdSb2jyQnj75HkMrOsR1df0FzQ+CtnKMoyN mKijc41Mc6Bt3lvJkdBNpbOnCiuxZWQnnow5iR+dism0uW9kIqIcc38/2jG3aiIZ SXKcyP5hBBjygsO+YcUb1xcGVJsw/mpzd6KaBtFktp8e7SLtQj752m5DZ+C//GyT R9Ie3cc1TrR+1c3CUM0LqWWp5xiMsuac1iHrON3sKBchVOWcdKCk09cZZsgth5rx U8GqMrvYi7ljNMt/wcGXcLNDCFnoKrduTsZF+UjxPkpWPYhg1lBG+ehCqctEukBX MheWQOIA7j6n0lVaJhdzC3Aaxr71xKwwY0R8kPL/15KZGDZ/lpr4z2e+BWVWkfDh dHIUXRqd1yXglaF/VXkUW/jr7+M/kQtbXQz8+Gt3SJuq3tJilZE+dVBqDkazJk1q 7b+gHujt7osTnYEofjvChFYGpg0Chke5lToUfYSIXfmmeYCdvWJuAaago0XBIKB7 QYz8jxv7ZuMwsU7coM1Z7dcn/Bq+Qv8q0hLP2JCIblCZrLDlGaQJxk44Wx8UNbEQ AJdfQZShS0C4mL5pycL3Wo94EcRBw6QkEUw2hlt6MzlXlWgQzBShZSlH44/EzCyA Vxd4eZ8t4gK8j0IG1SyUDwporwR6Z176W32IemY7QewuB9wflkppBPSI7kQbkbJz norf6p1Wv8Jl3MktYndzXnA902X5nnwGMRB5GYOvWjjCqtU0gYlyaxh9d7vySiYh uNttxuxOfprHt1OKiHPfoj4XvJxE5Zqv+IiCXvWLfg+2itsPWvfHSuvwv+NPIag/ B2sSvK3Dc/BL6ZGBlTk2/I3RPcl17qZX6r2OFzBA3151G/NcJvHeU4BfJzbv/xc9 zhirrhrre2cwThUZDvytUmQsIZy5DolTwZ1oqQNyJj0dQivFsCwKRF4K2ji6bt1C R+rviPKFkWXubzK3w6F/OVF9RDdn1rXfBKuSqXRueDWXoKXypcqF7OoQlUf5XNoz I4ZkziG6SG2/eRjPSQyBQmMJgUyVbbU7IHmUmCbaNUpUdpZ+g0djzUx7qYLe2pS/ fA6niLgvLcALUtu6US6mpfkr5GJBNcoN3OfZjQJKrDZ6sjCalygSjg/ad+YmPmH0 jhvG7gBL0WQXj0Q0BYGy8FFcyvnFYT+91dHX4hPgp3UK1DXBj4YEmUr7bARvp+n0 ALXIRcwaiW7Vkq4qhZ3AyxszcjGqGL6Xo6wYbD+fQmI80sE7AZ4zfjWhNFIqjVCT tZHkqW0JS59m90bCmvdulCumHeQlHZMY2E0SdpumdwScAhsJKLudIYxbdLDFm1wZ Gpa7zXHQNfkb0bDXb+EpECkZIwiiCgSA1i/STCMM91jXMuf0b/5WYVrE8/j0jaAJ geICP5DUcqJnKSDQvSbgV9q9HKzj4ga7tsnM8xU7LiyeDVEvXqjyAbGWwoQgmIdA V6wHFmHB2Lu0x3qHcu6Vs5FmqiU3lvnr+uxqyY5fwtxr5Kwp7NXvZBDq083KUKvI 9GLU4Cr50EeDnb849Iyd8zBPdBg+XK/LGTHe6G2aMCJdDij3nb8LhH2KB+BR3q+5 IKDTuQepvtHjRrNvuwWBrY7NspZg0FhDhh/PrT+aNnFwlrQW28n+c6Hvv2YSO/Va ow1iOPir32CqBuXNVOZFBPZuwJrck8uKEpqNKbkxRd3OolTE8KHbyFh3T8UeNrBL 2Lm711n2Qfrb9HViEitb0ehTd84u9On6Qst8BuYsqTIKXW9BO/5XeHRSaSZoND1B A162abki/5KGxUIMW3SMZrwHyy2evZzHhlf9bd+G89NNiPtoaogIKjW3Pgp4/a24 x0byLjMW9ERYDDCedvCMS+xfNKEfVCOTw2ypQkRAQfcIXJWrAzYLdouCem5S/hxZ I5l3euU5m8ySSRa4EyC9 =nHmX -END PGP MESSAGE- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
