[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892559] Re: [MIR] ccid opensc pcsc-lite

2021-10-07 Thread Treviño
The plan seems quite solid, and I do agree that having some more testing
would be nice (also using libsofthsm2 can help here I think).

I'm not sure if all this can be achieved by the next LTS though, which I
think we're targetting.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pcsc-lite in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892559

Title:
  [MIR] ccid opensc pcsc-lite

Status in ccid package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in opensc package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in pam-pkcs11 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in pcsc-lite package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in pcsc-perl package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in pcsc-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  ==> ccid <==
  [Availability]
  ccid is in universe, and builds on all architectures.

  [Rationale]
  The desktop team and security team are interested in bringing smartcard
  authentication to enterprise desktop environments.

  [Security]
  No CVEs for ccid are listed in our database.
  Doesn't appear to bind to a socket.
  No privileged executables, but does have udev rules.
  Probably needs a security review.

  [Quality assurance]
  No test suite.
  Does require odd hardware that we'll probably need to buy.
  I don't see debconf questions.
  ccid is well maintained in Debian by upstream author.
  One open wishlist bug in BTS, harmless.

  One open bug in launchpad, not security, but looks very frustrating
  for the users. The upstream author was engaged but it never reached
  resolution.  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ccid/+bug/1175465

  Has a debian/watch file.
  Quilt packaging.

  P: ccid source: no-dep5-copyright
  P: ccid source: package-uses-experimental-debhelper-compat-version 13

  [Dependencies]
  Minimal dependencies, in main

  [Standards compliance]
  Appears to satisfy FHS and Debian policy

  [Maintenance]
  The desktop team will subscribe to bugs, however it is expected that the
  security team will assist with security-relevant questions.

  [Background information]
  ccid provides drivers to interact with usb-connected smart card readers.

  ==> libpam-pkcs11 <==
  [Availability]
  Source package pam-pkcs11 is in universe and builds on all architectures.

  [Rationale]
  The desktop team and security team are interested in bringing smartcard
  authentication to enterprise desktop environments.

  [Security]
  No CVEs in our database.
  Doesn't appear to bind to sockets.
  No privileged executables (but is a PAM module).
  As a PAM module this will require a security review.

  [Quality assurance]
  The package does not call pam-auth-update in its postinst #1650366
  Does not ask questions during install.
  One Ubuntu bug claims very poor behaviour if a card isn't plugged in.
  No Debian bugs.
  Occasional updates in Debian by long-term maintainer.
  Does require odd hardware that we'll probably need to buy.
  Does not appear to run tests during build.
  Has scary warnings in the build logs.
  Has a debian/watch file.

  Ancient standards version; other smaller lintian messages, mostly
  documentation problems.

  Quilt packaging.

  [Dependencies]
  Depends on libcurl4, libldap-2.4-2, libpam0g, libpcsclite1, libssl1.1
  All are in main.

  [Standards compliance]
  The package does not call pam-auth-update in its postinst #1650366
  Otherwise looks to conform to FHS and Debian policies

  [Maintenance]
  The desktop team will subscribe to bugs, however it is expected that the
  security team will assist with security-relevant questions.

  [Background information]
  This PAM module can use CRLs and full-chain verification of certificates.
  It can also do LDAP, AD, and Kerberos username mapping.

  ==> libpcsc-perl <==
  [Availability]
  Source package pcsc-perl is in universe, builds for all architectures,
  plus i386

  [Rationale]
  The desktop team and security team are interested in bringing smartcard
  authentication to enterprise desktop environments.

  [Security]
  There are no cves for pcsc-perl in our database.
  No privileged executables.
  Doesn't appear to bind to sockets.
  Probably needs a security review.

  [Quality assurance]
  Library package not intended to be used directly.
  No debconf questions.
  No bugs in Debian.
  No bugs in Ubuntu.
  Does require odd hardware that we'll probably need to buy.
  Tests exist, not run during the build; probably can't run during the build.
  Includes debian/watch file.
  A handful of lintian issues
  Quilt packaging.

  [Dependencies]
  libpcsc-perl depends upon libpcsclite1, libc6, perl, perlapi-5.30.0.
  All are in main.

  [Standards compliance]
  One oddity, Card.pod is stored in 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl5/5.30/Chipcard/PCSC/
  Many other perl packages have .pod files in these directory trees so maybe
  it's fine, but it seems funny all the same.

  Otherwise appears to satisfy FHS and Debian policy.

  [Maintenance]
  The desktop team will subscribe to bugs, 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1930188] Re: Acer Aspire 5 sound driver issues

2021-10-07 Thread Hui Wang
** Changed in: alsa-ucm-conf (Ubuntu Focal)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Hui Wang (hui.wang)

** Changed in: alsa-ucm-conf (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: alsa-ucm-conf (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: alsa-ucm-conf (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: alsa-ucm-conf (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: alsa-ucm-conf (Ubuntu Impish)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: alsa-ucm-conf (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930188

Title:
  Acer Aspire 5 sound driver issues

Status in alsa-ucm-conf package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in alsa-ucm-conf source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in pulseaudio source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in alsa-ucm-conf source package in Hirsute:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released
Status in pulseaudio source package in Hirsute:
  In Progress
Status in alsa-ucm-conf source package in Impish:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Impish:
  Fix Released
Status in pulseaudio source package in Impish:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  SRU Justification for alsa-ucm-conf:

  [Impact]
  On the machines with the sof audio driver, users could adjust the input
  volume from UI, but this only adjusts the "Capture Volume",  the "Mic
  Boost" can't be changed, if "Mic Boost" is 0, even we adjust the "Capture
  Volume" to max, the recorded volume is still very low.

  [Fix]
  Backport a upstream patch, the patch adds the "Mic Boost" into the
  ucm

  [Test]
  plug a headset, make sure the headset-mic is the active input device,
  adjust the input volume to %20, open a terminal and run alsamixer,
  check the "Capture Volume" and "Mic Boost" value, then adjust the
  input volume to 80%, check those values and we could see both values
  are changed.

  [Where problems could occur]
  This patch could make the parse of input volume control fail, then
  the input volume can't be changed anymore when users adjust the
  volume from UI. But this possibility is very low, I tested this patch
  on many lenovo and dell machines with sof audio driver, all worked
  well.

  

  SRU Justification for pulseaudio:

  [Impact]
  On the machines with the sof audio driver, after booting up, the
  active output device is speaker by default, we adjust the output
  volume to 100%, then we plug a headphone, and adjust the output
  volume from 100% to 20%, now in theory, the speaker's volume is
  100%, the headphone's volume is 20%. We plugout the headphone,
  the active output device becomes speaker and we expect the volume
  changes to 100%, but the output volume for speaker is 20%.

  [Fix]
  Backport a upstream patch, this patch is already in the pulseaudio-15.0,
  so impish already has this fix. Only hirsute and focal need to backport
  this patch.

  [Test]
  adjust speaker's volume to 80%, then plug headphone and adjust headphone's
  volume to 20%, unplug the headphone, the speaker's volume becomes to 80%,
  plug the headphone, the headphone's volume becomes to 20%.

  [Where problems could occur]
  The patch writes the output volume to hardware immediately when switching
  output device on the machines with sof audio driver, this could introduce
  pop noise when changing the output device, but this possibility is very
  low, I tested the patch on many lenovo and dell machines with sof audio 
driver,
  all worked as expected and have no pop noise when switching output device.

  

  The patch was merged to ubuntu 5.13.0 and 5.11.0 generic kernels
  with stable update already, but it is not merged to ubuntu 5.4.0
  kernel yet, so I sent this SRU for the focal kernel.

  [Impact]
  Users plug headphone and Mic to the audio jacks, but the system
  can't detect them, and couldn't output sound through headphone and
  record sound through Mic.

  [Fix]
  Backport a upstream patch, this will set the Mic to auto-detection
  mode and set the headphone to left location.

  [Test]
  Plug a headset to the headset audio jack, both headphone and mic
  could be detected. And output the sound to headphone, could hear
  the sound, record the sound through Mic, the sound could be recorded.

  [Where problems could occur]
  The patch is specific to Acer Aspire 5 machine, if it could introduce
  regression, it will make the audio like internal mic and internal spk
  stop working. But this possibility is very low.

  Hello,

  There seems to be 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946410] Re: freezing

2021-10-07 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Please run:

gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.a11y always-show-universal-access-status
true

and then use the new menu in the top panel to check you don't have any
of those options enabled that would affect keyboard behaviour.


** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => mutter (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

** Summary changed:

- freezing
+ when "/" or "?" the system hangs for 5 seconds

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946410

Title:
  when "/" or "?" the system hangs for 5 seconds

Status in mutter package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  when "/" or "?" the system hangs for 5 seconds

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu14
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permissão negada: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Oct  7 22:49:32 2021
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: focal
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  GraphicsCard:
   Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Cape Verde PRO [Radeon HD 7750/8740 / 
R7 250E] [1002:683f] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: XFX Pine Group Inc. Cape Verde PRO [Radeon HD 7750/8740 / R7 
250E] [1682:3248]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-29 (8 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819)
  MachineType: ASUS All Series
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.11.0-37-generic 
root=UUID=e4266656-ad3e-418c-ad5b-feb2f61ea165 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  Symptom: display
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 05/29/2014
  dmi.bios.release: 4.6
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 0330
  dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M.
  dmi.board.name: Z97M-PLUS
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.board.version: Rev X.0x
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0330:bd05/29/2014:br4.6:svnASUS:pnAllSeries:pvrSystemVersion:skuAll:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnZ97M-PLUS:rvrRevX.0x:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:
  dmi.product.family: ASUS MB
  dmi.product.name: All Series
  dmi.product.sku: All
  dmi.product.version: System Version
  dmi.sys.vendor: ASUS
  version.compiz: compiz N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.105-3~20.04.2
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.3~20.04.2
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.3~20.04.2
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1~20.04.2
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200226-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.16-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1946410/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946367] Re: DisplayPort MST Hub only recognizes one of two displays using Wayland (NVIDIA)

2021-10-07 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Please report the bug upstream at:

  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues

and then tell us the new issue ID.

** Package changed: wayland (Ubuntu) => mutter (Ubuntu)

** Tags added: nvidia

** Tags added: multimonitor

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wayland in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946367

Title:
  DisplayPort MST Hub only recognizes one of two displays using Wayland
  (NVIDIA)

Status in mutter package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I have two 4K Monitors connected to a single DisplayPort 1.4 Output
  via a DisplayPort 1.4 MST Hub working flawlessly under X.org.

  I have enabled nvidia-drm.modeset=1 in the GRUB CMDLINE Settings and
  switched to Wayland in the GDM Greeter.

  But it seems like Wayland is unable to drive multiple displays via a
  DisplayPort 1.4 MST Hub, because only one of them shows a display
  output. However they are both correctly recognized under the display
  settings.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+22ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-16.16-generic 5.13.13
  Uname: Linux 5.13.0-16-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon 
znvpair
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.gpu0: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.mig: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..2a.00.0: Error: path was not a regular file.
  .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
  .proc.driver.nvidia.version:
   NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  470.63.01  Tue Aug  3 
20:44:16 UTC 2021
   GCC version:
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu70
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Keine Berechtigung: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Oct  7 15:05:07 2021
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: impish
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus: zfs, 2.0.6, 5.13.0-16-generic, x86_64: installed (WARNING! Diff 
between built and installed module!)
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
  GraphicsCard:
   NVIDIA Corporation GA102 [GeForce RTX 3080 Ti] [10de:2208] (rev a1) (prog-if 
00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: NVIDIA Corporation GA102 [GeForce RTX 3080 Ti] [10de:1535]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-10-07 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Daily amd64 (20211006)
  MachineType: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/BOOT/ubuntu_10kpab@/vmlinuz-5.13.0-16-generic 
root=ZFS=rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_10kpab ro quiet splash nvidia-drm.modeset=1 
vt.handoff=1
  SourcePackage: xorg
  Symptom: display
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 08/11/2021
  dmi.bios.release: 5.17
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: P3.20
  dmi.board.name: X570 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB3
  dmi.board.vendor: ASRock
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrP3.20:bd08/11/2021:br5.17:svnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:pnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:pvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:skuToBeFilledByO.E.M.:rvnASRock:rnX570PhantomGaming-ITX/TB3:rvr:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:
  dmi.product.family: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.product.name: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.product.sku: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.product.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.sys.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  nvidia-settings:
   ERROR: Unable to find display on any available system
   
   
   ERROR: Unable to find display on any available system
  version.compiz: compiz N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.107-8
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 21.2.2-1ubuntu1
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
  version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers-* N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.13-1ubuntu1
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-2
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200714-1ubuntu1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1946367/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946410] [NEW] freezing

2021-10-07 Thread MAURICIO SILVA AMARAL
Public bug reported:

when "/" or "?" the system hangs for 5 seconds

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu14
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permissão negada: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Thu Oct  7 22:49:32 2021
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: focal
DistroVariant: ubuntu
GraphicsCard:
 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Cape Verde PRO [Radeon HD 7750/8740 / 
R7 250E] [1002:683f] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: XFX Pine Group Inc. Cape Verde PRO [Radeon HD 7750/8740 / R7 
250E] [1682:3248]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-29 (8 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819)
MachineType: ASUS All Series
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.11.0-37-generic 
root=UUID=e4266656-ad3e-418c-ad5b-feb2f61ea165 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
Symptom: display
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 05/29/2014
dmi.bios.release: 4.6
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 0330
dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: Z97M-PLUS
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev X.0x
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0330:bd05/29/2014:br4.6:svnASUS:pnAllSeries:pvrSystemVersion:skuAll:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnZ97M-PLUS:rvrRevX.0x:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:
dmi.product.family: ASUS MB
dmi.product.name: All Series
dmi.product.sku: All
dmi.product.version: System Version
dmi.sys.vendor: ASUS
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.105-3~20.04.2
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.3~20.04.2
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.3~20.04.2
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1~20.04.2
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200226-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.16-1

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal performance ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946410

Title:
  freezing

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  when "/" or "?" the system hangs for 5 seconds

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu14
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permissão negada: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Oct  7 22:49:32 2021
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: focal
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  GraphicsCard:
   Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Cape Verde PRO [Radeon HD 7750/8740 / 
R7 250E] [1002:683f] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: XFX Pine Group Inc. Cape Verde PRO [Radeon HD 7750/8740 / R7 
250E] [1682:3248]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-29 (8 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819)
  MachineType: ASUS All Series
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.11.0-37-generic 
root=UUID=e4266656-ad3e-418c-ad5b-feb2f61ea165 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  Symptom: display
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 05/29/2014
  dmi.bios.release: 4.6
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 0330
  dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M.
  dmi.board.name: Z97M-PLUS
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.board.version: Rev X.0x
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0330:bd05/29/2014:br4.6:svnASUS:pnAllSeries:pvrSystemVersion:skuAll:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnZ97M-PLUS:rvrRevX.0x:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:
  dmi.product.family: ASUS MB
  dmi.product.name: All Series
  dmi.product.sku: All
  dmi.product.version: System Version
  dmi.sys.vendor: ASUS
  version.compiz: compiz N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.105-3~20.04.2
  

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1943077] Re: snapd fails to autopkgtest on mksquashfs, which is looking for libgcc_s

2021-10-07 Thread Ian Johnson
Dan, note that although we set the SNAP_REEXEC environment variable in
that integration test, that environment variable is actually not obeyed
when it comes to the mksquashfs command which is called here:

https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/blob/dfba7de59a41bc22786d87f53b20deea14240713/snap/squashfs/squashfs.go#L524

and the function snapdtool.CommandFromSystemSnap does not observe the
SNAP_REEXEC environment variable at all, instead just checking if the
snapd or core snaps exist at all, and using the mksquashfs from those
snaps instead of what's on the host on $PATH (though we do fallback and
if there is no mksquashfs found in the core or snapd snaps (somehow???),
then we use $PATH).

As I mentioned on IRC, we could potentially someday add a workaround
where if mksquashfs from the system snap specifically segfaults then we
will fall back to using the host's mksquashfs, but we have chosen for
now not to work on that patch.

Hope this helps explain things.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943077

Title:
  snapd fails to autopkgtest on mksquashfs, which is looking for
  libgcc_s

Status in snapd:
  Fix Committed
Status in openssh package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in squashfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  During current snapd autopkgtest, a failure can be observed:

  https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-
  impish/impish/amd64/s/snapd/20210907_175258_5451b@/log.gz

  
  error: cannot pack 
"/home/gopath/src/github.com/snapcore/snapd/tests/smoke/sandbox/test-snapd-sandbox":
 mksquashfs call failed: 
  -
  libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_cancel to work
  Parallel mksquashfs: Using 1 processor
  Creating 4.0 filesystem on 
/home/gopath/src/github.com/snapcore/snapd/tests/smoke/sandbox/test-snapd-sandbox/test-snapd-sandbox_1.0_all.snap,
 block size 131072.
  -
  error: cannot read snap file: "/var/lib/snapd/snaps/.local-install-136125945"
 is not a snap or snapdir

  
  I traced the underlying call to the following:
  "/snap/snapd/current/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so" "--library-path"
  
"/snap/snapd/current/usr/local/lib:/snap/snapd/current/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu:/snap/snapd/current/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu"
  "/snap/snapd/current/usr/bin/mksquashfs" asdf asdf.squashfs

  (the real call has more arguments, this is a simplified version that
  produces the failure)

  To observe this, one can create a VM based a cloud image from
  https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/impish/current, then run the above command in
  the resulting environment.
  Doing so will test against snapd v2.51.4 (12883).
  Retesting with edge 2.52+git635.gada2d87 (13323) produces an equivalent 
result.

  Running a more bland `/snap/snapd/current/usr/bin/mksquashfs asdf
  asdf.squashfs` without messing with library paths has mksquashfs behaving as
  expected.  Also, getting a v2.51.3 snapd seems to behave itself.  Updating 
from
  2.51.3 -> 2.51.4 also works.

  One can see a passing mksquashfs by taking libgcc_s.so.1 from hirsute
  and placing it in the library path for the above call.

  In the working scenario, it appears that libgcc_s is being obtained
  from outside of /snap (and also libz).  In the failing scenario, this
  external copy of libgcc_s is not being loaded (per gdb info sharedlibrary),
  but libz still is.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1943077/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946096] Re: Apply upstream patches to fix problems for Foxconn and Quectel modems.

2021-10-07 Thread Jerry Lee
** Changed in: oem-priority
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to modemmanager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946096

Title:
  Apply upstream patches to fix problems for Foxconn and Quectel modems.

Status in OEM Priority Project:
  In Progress
Status in modemmanager package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  The following 2 modems need the ModemManager v1.16.6 suite to be patched from 
v1.18.2 to fix some problems(LP#1943774, LP#1943780):
  * Foxconn SDX55 T99W175 5G sub6 PCIE Modem
  * Quectel SDX24 EM160R-GL 4G LTE CAT16 PCIE Modem 

  The requested upstream patches are listed as below:
  * for Quectel EM160 4G
** 
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager/-/commit/83ac82470589a3672092a0ba0be855093b1cf5e2
 
  * for Foxconn T99W175
** 
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager/-/commit/21ae558fe3600c84b3ca7dcd9bf50a3ba576c7c9

**https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager/-/commit/76e700f4fd703f952208993330ab098305c13d6b
** 
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager/-/commit/52bf2c641171ded9e617022f40497c8984520371
** 
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager/-/commit/33e2b023ef01bea9da37ae2beb192f7d92bce47a
** 
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager/-/commit/f72046701659073fbfa97516e155865647acb154
 

  
  [Test Plan]

  1. Install the Ubuntu image.
  2. Boot and login the system.
  3. Prepare the modem’s firmware and install the firmware upgrading 
application provided by Foxconn and Quectel
  4. Using the firmware upgrading application to upgrade the modem’s firmware 
  5. Verify if the modem’s firmware upgrading is successful
  6. Reboot 
  7. Verify if the upgraded modem firmware is still working

  
  [Where problems could occur]

  The requested upstream patches are for these 2 specific modems and the status 
information.
  This should not affect existing generic functions and other modems.

  
  [Other Info]

  The firmware and the upgrading application can be downloaded from the 
following link:
  * LP#1943774 for Quectel modems
  * LP#1943780 for Foxconn modems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1946096/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1943077] Re: snapd fails to autopkgtest on mksquashfs, which is looking for libgcc_s

2021-10-07 Thread Dan Bungert
Snapd team advises that this will be fixed in 2.52.1, and that affected
users should pick up that version when available or, in the mean time,
pickup a newer snapd.  Currently the beta channel has this 2.52.1
version, which does appear to resolve the issue.  Based on this advise
I'm removing 'rls-ii-incoming'

Note that this version being on stable does not necessarily fix autopkgtest, as 
this deb version of snapd goes out of its way to NOT actually install the snap 
version of snapd.
https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/blob/master/packaging/ubuntu-16.04/tests/integrationtests#L38

** Tags removed: rls-ii-incoming

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943077

Title:
  snapd fails to autopkgtest on mksquashfs, which is looking for
  libgcc_s

Status in snapd:
  Fix Committed
Status in openssh package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in squashfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  During current snapd autopkgtest, a failure can be observed:

  https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-
  impish/impish/amd64/s/snapd/20210907_175258_5451b@/log.gz

  
  error: cannot pack 
"/home/gopath/src/github.com/snapcore/snapd/tests/smoke/sandbox/test-snapd-sandbox":
 mksquashfs call failed: 
  -
  libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_cancel to work
  Parallel mksquashfs: Using 1 processor
  Creating 4.0 filesystem on 
/home/gopath/src/github.com/snapcore/snapd/tests/smoke/sandbox/test-snapd-sandbox/test-snapd-sandbox_1.0_all.snap,
 block size 131072.
  -
  error: cannot read snap file: "/var/lib/snapd/snaps/.local-install-136125945"
 is not a snap or snapdir

  
  I traced the underlying call to the following:
  "/snap/snapd/current/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so" "--library-path"
  
"/snap/snapd/current/usr/local/lib:/snap/snapd/current/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu:/snap/snapd/current/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu"
  "/snap/snapd/current/usr/bin/mksquashfs" asdf asdf.squashfs

  (the real call has more arguments, this is a simplified version that
  produces the failure)

  To observe this, one can create a VM based a cloud image from
  https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/impish/current, then run the above command in
  the resulting environment.
  Doing so will test against snapd v2.51.4 (12883).
  Retesting with edge 2.52+git635.gada2d87 (13323) produces an equivalent 
result.

  Running a more bland `/snap/snapd/current/usr/bin/mksquashfs asdf
  asdf.squashfs` without messing with library paths has mksquashfs behaving as
  expected.  Also, getting a v2.51.3 snapd seems to behave itself.  Updating 
from
  2.51.3 -> 2.51.4 also works.

  One can see a passing mksquashfs by taking libgcc_s.so.1 from hirsute
  and placing it in the library path for the above call.

  In the working scenario, it appears that libgcc_s is being obtained
  from outside of /snap (and also libz).  In the failing scenario, this
  external copy of libgcc_s is not being loaded (per gdb info sharedlibrary),
  but libz still is.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1943077/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946343] Re: Stale os-release file after possible upgrade from 20.04.2 to 20.04.3

2021-10-07 Thread Vivek
This is the output of my dpkg-query for os-release:

$ dpkg-query --search os-release
systemd: /usr/share/man/man5/os-release.5.gz
diversion by oem-release from: /usr/lib/os-release
diversion by oem-release to: /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release
base-files: /etc/os-release
diversion by oem-release from: /usr/lib/os-release
diversion by oem-release to: /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release
base-files: /usr/lib/os-release

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946343

Title:
  Stale os-release file after possible upgrade from 20.04.2 to 20.04.3

Status in base-files package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Refer: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/698949

  I recently bought a Dell laptop with Ubuntu pre-installed in it. Looks
  like it came with Ubuntu 20.04.2 and OEM Linux Kernel in it. After my
  initial login (on October 1, 2021), the 'Software Updater' GUI
  prompted me for updates, which I went ahead with.

  However at the end of it, I noticed that I was still at 20.04.2 with
  Linux Kernel at 5.10.0-1045-oem.

  lsb_release -a
  ---

  No LSB modules are available.
  Distributor ID: Ubuntu
  Description:Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS (fossa-bulbasaur X55.1)
  Release:20.04
  Codename:   focal

  uname -a
  -
  Linux dev-linux 5.10.0-1045-oem #47-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 18 10:41:03 UTC 2021 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  Then I manually tried sudo apt update and sudo apt upgrade / dist-
  upgrade from the terminal, but nothing got upgraded. When I invoked
  the GUI 'Software Updater' again, it showed me that my system was
  already up-to-date. However, as 20.04.3 was released end of Aug 2021,
  I was expecting that I should be at that release after my initial
  updates.

  Since that didn't happen, I asked a question regarding this in
  askubuntu followed by launchpad
  https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/698949, thinking my
  update had failed for some unknown reason.

  However, based on some inputs from other users, we were able to narrow
  down the problem to /usr/lib/os-release file not having the right
  contents in it. Every other file including /usr/lib/os-release.oem-
  release, /etc/issue, /etc/issue.net specifies that I am on 20.04.3.
  Whereas only /usr/lib/os-release (and its symlink /etc/release)
  specifies my current release as 20.04.2.

  Even the lsb_release -a command always displays the output of
  /usr/lib/os-release file only.

  $ cat /usr/lib/os-release
  NAME="Ubuntu"
  VERSION="20.04.2 LTS (Focal Fossa)"
  ID=ubuntu
  ID_LIKE=debian
  PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS (fossa-bulbasaur X55.1)"
  VERSION_ID="20.04"
  HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
  SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
  BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
  
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
  VERSION_CODENAME=focal
  UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal

  $ cat /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release
  NAME="Ubuntu"
  VERSION="20.04.3 LTS (Focal Fossa)"
  ID=ubuntu
  ID_LIKE=debian
  PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS"
  VERSION_ID="20.04"
  HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
  SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
  BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
  
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
  VERSION_CODENAME=focal
  UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal

  $ cat /etc/issue
  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS \n \l

  $ cat /etc/issue.net
  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS

  If you look at the timestamp of these files, strangely os-release had
  a newer timestamp of Oct 1 compared to other files.

  $ ls -l /usr/lib/os-release
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 406 Oct 1 20:31 /usr/lib/os-release

  $ ls -l /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 382 Aug 4 07:53 /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release

  $ ls -l /etc/issue
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 26 Aug 4 07:53 /etc/issue

  $ ls -l /etc/issue.net
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19 Aug 4 07:53 /etc/issue.net

  Please note that, other software package updates, and linux kernel
  updates are happening automatically without any issues so far for me.
  Few days back even got a new kernel update.

  $ uname -a
  Linux vivek-dev-linux 5.10.0-1049-oem #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Sep 27 11:01:10 UTC 
2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  Workarounds Attempted
  -
  1. Commented out all non-ubuntu external sources from /etc/apt/*.list. Then 
performed an apt clean + update + upgrade. But still nothing happened and the 
same issue remained. 

  2. Tried performing apt-install --reinstall base-files. But still
  nothing changed:

  $ sudo apt install --reinstall base-files
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree
  Reading state information... Done
  0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded.
  Need to get 60.6 kB of archives.
  After this operation, 0 B of additional disk 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1659950] Re: rsync -u --inplace --partial -a can't resume transfer

2021-10-07 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: rsync
   Status: Unknown => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659950

Title:
  rsync -u --inplace --partial -a can't resume transfer

Status in rsync:
  New
Status in rsync package in Ubuntu:
  Opinion

Bug description:
  Suppose you have a file in hostA:

hostA$ ls -l /tmp/files
 -rw-rw-r-- 2 root root 563016 Jan 10 15:01 test.txt

  You download it from the hostB using:

hostB$ rsync -u --inplace --partial -a hostA::files/* .

  If the transfer is aborted, hostB will get only a partial file:

hostB$ ls -l /tmp/files
 -rw-rw-r-- 2 root root   2024 Jan 11 18:00 test.txt

  BUT the ctime/mtime of hostB/test.txt now is NEWER than hostA/test.txt(and 
mtime == ctime). So, if you run the same rsync -u command again:

hostB$ rsync -u --inplace --partial -a hostA::files/* .

  Rsync will SKIP THE FILE, because hostB/test.txt is "newer" than
  hostA/test.txt. So you CAN'T resume using rsync -u command, and you
  will think there are no differences.

  To avoid this bug, rsync must create the file with ctime=mtime=0. And
  if the file already exists before transfer, rsync -u must not change
  his current ctime/mtime. Ctime/mtime must be updated ONLY after the
  transfer was successfully completed.

  Note this is really need because there are scenarios where checksum
  comparison can't be used, only comparison by time. For example, to
  avoid deleting changes made in hostB to test.txt. Also I need to use
  --inplace.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/rsync/+bug/1659950/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946388] [NEW] Journalctl -f --file some.journal causes coredump

2021-10-07 Thread Marko Man
Public bug reported:

Focal latest systemd 245.

Journalctl -f --file path/to/file.journal.  Will allways causes
journalctl crash...

The same doesnt happen on centos8 systemd 239... I couldnt test on any
more systems atm.

** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946388

Title:
  Journalctl -f --file some.journal causes coredump

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Focal latest systemd 245.

  Journalctl -f --file path/to/file.journal.  Will allways causes
  journalctl crash...

  The same doesnt happen on centos8 systemd 239... I couldnt test on any
  more systems atm.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1946388/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946343] Re: Stale os-release file after possible upgrade from 20.04.2 to 20.04.3

2021-10-07 Thread Vivek
@Steve, thank you for looking into this. If this is not a base-files
issue, where could the problem be? I have not installed any other
package myself. This is just the Ubuntu installation that the laptop
came with.

As an end user I am unable to see whether upgrade to 20.04.3 is
successful or not. Clearly lsb_release is not saying so.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946343

Title:
  Stale os-release file after possible upgrade from 20.04.2 to 20.04.3

Status in base-files package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Refer: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/698949

  I recently bought a Dell laptop with Ubuntu pre-installed in it. Looks
  like it came with Ubuntu 20.04.2 and OEM Linux Kernel in it. After my
  initial login (on October 1, 2021), the 'Software Updater' GUI
  prompted me for updates, which I went ahead with.

  However at the end of it, I noticed that I was still at 20.04.2 with
  Linux Kernel at 5.10.0-1045-oem.

  lsb_release -a
  ---

  No LSB modules are available.
  Distributor ID: Ubuntu
  Description:Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS (fossa-bulbasaur X55.1)
  Release:20.04
  Codename:   focal

  uname -a
  -
  Linux dev-linux 5.10.0-1045-oem #47-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 18 10:41:03 UTC 2021 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  Then I manually tried sudo apt update and sudo apt upgrade / dist-
  upgrade from the terminal, but nothing got upgraded. When I invoked
  the GUI 'Software Updater' again, it showed me that my system was
  already up-to-date. However, as 20.04.3 was released end of Aug 2021,
  I was expecting that I should be at that release after my initial
  updates.

  Since that didn't happen, I asked a question regarding this in
  askubuntu followed by launchpad
  https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/698949, thinking my
  update had failed for some unknown reason.

  However, based on some inputs from other users, we were able to narrow
  down the problem to /usr/lib/os-release file not having the right
  contents in it. Every other file including /usr/lib/os-release.oem-
  release, /etc/issue, /etc/issue.net specifies that I am on 20.04.3.
  Whereas only /usr/lib/os-release (and its symlink /etc/release)
  specifies my current release as 20.04.2.

  Even the lsb_release -a command always displays the output of
  /usr/lib/os-release file only.

  $ cat /usr/lib/os-release
  NAME="Ubuntu"
  VERSION="20.04.2 LTS (Focal Fossa)"
  ID=ubuntu
  ID_LIKE=debian
  PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS (fossa-bulbasaur X55.1)"
  VERSION_ID="20.04"
  HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
  SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
  BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
  
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
  VERSION_CODENAME=focal
  UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal

  $ cat /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release
  NAME="Ubuntu"
  VERSION="20.04.3 LTS (Focal Fossa)"
  ID=ubuntu
  ID_LIKE=debian
  PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS"
  VERSION_ID="20.04"
  HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
  SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
  BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
  
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
  VERSION_CODENAME=focal
  UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal

  $ cat /etc/issue
  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS \n \l

  $ cat /etc/issue.net
  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS

  If you look at the timestamp of these files, strangely os-release had
  a newer timestamp of Oct 1 compared to other files.

  $ ls -l /usr/lib/os-release
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 406 Oct 1 20:31 /usr/lib/os-release

  $ ls -l /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 382 Aug 4 07:53 /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release

  $ ls -l /etc/issue
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 26 Aug 4 07:53 /etc/issue

  $ ls -l /etc/issue.net
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19 Aug 4 07:53 /etc/issue.net

  Please note that, other software package updates, and linux kernel
  updates are happening automatically without any issues so far for me.
  Few days back even got a new kernel update.

  $ uname -a
  Linux vivek-dev-linux 5.10.0-1049-oem #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Sep 27 11:01:10 UTC 
2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  Workarounds Attempted
  -
  1. Commented out all non-ubuntu external sources from /etc/apt/*.list. Then 
performed an apt clean + update + upgrade. But still nothing happened and the 
same issue remained. 

  2. Tried performing apt-install --reinstall base-files. But still
  nothing changed:

  $ sudo apt install --reinstall base-files
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree
  Reading state information... Done
  0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded.
  Need to get 60.6 kB of archives.
  After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
  Get:1 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946209] StacktraceSource.txt

2021-10-07 Thread Apport retracing service
** Attachment added: "StacktraceSource.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946209/+attachment/5531338/+files/StacktraceSource.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946209

Title:
  evolution-alarm-notify crashed with signal 5 in _XEventsQueued()

Status in evolution-data-server package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Crashes when going to system setting /  Graphic tablet  / manually
  register a tablet / select Multi-device tablet pen sensor => crash

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
  Package: evolution-data-server 3.40.4-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-16.16-generic 5.13.13
  Uname: Linux 5.13.0-16-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu69
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CrashCounter: 1
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Wed Oct  6 10:32:24 2021
  ExecutablePath: /usr/libexec/evolution-data-server/evolution-alarm-notify
  ProcCmdline: /usr/libexec/evolution-data-server/evolution-alarm-notify
  Signal: 5
  SourcePackage: evolution-data-server
  StacktraceTop:
   ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
   ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
   _XEventsQueued () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
   XPending () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
   ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-3.so.0
  Title: evolution-alarm-notify crashed with signal 5 in _XEventsQueued()
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to impish on 2021-10-03 (3 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo uinput
  separator:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-data-server/+bug/1946209/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946209] ThreadStacktrace.txt

2021-10-07 Thread Apport retracing service
** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946209/+attachment/5531339/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** Attachment removed: "CoreDump.gz"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946209/+attachment/5531020/+files/CoreDump.gz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946209

Title:
  evolution-alarm-notify crashed with signal 5 in _XEventsQueued()

Status in evolution-data-server package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Crashes when going to system setting /  Graphic tablet  / manually
  register a tablet / select Multi-device tablet pen sensor => crash

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
  Package: evolution-data-server 3.40.4-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-16.16-generic 5.13.13
  Uname: Linux 5.13.0-16-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu69
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CrashCounter: 1
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Wed Oct  6 10:32:24 2021
  ExecutablePath: /usr/libexec/evolution-data-server/evolution-alarm-notify
  ProcCmdline: /usr/libexec/evolution-data-server/evolution-alarm-notify
  Signal: 5
  SourcePackage: evolution-data-server
  StacktraceTop:
   ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
   ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
   _XEventsQueued () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
   XPending () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
   ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-3.so.0
  Title: evolution-alarm-notify crashed with signal 5 in _XEventsQueued()
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to impish on 2021-10-03 (3 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo uinput
  separator:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-data-server/+bug/1946209/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946209] Stacktrace.txt

2021-10-07 Thread Apport retracing service
** Attachment added: "Stacktrace.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946209/+attachment/5531337/+files/Stacktrace.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946209

Title:
  evolution-alarm-notify crashed with signal 5 in _XEventsQueued()

Status in evolution-data-server package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Crashes when going to system setting /  Graphic tablet  / manually
  register a tablet / select Multi-device tablet pen sensor => crash

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
  Package: evolution-data-server 3.40.4-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-16.16-generic 5.13.13
  Uname: Linux 5.13.0-16-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu69
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CrashCounter: 1
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Wed Oct  6 10:32:24 2021
  ExecutablePath: /usr/libexec/evolution-data-server/evolution-alarm-notify
  ProcCmdline: /usr/libexec/evolution-data-server/evolution-alarm-notify
  Signal: 5
  SourcePackage: evolution-data-server
  StacktraceTop:
   ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
   ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
   _XEventsQueued () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
   XPending () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
   ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-3.so.0
  Title: evolution-alarm-notify crashed with signal 5 in _XEventsQueued()
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to impish on 2021-10-03 (3 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo uinput
  separator:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-data-server/+bug/1946209/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946209] evolution-alarm-notify crashed with signal 5 in _XEventsQueued()

2021-10-07 Thread Apport retracing service
StacktraceTop:
 XPending (dpy=0x560aba38aef0) at ../../src/Pending.c:55
 gdk_check_xpending (display=0x560aba3a10e0) at 
x11/../../../../../gdk/x11/gdkeventsource.c:269
 gdk_event_source_check (source=source@entry=0x560aba3e2cb0) at 
x11/../../../../../gdk/x11/gdkeventsource.c:306
 g_main_context_check (context=0x560aba3e2da0, max_priority=2147483647, 
fds=, n_fds=-728157272) at ../../../glib/gmain.c:3955
 g_main_context_iterate.constprop.0 (context=context@entry=0x560aba3e2da0, 
block=block@entry=1, dispatch=dispatch@entry=1, self=) at 
../../../glib/gmain.c:4128

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946209

Title:
  evolution-alarm-notify crashed with signal 5 in _XEventsQueued()

Status in evolution-data-server package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Crashes when going to system setting /  Graphic tablet  / manually
  register a tablet / select Multi-device tablet pen sensor => crash

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
  Package: evolution-data-server 3.40.4-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-16.16-generic 5.13.13
  Uname: Linux 5.13.0-16-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu69
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CrashCounter: 1
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Wed Oct  6 10:32:24 2021
  ExecutablePath: /usr/libexec/evolution-data-server/evolution-alarm-notify
  ProcCmdline: /usr/libexec/evolution-data-server/evolution-alarm-notify
  Signal: 5
  SourcePackage: evolution-data-server
  StacktraceTop:
   ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
   ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
   _XEventsQueued () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
   XPending () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
   ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-3.so.0
  Title: evolution-alarm-notify crashed with signal 5 in _XEventsQueued()
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to impish on 2021-10-03 (3 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo uinput
  separator:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-data-server/+bug/1946209/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946343] Re: Stale os-release file after possible upgrade from 20.04.2 to 20.04.3

2021-10-07 Thread Steve Langasek
$ cat /usr/lib/os-release
NAME="Ubuntu"
VERSION="20.04.2 LTS (Focal Fossa)"
ID=ubuntu
ID_LIKE=debian
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS (fossa-bulbasaur X55.1)"
VERSION_ID="20.04"
HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
VERSION_CODENAME=focal
UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal

You have an OEM-specific package installed that diverts /usr/lib/os-
release and replaces the contents.  The fact that this file has not
changed when base-files changed is not a bug in base-files.

** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946343

Title:
  Stale os-release file after possible upgrade from 20.04.2 to 20.04.3

Status in base-files package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Refer: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/698949

  I recently bought a Dell laptop with Ubuntu pre-installed in it. Looks
  like it came with Ubuntu 20.04.2 and OEM Linux Kernel in it. After my
  initial login (on October 1, 2021), the 'Software Updater' GUI
  prompted me for updates, which I went ahead with.

  However at the end of it, I noticed that I was still at 20.04.2 with
  Linux Kernel at 5.10.0-1045-oem.

  lsb_release -a
  ---

  No LSB modules are available.
  Distributor ID: Ubuntu
  Description:Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS (fossa-bulbasaur X55.1)
  Release:20.04
  Codename:   focal

  uname -a
  -
  Linux dev-linux 5.10.0-1045-oem #47-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 18 10:41:03 UTC 2021 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  Then I manually tried sudo apt update and sudo apt upgrade / dist-
  upgrade from the terminal, but nothing got upgraded. When I invoked
  the GUI 'Software Updater' again, it showed me that my system was
  already up-to-date. However, as 20.04.3 was released end of Aug 2021,
  I was expecting that I should be at that release after my initial
  updates.

  Since that didn't happen, I asked a question regarding this in
  askubuntu followed by launchpad
  https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/698949, thinking my
  update had failed for some unknown reason.

  However, based on some inputs from other users, we were able to narrow
  down the problem to /usr/lib/os-release file not having the right
  contents in it. Every other file including /usr/lib/os-release.oem-
  release, /etc/issue, /etc/issue.net specifies that I am on 20.04.3.
  Whereas only /usr/lib/os-release (and its symlink /etc/release)
  specifies my current release as 20.04.2.

  Even the lsb_release -a command always displays the output of
  /usr/lib/os-release file only.

  $ cat /usr/lib/os-release
  NAME="Ubuntu"
  VERSION="20.04.2 LTS (Focal Fossa)"
  ID=ubuntu
  ID_LIKE=debian
  PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS (fossa-bulbasaur X55.1)"
  VERSION_ID="20.04"
  HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
  SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
  BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
  
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
  VERSION_CODENAME=focal
  UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal

  $ cat /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release
  NAME="Ubuntu"
  VERSION="20.04.3 LTS (Focal Fossa)"
  ID=ubuntu
  ID_LIKE=debian
  PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS"
  VERSION_ID="20.04"
  HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
  SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
  BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
  
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
  VERSION_CODENAME=focal
  UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal

  $ cat /etc/issue
  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS \n \l

  $ cat /etc/issue.net
  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS

  If you look at the timestamp of these files, strangely os-release had
  a newer timestamp of Oct 1 compared to other files.

  $ ls -l /usr/lib/os-release
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 406 Oct 1 20:31 /usr/lib/os-release

  $ ls -l /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 382 Aug 4 07:53 /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release

  $ ls -l /etc/issue
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 26 Aug 4 07:53 /etc/issue

  $ ls -l /etc/issue.net
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19 Aug 4 07:53 /etc/issue.net

  Please note that, other software package updates, and linux kernel
  updates are happening automatically without any issues so far for me.
  Few days back even got a new kernel update.

  $ uname -a
  Linux vivek-dev-linux 5.10.0-1049-oem #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Sep 27 11:01:10 UTC 
2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  Workarounds Attempted
  -
  1. Commented out all non-ubuntu external sources from /etc/apt/*.list. Then 
performed an apt clean + update + upgrade. But still nothing happened and the 
same issue remained. 

  2. Tried performing apt-install --reinstall base-files. But still
  nothing changed:

  $ sudo apt install 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946196] Re: Additional Drivers fails with pk-client-error-quark: Cannot download packages whilst offline (257)

2021-10-07 Thread Sebastien Bacher
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946196

Title:
  Additional Drivers fails with pk-client-error-quark: Cannot download
  packages whilst offline (257)

Status in software-properties package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Additional Drivers fails to install nvidia-driver-470:

Error while applying changes

pk-client-error-quark: Cannot download packages whilst offline (257)

  But the machine is ONLINE with full Internet access.

  WORKAROUND:

  sudo apt install nvidia-driver-470

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1946196/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946367] [NEW] DisplayPort MST Hub only recognizes one of two displays using Wayland (NVIDIA)

2021-10-07 Thread Sebastian Heiden
Public bug reported:

I have two 4K Monitors connected to a single DisplayPort 1.4 Output via
a DisplayPort 1.4 MST Hub working flawlessly under X.org.

I have enabled nvidia-drm.modeset=1 in the GRUB CMDLINE Settings and
switched to Wayland in the GDM Greeter.

But it seems like Wayland is unable to drive multiple displays via a
DisplayPort 1.4 MST Hub, because only one of them shows a display
output. However they are both correctly recognized under the display
settings.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
Package: xorg 1:7.7+22ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-16.16-generic 5.13.13
Uname: Linux 5.13.0-16-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon 
znvpair
.proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.gpu0: Error: path was not a regular file.
.proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.mig: Error: path was not a regular file.
.proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..2a.00.0: Error: path was not a regular file.
.proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
.proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
.proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
.proc.driver.nvidia.version:
 NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  470.63.01  Tue Aug  3 20:44:16 
UTC 2021
 GCC version:
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu70
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Keine Berechtigung: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Thu Oct  7 15:05:07 2021
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: impish
DistroVariant: ubuntu
DkmsStatus: zfs, 2.0.6, 5.13.0-16-generic, x86_64: installed (WARNING! Diff 
between built and installed module!)
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
GraphicsCard:
 NVIDIA Corporation GA102 [GeForce RTX 3080 Ti] [10de:2208] (rev a1) (prog-if 
00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: NVIDIA Corporation GA102 [GeForce RTX 3080 Ti] [10de:1535]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-10-07 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Daily amd64 (20211006)
MachineType: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M.
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/BOOT/ubuntu_10kpab@/vmlinuz-5.13.0-16-generic 
root=ZFS=rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_10kpab ro quiet splash nvidia-drm.modeset=1 
vt.handoff=1
SourcePackage: xorg
Symptom: display
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 08/11/2021
dmi.bios.release: 5.17
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: P3.20
dmi.board.name: X570 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB3
dmi.board.vendor: ASRock
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrP3.20:bd08/11/2021:br5.17:svnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:pnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:pvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:skuToBeFilledByO.E.M.:rvnASRock:rnX570PhantomGaming-ITX/TB3:rvr:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:
dmi.product.family: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.product.name: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.product.sku: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.product.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.sys.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
nvidia-settings:
 ERROR: Unable to find display on any available system
 
 
 ERROR: Unable to find display on any available system
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.107-8
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 21.2.2-1ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers-* N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.13-1ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-2
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200714-1ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-1

** Affects: wayland (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug impish ubuntu wayland-session

** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => wayland (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946367

Title:
  DisplayPort MST Hub only recognizes one of two displays using Wayland
  (NVIDIA)

Status in wayland package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I have two 4K Monitors connected to a single DisplayPort 1.4 Output
  via a DisplayPort 1.4 MST Hub working flawlessly under X.org.

  I have enabled nvidia-drm.modeset=1 in the GRUB CMDLINE Settings and
  switched to Wayland in the GDM Greeter.

  But it seems like Wayland is unable to drive multiple displays via a
  DisplayPort 1.4 MST Hub, because only one of them shows a display
  output. However they are both correctly recognized under the display
  settings.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
  Package: 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 788167] Re: CUPS cannot print to Kerberos-authenticated SMB print queue

2021-10-07 Thread supremesyntax
Still not possible to print to via SMB shared printer with kerberos
authentication.

"No valid Kerberos credential cache found!"

Ubuntu 20.04.3
Cups 2.3.1
smbclient 4.11.6-Ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788167

Title:
  CUPS cannot print to Kerberos-authenticated SMB print queue

Status in cups package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in Debian:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: cups

  That was investigated on maverick (cups 1.4.4) and natty (cups 1.4.6).

  CUPS in Ubuntu cannot authenticate using Kerberos to an SMB print
  queue, such as one in an Active Directory.  This is because the smb
  backend is being invoked as user lp, and this user cannot access the
  Kerberos credential cache of the user who submitted the job.  When
  trying to print, the job is held for authentication, and a dialog
  prompting for username/password is being shown.  On Windows (and
  possibly other OS), the user would not be prompted if he has a ticket
  in the Kerberos realm (ie, "logged on to the domain") he is trying to
  print to.

  The CUPS smb backend on Ubuntu is the smbspool binary provided by
  Samba.  When run as a user, it will pick the Kerberos credential cache
  by itself and authenticate seamlessly.  Otherwise, it will read the
  KRB5CCNAME environment variable and try to use that when possible.

  There is two possible solutions to that:

  - Invoke the smb backend as root and pass it the KRB5CCNAME
  environment variable pointing to the user's Kerberos credential cache.
  CUPS execute the backend as user lp if it is world-executable, which
  is currently the case on Ubuntu.  User lp do not have the permission
  to read  the user's credential cache, hence why the smb backend would
  need to be executed as root (by removing the world-executable bit).
  Also, CUPS does not currently set KRB5CCNAME before invoking the smb
  backend (see http://www.cups.org/str.php?L3847).

  - Execute smbspool as the user submitting the job.

  
  I presume we would have the same problem with other backend that would do 
Kerberos authentication, although I do not know of a specific one.  I have only 
tested and investigated with the smb backend.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/788167/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1794064] Re: Clicking a hyperlink in a PDF fails to open it if the default browser is a snap

2021-10-07 Thread Georgia Garcia
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Georgia Garcia (georgiag)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794064

Title:
  Clicking a hyperlink in a PDF fails to open it if the default browser
  is a snap

Status in apparmor package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in evince package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  This is related to bug #1792648. After fixing that one (see discussion
  at https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/evince/merge_requests/1),
  clicking a hyperlink in a PDF opens it correctly if the default
  browser is a well-known application (such as /usr/bin/firefox), but it
  fails to do so if the default browser is a snap (e.g. the chromium
  snap).

  This is not a recent regression, it's not working on bionic either.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.10
  Package: evince 3.30.0-2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.18.0-7.8-generic 4.18.5
  Uname: Linux 4.18.0-7-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu11
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Mon Sep 24 12:28:06 2018
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-07-02 (813 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20160420.1)
  SourcePackage: evince
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to cosmic on 2018-09-14 (9 days ago)
  modified.conffile..etc.apparmor.d.abstractions.evince: [modified]
  mtime.conffile..etc.apparmor.d.abstractions.evince: 2018-09-24T11:35:41.904158

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1794064/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1794064] Re: Clicking a hyperlink in a PDF fails to open it if the default browser is a snap

2021-10-07 Thread Jamie Strandboge
Olivier, yes, I shouldn't be assigned. Ian, you're right the profile is
suboptimal (it's also old so likely needs updating).

Do note that this is a separate named profile and evince (and if this is
put in an abstraction, anything that uses the abstraction) only has the
`/{,snap/core/[0-9]*/}usr/bin/snap mrCx -> snap_browser,` rule which
means that it is able to run the 'snap' command (needed since everything
in /snap/bin points to /usr/bin/snap) which at the time I wrote the
profile meant that access to this socket was needed as part of snap run.
IIRC, snapd should be protecting certain actions by uid connecting to it
(eg, you are root or not), but it has been a while since I've looked at
that. Evince is not a snap though so if snapd does any checks on 'is the
client a snap' then those would fail and evince would be able to do
whatever a non-root user could do with the 'snap' command via the
socket.

For snap run, we can see that the snap_browser profile limits what can
be used with 'run' since (at the time I wrote the comment) 'snap run'
required being able to look at the meta/snap.yaml of the specific snap.
This 'works' (worked?) but is brittle since if snap run changed to lift
this requirement (eg, 'snap run' just passed the name of the unresolved
symlink to snapd over the socket and let snapd start the snap, perhaps
via userd, etc) then this falls apart.

The profile was put up as an example as what could be done at the time without 
any help from snapd. I never particularly cared for it cause it was brittle and 
not designed. I'm not sure how to fix this, but here are some thoughts:
* evince is just executing stuff from /snap/bin (probably via the system's 
xdg-open). Assuming xdg-open, the system's xdg-open (or whatever evince is 
using to decide and launch the default browser) could itself be fixed in Ubuntu 
to launch a different command that behaved better. This wouldn't necessarily 
fix other distros (though this is the evince profile in Debian and Ubuntu, so 
*technically*, if you got this change (to presumably xdg-open) into them, you 
could update the evince profile in them accordingly)
* In lieu of that, if the profile still worked as intended, snapd could be 
hardened to look to check more than if the connecting process is root or a 
snap; it could also see if it is running under a non-snap profile, then limit 
access to the socket API accordingly. This has drawbacks and could break people 
who have written custom profiles similar to what I presented.
* I suppose an alternative approach would be to have symlinks in /snap/bin for 
things that are registered as browsers (or just the default browser) point to a 
designed snap command. Eg:

  /snap/bin/firefox -> /usr/bin/snap   # keep the 
existing one too
  /snap/bin/default-browser-is-a-snap -> /usr/bin/snap-browser # name is 
illustrative, TBD

  Now firefox, chromium, opera, brave, etc snaps registers themselves as
being capable of being a default browser with snapd, then snapd
registers with the system that /snap/bin/default-browser-is-a-snap is
the default browser (so system utilities like xdg-open don't need to
change) and /usr/bin/snap-browser is written to be safe (eg, only able
to 'snap run' the configured default browser, nothing else) and apparmor
profiles are adjusted to have `/{,snap/core/[0-9]*/}usr/bin/snap-browser
Uxr,` (or similar). The /snap/bin/default-browser-is-a-snap path is
illustrative and there isn't really a need for it at all. Could simply
perhaps have snapd register /usr/bin/snap-browser as the default browser
on the system (it now needs to know what snapd configured as the default
browser snap though) and forego the symlink.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794064

Title:
  Clicking a hyperlink in a PDF fails to open it if the default browser
  is a snap

Status in apparmor package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in evince package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  This is related to bug #1792648. After fixing that one (see discussion
  at https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/evince/merge_requests/1),
  clicking a hyperlink in a PDF opens it correctly if the default
  browser is a well-known application (such as /usr/bin/firefox), but it
  fails to do so if the default browser is a snap (e.g. the chromium
  snap).

  This is not a recent regression, it's not working on bionic either.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.10
  Package: evince 3.30.0-2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.18.0-7.8-generic 4.18.5
  Uname: Linux 4.18.0-7-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu11
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Mon Sep 24 12:28:06 2018
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-07-02 (813 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1794064] Re: Clicking a hyperlink in a PDF fails to open it if the default browser is a snap

2021-10-07 Thread Jamie Strandboge
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) => (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794064

Title:
  Clicking a hyperlink in a PDF fails to open it if the default browser
  is a snap

Status in apparmor package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in evince package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  This is related to bug #1792648. After fixing that one (see discussion
  at https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/evince/merge_requests/1),
  clicking a hyperlink in a PDF opens it correctly if the default
  browser is a well-known application (such as /usr/bin/firefox), but it
  fails to do so if the default browser is a snap (e.g. the chromium
  snap).

  This is not a recent regression, it's not working on bionic either.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.10
  Package: evince 3.30.0-2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.18.0-7.8-generic 4.18.5
  Uname: Linux 4.18.0-7-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu11
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Mon Sep 24 12:28:06 2018
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-07-02 (813 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20160420.1)
  SourcePackage: evince
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to cosmic on 2018-09-14 (9 days ago)
  modified.conffile..etc.apparmor.d.abstractions.evince: [modified]
  mtime.conffile..etc.apparmor.d.abstractions.evince: 2018-09-24T11:35:41.904158

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1794064/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1662620] Re: "ip addr add" permits illegal labels

2021-10-07 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Not sure if it will pass build, review or be acceptable as SRU since it is so 
low impact.
But the fix was so trivial that after all this time I'd feel bad to keep it 
as-is.

So I've prepared an MP to fix it
https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+git/iproute2/+merge/409821

And a PPA with a test build
https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4676/+packages


** Tags added: server-todo

** Changed in: iproute2 (Ubuntu Bionic)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer)

** Description changed:

+ [Impact]
+ 
+  * The filter on label names does not match the intention
+by upstream nor the description in the man page
+ 
+  * Fix by backporting upstream fix that strengthens the check
+ 
+ [Test Plan]
+ 
+ Bad case:
+ root@b:~# ip addr add 1.1.1.1 label test1 dev eth0
+ "dev" (eth0) must match "label" (test1).
+ root@b:~# ip addr add 1.1.1.1 label eth0-test dev eth0
+ root@b:~# ip addr show dev eth0 | grep test
+ inet 1.1.1.1/32 scope global eth0-test
+ 
+ With the fix it should look like:
+ root@i:~# ip addr add 1.1.1.1 label test1 dev eth0
+ "label" (test1) must match "dev" (eth0) or be prefixed by "dev" with a colon.
+ root@i:~# ip addr add 1.1.1.1 label eth0-test dev eth0
+ "label" (eth0-test) must match "dev" (eth0) or be prefixed by "dev" with a 
colon.
+ root@i:~# ip addr show dev eth0 | grep test
+ 
+ [Where problems could occur]
+ 
+  * While the fix indeed "corrects" behavior I must say that if someone 
+relied on the non-intended behavior it would now break e.g. his 
+scripting or automation.
+ 
+ [Other Info]
+  
+  * It was too easy to fix and too long dormant to ignore it further,
+but if the SRU team says this is too much regression risk relative to 
+the gain we will mark it Won't Fix based on that decision.
+ 
+ 
+ ---
+ 
  ip-address(8) manpage states:
  
-   label NAME
- Each address may be tagged with a label string.  In order to preserve 
compatibility with Linux-2.0 net aliases, this string must coincide with the 
name of the device or must be prefixed with the device name followed by colon.
+   label NAME
+ Each address may be tagged with a label string.  In order to preserve 
compatibility with Linux-2.0 net aliases, this string must coincide with the 
name of the device or must be prefixed with the device name followed by colon.
  
  But you can omit the colon, "ip addr add" is ONLY checking the label is
  prefixed with the device:
  
  # ip addr add 1.1.1.1 label test1 dev eth0
  "dev" (eth0) must match "label" (test1).
  
  # ip addr add 1.1.1.2 label eth0-test2 dev eth0
  
  # ip addr add 1.1.1.3 label eth0:test3 dev eth0
- 
  
  Now ifconfig becomes confused about eth0-test2:
  
  # ifconfig eth0-test2
  eth0-test2: error fetching interface information: Device not found
  
  # ifconfig eth0:test3
- eth0:test3 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr b0:d5:cc:fe:1d:7c  
-   inet addr:1.1.1.3  Bcast:0.0.0.0  Mask:255.255.255.255
-   UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
-   Interrupt:171 
+ eth0:test3 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr b0:d5:cc:fe:1d:7c
+   inet addr:1.1.1.3  Bcast:0.0.0.0  Mask:255.255.255.255
+   UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
+   Interrupt:171
  
  And daemons like ntpd also log errors about the interface with the
  illegal label:
  
  ntpd[7570]: eth0-test3: getting interface flags: No such device
-   ## => many of this error per minute until:
+   ## => many of this error per minute until:
  ntpd[7570]: Too many errors.  Shutting up.
  
- 
- So, I think ip addr show disallow adding address with illegal (as stated by 
his own documentation) labels, it must also check for the colon following the 
dev name.
+ So, I think ip addr show disallow adding address with illegal (as stated
+ by his own documentation) labels, it must also check for the colon
+ following the dev name.
  
  Version: 4.3.0-1ubuntu3

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1662620

Title:
  "ip addr add" permits illegal labels

Status in iproute2 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in iproute2 source package in Bionic:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * The filter on label names does not match the intention
 by upstream nor the description in the man page

   * Fix by backporting upstream fix that strengthens the check

  [Test Plan]

  Bad case:
  root@b:~# ip addr add 1.1.1.1 label test1 dev eth0
  "dev" (eth0) must match "label" (test1).
  root@b:~# ip addr add 1.1.1.1 label eth0-test dev eth0
  root@b:~# ip addr show dev eth0 | grep test
  inet 1.1.1.1/32 scope global eth0-test

  With the fix it should look like:
  root@i:~# ip addr add 1.1.1.1 label test1 dev eth0
  "label" (test1) must match "dev" (eth0) or be prefixed by "dev" with a colon.
  root@i:~# ip addr add 1.1.1.1 label 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1662620] Re: "ip addr add" permits illegal labels

2021-10-07 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
SRU template added

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1662620

Title:
  "ip addr add" permits illegal labels

Status in iproute2 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in iproute2 source package in Bionic:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * The filter on label names does not match the intention
 by upstream nor the description in the man page

   * Fix by backporting upstream fix that strengthens the check

  [Test Plan]

  Bad case:
  root@b:~# ip addr add 1.1.1.1 label test1 dev eth0
  "dev" (eth0) must match "label" (test1).
  root@b:~# ip addr add 1.1.1.1 label eth0-test dev eth0
  root@b:~# ip addr show dev eth0 | grep test
  inet 1.1.1.1/32 scope global eth0-test

  With the fix it should look like:
  root@i:~# ip addr add 1.1.1.1 label test1 dev eth0
  "label" (test1) must match "dev" (eth0) or be prefixed by "dev" with a colon.
  root@i:~# ip addr add 1.1.1.1 label eth0-test dev eth0
  "label" (eth0-test) must match "dev" (eth0) or be prefixed by "dev" with a 
colon.
  root@i:~# ip addr show dev eth0 | grep test

  [Where problems could occur]

   * While the fix indeed "corrects" behavior I must say that if someone 
 relied on the non-intended behavior it would now break e.g. his 
 scripting or automation.

  [Other Info]
   
   * It was too easy to fix and too long dormant to ignore it further,
 but if the SRU team says this is too much regression risk relative to 
 the gain we will mark it Won't Fix based on that decision.

  
  ---

  ip-address(8) manpage states:

    label NAME
  Each address may be tagged with a label string.  In order to preserve 
compatibility with Linux-2.0 net aliases, this string must coincide with the 
name of the device or must be prefixed with the device name followed by colon.

  But you can omit the colon, "ip addr add" is ONLY checking the label
  is prefixed with the device:

  # ip addr add 1.1.1.1 label test1 dev eth0
  "dev" (eth0) must match "label" (test1).

  # ip addr add 1.1.1.2 label eth0-test2 dev eth0

  # ip addr add 1.1.1.3 label eth0:test3 dev eth0

  Now ifconfig becomes confused about eth0-test2:

  # ifconfig eth0-test2
  eth0-test2: error fetching interface information: Device not found

  # ifconfig eth0:test3
  eth0:test3 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr b0:d5:cc:fe:1d:7c
    inet addr:1.1.1.3  Bcast:0.0.0.0  Mask:255.255.255.255
    UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
    Interrupt:171

  And daemons like ntpd also log errors about the interface with the
  illegal label:

  ntpd[7570]: eth0-test3: getting interface flags: No such device
    ## => many of this error per minute until:
  ntpd[7570]: Too many errors.  Shutting up.

  So, I think ip addr show disallow adding address with illegal (as
  stated by his own documentation) labels, it must also check for the
  colon following the dev name.

  Version: 4.3.0-1ubuntu3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1662620/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946096] Re: Apply upstream patches to fix problems for Foxconn and Quectel modems.

2021-10-07 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to modemmanager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946096

Title:
  Apply upstream patches to fix problems for Foxconn and Quectel modems.

Status in OEM Priority Project:
  New
Status in modemmanager package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  The following 2 modems need the ModemManager v1.16.6 suite to be patched from 
v1.18.2 to fix some problems(LP#1943774, LP#1943780):
  * Foxconn SDX55 T99W175 5G sub6 PCIE Modem
  * Quectel SDX24 EM160R-GL 4G LTE CAT16 PCIE Modem 

  The requested upstream patches are listed as below:
  * for Quectel EM160 4G
** 
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager/-/commit/83ac82470589a3672092a0ba0be855093b1cf5e2
 
  * for Foxconn T99W175
** 
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager/-/commit/21ae558fe3600c84b3ca7dcd9bf50a3ba576c7c9

**https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager/-/commit/76e700f4fd703f952208993330ab098305c13d6b
** 
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager/-/commit/52bf2c641171ded9e617022f40497c8984520371
** 
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager/-/commit/33e2b023ef01bea9da37ae2beb192f7d92bce47a
** 
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager/-/commit/f72046701659073fbfa97516e155865647acb154
 

  
  [Test Plan]

  1. Install the Ubuntu image.
  2. Boot and login the system.
  3. Prepare the modem’s firmware and install the firmware upgrading 
application provided by Foxconn and Quectel
  4. Using the firmware upgrading application to upgrade the modem’s firmware 
  5. Verify if the modem’s firmware upgrading is successful
  6. Reboot 
  7. Verify if the upgraded modem firmware is still working

  
  [Where problems could occur]

  The requested upstream patches are for these 2 specific modems and the status 
information.
  This should not affect existing generic functions and other modems.

  
  [Other Info]

  The firmware and the upgrading application can be downloaded from the 
following link:
  * LP#1943774 for Quectel modems
  * LP#1943780 for Foxconn modems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1946096/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1662620] Re: "ip addr add" permits illegal labels

2021-10-07 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+git/iproute2/+merge/409821

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1662620

Title:
  "ip addr add" permits illegal labels

Status in iproute2 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in iproute2 source package in Bionic:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  ip-address(8) manpage states:

label NAME
  Each address may be tagged with a label string.  In order to preserve 
compatibility with Linux-2.0 net aliases, this string must coincide with the 
name of the device or must be prefixed with the device name followed by colon.

  But you can omit the colon, "ip addr add" is ONLY checking the label
  is prefixed with the device:

  # ip addr add 1.1.1.1 label test1 dev eth0
  "dev" (eth0) must match "label" (test1).

  # ip addr add 1.1.1.2 label eth0-test2 dev eth0

  # ip addr add 1.1.1.3 label eth0:test3 dev eth0
  

  Now ifconfig becomes confused about eth0-test2:

  # ifconfig eth0-test2
  eth0-test2: error fetching interface information: Device not found

  # ifconfig eth0:test3
  eth0:test3 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr b0:d5:cc:fe:1d:7c  
inet addr:1.1.1.3  Bcast:0.0.0.0  Mask:255.255.255.255
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
Interrupt:171 

  And daemons like ntpd also log errors about the interface with the
  illegal label:

  ntpd[7570]: eth0-test3: getting interface flags: No such device
## => many of this error per minute until:
  ntpd[7570]: Too many errors.  Shutting up.

  
  So, I think ip addr show disallow adding address with illegal (as stated by 
his own documentation) labels, it must also check for the colon following the 
dev name.

  Version: 4.3.0-1ubuntu3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1662620/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1662620] Re: "ip addr add" permits illegal labels

2021-10-07 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Hi,
I come by trying to clear out a few old bugs that might still need to be 
resolved (or can be closed by now).

Even though this one seems to be forgotten by everyone so far it has
been fixed.

Bionic (affected)
root@b:~# ip addr add 1.1.1.1 label test1 dev eth0
"dev" (eth0) must match "label" (test1).
root@b:~# ip addr add 1.1.1.1 label eth0-test dev eth0
root@b:~# ip addr show dev eth0 | grep test
inet 1.1.1.1/32 scope global eth0-test


Impish (fixed)
root@i:~# ip addr add 1.1.1.1 label test1 dev eth0
"label" (test1) must match "dev" (eth0) or be prefixed by "dev" with a colon.
root@i:~# ip addr add 1.1.1.1 label eth0-test dev eth0
"label" (eth0-test) must match "dev" (eth0) or be prefixed by "dev" with a 
colon.
root@i:~# ip addr show dev eth0 | grep test

This was effectively fixed by
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/network/iproute2/iproute2.git/commit/?id=cad73425d8813

Which is in since v4.18.0

That version is in >=20.04 as well as in 18.04-backports.

 iproute2 | 3.12.0-2  | trusty   | source, amd64, 
arm64, armhf, i386, powerpc, ppc64el
 iproute2 | 3.12.0-2ubuntu1.2 | trusty-updates   | source, amd64, 
arm64, armhf, i386, powerpc, ppc64el
 iproute2 | 4.3.0-1ubuntu3| xenial   | source, amd64, 
arm64, armhf, i386, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
 iproute2 | 4.3.0-1ubuntu3.16.04.5| xenial-updates   | source, amd64, 
arm64, armhf, i386, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
 iproute2 | 4.15.0-2ubuntu1   | bionic   | source, amd64, 
arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x
 iproute2 | 4.15.0-2ubuntu1.1 | bionic-security  | source, amd64, 
arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x
 iproute2 | 4.15.0-2ubuntu1.3 | bionic-updates   | source, amd64, 
arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x
 iproute2 | 4.18.0-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1 | bionic-backports | source, amd64, 
arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x
 iproute2 | 5.5.0-1ubuntu1| focal| source, amd64, 
arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
 iproute2 | 5.10.0-4ubuntu1   | hirsute  | source, amd64, 
arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
 iproute2 | 5.10.0-4ubuntu1   | impish   | source, amd64, 
arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x


Thereby the active release that still is affected is Bionic (unless you use 
bionic-backports which already have 4.18).

I think to fix this in bionic is only prio-low since it is mostly a cosmetic.
Since it is fixed in newer releases there isn't more work to be done to drive 
this to conclusion for future releases.

@Nahuel - I can only beg your pardon that this was dormant for so long
:-/

** Also affects: iproute2 (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: iproute2 (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: iproute2 (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

** Changed in: iproute2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1662620

Title:
  "ip addr add" permits illegal labels

Status in iproute2 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in iproute2 source package in Bionic:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  ip-address(8) manpage states:

label NAME
  Each address may be tagged with a label string.  In order to preserve 
compatibility with Linux-2.0 net aliases, this string must coincide with the 
name of the device or must be prefixed with the device name followed by colon.

  But you can omit the colon, "ip addr add" is ONLY checking the label
  is prefixed with the device:

  # ip addr add 1.1.1.1 label test1 dev eth0
  "dev" (eth0) must match "label" (test1).

  # ip addr add 1.1.1.2 label eth0-test2 dev eth0

  # ip addr add 1.1.1.3 label eth0:test3 dev eth0
  

  Now ifconfig becomes confused about eth0-test2:

  # ifconfig eth0-test2
  eth0-test2: error fetching interface information: Device not found

  # ifconfig eth0:test3
  eth0:test3 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr b0:d5:cc:fe:1d:7c  
inet addr:1.1.1.3  Bcast:0.0.0.0  Mask:255.255.255.255
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
Interrupt:171 

  And daemons like ntpd also log errors about the interface with the
  illegal label:

  ntpd[7570]: eth0-test3: getting interface flags: No such device
## => many of this error per minute until:
  ntpd[7570]: Too many errors.  Shutting up.

  
  So, I think ip addr show disallow adding address with illegal (as stated by 
his own documentation) labels, it must also check for the colon following the 
dev name.

  Version: 4.3.0-1ubuntu3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1662620/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946341] Re: In Display Setting it is showing UnKnown Device and maximum resolution setting is set to 1024x768 and when i am requesting to update a driver it is saying Drivers ar

2021-10-07 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Thanks for the bug report. GNOME is using 1024x768 because that's the
maximum resolution reported by the kernel. The kernel would report that
if it is unable to detect your monitor properly.

If you can, please try a different monitor cable and use a digital
monitor connection.

** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)

** Summary changed:

- In Display Setting it is showing UnKnown Device and maximum resolution 
setting is set to 1024x768 and when i am requesting to update a driver it is 
saying Drivers are already updated
+ [i915] In Display Setting it is showing UnKnown Device and maximum resolution 
setting is set to 1024x768 and when i am requesting to update a driver it is 
saying Drivers are already updated

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946341

Title:
  [i915] In Display Setting it is showing UnKnown Device and maximum
  resolution setting is set to 1024x768 and when i am requesting to
  update a driver it is saying Drivers are already updated

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In Display Setting it is showing UnKnown Device and maximum resolution
  setting is set to 1024x768 and when i am requesting to update a driver
  it is saying Drivers are already updated

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+22ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65.3
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Oct  7 13:55:32 2021
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: hirsute
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller 
[8086:0152] (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen Core processor 
Graphics Controller [103c:339a]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-10-07 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.04 "Hirsute Hippo" - Release amd64 (20210420)
  MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.11.0-37-generic 
root=UUID=46918b1f-e034-4313-8da7-d5df94db823e ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 07/16/2013
  dmi.bios.release: 2.90
  dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.bios.version: K01 v02.90
  dmi.board.asset.tag: MXL330027R
  dmi.board.name: 339A
  dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: MXL330027R
  dmi.chassis.type: 6
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvrK01v02.90:bd07/16/2013:br2.90:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPCompaqPro6300MT:pvr:skuD8C62UT#ABA:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn339A:rvr:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct6:cvr:
  dmi.product.family: 103C_53307F G=D
  dmi.product.name: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT
  dmi.product.sku: D8C62UT#ABA
  dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  version.compiz: compiz N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.105-3~21.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 21.0.1-2
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1.1
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-2
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200714-1ubuntu1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946341/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946192] Re: "Press Ctrl+C to cancel all filesystem checks in process" on every boot

2021-10-07 Thread Oleg Moiseichuk
One more reasoning: fsck is called DESPITE the settings of tune2fs. By default 
"Maximum mount counts" equals -1 which means that fsck shouldn't run at all. If 
this parameter is set to some positive value fcsk should run periodically but 
not on every start.
Less experienced users may think that they've got real problems with their disk 
because of these checks on every boot.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946192

Title:
  "Press Ctrl+C to cancel all filesystem checks in process" on every
  boot

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  I installed Kubuntu 20.04 on Latitude 5591 laptop using flash drive.
  Installation run without any issues but now on every boot I notice a
  message "Press Ctrl+C to cancel all filesystem checks in process" on
  the Plymouth screen with Kubuntu logo. It flashes quickly and
  disappears. I've got fast NVMe drive so I cannot say for sure whether
  it runs any checks or not.

  I booted from LiveCD and performed fsck checks of all my partitions:
  fsck.vfat /dev/nvme0n1p1 (EFI partition)
  fsck.vfat /dev/nvme0n1p2 (Dell service partition, not mounted)
  e2fsck -f /dev/nvme0n1p3 (Root partition)
  e2fsck -f /dev/nvme0n1p5 (Home partition)
  These checks showed no problems.

  I changed mount counter to set periodic checks:
  sudo tune2fs -c 29 /dev/nvme0n1p3
  sudo tune2fs -c 30 /dev/nvme0n1p5
  But despite these settings this message still appears on every boot.

  Operating System: Kubuntu 20.04.3
  Kernel Version: 5.4.0-88-generic
  OS Type: 64-bit
  Processors: 12 × Intel® Core™ i7-8850H CPU @ 2.60GHz
  Memory: 15,4 GiB of RAM

  ---
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  DefaultPlymouth: /usr/share/plymouth/themes/kubuntu-logo/kubuntu-logo.plymouth
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-08-09 (57 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20200731)
  Lsusb:
   Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
   Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bda:568c Realtek Semiconductor Corp. 
Integrated_Webcam_HD
   Bus 001 Device 002: ID 046d:c534 Logitech, Inc. Unifying Receiver
   Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
  MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude 5591
  Package: plymouth 0.9.4git20200323-0ubuntu6.2
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-88-generic 
root=UUID=fc777e68-1731-4eeb-8a59-9bc45137ad80 ro video=efifb:nobgrt quiet 
splash vt.handoff=7
  ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-88-generic 
root=UUID=fc777e68-1731-4eeb-8a59-9bc45137ad80 ro video=efifb:nobgrt quiet 
splash vt.handoff=7
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-88.99-generic 5.4.140
  Tags:  focal
  TextPlymouth: /usr/share/plymouth/themes/kubuntu-text/kubuntu-text.plymouth
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-88-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo vboxusers
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 06/10/2021
  dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 1.15.0
  dmi.board.name: 0DVVG1
  dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.board.version: A00
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr1.15.0:bd06/10/2021:svnDellInc.:pnLatitude5591:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0DVVG1:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct10:cvr:
  dmi.product.family: Latitude
  dmi.product.name: Latitude 5591
  dmi.product.sku: 0819
  dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1946192/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946343] [NEW] Stale os-release file after possible upgrade from 20.04.2 to 20.04.3

2021-10-07 Thread Vivek
Public bug reported:

Refer: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/698949

I recently bought a Dell laptop with Ubuntu pre-installed in it. Looks
like it came with Ubuntu 20.04.2 and OEM Linux Kernel in it. After my
initial login (on October 1, 2021), the 'Software Updater' GUI prompted
me for updates, which I went ahead with.

However at the end of it, I noticed that I was still at 20.04.2 with
Linux Kernel at 5.10.0-1045-oem.

lsb_release -a
---

No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS (fossa-bulbasaur X55.1)
Release:20.04
Codename:   focal

uname -a
-
Linux dev-linux 5.10.0-1045-oem #47-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 18 10:41:03 UTC 2021 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Then I manually tried sudo apt update and sudo apt upgrade / dist-
upgrade from the terminal, but nothing got upgraded. When I invoked the
GUI 'Software Updater' again, it showed me that my system was already
up-to-date. However, as 20.04.3 was released end of Aug 2021, I was
expecting that I should be at that release after my initial updates.

Since that didn't happen, I asked a question regarding this in askubuntu
followed by launchpad
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/698949, thinking my
update had failed for some unknown reason.

However, based on some inputs from other users, we were able to narrow
down the problem to /usr/lib/os-release file not having the right
contents in it. Every other file including /usr/lib/os-release.oem-
release, /etc/issue, /etc/issue.net specifies that I am on 20.04.3.
Whereas only /usr/lib/os-release (and its symlink /etc/release)
specifies my current release as 20.04.2.

Even the lsb_release -a command always displays the output of
/usr/lib/os-release file only.

$ cat /usr/lib/os-release
NAME="Ubuntu"
VERSION="20.04.2 LTS (Focal Fossa)"
ID=ubuntu
ID_LIKE=debian
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS (fossa-bulbasaur X55.1)"
VERSION_ID="20.04"
HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
VERSION_CODENAME=focal
UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal

$ cat /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release
NAME="Ubuntu"
VERSION="20.04.3 LTS (Focal Fossa)"
ID=ubuntu
ID_LIKE=debian
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS"
VERSION_ID="20.04"
HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
VERSION_CODENAME=focal
UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal

$ cat /etc/issue
Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS \n \l

$ cat /etc/issue.net
Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS

If you look at the timestamp of these files, strangely os-release had a
newer timestamp of Oct 1 compared to other files.

$ ls -l /usr/lib/os-release
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 406 Oct 1 20:31 /usr/lib/os-release

$ ls -l /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 382 Aug 4 07:53 /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release

$ ls -l /etc/issue
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 26 Aug 4 07:53 /etc/issue

$ ls -l /etc/issue.net
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19 Aug 4 07:53 /etc/issue.net

Please note that, other software package updates, and linux kernel
updates are happening automatically without any issues so far for me.
Few days back even got a new kernel update.

$ uname -a
Linux vivek-dev-linux 5.10.0-1049-oem #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Sep 27 11:01:10 UTC 
2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Workarounds Attempted
-
1. Commented out all non-ubuntu external sources from /etc/apt/*.list. Then 
performed an apt clean + update + upgrade. But still nothing happened and the 
same issue remained. 

2. Tried performing apt-install --reinstall base-files. But still
nothing changed:

$ sudo apt install --reinstall base-files
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded.
Need to get 60.6 kB of archives.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates/main amd64 base-files 
amd64 11ubuntu5.4 [60.6 kB]
Fetched 60.6 kB in 1s (55.7 kB/s)
(Reading database ... 191154 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../base-files_11ubuntu5.4_amd64.deb ...
Warning: Stopping motd-news.service, but it can still be activated by:
  motd-news.timer
Unpacking base-files (11ubuntu5.4) over (11ubuntu5.4) ...
Setting up base-files (11ubuntu5.4) ...
motd-news.service is a disabled or a static unit, not starting it.
Processing triggers for cracklib-runtime (2.9.6-3.2) ...
Processing triggers for plymouth-theme-ubuntu-text 
(0.9.4git20200323-0ubuntu6.2) ...
update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
Processing triggers for install-info (6.7.0.dfsg.2-5) ...
Processing triggers for man-db (2.9.1-1) ...
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools (0.136ubuntu6.6) ...

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946341] [NEW] In Display Setting it is showing UnKnown Device and maximum resolution setting is set to 1024x768 and when i am requesting to update a driver it is saying Drivers

2021-10-07 Thread Aman khan
Public bug reported:

In Display Setting it is showing UnKnown Device and maximum resolution
setting is set to 1024x768 and when i am requesting to update a driver
it is saying Drivers are already updated

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+22ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41-generic 5.11.22
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65.3
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Thu Oct  7 13:55:32 2021
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: hirsute
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller 
[8086:0152] (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen Core processor 
Graphics Controller [103c:339a]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-10-07 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.04 "Hirsute Hippo" - Release amd64 (20210420)
MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.11.0-37-generic 
root=UUID=46918b1f-e034-4313-8da7-d5df94db823e ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 07/16/2013
dmi.bios.release: 2.90
dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.bios.version: K01 v02.90
dmi.board.asset.tag: MXL330027R
dmi.board.name: 339A
dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: MXL330027R
dmi.chassis.type: 6
dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvrK01v02.90:bd07/16/2013:br2.90:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPCompaqPro6300MT:pvr:skuD8C62UT#ABA:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn339A:rvr:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct6:cvr:
dmi.product.family: 103C_53307F G=D
dmi.product.name: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT
dmi.product.sku: D8C62UT#ABA
dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.105-3~21.04.1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 21.0.1-2
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1.1
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-2
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200714-1ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-1

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug hirsute ubuntu wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946341

Title:
  In Display Setting it is showing UnKnown Device and maximum resolution
  setting is set to 1024x768 and when i am requesting to update a driver
  it is saying Drivers are already updated

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In Display Setting it is showing UnKnown Device and maximum resolution
  setting is set to 1024x768 and when i am requesting to update a driver
  it is saying Drivers are already updated

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+22ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65.3
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Oct  7 13:55:32 2021
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: hirsute
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller 
[8086:0152] (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen Core processor 
Graphics Controller [103c:339a]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-10-07 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.04 "Hirsute Hippo" - Release amd64 (20210420)
  MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.11.0-37-generic 
root=UUID=46918b1f-e034-4313-8da7-d5df94db823e ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 07/16/2013
  dmi.bios.release: 2.90
  dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.bios.version: K01 v02.90
  dmi.board.asset.tag: MXL330027R
  dmi.board.name: 339A
  dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: MXL330027R
  dmi.chassis.type: 6
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvrK01v02.90:bd07/16/2013:br2.90:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPCompaqPro6300MT:pvr:skuD8C62UT#ABA:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn339A:rvr:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct6:cvr:
  dmi.product.family: 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1659950] Re: rsync -u --inplace --partial -a can't resume transfer

2021-10-07 Thread Paride Legovini
Thanks Nahuel! We're doing some retriage and cleanup of old bugs, and I
stumbled on this one :-)

I linked your upstream bug report to this bug, Launchpad will keep its
status in sync. You may have noticed that I didn't set the status of
this bug to Wontfix but to Opinion ("Doesn't fit with the project, but
can be discussed"), I think it fits better.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659950

Title:
  rsync -u --inplace --partial -a can't resume transfer

Status in rsync:
  Unknown
Status in rsync package in Ubuntu:
  Opinion

Bug description:
  Suppose you have a file in hostA:

hostA$ ls -l /tmp/files
 -rw-rw-r-- 2 root root 563016 Jan 10 15:01 test.txt

  You download it from the hostB using:

hostB$ rsync -u --inplace --partial -a hostA::files/* .

  If the transfer is aborted, hostB will get only a partial file:

hostB$ ls -l /tmp/files
 -rw-rw-r-- 2 root root   2024 Jan 11 18:00 test.txt

  BUT the ctime/mtime of hostB/test.txt now is NEWER than hostA/test.txt(and 
mtime == ctime). So, if you run the same rsync -u command again:

hostB$ rsync -u --inplace --partial -a hostA::files/* .

  Rsync will SKIP THE FILE, because hostB/test.txt is "newer" than
  hostA/test.txt. So you CAN'T resume using rsync -u command, and you
  will think there are no differences.

  To avoid this bug, rsync must create the file with ctime=mtime=0. And
  if the file already exists before transfer, rsync -u must not change
  his current ctime/mtime. Ctime/mtime must be updated ONLY after the
  transfer was successfully completed.

  Note this is really need because there are scenarios where checksum
  comparison can't be used, only comparison by time. For example, to
  avoid deleting changes made in hostB to test.txt. Also I need to use
  --inplace.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/rsync/+bug/1659950/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1943964] Re: local var="$@" doesn't behave like every other system

2021-10-07 Thread raf
I thought I'd illustrate the problem. Given a #!/bin/sh script like this
called tst:

#!/bin/sh
f()
{
local v="$@"
echo "<$V>"
}
f "$@"

On Debian, Fedora, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, macOS, and Solaris, the arguably incorrect
but more useful behaviour is:

> ./tst a b c

> ./tst 1 2 3
<1 2 3>

On Ubuntu, the arguably correct but less useful behaviour is:

> ./tst a b c

> ./tst 1 2 3
./tst: 4: local: 2: bad variable name

On NetBSD, the behaviour is very similar to Ubuntu's, but not identical:

> ./tst a b c

> ./tst 1 2 3
local: 2: bad variable name
<1>

It seems that "bad variable name" is a fatal error on Ubuntu, but not on
NetBSD.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dash in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943964

Title:
  local var="$@" doesn't behave like every other system

Status in dash package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  With Ubuntu (for many years), the following code in /bin/sh (i.e.
  dash):

f()
{
  local v="$@"
  echo "<$v>"
}
f "$@"

  behaves differently to /bin/sh on Debian, macOS, FreeBSD, Solaris 
(/usr/xpg4/bin/sh).
  The behaviour of "$@" is very special. When there are no arguments, it 
completely
  disappears (i.e. even the surrounding quotes disappear so that there are no 
words). When
  there are arguments, it replicates those arguments perfectly (i.e. it 
effectively produces
  multiple quoted arguments if necessary).

  The described behaviour applies when "$@" is used for local variable 
assignment on Ubuntu,
  which sounds consistent with other uses of "$@" and therefore correct, but it 
doesn't
  match the behaviour on any other system, and is therefore a problem for shell 
portability.
  On the other systems mentioned above, the behaviour of "$@" when used as the 
value of a
  variable assignment (local or not) is as though "$*" had been used (i.e. it 
produces a
  single argument containing all the words).

  The difference is clear when the arguments contain multiple words. On Ubuntu, 
only
  the first word is assigned to v. Any subsequent words are treated as 
subsequent variable
  names. This goes unnoticed if the subsequent words are valid variable 
identifiers.
  But if the subsequent words are not valid identifiers, then dash emits a "bad 
variable name"
  error message.

  Note that without the "local" keyword, "$@" does behave like "$*"
  (like all the other systems).

  You might think that this is correct behaviour, but it is contrary to 
non-local variable
  assignment, and contrary to all other systems, and is therefore unhelpful. 
Please change
  it to behave like dash on other systems, e.g. debian.

  This behaviour has been witnessed on ubuntu-16.x and ubuntu-20.04.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/1943964/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946096] Re: Apply upstream patches to fix problems for Foxconn and Quectel modems.

2021-10-07 Thread Mathew Hodson
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to modemmanager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946096

Title:
  Apply upstream patches to fix problems for Foxconn and Quectel modems.

Status in OEM Priority Project:
  New
Status in modemmanager package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  The following 2 modems need the ModemManager v1.16.6 suite to be patched from 
v1.18.2 to fix some problems(LP#1943774, LP#1943780):
  * Foxconn SDX55 T99W175 5G sub6 PCIE Modem
  * Quectel SDX24 EM160R-GL 4G LTE CAT16 PCIE Modem 

  The requested upstream patches are listed as below:
  * for Quectel EM160 4G
** 
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager/-/commit/83ac82470589a3672092a0ba0be855093b1cf5e2
 
  * for Foxconn T99W175
** 
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager/-/commit/21ae558fe3600c84b3ca7dcd9bf50a3ba576c7c9

**https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager/-/commit/76e700f4fd703f952208993330ab098305c13d6b
** 
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager/-/commit/52bf2c641171ded9e617022f40497c8984520371
** 
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager/-/commit/33e2b023ef01bea9da37ae2beb192f7d92bce47a
** 
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager/-/commit/f72046701659073fbfa97516e155865647acb154
 

  
  [Test Plan]

  1. Install the Ubuntu image.
  2. Boot and login the system.
  3. Prepare the modem’s firmware and install the firmware upgrading 
application provided by Foxconn and Quectel
  4. Using the firmware upgrading application to upgrade the modem’s firmware 
  5. Verify if the modem’s firmware upgrading is successful
  6. Reboot 
  7. Verify if the upgraded modem firmware is still working

  
  [Where problems could occur]

  The requested upstream patches are for these 2 specific modems and the status 
information.
  This should not affect existing generic functions and other modems.

  
  [Other Info]

  The firmware and the upgrading application can be downloaded from the 
following link:
  * LP#1943774 for Quectel modems
  * LP#1943780 for Foxconn modems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1946096/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1945321] Re: umockdev 0.16.3-1 breaks autopkgtest of bolt

2021-10-07 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: umockdev (Debian)
   Status: Unknown => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to umockdev in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945321

Title:
  umockdev 0.16.3-1 breaks autopkgtest of bolt

Status in bolt package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in umockdev package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in umockdev package in Debian:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  The test of bolt fails with the new version due to a crash:
  
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/amd64/b/bolt/20210917_063952_c9336@/log.gz

  ...
Trace/breakpoint trap (core dumped)

  The bolt test really uses umockdev, d/t/control has gir1.2-umockdev-1.0 and
  python3-dbusmock and the new version causes this.

  Retrying autopkgtest locally with no, all and just umockdev from proposed
  and it seems reproducible.
   - impish-release - works
   - impish-all-proposed - crashes
   - impish-release + umockdev+libc6 from proposed - crashes

  Repro:
  $ umockdev-wrapper /usr/libexec/installed-tests/bolt/test-power

  FYI:
  Downgrading to umockdev 0.16.2-1 in the same environment does not
  eliminate the issue. So it might happen at the bolt test-build time.

  Debian has the same issue in:
  https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/b/bolt/15587717/log.gz

  The new mockdev fails to create /sys/bus which is requested by the test.
  From there the error path is what crashes, but the root cause is why we enter
  the error-path in the first place.

  One should be aware, this fail is "normal" if the environment is not mocked.
  Even in the good case the different calls with/without umockdev lead to
  exactly the same crash.
  # good
  $ umockdev-wrapper /usr/libexec/installed-tests/bolt/test-power
  # same crash as the new version has with umockdev-wrapper
  $ gdb /usr/libexec/installed-tests/bolt/test-power

  This is based on ldpreload.
  $ cat /usr/bin/umockdev-wrapper
  #!/bin/sh
  # Wrapper program to preload the libumockdev library, so that test programs 
can
  # set $UMOCKDEV_DIR for redirecting sysfs and other queries to a test bed.
  exec env LD_PRELOAD=libumockdev-preload.so.0:$LD_PRELOAD "$@"

  Gut feeling: it seems the mocking no more happens, and due to that
  it runs into the non-mocked crash

  Debugging with that:
  $ pull-lp-source bolt
  $ cd bolt-0.9.1/tests
  $ gdb /usr/libexec/installed-tests/bolt/test-power
  (gdb) set environment LD_PRELOAD libumockdev-preload.so.0
  (gdb) b mock_sysfs_init
  (gdb) run

  With that we can see that while the crash is somewhere inside g_warning the
  reason is in the g_mkdir failing with the new umockdev.

  
  Good-case

  Breakpoint 1, mock_sysfs_init (ms=0x555b6400) at ../tests/mock-sysfs.c:165
  165   {
  (gdb) n
  171 ms->bed = umockdev_testbed_new ();
  (gdb) 
  [New Thread 0x76e65640 (LWP 11444)]
  # GLib-DEBUG: setenv()/putenv() are not thread-safe and should not be used 
after threads are created
  # DEBUG: umockdev.vala:104: Created udev test bed /tmp/umockdev.RQBNA1
  172 ms->domains = g_hash_table_new_full (g_str_hash, g_str_equal,
  (gdb) 
  [New Thread 0x76664640 (LWP 11445)]
  175 ms->devices = g_hash_table_new (g_str_hash, g_str_equal);
  (gdb) 
  180 sys = umockdev_testbed_get_sys_dir (ms->bed);
  (gdb) 
  182 bus = g_build_filename (sys, "bus", NULL);
  (gdb) p sys
  $1 = 0x555b99a0 "/tmp/umockdev.RQBNA1/sys"
  (gdb) n
  183 r = g_mkdir (bus, 0744);
  (gdb) p bus
  $2 = 0x555be330 "/tmp/umockdev.RQBNA1/sys/bus"
  (gdb) n
  185 if (r < 0)
  (gdb) p r
  $3 = 0
  (gdb) n
  188 cls = g_build_filename (sys, "class", NULL);

  Bad-Case

  Breakpoint 1, mock_sysfs_init (ms=0x555b6400) at ../tests/mock-sysfs.c:165
  165   {
  (gdb) n
  171 ms->bed = umockdev_testbed_new ();
  (gdb) 
  [New Thread 0x76e65640 (LWP 17082)]
  # GLib-DEBUG: setenv()/putenv() are not thread-safe and should not be used 
after threads are created
  # DEBUG: umockdev.vala:110: Created udev test bed /tmp/umockdev.TK2VA1
  172 ms->domains = g_hash_table_new_full (g_str_hash, g_str_equal,
  (gdb) 
  [New Thread 0x76664640 (LWP 17083)]
  175 ms->devices = g_hash_table_new (g_str_hash, g_str_equal);
  (gdb) 
  180 sys = umockdev_testbed_get_sys_dir (ms->bed);
  (gdb) 
  182 bus = g_build_filename (sys, "bus", NULL);
  (gdb) p sys
  $1 = 0x555a98b0 "/tmp/umockdev.TK2VA1/sys"
  (gdb) n
  183 r = g_mkdir (bus, 0744);
  (gdb) p bus
  $2 = 0x555be560 "/tmp/umockdev.TK2VA1/sys/bus"
  (gdb) n
  185 if (r < 0)
  (gdb) p r
  $3 = -1
  (gdb) n
  186   g_warning ("could not create %s", bus);
  (gdb) n

  ** (/usr/libexec/installed-tests/bolt/test-power:17078): WARNING **:
  15:11:06.614: could not create /tmp/umockdev.TK2VA1/sys/bus

  Thread 1 "test-power" received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.

  
  I'll tag this update-excuse and FYI-subscribe Martin who has 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1943561] Re: Add ACCEL_LOCATION=base property for 6 Dell clamshell models

2021-10-07 Thread Yao Wei
Any updates to this SRU? What's the expected date to include this patch?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943561

Title:
  Add ACCEL_LOCATION=base property for 6 Dell clamshell models

Status in OEM Priority Project:
  New
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This hwdb update is to avoid unwanted screen rotation when tilting the
  laptop.

  This is the update to the previously rolled back SRU LP: #1938259

  [Impact]

   * This fixes unwanted rotations on certain Dell clamshell laptop
  models with accelerometer.

  [Test Plan]

   * On Dell laptops with model SKU 0A36, 0A3E, 0B09, 0B0B, 0B0D, 0B11, install 
this package and ensure the kernel is updated to the latest.
   * Screen should be correct side up in login screen and desktop.
   * Tilt the laptop and the screen should not be rotated.

  [Where problems could occur]

   * This is to add parameters for certain models in hwdb, and does not
  affect any other part of systemd.

   * Only models with the same Dell SKU would be affected.

  [scope]

  this is needed for all releases

  this is being added to upstream by
  https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20314 and
  https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20661

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1943561/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946192] Re: "Press Ctrl+C to cancel all filesystem checks in process" on every boot

2021-10-07 Thread Daniel van Vugt
The brevity of the message looks like a one-frame flicker, so it looks
like a bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946192

Title:
  "Press Ctrl+C to cancel all filesystem checks in process" on every
  boot

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  I installed Kubuntu 20.04 on Latitude 5591 laptop using flash drive.
  Installation run without any issues but now on every boot I notice a
  message "Press Ctrl+C to cancel all filesystem checks in process" on
  the Plymouth screen with Kubuntu logo. It flashes quickly and
  disappears. I've got fast NVMe drive so I cannot say for sure whether
  it runs any checks or not.

  I booted from LiveCD and performed fsck checks of all my partitions:
  fsck.vfat /dev/nvme0n1p1 (EFI partition)
  fsck.vfat /dev/nvme0n1p2 (Dell service partition, not mounted)
  e2fsck -f /dev/nvme0n1p3 (Root partition)
  e2fsck -f /dev/nvme0n1p5 (Home partition)
  These checks showed no problems.

  I changed mount counter to set periodic checks:
  sudo tune2fs -c 29 /dev/nvme0n1p3
  sudo tune2fs -c 30 /dev/nvme0n1p5
  But despite these settings this message still appears on every boot.

  Operating System: Kubuntu 20.04.3
  Kernel Version: 5.4.0-88-generic
  OS Type: 64-bit
  Processors: 12 × Intel® Core™ i7-8850H CPU @ 2.60GHz
  Memory: 15,4 GiB of RAM

  ---
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  DefaultPlymouth: /usr/share/plymouth/themes/kubuntu-logo/kubuntu-logo.plymouth
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-08-09 (57 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20200731)
  Lsusb:
   Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
   Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bda:568c Realtek Semiconductor Corp. 
Integrated_Webcam_HD
   Bus 001 Device 002: ID 046d:c534 Logitech, Inc. Unifying Receiver
   Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
  MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude 5591
  Package: plymouth 0.9.4git20200323-0ubuntu6.2
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-88-generic 
root=UUID=fc777e68-1731-4eeb-8a59-9bc45137ad80 ro video=efifb:nobgrt quiet 
splash vt.handoff=7
  ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-88-generic 
root=UUID=fc777e68-1731-4eeb-8a59-9bc45137ad80 ro video=efifb:nobgrt quiet 
splash vt.handoff=7
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-88.99-generic 5.4.140
  Tags:  focal
  TextPlymouth: /usr/share/plymouth/themes/kubuntu-text/kubuntu-text.plymouth
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-88-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo vboxusers
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 06/10/2021
  dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 1.15.0
  dmi.board.name: 0DVVG1
  dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.board.version: A00
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr1.15.0:bd06/10/2021:svnDellInc.:pnLatitude5591:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0DVVG1:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct10:cvr:
  dmi.product.family: Latitude
  dmi.product.name: Latitude 5591
  dmi.product.sku: 0819
  dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1946192/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946235] Re: pcscd won't install due to bad dependency version

2021-10-07 Thread Lars Noodén
Ok. This was probably a bug in the update-manager that only manifested
symptoms in my case in pcscd.

I noticed the only place 'hirsute' was mentioned was in /etc/apt/ is one
file, /etc/apt/sources.list.d/system.sources there.  Once I changed all
instances of 'hirsute' to 'impish' in
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/system.sources it was possible to get pcscd
installed as normal.

So I guess this is either solved or should be relabeled as applying to
'update-manager'

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pcsc-lite in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946235

Title:
  pcscd won't install due to bad dependency version

Status in pcsc-lite package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  # apt install pcscd
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree... Done
  Reading state information... Done
  Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
  requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
  distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
  or been moved out of Incoming.
  The following information may help to resolve the situation:

  The following packages have unmet dependencies:
   pcscd : Depends: libpcsclite1 (= 1.9.1-1) but it is not going to be installed
   qemu-block-extra : Depends: qemu-system-x86 (= 1:6.0+dfsg-2expubuntu1) but 
it is not going to be installed or
   qemu-system-arm (= 1:6.0+dfsg-2expubuntu1) but 
it is not going to be installed or
   qemu-system-mips (= 1:6.0+dfsg-2expubuntu1) but 
it is not going to be installed or
   qemu-system-ppc (= 1:6.0+dfsg-2expubuntu1) but 
it is not going to be installed or
   qemu-system-sparc (= 1:6.0+dfsg-2expubuntu1) but 
it is not going to be installed or
   qemu-system-misc (= 1:6.0+dfsg-2expubuntu1) but 
it is not going to be installed or
   qemu-system-s390x (= 1:6.0+dfsg-2expubuntu1) but 
it is not going to be installed or
   qemu-system-x86-xen (= 1:6.0+dfsg-2expubuntu1) 
but it is not going to be installed
  E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by 
held packages.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
  Package: pcscd (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-16.16-generic 5.13.13
  Uname: Linux 5.13.0-16-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu69
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  Date: Wed Oct  6 17:15:29 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-06-16 (477 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  SourcePackage: pcsc-lite
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to impish on 2021-10-06 (0 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcsc-lite/+bug/1946235/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1933828] Re: NTP servers from DHCP are not propagated to timesyncd

2021-10-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
There is also an additional requirement. The package must install
successfully and replace an existing file that would have been created
manually (we had to ship the file on the image for the customer since we
don't have this fix in a package yet)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933828

Title:
  NTP servers from DHCP are not propagated to timesyncd

Status in OEM Priority Project:
  New
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in network-manager source package in Focal:
  New

Bug description:
  Network manager gets NTP servers from DHCP but do not update timesyncd to use 
it which keeps using ntp.ubuntu.com.
   
  This is a problem on private networks which do not have access to public 
internet. On this type of network the configuration of timesyncd must be 
updated manually instead of inheriting the conf from the dhcp servers.

  This can be integrated with a NM dispatcher script such as below:

  etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/10-update-timesyncd for example:

  ==8<=8<=8<=8<=8<==
  #! /usr/bin/bash

  [ -n "$CONNECTION_UUID" ] || exit

  INTERFACE=$1
  ACTION=$2

  case $ACTION in
  up | dhcp4-change | dhcp6-change)
  [ -n "$DHCP4_NTP_SERVERS" ] || exit
  mkdir -p /etc/systemd/timesyncd.conf.d/
  cat< /etc/systemd/timesyncd.conf.d/$CONNECTION_UUID.conf
  [Time]
  NTP=$DHCP4_NTP_SERVERS
  RootDistanceMaxSec=15
  EOF
  systemctl restart systemd-timesyncd
 ;;
  down)
  rm -f /etc/systemd/timesyncd.conf.d/$CONNECTION_UUID.conf
  systemctl restart systemd-timesyncd
  ;;
  esac
  ==8<=8<=8<=8<=8<==

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
  Package: network-manager 1.30.0-1ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-18.19+21.10.1-generic 5.11.17
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-18-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu67
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Mon Jun 28 14:08:52 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-05-31 (393 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.10 "Groovy Gorilla" - Alpha amd64 (20200527)
  RebootRequiredPkgs:
   linux-image-5.11.0-20-generic
   linux-base
  SourcePackage: network-manager
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  nmcli-nm:
   RUNNING  VERSION  STATE  STARTUP  CONNECTIVITY  NETWORKING  WIFI-HW  
WIFI  WWAN-HW  WWAN
   running  1.30.0   connected  started  full  enabled enabled  
disabled  enabled  enabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1933828/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1933828] Re: NTP servers from DHCP are not propagated to timesyncd

2021-10-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
IMHO having the fix in network-dispatcher makes more sense.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933828

Title:
  NTP servers from DHCP are not propagated to timesyncd

Status in OEM Priority Project:
  New
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in network-manager source package in Focal:
  New

Bug description:
  Network manager gets NTP servers from DHCP but do not update timesyncd to use 
it which keeps using ntp.ubuntu.com.
   
  This is a problem on private networks which do not have access to public 
internet. On this type of network the configuration of timesyncd must be 
updated manually instead of inheriting the conf from the dhcp servers.

  This can be integrated with a NM dispatcher script such as below:

  etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/10-update-timesyncd for example:

  ==8<=8<=8<=8<=8<==
  #! /usr/bin/bash

  [ -n "$CONNECTION_UUID" ] || exit

  INTERFACE=$1
  ACTION=$2

  case $ACTION in
  up | dhcp4-change | dhcp6-change)
  [ -n "$DHCP4_NTP_SERVERS" ] || exit
  mkdir -p /etc/systemd/timesyncd.conf.d/
  cat< /etc/systemd/timesyncd.conf.d/$CONNECTION_UUID.conf
  [Time]
  NTP=$DHCP4_NTP_SERVERS
  RootDistanceMaxSec=15
  EOF
  systemctl restart systemd-timesyncd
 ;;
  down)
  rm -f /etc/systemd/timesyncd.conf.d/$CONNECTION_UUID.conf
  systemctl restart systemd-timesyncd
  ;;
  esac
  ==8<=8<=8<=8<=8<==

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
  Package: network-manager 1.30.0-1ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-18.19+21.10.1-generic 5.11.17
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-18-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu67
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Mon Jun 28 14:08:52 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-05-31 (393 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.10 "Groovy Gorilla" - Alpha amd64 (20200527)
  RebootRequiredPkgs:
   linux-image-5.11.0-20-generic
   linux-base
  SourcePackage: network-manager
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  nmcli-nm:
   RUNNING  VERSION  STATE  STARTUP  CONNECTIVITY  NETWORKING  WIFI-HW  
WIFI  WWAN-HW  WWAN
   running  1.30.0   connected  started  full  enabled enabled  
disabled  enabled  enabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1933828/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946192] Re: "Press Ctrl+C to cancel all filesystem checks in process" on every boot

2021-10-07 Thread Steve Langasek
The message comes from systemd-fsckd.  Though I'm not sure why it would
be considered a bug that the message shows up briefly on the screen; we
always call systemd-fsckd, even if it quickly determines there's no work
to do and exits.

** Package changed: plymouth (Ubuntu) => systemd (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946192

Title:
  "Press Ctrl+C to cancel all filesystem checks in process" on every
  boot

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  I installed Kubuntu 20.04 on Latitude 5591 laptop using flash drive.
  Installation run without any issues but now on every boot I notice a
  message "Press Ctrl+C to cancel all filesystem checks in process" on
  the Plymouth screen with Kubuntu logo. It flashes quickly and
  disappears. I've got fast NVMe drive so I cannot say for sure whether
  it runs any checks or not.

  I booted from LiveCD and performed fsck checks of all my partitions:
  fsck.vfat /dev/nvme0n1p1 (EFI partition)
  fsck.vfat /dev/nvme0n1p2 (Dell service partition, not mounted)
  e2fsck -f /dev/nvme0n1p3 (Root partition)
  e2fsck -f /dev/nvme0n1p5 (Home partition)
  These checks showed no problems.

  I changed mount counter to set periodic checks:
  sudo tune2fs -c 29 /dev/nvme0n1p3
  sudo tune2fs -c 30 /dev/nvme0n1p5
  But despite these settings this message still appears on every boot.

  Operating System: Kubuntu 20.04.3
  Kernel Version: 5.4.0-88-generic
  OS Type: 64-bit
  Processors: 12 × Intel® Core™ i7-8850H CPU @ 2.60GHz
  Memory: 15,4 GiB of RAM

  ---
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  DefaultPlymouth: /usr/share/plymouth/themes/kubuntu-logo/kubuntu-logo.plymouth
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-08-09 (57 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20200731)
  Lsusb:
   Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
   Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bda:568c Realtek Semiconductor Corp. 
Integrated_Webcam_HD
   Bus 001 Device 002: ID 046d:c534 Logitech, Inc. Unifying Receiver
   Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
  MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude 5591
  Package: plymouth 0.9.4git20200323-0ubuntu6.2
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-88-generic 
root=UUID=fc777e68-1731-4eeb-8a59-9bc45137ad80 ro video=efifb:nobgrt quiet 
splash vt.handoff=7
  ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-88-generic 
root=UUID=fc777e68-1731-4eeb-8a59-9bc45137ad80 ro video=efifb:nobgrt quiet 
splash vt.handoff=7
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-88.99-generic 5.4.140
  Tags:  focal
  TextPlymouth: /usr/share/plymouth/themes/kubuntu-text/kubuntu-text.plymouth
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-88-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo vboxusers
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 06/10/2021
  dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 1.15.0
  dmi.board.name: 0DVVG1
  dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.board.version: A00
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr1.15.0:bd06/10/2021:svnDellInc.:pnLatitude5591:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0DVVG1:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct10:cvr:
  dmi.product.family: Latitude
  dmi.product.name: Latitude 5591
  dmi.product.sku: 0819
  dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1946192/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946192] [NEW] "Press Ctrl+C to cancel all filesystem checks in process" on every boot

2021-10-07 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
You have been subscribed to a public bug:

I installed Kubuntu 20.04 on Latitude 5591 laptop using flash drive.
Installation run without any issues but now on every boot I notice a
message "Press Ctrl+C to cancel all filesystem checks in process" on the
Plymouth screen with Kubuntu logo. It flashes quickly and disappears.
I've got fast NVMe drive so I cannot say for sure whether it runs any
checks or not.

I booted from LiveCD and performed fsck checks of all my partitions:
fsck.vfat /dev/nvme0n1p1 (EFI partition)
fsck.vfat /dev/nvme0n1p2 (Dell service partition, not mounted)
e2fsck -f /dev/nvme0n1p3 (Root partition)
e2fsck -f /dev/nvme0n1p5 (Home partition)
These checks showed no problems.

I changed mount counter to set periodic checks:
sudo tune2fs -c 29 /dev/nvme0n1p3
sudo tune2fs -c 30 /dev/nvme0n1p5
But despite these settings this message still appears on every boot.

Operating System: Kubuntu 20.04.3
Kernel Version: 5.4.0-88-generic
OS Type: 64-bit
Processors: 12 × Intel® Core™ i7-8850H CPU @ 2.60GHz
Memory: 15,4 GiB of RAM

---
ProblemType: Bug
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: KDE
DefaultPlymouth: /usr/share/plymouth/themes/kubuntu-logo/kubuntu-logo.plymouth
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-08-09 (57 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
Lsusb:
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
 Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bda:568c Realtek Semiconductor Corp. 
Integrated_Webcam_HD
 Bus 001 Device 002: ID 046d:c534 Logitech, Inc. Unifying Receiver
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude 5591
Package: plymouth 0.9.4git20200323-0ubuntu6.2
PackageArchitecture: amd64
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-88-generic 
root=UUID=fc777e68-1731-4eeb-8a59-9bc45137ad80 ro video=efifb:nobgrt quiet 
splash vt.handoff=7
ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-88-generic 
root=UUID=fc777e68-1731-4eeb-8a59-9bc45137ad80 ro video=efifb:nobgrt quiet 
splash vt.handoff=7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-88.99-generic 5.4.140
Tags:  focal
TextPlymouth: /usr/share/plymouth/themes/kubuntu-text/kubuntu-text.plymouth
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-88-generic x86_64
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo vboxusers
_MarkForUpload: True
dmi.bios.date: 06/10/2021
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 1.15.0
dmi.board.name: 0DVVG1
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.board.version: A00
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr1.15.0:bd06/10/2021:svnDellInc.:pnLatitude5591:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0DVVG1:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct10:cvr:
dmi.product.family: Latitude
dmi.product.name: Latitude 5591
dmi.product.sku: 0819
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.

** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed


** Tags: apport-collected bot-comment focal
-- 
"Press Ctrl+C to cancel all filesystem checks in process" on every boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946192
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch 
seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp