Re: [tor-relays] Again: abuse email for non-exit relay (masergy)
On 04.05.2020 14:06, cxx wrote: I used to work there years ago and established the abuse-handling-process. As long as you explain it to them everything should be fine. The abuse-mails are forwarded to you automatically and only if you don't respond at all and more complaints keep arriving for your ip your server could be suspended automatically. They would not suspend your server for one incomprehensible bogus-complaint, but you should reply nevertheless reply to keep the counters for the automated abuse-handling low. Regards cxx Thanks for the information. That calms me. Grüße aus Bonn ;-) -- ╰_╯ Ciao Marco! Debian GNU/Linux It's free software and it gives you freedom! ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Again: abuse email for non-exit relay (masergy)
Hi there, I got the same complaints for my non-exit-relays running at myloc in the past. I think I got two of them within the last 6 years, always responded asking for more details, but they never explained what's wrong from their point of view. I think it's some IDS within their network reporting connections from their clients to the tor network as malicious and automatically sending abuse-reports. I explained that I requested more information but never got any, the case was then closed. I used to work there years ago and established the abuse-handling-process. As long as you explain it to them everything should be fine. The abuse-mails are forwarded to you automatically and only if you don't respond at all and more complaints keep arriving for your ip your server could be suspended automatically. They would not suspend your server for one incomprehensible bogus-complaint, but you should reply nevertheless reply to keep the counters for the automated abuse-handling low. Regards cxx 4. Mai 2020 00:29, li...@for-privacy.net schrieb: > On 03.05.2020 23:31, Roger Dingledine wrote: > > First of all thank you all. > > I have already written to masergy that they should send me logs and that > the problem comes from them. > If necessary, I have to block all masergy IP's on the firewall. But > their AS is huge, does a lot of work > >> Whether you should respond depends on whether you need to answer your >> own hosting provider to keep them happy, > > I have to make my provider happy. myLoc/Servdiscount is not amused by my > traffic. > More than 100TB per server which costs only 23-32Eur/month. > > -- > ╰_╯ Ciao Marco! > > Debian GNU/Linux > > It's free software and it gives you freedom! > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] (Без темы)
thanks for the link. I increased 'ulimit -n' with 1024 to 13500. see how it works. 04.05.2020, 15:29, "teor" :Hi, On 4 May 2020, at 20:51, Станиславwrote: hi, strange but the relay constantly spontaneously goes offline after 3, 4 hours again online in the logs no errors other than this (Failing because we have 4063 connections already. Please read doc / TUNING for guidance. [over 1601 similar message (s) suppressed in last 21600 seconds)CE5ED345398CC02D573347C2F238F80B18E680EE Here is a link to doc/TUNING:https://github.com/torproject/tor/blob/master/doc/TUNING It says: "Most operating systems limit an amount of TCP sockets that can be used simultaneously. It is possible for a busy Tor relay to run into these limits, thus being unable to fully utilize the bandwidth resources it has at its disposal. Following system-specific tips might be helpful…" Let us know how you go with the system-specific instructions! T,___tor-relays mailing listtor-relays@lists.torproject.orghttps://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays С уважением,Станислав ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] (Без темы)
Hi, > On 4 May 2020, at 20:51, Станислав wrote: > > hi, strange but the relay constantly spontaneously goes offline after 3, 4 > hours again online in the logs no errors other than this (Failing because we > have 4063 connections already. Please read doc / TUNING for guidance. [over > 1601 similar message (s) suppressed in last 21600 seconds) > CE5ED345398CC02D573347C2F238F80B18E680EE Here is a link to doc/TUNING: https://github.com/torproject/tor/blob/master/doc/TUNING It says: "Most operating systems limit an amount of TCP sockets that can be used simultaneously. It is possible for a busy Tor relay to run into these limits, thus being unable to fully utilize the bandwidth resources it has at its disposal. Following system-specific tips might be helpful…" Let us know how you go with the system-specific instructions! T___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] (Без темы)
hi, strange but the relay constantly spontaneously goes offline after 3, 4 hours again online in the logs no errors other than this (Failing because we have 4063 connections already. Please read doc / TUNING for guidance. [over 1601 similar message (s) suppressed in last 21600 seconds)CE5ED345398CC02D573347C2F238F80B18E680EE С уважением,Станислав ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays