Re: [tor-talk] Fwd: [liberationtech] FFII - European Commission net neutrality consultation excludes TOR users
On 23 Jul 2012, at 23:24, SiNA Rabbani s...@redteam.io wrote: fyi [ EU / Blocking / TOR ] == European Commission net neutrality consultation excludes TOR users == Brussels, 23 July 2012 -- The European Commission blocks TOR users' access to its web site. TOR is an internet anonymisation technology and became widely popular for its facilitating role in the Arab spring movement. Is this still the case? The ban was lifted earlier this month (around the first week of July). -- Runa A. Sandvik ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] Fwd: [liberationtech] FFII - European Commission net neutrality consultation excludes TOR users
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 08:37:12AM +0100, runa.sand...@gmail.com wrote 0.8K bytes in 22 lines about: : Is this still the case? The ban was lifted earlier this month (around the first week of July). Yes. The ban was back during the hackfest week. Confirmed just now too via europa.eu exiting via https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/1A7A34FD161EEF2320728E79FB56391660329955 -- Andrew http://tpo.is/contact pgp 0x6B4D6475 ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] TorBirdy 0.0.10 released - testing and feedback requested!
adrelanos adrela...@riseup.net wrote: Good idea. Just created: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/6451 Thanks! And thanks to all for the feedback on the ticket ... enjoying the discussion. -- kat ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] Tails' htpdate [Was: secure and simple network time (hack)]
Hi, adrelanos wrote (21 Jul 2012 04:30:31 GMT) : If I understand correctly, you pick three random servers. One from each pool. And then build the mediate of the three. This is correct. What's the point of asking the foe pool? (Servers which generally do not care about privacy.) This means we implicitly decided it was more important to ask parties that are unlikely to cooperate to send fake time information to Tails users, than it would be to entirely avoid asking servers who generally don't care about privacy. In general, for such matters, I'd rather rely on diversity, rather than on a set of trusted peers. Why doesn't tails_htp ask more than three servers for the time and build the mediate? Like 6, 9 or 12. IIRC: speed, and simplicity (good enough is good enough). If that's not good enough, I'm happy to take a patch :) ... but we need to make up our mind wrt. tlsdate first, I think. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
