Re: [tor-talk] augmented browsing -

2016-05-16 Thread Dafwig
haaber  web.de> writes:
> Thank you for your answer. I should have mentionoed that I have tried
> Greasemonkey some time ago. But it is javascript based. None of the
> example-scripts worked on a JS-deactivated firefox.  Am I wrong?

This may have been true in the past, but not anymore. i think the original
version of Greasemonkey worked by essentially injecting custom JS code into
the page, so the custom scripts would run in the page's context. Nowadays,
however, Greasemonkey and NoScript work just fine together. I use both every
day.

> A sed / awk whatsoever is at least as powerful, more secure (code tested
> for decades), and easy relatively to use, at least if you want
> to browse JS-free.
> 
> - How to transform JS-enforcing codes like
>into 

Re: [tor-talk] augmented browsing - "sed inside torbrowser"

2016-05-16 Thread haaber

Thank you for your answer. I should have mentionoed that I have tried
Greasemonkey some time ago. But it is javascript based. None of the
example-scripts worked on a JS-deactivated firefox.  Am I wrong?

A sed / awk whatsoever is at least as powerful, more secure (code tested
for decades), and easy relatively to use, at least if you want
to browse JS-free.

- How to transform JS-enforcing codes like
   into 

Re: [tor-talk] augmented browsing - "sed inside torbrowser"

2016-05-16 Thread Seth David Schoen
haaber writes:

> Hello,
> 
> I wonder if there are more interested people out there to include a
> "postprocessing" of the HTML code via  *sed*  type search & replace
> expressions. A tiny sed copy could be included in the brwoser and a
> domainbased list of expressions be given to sed that modifies the html
> code(s) according to personal tastes.

There is a nice existing and non-Tor Browser-specific tool that does
something along these lines:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greasemonkey

It may be a bit more elaborate than what you were thinking of but it's
a nice tool that can handle a variety of use cases -- and should be
fully compatible with Tor Browser already.

-- 
Seth Schoen  
Senior Staff Technologist   https://www.eff.org/
Electronic Frontier Foundation  https://www.eff.org/join
815 Eddy Street, San Francisco, CA  94109   +1 415 436 9333 x107
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


[tor-talk] augmented browsing - "sed inside torbrowser"

2016-05-16 Thread haaber
Hello,

I wonder if there are more interested people out there to include a
"postprocessing" of the HTML code via  *sed*  type search & replace
expressions. A tiny sed copy could be included in the brwoser and a
domainbased list of expressions be given to sed that modifies the html
code(s) according to personal tastes.

advantages:
   + this allows javascript-free augmented browsing
   + sed is very powerful & a  lot of tutorials are available.
   + sed is rather stable & tested

disadvatanges:
   - a sed-copy has to sit inside the browser,
   - I am not sure to be able to do this alone: I never coded larger
 projects, my C-knowledge is basic and tor-browser is a
 "sensible object" to start "playing" around :)


Thank you for comments / suggestions. Bernard
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] torsocks vs proxychains4

2016-05-16 Thread mrnob...@mail-on.us
It usually works well, but for instance, when running firefox (or other
browser with it) it may leak your DNS requests, so beware of that.

To avoid this you could edit /etc/resolv.conf to
nameserver 127.0.0.1

and your requests will be resolved through tor.


Lara:
> I trust torsocks more, not because it has tor in its name, but because
> Jake is working or has worked on it. But torsocks 2 makes youtube-dl get
> out of memory and swap too.
>
> proxychains4 is something I just found out. It works well. It was built
> for something else, although it can be used only for tor too. It is more
> complex and that is usually not a good thing. And there is no -i switch
> to generate a user/password pair.
>
> What can you tell me about these two apps? Can I trust proxychains4 not
> to leak data?
>
> Cheers,
> Lara




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] Anonymous Teaching Hacktivism and Hacking via OnionIRC

2016-05-16 Thread mrnob...@mail-on.us
There are logs of other classes:
http://32qms7q5widd7wke.onion/


grarpamp:
> https://twitter.com/onionirc
> irc://onionirchubx5363.onion:6667
> ircs://onionirchubx5363.onion:6697




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


[tor-talk] Anonymous Teaching Hacktivism and Hacking via OnionIRC

2016-05-16 Thread grarpamp
https://twitter.com/onionirc
irc://onionirchubx5363.onion:6667
ircs://onionirchubx5363.onion:6697
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk