Re: [tor-relays] Would you also like to have family-level atlas pages?

2017-09-11 Thread Patrick O'Doherty
+1 definitely would love to see this in Atlas.

On 9/11/17 3:10 PM, nusenu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Iain - the atlas maintainer - asked on twitter if relay operators at the
> relay operators meetup in Montreal have feature requests for atlas [1].
> 
> I suggested family-level pages where an operator of more than one relay
> can see all the relays of his family including aggregated (stacked)
> graphs for the graphs that are already available on a per-relay level.
> 
> Before filing this as a trac ticket - as Iain - suggested, I wanted to
> ask around if others would find that useful as well because it probably
> makes only sense to implement it if there are more people actually
> finding it useful.
> 
> So let us know if you do.
> 
> thanks,
> nusenu
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [1] https://twitter.com/iainlearmonth/status/907003817434271746
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] Experience hosting exit relay with Costa Rica Servers: crservers.com

2015-09-12 Thread Patrick O'Doherty
I intend on doing so when I hear back about their DMCA forwarding
option, as I think that'll decide whether they're friendly or not.

p

Greg:
> Patrick,
> Do you mind adding this info to the "good/bad isps" wiki? I'm looking
> around for hosting as well and thought we could improve that page a
> little.
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/GoodBadISPs
> 
> Thanks,
> Greg
> 
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Kenneth Freeman <kencf0...@riseup.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/08/2015 12:14 PM, Patrick O'Doherty wrote:
>>> I received the following response from them:
>>>
>>>> We do not discriminate on the use of any protocol among our customers.
>>>> Nevertheless, if we get complains or any type of pressure from public or 
>>>> private
>>>> entities for illegal activity occurring in your server, we will have to 
>>>> suspend
>>>> service.
>>>> You will be immediately contacted about any issue that arises.
>>
>> This explanation is marvelously vague.
>>
>>> so it would appear that they're not too friendly about hosting exit
>>> relays. I've asked if they can forward all abuse complains to be instead
>>> of immediately terminating service, but I'm not too hopeful.
>>
>> My hunch is that they just don't want to deal with the complaints and
>> legal & administrative overhead -it's more cost-effective just to cut
>> you off. When I first set up Tor some years ago I briefly ran it as an
>> exit node, having sent an explanatory e-mail to my ISP, but I very
>> quickly learned that once they receive a DMCA notice they cut you off at
>> the knees, whereupon you're dealing with "help" desk morons working from
>> a very strict script. Best to run an exit node from a corporate set-up
>> with the legal boilerplate already in place.
>>
>>
>> ___
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>>
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] Experience hosting exit relay with Costa Rica Servers: crservers.com

2015-09-08 Thread Patrick O'Doherty
I received the following response from them:

> We do not discriminate on the use of any protocol among our customers.
> Nevertheless, if we get complains or any type of pressure from public or 
> private 
> entities for illegal activity occurring in your server, we will have to 
> suspend 
> service.
> You will be immediately contacted about any issue that arises.

so it would appear that they're not too friendly about hosting exit
relays. I've asked if they can forward all abuse complains to be instead
of immediately terminating service, but I'm not too hopeful.

p

Patrick O'Doherty:
> hey all,
> 
> I'm looking to host an exit relay in a country with a low node count. I
> came across crservers.com[0] via exotic VPS, and am considering using
> them to host a small exit node to start out.
> 
> A quick glance at their ToS for VPS services[1] indidicates that their
> policies are pretty strict, but figured it'd be worth asking the list to
> see if anyone had personal experience with them before I rule them out.
> I've also contacted them about this.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> p
> 
> [0] - https://crservers.com
> [1] - https://www.crservers.com/downloads/SHARED-SERVER-CONTRACT.pdf
> 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


[tor-relays] Experience hosting exit relay with Costa Rica Servers: crservers.com

2015-09-05 Thread Patrick O'Doherty
hey all,

I'm looking to host an exit relay in a country with a low node count. I
came across crservers.com[0] via exotic VPS, and am considering using
them to host a small exit node to start out.

A quick glance at their ToS for VPS services[1] indidicates that their
policies are pretty strict, but figured it'd be worth asking the list to
see if anyone had personal experience with them before I rule them out.
I've also contacted them about this.

cheers,

p

[0] - https://crservers.com
[1] - https://www.crservers.com/downloads/SHARED-SERVER-CONTRACT.pdf



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] BoingBoing: What happened when we got subpoenaed over our Tor exit node

2015-08-07 Thread Patrick O'Doherty
noisetor received an identical subpoena, for what looks to be the same
grand jury appearance in NJ (same date  location IIRC).

Unlike the commenter, noisetor keeps zero logs, so we had nothing to
provide.

We did the same as BoingBoing, got our legal counsel and then contacted
the FBI to explain the situation. At this point the requirement to
testify was dropped.

p

On 8/7/15 2:29 PM, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote:
 http://boingboing.net/2015/08/04/what-happened-when-the-fbi-sub.html
 
 check out comment #2 as well as the blog article
 
 ___
 tor-relays mailing list
 tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
 https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays