Re: [tor-relays] atlas.cogentco.com Is blocking
I don't really get it... You want me to ping 95.130.9.210 ? If so, ping & traceroute works great from both my exits Le mercredi 18 octobre 2017 à 23:48 +, Paul Templeton a écrit : > Has anyone come across a scenario where a carrier blocks IP traffic? > > atlas.cogentco.com is the point which drops any packet to > 95.130.9.210 > > The server is up and running internal monitoring says its OK. The ISP > doesn't provide an interface to the Server so I can not log on to do > any other validating. > > Trace routes to any IP with the ISP (active or not)terminates in the > ISP's network. Trace route from any point on the planet times out as > soon as you hit atlas.cogentco.com > > Any thoughts... > > **IPonU could you ping from one of your servers at Digicube please > and let me know. > > Paul > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Attacks to and from Tor
1) I think you can't 2) All Tor relays IPs are public Le 04/10/2017 à 08:49, Thomas Dünser a écrit : Hi everybody, I've read a few threads about attacks from exit nodes to the clear net and from the clear net to tor nodes and have several questions: -How can you recognize that the attacks to tor nodes are especially against Tor? -And how can a clear net user or better IDS easily differencing between an attacker that comes over Tor (exit node) or from a clear net host? I think this is important to categorize the situation. Thanks, Tom ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] About relay size
I don't know if they accept foreign people to order (you could ask them by clicking on "Nous contacter <http://www.digicube.fr/index/contact>") The forum doesn't work in France either. I already asked them about tor exits and they told me they were OK with it as long it's not spamming and it's not affecting (slowing) their network. This ISP is already mentionned in the goodbadisp page and i'll update it if they shut down my relay. Le 29/09/2017 à 13:31, Ralph Seichter a écrit : On 29.09.2017 10:18, IPonU wrote: http://www.digicube.fr/rapidserveurs DigiCube notes "Offre uniquement valable pour la France métropolitaine". Has anybody asked if non-French customers are also welcome? Have they agreed to hosting Tor nodes, especially exits? My French is rusty, and I could not find answers to these questions on their site, and I get only timeouts when trying to connect to the DigiCube forum. -Ralph ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] About relay size
I'm not sure what you're asking so I'll show you the website : http://www.digicube.fr/rapidserveurs ATM I have the cheapest (4€). So i'm not sure if I take others or if I take only one at the top with 1Gbps bandwidth. I think it could be great to have multiple relays in case one is down but i'm not sure Le 29/09/2017 à 09:54, John Ricketts a écrit : Hi, 100Mbps is not a small node. Thanks for running a relay! When you say you’re going to spend more money on it... do you mean hardware or bandwidth? All of my relays are running as virtual machines on multiple computers to maximize the CPU and memory usage. If you didn’t want to virtualize your machines you could put two Tor nodes on the same physical box to maximize hardware usage. If you’re comfortable telling us where you’re putting your money I suspect we can advise you better. John Quintex Alliance Consulting On Sep 29, 2017, at 02:37, IPonU <cont...@iponu.net <mailto:cont...@iponu.net>> wrote: Hi Tor list, I'm already running a small exit node (100Mbps bandwidth) and I'm ready to spend more money on it, so have a question for you guys : Is it better if I run other small ones (100Mbps too) or only 1 big exit relay (1 Gbps) ? What's best for the network stability/security ? Thanks a lot IPonU ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] About relay size
Hi Tor list, I'm already running a small exit node (100Mbps bandwidth) and I'm ready to spend more money on it, so have a question for you guys : Is it better if I run other small ones (100Mbps too) or only 1 big exit relay (1 Gbps) ? What's best for the network stability/security ? Thanks a lot IPonU ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
