Re: [tor-talk] WebRTC via Tor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/10/13 11:54 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:56 AM, David Huerta wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> ... The problem is that >> Twilio WebRTC requires UDP connections over ports 10,000 to 60,000 and >> at least from my research (correct me if I'm wrong), Tor doesn't do >> onion routing for UDP traffic > UDP does not work on some smart phones because many carriers allow UDP > from the phone (send) but block UDP to the phone (receive). In the US, > you will have probably trouble with Verizon, Sprint, and AT&T (and > likely others). Good point; The project in mind will be using a plain wifi connection, with the carrier out of the picture as far as the device (BeagleBone Black) goes, so this should help mitigate the issue, assuming the network's firewall doesn't get in the way. - -- david [.dh] huerta davidhuerta.me - -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org mQENBFDlBaMBCADDRmcSL+YpVzawcjwCtm61lQT32VILEPE3o9mZMAfKlYiEtfJY 8r4ggOCdWRoqglPUGOoTSANsQfahxxmyLylFz1D9iNerx9/23iQ8hcFcokoOAdwA fhmNHEdkgyQg9Lyy5KcfGsrzJyxd7SBwMOvbRGudWpuA0+Dp84sQXTxHawp/LUVU G+zCrrc39jeyHWVLdNESxXCW7nOSRe/jU92/PiMTS0VAYZuHE9j93bH37JjLvXZx MgozTZImBxB9SmvT8ztuU1BS9jdmtO9/XD/XjWdvdbWS7z6fjambB8zWWAOkQvz/ TbCeaIVqYEaQspDaAs4jhdzfpRYRUAfk20cpABEBAAG0IkRhdmlkIEh1ZXJ0YSA8 aHVlcnRhbml4QGdtYWlsLmNvbT6JAT8EEwECACkFAlD9jbgCGyMFCQlmAYAHCwkI BwMCAQYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRA11ya9rgnzKGv1CACBZzhAEGpA5IAB k58CbcDJ4hXg8OSoay24SNi7jdCemp0CEbr1EhHGw3s05sUExl/KRgeQxgazvXtk +Y0ynyguA39U+nu/kkRVhB7vNPXj2GKdcsO9cw92KmCcRhKZiYL3OEAiGXYa/kvl 6YqXxzbw7oshcceDmSAKctsiBHhS/zwpdb4Co1v260H8HXAf+tsDPbkZHVRSNX/V PyhxQFtnFvdEiLE6D6hsMXJWAvNBoeaGb/xaQnU9Elu0JqY+n2372oc2F9ZYsg/D WcwcKb5SkucyXnlph8AXTx3SCTISVVN95Pj8anv2Z1XwKV0iM+K3dp/v0bWsIvRq 07ZFT/hKtCREYXZpZCBIdWVydGEgPGh1ZXJ0YW5peEBvcGVudGlsLmNvbT6JAUIE EwECACwCGyMFCQlmAYAHCwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAUCUP2N2gIZ AQAKCRA11ya9rgnzKBPcB/4ltGkLGpzhH+4OxI+zRk7qRnF3sFLYJUh/VUSSDU8l Bu8eEYPol1DJ/MGIKqZytvLC6kvevHBRGT3YpEWJ3q97Iqvzpg52RftN8IZpN8dQ 6L8Tr1DLCcIl+F3J0rHBxrU54pXBlPpeo2Yppv2nGo+plFwKkg711A4ZJIUSaG6V hmslIovxoUxo4F0QyRNZ9dPqCzzTP63xJCgh0Ez+WVT8gaan1iE4Ck4xlEH6vMZB 8tVjXx0tCYPyNRwl0DDXkIfX+9s92stIQVDt4srNKcu6yjjQs7f+0UiULotZ3fKX skykx4wBk59BT92VQwBM/tFxgf+p0BLcbasFhCpfTNepiQE/BBMBAgApBQJQ5QWj AhsjBQkJZgGABwsJCAcDAgEGFQgCCQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQNdcmva4J8yj6 /gf/f4lSeMMK3yHLxcRQ7vqHJ+TrWCh62AxTHbbabnozGaug42ekZUJWqf+O97DT TpKRhknaTleXWontnotIdHcv/ciFM85SSlO2+k3jouxnyPEIP45wgabAAG55zUZ4 lUGH9z4OZo0j/OuxfTj/EWc1AciuJAONd5Cz6wFpbPMQ4811cB7IrDKPd5pTOe7M B+Y3SpWo95i0DWWeoa3MfXoBUjTjF8c79ZRel+M/9Qxqi9GkD+NWrJbSh1G9Rrkf 4FXFDO2tYadsnXV8+PnR0hoHXHoXSpWQzmbNhYa/OZOhPdgqAuOKTgAoT8rR9ELq vSHsuacDQOli8WqWd/IR4Szi8rkBDQRQ5QWjAQgA0oAIKM8AFYqHIrQocHmTGR/j YybKQ41u+RUkrhzQPGm9lNSIR7MdD+DEwyEPeZLezNzuUk/huA2eZrjI7P/6aire 0CtUePzkrY93/OuDS5Tb9FtduyclCFMVm+OlOkMjBiqUofQsei4mB6FLKKtKRdiH 0jng3UUkTbJY7iAlKannKBWtsuDCTQuguLh1+Z9bQmINiKSefYgYGJgCklhvYahc kX/NKnisepYOwiCldwvbGs6ify962qG14xPf1y/Q4dSCxgSjzLdXDxpp90XEZNiT 5YATzZrPJUrcFZX8/ep6I0COtIE+FnjMDKQ2VLCbC8lOJDcTtJdzXUIALrL69wAR AQABiQElBBgBAgAPBQJQ5QWjAhsMBQkJZgGAAAoJEDXXJr2uCfMoxs0H/j9YpD4m urSQZh8d6yQahM57sxmqBNer4YyZqHzNBVt6jUJ60wM90Yfn2m7mGjcD/GK6/fLq PzLv3VsQmMM+aVcCRGiFR5P/bLx5/t90PAgprrA7/ld3g0yN+5TGkI/fdOXQmApl bnKDy1q9a9CmtD5M+cOU7adIMEI8ymW2t2Cnw/aTEDNIss/eg2IcfvqirgkBuqw4 TtYAZiMhY38zifjTu0n2aUcKv64K4PGZVklo3BWdqN3bpt2cviB/kQCC/9JZNmqs WfZkK1q9rzo0wkJKTCAtmYYGDzOTYHDCXcOaviexnnq2+DDdfngcu1YpBclf2S4P J9HbchaaZTsCADw= =mmiq - -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRtrnyAAoJEDXXJr2uCfMobgkH/2Nyp8jn4KFQu/X8vFpDT75A 0oYps0zRuD2A1AqKpb2IPYxXhOoAAVDdqZN37H8g/xi9gjgxHuMMCVaTiO6gQd6x 5FTQMPMMqiSLdYbNIU1K9GB77lMZNXPg0wT1WqJAouBong+8nxin7wot7NbSoWYo Udemhtt24Nb6chD+tN75j/dEmPcy0ULgex7T3Rx+c06bzb2peyelIGxuqPpqwYsq xrcK+4I1i3X9iad8CS4YrdPra1e/ucQYUYnWHwT/9BAnpmEoFoSe/EybMQggMt8H oRYP8aNADiiLGA6TtFf3vsXdJEIZQSUtjhWKgO/u3+/mHDtFspCtHw7x7ENFU1Y= =uUYo -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] WebRTC via Tor
I don't have a need for UDP as I mostly browse the web and stream Spotify which can be done over HTTPS... On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:57 PM, mirimir wrote: > On 06/10/2013 03:54 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:56 AM, David Huerta > wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> ... The problem is that > >> Twilio WebRTC requires UDP connections over ports 10,000 to 60,000 and > >> at least from my research (correct me if I'm wrong), Tor doesn't do > >> onion routing for UDP traffic > > UDP does not work on some smart phones because many carriers allow UDP > > from the phone (send) but block UDP to the phone (receive). In the US, > > you will have probably trouble with Verizon, Sprint, and AT&T (and > > likely others). > > If traffic uses VPN via Tor, the carrier will see only TCP. > > ___ > tor-talk mailing list > tor-talk@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > -- Nathan Suchy If this email was not intended for you delete it and any copies you have of it. The email was intended for "FirstName LastName". ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
[tor-talk] My Tor Exit Node,
I really love it. Check out the Tor Atlas Page: https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/AF32506D548DAE6C17C02BE7E9F824467D546DC9 It runs at average of 3.80MBPS but sometimes is pumping up to 10MBPS according to Tor Arm. Also my server provider DigitalOcean has not send me any abuse complaints since I verfied my account and set an exit policy of only ports 80, 443, and 53 yet I have pumped almost 500GB. Gonna set a more open policy... ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] WebRTC via Tor
On 06/10/2013 03:54 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:56 AM, David Huerta wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> ... The problem is that >> Twilio WebRTC requires UDP connections over ports 10,000 to 60,000 and >> at least from my research (correct me if I'm wrong), Tor doesn't do >> onion routing for UDP traffic > UDP does not work on some smart phones because many carriers allow UDP > from the phone (send) but block UDP to the phone (receive). In the US, > you will have probably trouble with Verizon, Sprint, and AT&T (and > likely others). If traffic uses VPN via Tor, the carrier will see only TCP. ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] Current state of Pidgin and Tor? DNS fix w/Privoxy or Polipo? TIMBB?
From:Karsten N. To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 12:40 PM Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Current state of Pidgin and Tor? DNS fix w/Privoxy or Polipo? TIMBB? On 10.06.2013 20:34, Cat S wrote: > What's the current state of Pidgin? Specifically about DNS for IRC? Pidgin 2.10 contains a proxy type "Tor/Privacy". It doesn't leak DNS requests. Do not use proxy type "HTTP" with polipo or privoxy. Best regards Karsten N. ___ Thanks! I knew that was there but didn't releaze it fixed the DNS issue. Cheers :) ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] Current state of Pidgin and Tor? DNS fix w/Privoxy or Polipo? TIMBB?
From:Karsten N. To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 12:46 PM Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Current state of Pidgin and Tor? DNS fix w/Privoxy or Polipo? TIMBB? On 10.06.2013 20:34, Cat S wrote: > "Audit pidgin for leaks and other privacy issues" Other privacy leaks are voice support of "libjingle". You have to compile Pidgin by self without voice support. for Linux/Unix: > ./configure --disable-screensaver --disable-gstreamer --disable-vv --disable-idn --disable-meanwhile --disable-nm --disable-perl --disable-tcl --disable-avahi > make && make install Seems, it works for me. Did not found a leak. (sorry for two answer mails) Best regards Karsten N. ___ Hi Karsten, Thanks. Is this an issue I would need to worry about if only using Pidgin for IRC with Tor? I'm on Windows and Ubuntu so I'll look into building on Windows, too. ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] Current state of Pidgin and Tor? DNS fix w/Privoxy or Polipo? TIMBB?
On 10.06.2013 20:34, Cat S wrote: > What's the current state of Pidgin? Specifically about DNS for IRC? Pidgin 2.10 contains a proxy type "Tor/Privacy". It doesn't leak DNS requests. Do not use proxy type "HTTP" with polipo or privoxy. Best regards Karsten N. ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] Current state of Pidgin and Tor? DNS fix w/Privoxy or Polipo? TIMBB?
On 10.06.2013 20:34, Cat S wrote: > "Audit pidgin for leaks and other privacy issues" Other privacy leaks are voice support of "libjingle". You have to compile Pidgin by self without voice support. for Linux/Unix: > ./configure --disable-screensaver --disable-gstreamer --disable-vv --disable-idn --disable-meanwhile --disable-nm --disable-perl --disable-tcl --disable-avahi > make && make install Seems, it works for me. Did not found a leak. (sorry for two answer mails) Best regards Karsten N. ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
[tor-talk] Current state of Pidgin and Tor? DNS fix w/Privoxy or Polipo? TIMBB?
What's the current state of Pidgin? Specifically about DNS for IRC? Can I use Polipo or Privoxy to make sure Pidgin doesn't leak DNS? "Tor IM Browser Bundle discontinued temporarily" (from 2011, that's a serious temporary time period!) https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tor-im-browser-bundle-discontinued-temporarily "Audit pidgin for leaks and other privacy issues" https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/2918 ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] WebRTC via Tor
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:56 AM, David Huerta wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > ... The problem is that > Twilio WebRTC requires UDP connections over ports 10,000 to 60,000 and > at least from my research (correct me if I'm wrong), Tor doesn't do > onion routing for UDP traffic UDP does not work on some smart phones because many carriers allow UDP from the phone (send) but block UDP to the phone (receive). In the US, you will have probably trouble with Verizon, Sprint, and AT&T (and likely others). Jeff ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
