Re: [tor-relays] ISP Nat

[Paul Templeton]

Thanks teor

> I would recommend using a caching resolver, it puts much less load on the
> remote resolvers you are using.

Went down this path - its working.

Paul

609662E824251C283164243846C035C803940378

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Hidden service error in log

[grarpamp]

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 8:51 AM, Gary  wrote:
> 4l53ozkhv***

Whether tor or you *''d it, 45 bits is insufficient to
prevent association in posts, and being v2, can be
discovered in full, further, onions can be deanon'd
to IP address in time by motivated adversaries.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Tor program

[grarpamp]

> I2P, Gnunet, IPFS, GPG, blockchain,
> lots of other networks have relavant
> philosophy material.

Many of which could make up list of new
software packages such places could install
as part of such program.
Just as they might have libreoffice on windows,
or even some easy / volunteer admin, $free software,
*nix machines for public use.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Tor program

[grarpamp]

media.torproject.org
youtube
library freedom project

I2P, Gnunet, IPFS, GPG, blockchain,
lots of other networks have relavant
philosophy material.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] middle relay connexions dropped in half

[Edwin]

On 14.03.2018 03:56, teor wrote:

On 13 Mar 2018, at 20:51, mytormail  wrote:

I just doesn't feel right if donated capacity isn't used.


Oh, but your relay's spare capacity *is* used.
Just not the way you think.


Hi teor,

Thanks for your reassuring words. :)
I just wait a few weeks and see what happens. DoS mitigation will have 
it's impact I guess.
One of my relays has a lot circuits rejected compared to my other 
relays:


"DoS mitigation since startup: 79258 circuits rejected, 14 marked 
addresses. 701 connections closed. 1287 single hop clients refused."

Six hours after the upgrade it rejected 56722 circuits already..
So it seems to have a big impact indeed.

Regards,

Edwin.

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

[tor-relays] Hidden service error in log

[Gary]

Hello.

I made a "hello world" hidden service and I had to following message in the
logs about exceeding launch limit. I have not seen this before. I had one
onion for a while and added a second one recently - not sure if that
matters as it is only complaining about the first one.

I am not sure what / why it is exceeding launch limit, I would be grateful
if someone could explain it to me.

Thanks.

Mar 14 12:43:24.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 100%: Done
Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn] Hidden service 4l53ozkhv*** exceeded launch
limit with 10 intro points in the last 202 seconds. Intro circuit launches
are limited to 10 per 300 seconds.
Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn] Service configured in
"/var/lib/tor/hidden_service/":
Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn]   Intro point 0 at [scrubbed]: circuit is open
Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn]   Intro point 1 at [scrubbed]: circuit is open
Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn]   Intro point 2 at [scrubbed]: circuit is doing
handshakes
Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn]   Intro point 3 at [scrubbed]: circuit is open
Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn] Service configured in "/var/lib/tor/hidden2/":
Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn]   Intro point 0 at [scrubbed]: circuit is doing
handshakes
Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn]   Intro point 1 at [scrubbed]: circuit is open
Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn]   Intro point 2 at [scrubbed]: circuit is open
Mar 14 12:43:32.000 [warn]   Intro point 3 at [scrubbed]: circuit is open
Mar 14 12:44:25.000 [notice] Performing bandwidth self-test...done.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Best tor version

[teor]

> On 14 Mar 2018, at 08:50, Jonathan Marquardt  wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 07:40:30AM +, Даннил Николаев wrote:
>> What is best to run on relay? Version 0.2 or 0.3?
> 
> Always the latest stable version, which is currently 0.3.2.10. Be sure to 
> follow this guide for how to set up a relay: 
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/TorRelayGuide

Or, if you want a long-term stable version, use 0.2.9.

Long-term stable is for distributions and people who don't want to upgrade
major Tor versions every 6-12 months.

T
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Best tor version

[Jonathan Marquardt]

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 07:40:30AM +, Даннил Николаев wrote:
> What is best to run on relay? Version 0.2 or 0.3?

Always the latest stable version, which is currently 0.3.2.10. Be sure to 
follow this guide for how to set up a relay: 
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/TorRelayGuide
-- 
OpenPGP Key: 47BC7DE83D462E8BED18AA861224DBD299A4F5F3
 https://www.parckwart.de/pgp_key


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

[tor-relays] Best tor version

[Даннил Николаев]

What is best to run on relay? Version 0.2 or 0.3?
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays