Re: [tor-relays] Current pluggable transport recommendation

[Jeff Duncan]

I am interested in this as well. I am thinking of installing a new bridge
on Digital Ocean in Singapore. Considering geographical location is there a
preferred pluggable transport?

P.S. I'm new to the list. Computer hobbyist. I've used Linux for 15+ years
almost exclusively but I'm no where near a sys admin. I have 2 relays on
DO. One in San Francisco and one in Singapore.



On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 2:31 AM, Alexander Dietrich 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> the obfs2 pluggable transport was deprecated a while ago since it was easy
> to detect, but obfs3 was still considered safe, IIRC. Has anything changed
> here?
>
> I was just wondering if new bridges should only run obfs4, or if it's fine
> to run obfs3 at the same time.
>
> Best regards,
> Alexander
> --
> PGP Key: https://dietrich.cx/pgp | 0x52FA4EE1722D54EB
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

[tor-relays] Current pluggable transport recommendation

[Alexander Dietrich]

Hi,

the obfs2 pluggable transport was deprecated a while ago since it was 
easy to detect, but obfs3 was still considered safe, IIRC. Has anything 
changed here?


I was just wondering if new bridges should only run obfs4, or if it's 
fine to run obfs3 at the same time.


Best regards,
Alexander
--
PGP Key: https://dietrich.cx/pgp | 0x52FA4EE1722D54EB
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays