Re: [tor-talk] Tor users in US up by nearly 100,000 this month
Hi Ryan, Ryan Carboni: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebookcorewwwi.onion > > I find it hard to believe that you cannot make use of any informal > relationships to make a meatspace query on valid Tor usage estimates. Can you expand on what you mean by this? What sort of "informal" relationships are you considering? If I decide to phone up a friend at Akamai or Cloudflare, there's no guarantee that CDNs like these keep statistics about Tor users (and differentiate between bots and humans), or that they'd want to share this. Maybe they think it would give their competitors information about their business e.g. its size (whether that's a valid concern is another matter entirely). As for the terminology "meatspace", I don't think it's useful to differentiate between "online" and "offline". The internet is life. It's a matter of language but I do think it's important. If I wanted to do it as a research project, the information would probably need to be given in a more formal manner by these CDNs, or collected by oneself. I think it would be interesting to devise such an experiment, and work out a way to differentiate between bots. This entire thread should give you plenty of ideas - I encourage you to make something out of these questions! > People do not exist in isolation, and this meme that no private sector > individual has knowledge on Tor ignores that Tor's often outdated > documentation itself makes RTFM invalid. > I wouldn't call it a meme. While people don't exist in isolation, whether they want to give up information about their usage (or would be more or less likely to go on sites explicitly advertising they're measuring whether they're a bot or not) is another matter entirely. I'm honestly not sure about the ethics of measuring this, either. Best, Duncan -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] Tor users in US up by nearly 100,000 this month
Roger Dingledine writes: > Asking Cloudflare how many people are deciding to solve their captchas > today is measuring a different thing -- if I try to load a news article, > see a cloudflare captcha, and say "aw, fuck cloudflare, oh well" and > move on, am I a bot? I'm just figuring that you can get useful relative rather than absolute metrics if you assume that people's tendency to do this is relatively stable across time and across user populations. So you don't know how many of the non-solvers are bots, but you can say that the solvers are up 10% this month or something, which perhaps then suggests that non-bot Tor users are up about 10% this month. This still wouldn't reveal whether 60% or 95% of the non-solvers are bots. -- Seth SchoenSenior Staff Technologist https://www.eff.org/ Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org/join 815 Eddy Street, San Francisco, CA 94109 +1 415 436 9333 x107 -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] Tor users in US up by nearly 100,000 this month
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebookcorewwwi.onion I find it hard to believe that you cannot make use of any informal relationships to make a meatspace query on valid Tor usage estimates. People do not exist in isolation, and this meme that no private sector individual has knowledge on Tor ignores that Tor's often outdated documentation itself makes RTFM invalid. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] Tor users in US up by nearly 100,000 this month
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 08:08:30PM -0700, Seth David Schoen wrote: > I'd be happy to ask CloudFlare if they'd be willing to share this data > (maybe in relative rather than absolute numeric terms, like "the number > of people successfully completing a CAPTCHA per day from a Tor exit > node on September 1, 2017 is x% of what it was on January 1, 2016"). If you're thinking in that direction, I would suggest asking Akamai instead. The question is "how many people are connecting from known Tor IP addresses to your sites?" Asking Cloudflare how many people are deciding to solve their captchas today is measuring a different thing -- if I try to load a news article, see a cloudflare captcha, and say "aw, fuck cloudflare, oh well" and move on, am I a bot? --Roger -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] Tor users in US up by nearly 100,000 this month
Scfith Riseup writes: > Nope. > > Indication that Tor in use uptick unfortunately could point to more > bots collecting Tor, not necessarily people using Tor. Wish there was > a way to differentiate bots from meat. Amusingly, CloudFlare would probably be in a position to do so because they present many Tor users with CAPTCHAs. While this has annoyed Tor users quite a bit, if we assume that * old and new Tor users are about equally likely to attempt the CAPTCHA * old and new Tor users are about equally likely to pass it * old and new users visit a similar proportion of CloudFlare-hosted sites via Tor exits * CAPTCHAs are relatively effective at preventing access by bots * CloudFlare keeps logs that clearly identify total volumes of successful CAPTCHA completion from Tor exit nodes then CloudFlare would have good, meaningful data about trends in human use of Tor. They wouldn't know the overall volume of human or bot use of Tor, but they could tell pretty accurately when human use is up or down and by what fraction. One confounding factor would arise if the new users are significantly more or less likely than old users to use onion services. I'd be happy to ask CloudFlare if they'd be willing to share this data (maybe in relative rather than absolute numeric terms, like "the number of people successfully completing a CAPTCHA per day from a Tor exit node on September 1, 2017 is x% of what it was on January 1, 2016"). -- Seth SchoenSenior Staff Technologist https://www.eff.org/ Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org/join 815 Eddy Street, San Francisco, CA 94109 +1 415 436 9333 x107 -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] Tor users in US up by nearly 100,000 this month
Nope. Indication that Tor in use uptick unfortunately could point to more bots collecting Tor, not necessarily people using Tor. Wish there was a way to differentiate bots from meat. Cheers. > On Sep 1, 2017, at 7:35 PM, Jameswrote: > > Ryan Carboni: >> I think the graph speaks for itself. Tor usage is becoming a lot more >> widespread. >> >> https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html?start=2017-08-03=2017-09-01=us=off > > so is linux: > > https://www.netmarketshare.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx > > -- > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] Tor users in US up by nearly 100,000 this month
Ryan Carboni: > I think the graph speaks for itself. Tor usage is becoming a lot more > widespread. > > https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html?start=2017-08-03=2017-09-01=us=off so is linux: https://www.netmarketshare.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk