Re: [tor-relays] Fwd: 2017-06-07 15:37: 65 new tor exits in 30 minutes

[grarpamp]

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Arisbe  wrote:

Content-Type: text/html :(

> Seems like none of us have the time to research these events or those before. 
>  If people can't play by written and unwritten rules regarding Tor contact 
> info, family members, etc. and they 'could' be a danger to anonymity, why 
> does Tor bother with them?  If people are sincere about helping the Tor 
> network, they will express that in their offers--otherwise, as in this 
> situation, they should be removed until sufficient information is provided.

Both anonymity and nymity provide strengths and weakness to networks.
Certainly everyone can imagine some.

In that understanding, finding / creating "good" relays is as useful as
hunting for "bad" relays.

As before, if some set of rules and metrics might be felt important
to you or others in choosing relays to use, why not start a project to collate
and publish lists of relays based on that, then users can subscribe it.

Thanks to the appreciated efforts of those volunteering their time and
research to find things, these relays are up for a fat k-line real soon now :)
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

[tor-relays] Fwd: 2017-06-07 15:37: 65 new tor exits in 30 minutes

[Arisbe]

  
  
To All, 

Seems like none of us have the time to research these events or
  those before.  If people can't play by written and unwritten rules
  regarding Tor contact info, family members, etc. and they 'could'
  be a danger to anonymity, why does Tor bother with them?  If
  people are sincere about helping the Tor network, they will
  express that in their offers--otherwise, as in this situation,
  they should be removed until sufficient information is provided.
Arisbe


  
   Forwarded Message 
  

  
Subject:

[tor-relays] 2017-06-07 15:37: 65 new tor exits in 30
  minutes
  
  
Date: 
Wed, 07 Jun 2017 19:41:00 +
  
  
From: 
nusenu 
  
  
Reply-To:

tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
  
  
To: 
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
  

  
  
  
  DocTor [1] made me look into this.



_All_ 65 relays in the following table have the following characteristics:
(not shown in the table to safe some space)

- OS: Linux
- run two instances per IP address (the number of relays is only odd
because in one case they created 3 keys per IP)
- ORPort: random
- DirPort: disabled
- Tor Version: 0.2.9.10
- ContactInfo: None
- MyFamily: None
- Joined the Tor network between 2017-06-07 15:37:32 and 2017-06-07
16:08:54 (UTC)
- Exit Policy summary: {u'reject': [u'25', u'119', u'135-139', u'445',
u'563', u'1214', u'4661-4666', u'6346-6429', u'6699', u'6881-6999']}
- table is sorted by colmns 3,1,2 (in that order)


- Group diversity:
 - 20 distinct autonomous systems
 - 18 distinct countries

https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/81337aed747ea5c7dec57899b0e27e94/raw/c7e0c4538e4f424b4cc529f3c2b1cabf6a5df579/2017-06-07_tor_network_65_relays_group.txt



Relay fingerprints are at the bottom of this file.

This list of relays is NOT identical to the one from DocTor (even though
the number is identical (65)):
[1]
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-consensus-health/2017-June/007968.html

https://twitter.com/nusenu_/status/872536564647198720


-- 
https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
https://twitter.com/nusenu_




  



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays