[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956833] Re: No GSS-SPNEGO support in jammy

2022-01-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package cyrus-sasl2 - 2.1.27+dfsg2-2ubuntu1

---
cyrus-sasl2 (2.1.27+dfsg2-2ubuntu1) jammy; urgency=medium

  * d/p/0036-autoconf-270-fix.patch: fix configure.ac for autoconf 2.70.
This also fixes detecting and enabling GSS-SPNEGO in our build.
(LP: #1956833)

 -- Andreas Hasenack   Sat, 08 Jan 2022 17:28:28
-0300

** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956833

Title:
  No GSS-SPNEGO support in jammy

Status in cyrus-sasl2 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in cyrus-sasl2 package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  In jammy:
  root@j1:~# saslpluginviewer | head | grep SPNEGO
  root@j1:~# 

  Confirming against a windows 2016 active directory server, fully patched:
  root@j1:~# ldapwhoami -Y GSS-SPNEGO
  ldap_sasl_interactive_bind: Unknown authentication method (-6)
  additional info: SASL(-4): no mechanism available: No worthy mechs 
found

  
  gssapi (kerberos) works:
  root@j1:~# ldapwhoami -Y GSSAPI
  SASL/GSSAPI authentication started
  SASL username: administra...@internal.example.fake
  SASL SSF: 256
  SASL data security layer installed.
  u:INTEXAMPLE\Administrator

  root@j1:~# klist
  Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0
  Default principal: administra...@internal.example.fake

  Valid starting ExpiresService principal
  01/08/22 22:31:48  01/09/22 08:31:48  
krbtgt/internal.example.f...@internal.example.fake
  renew until 01/09/22 22:31:45
  01/08/22 22:34:53  01/09/22 08:31:48  
ldap/win-kriet1e5elo.internal.example.fake@
  renew until 01/09/22 22:31:45
  Ticket server: 
ldap/win-kriet1e5elo.internal.example.f...@internal.example.fake

  
  In focal, GSS-SPNEGO works:
  root@f1:~# saslpluginviewer | head | grep SPNEGO
GS2-IAKERB GS2-KRB5 SCRAM-SHA-1 SCRAM-SHA-256 GSSAPI GSS-SPNEGO DIGEST-MD5 
EXTERNAL NTLM CRAM-MD5 PLAIN LOGIN ANONYMOUS
GS2-IAKERB GS2-KRB5 SCRAM-SHA-1 SCRAM-SHA-256 GSSAPI GSS-SPNEGO DIGEST-MD5 
NTLM CRAM-MD5 PLAIN LOGIN ANONYMOUS

  Confirming with ldapwhoami:
  root@f1:~# ldapwhoami -Y GSS-SPNEGO
  SASL/GSS-SPNEGO authentication started
  SASL username: administra...@internal.example.fake
  SASL SSF: 256
  SASL data security layer installed.
  u:INTEXAMPLE\Administrator

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/1956833/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1955997] Re: The airplane hotkey has no function on a HP platform

2022-01-10 Thread jeremyszu
Hi Lukas,

The jammy and impish do have this issue and will be fixed in v250[1],
FWIK, we will upgrade to v250 soon? let me know if you think I should
still prepare the workaround for impish and jammy.

[1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20219

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955997

Title:
  The airplane hotkey has no function on a HP platform

Status in OEM Priority Project:
  Triaged
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  The airplane hokey doesn't work on HP new generation machines.

  [Test Plan]
  Press airplane hokey.

  Before the patch, nothing happens.
  After the patch, the rfkill works as expected.

  [Where problems could occur]
  In non-gnome ubuntu, if the specific dmi contains HPQ6001, then airplane will 
not work but HP confirmed the new HP generation won't contain the HPQ6001 and 
also each DM still need to deal with multi-rfkill events because upstream 
changes[2].

  ---

  In the last year, HP mentions HP machines need to use hp-wireless
  (HPQ6001) as the rfkill source[1].

  However, HP confirms the HPQ6001 has been retired in the platforms
  since 2022.

  In the platforms after 2022, there are two sources of rkfill events 
(intel-hid, atkbd) and HP only guarantee the intel-hid works.
  Therefore, the upstream already accept the patch[2] to unmask intel-hid and 
mention this big change in the NEWS.

  This change makes the pre-2022 HP platforms meet the regression since they 
have two rfkill events (HPQ6001 and intel-hid) be triggered if pressing 
function key.
  Thus, there is a patch[3] to make sure the GNOME could deal with this case 
smoothly.
  However, the systemd change will still cause other DEs meet the regression 
(xfce, KDE, lxde, etc..).
  Backport systemd change to make HP 2022 platforms work is not the best choice 
on stable version (focal in this case).

  We still need a solution to make airplane key works on 2022 HP platforms 
(intel-hid and atkbd only).
  The potential solution from my mind that is to maintain a whitelist to unmask 
intel-hid in ubuntu-patch in focal, something like:
  ```
  evdev:name:Intel HID events:dmi:bvn*:bvr*:bd*:svnHP*:pnHPZBookFury16inchG9*:*
   KEYBOARD_KEY_8=wlan # Use hp-wireless instead
  ```
  after "KEYBOARD_KEY_8=unkown".

  [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883846
  [2] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20219
  [3] 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-settings-daemon/-/commit/f4dbcf3d7b0f951fe44b29229206c97b625dbfda

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1955997/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1957024] Re: pam-mkhomedir does not honor private home directories

2022-01-10 Thread Andrew Lowther
Here is a demonstration as requested in Discourse.  These steps were run
on a stock image of Ubuntu Impish taken from https://cloud-
images.ubuntu.com/impish/current/.

Showing the inconsistent behavior of the default settings if the goal is
private home directories.  Both adduser and useradd create a home
directory that is private but pam_mkhomedir.so does not.

# enable pam_mkhomedir.so configuration
pam-auth-update --enable mkhomedir
# create a user with adduser that creates the home directory
adduser --disabled-password --gecos adduser homemadebyadduser
# create a user with useradd that creates the home directory
useradd --create-home homemadebyuseradd
# create a user with useradd that does *not* create the home directory so that 
pam_mkhomedir.so can create it
useradd --no-create-home homemadebymkhomedir
# trigger pam_mkhomedir.so to create the home directory
su - homemadebymkhomedir -c exit

The result is inconsistent permissions on the home directories.
root@ubuntu:~# ls -al /home
total 24
drwxr-xr-x  6 rootroot4096 Jan 11 03:27 .
drwxr-xr-x 19 rootroot4096 Jan 11 03:13 ..
drwxr-x---  2 homemadebyadduser   homemadebyadduser   4096 Jan 11 03:20 
homemadebyadduser
drwxr-xr-x  2 homemadebymkhomedir homemadebymkhomedir 4096 Jan 11 03:27 
homemadebymkhomedir
drwxr-x---  2 homemadebyuseradd   homemadebyuseradd   4096 Jan 11 03:23 
homemadebyuseradd
drwxr-x---  4 ubuntu  ubuntu  4096 Jan 11 03:15 ubuntu


Configuring pam_mkhomedir.so to be consistent with the other tools.

# update pam_mkhomedir.so configuration
sed -i -e "s/pam_mkhomedir.so$/pam_mkhomedir.so umask=0027/" 
/usr/share/pam-configs/mkhomedir
# enable mkhomedir again
pam-auth-update --enable mkhomedir
# create a user with useradd that does *not* create the home directory so that 
pam_mkhomedir.so can create it
useradd --no-create-home homemadebymkhomedirpatch
# trigger pam_mkhomedir.so to create the home directory
su - homemadebymkhomedirpatch -c exit

The result is the permissions are consistent with the other tools.
root@ubuntu:~# ls -l /home/
total 20
drwxr-x--- 2 homemadebyadduserhomemadebyadduser4096 Jan 11 
03:20 homemadebyadduser
drwxr-xr-x 2 homemadebymkhomedir  homemadebymkhomedir  4096 Jan 11 
03:27 homemadebymkhomedir
drwxr-x--- 2 homemadebymkhomedirpatch homemadebymkhomedirpatch 4096 Jan 11 
03:36 homemadebymkhomedirpatch
drwxr-x--- 2 homemadebyuseraddhomemadebyuseradd4096 Jan 11 
03:23 homemadebyuseradd
drwxr-x--- 4 ubuntu   ubuntu   4096 Jan 11 
03:15 ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957024

Title:
  pam-mkhomedir does not honor private home directories

Status in pam package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  As reported in https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/private-home-
  directories-for-ubuntu-21-04-onwards/19533/13:

  A common situation is to have a central set of users (e.g. in LDAP)
  and use pam_mkhomedir.so to create the home directory when the user
  first logs in.

  These changes do not cover this situation. The default configuration
  of pam_mkhomedir.so will result in a home directory created with 0755
  permissions.

  To make pam_mkhomedir.so create a home directory by default with
  permissions consistent with the other tools then a umask argument can
  be added to the pam_mkhomedir.so module in the file /usr/share/pam-
  configs/mkhomedir. I believe this would have to be done before
  enabling the module. The file is part of the libpam-modules package.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1957024/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956833] Re: No GSS-SPNEGO support in jammy

2022-01-10 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Debian)
   Status: Unknown => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956833

Title:
  No GSS-SPNEGO support in jammy

Status in cyrus-sasl2 package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in cyrus-sasl2 package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  In jammy:
  root@j1:~# saslpluginviewer | head | grep SPNEGO
  root@j1:~# 

  Confirming against a windows 2016 active directory server, fully patched:
  root@j1:~# ldapwhoami -Y GSS-SPNEGO
  ldap_sasl_interactive_bind: Unknown authentication method (-6)
  additional info: SASL(-4): no mechanism available: No worthy mechs 
found

  
  gssapi (kerberos) works:
  root@j1:~# ldapwhoami -Y GSSAPI
  SASL/GSSAPI authentication started
  SASL username: administra...@internal.example.fake
  SASL SSF: 256
  SASL data security layer installed.
  u:INTEXAMPLE\Administrator

  root@j1:~# klist
  Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0
  Default principal: administra...@internal.example.fake

  Valid starting ExpiresService principal
  01/08/22 22:31:48  01/09/22 08:31:48  
krbtgt/internal.example.f...@internal.example.fake
  renew until 01/09/22 22:31:45
  01/08/22 22:34:53  01/09/22 08:31:48  
ldap/win-kriet1e5elo.internal.example.fake@
  renew until 01/09/22 22:31:45
  Ticket server: 
ldap/win-kriet1e5elo.internal.example.f...@internal.example.fake

  
  In focal, GSS-SPNEGO works:
  root@f1:~# saslpluginviewer | head | grep SPNEGO
GS2-IAKERB GS2-KRB5 SCRAM-SHA-1 SCRAM-SHA-256 GSSAPI GSS-SPNEGO DIGEST-MD5 
EXTERNAL NTLM CRAM-MD5 PLAIN LOGIN ANONYMOUS
GS2-IAKERB GS2-KRB5 SCRAM-SHA-1 SCRAM-SHA-256 GSSAPI GSS-SPNEGO DIGEST-MD5 
NTLM CRAM-MD5 PLAIN LOGIN ANONYMOUS

  Confirming with ldapwhoami:
  root@f1:~# ldapwhoami -Y GSS-SPNEGO
  SASL/GSS-SPNEGO authentication started
  SASL username: administra...@internal.example.fake
  SASL SSF: 256
  SASL data security layer installed.
  u:INTEXAMPLE\Administrator

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/1956833/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956412] Re: crash reports don't go to proper dev team

2022-01-10 Thread erik flister
why would you say you won't fix this?  it would be easy to implement
systems and policies for ubuntu modders and upstream teams to
coordinate.  at minimum, give upstream access to the crash reports,
issue trackers, etc.

it doesn't take manpower, you don't have to test.  all you have to do is
forward by default, or at least provide access.  if upstream wants to
ignore the forwards, that's on them.  don't ruin it for everyone by
assuming you have to accommodate the least cooperative teams.

i doubt that the vast majority of reports have to do with ubuntu mods
anyway -- they almost all belong upstream.  the majority case is the
case you should design for.

it is a huge shame to take your users' reports and efforts in reporting
issues, and let them go to waste.  the spirit of oss is a partnership
with users, upstream teams, and not wasting anyone's contributions and
efforts.

as an example please note the crash i reported regarding gnome-remote-
desktop.  where did it go?  how do we find it?  it had nothing to do
with any ubuntu mod.  how do i get it to that upstream gnome team?  how
do we give them access to the system holding it?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956412

Title:
  crash reports don't go to proper dev team

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  i'm on 21.10.  i was reporting a crash to a gnome dev team and they informed 
me that the crash report dialog that submits coredumps, etc. never makes it to 
the actual responsible party.
  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-remote-desktop/-/issues/80#note_1346891

  you need a process that forwards these to the proper team

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1956412/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1957024] [NEW] pam-mkhomedir does not honor private home directories

2022-01-10 Thread Alex Murray
Public bug reported:

As reported in https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/private-home-directories-
for-ubuntu-21-04-onwards/19533/13:

A common situation is to have a central set of users (e.g. in LDAP) and
use pam_mkhomedir.so to create the home directory when the user first
logs in.

These changes do not cover this situation. The default configuration of
pam_mkhomedir.so will result in a home directory created with 0755
permissions.

To make pam_mkhomedir.so create a home directory by default with
permissions consistent with the other tools then a umask argument can be
added to the pam_mkhomedir.so module in the file /usr/share/pam-
configs/mkhomedir. I believe this would have to be done before enabling
the module. The file is part of the libpam-modules package.

** Affects: pam (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957024

Title:
  pam-mkhomedir does not honor private home directories

Status in pam package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  As reported in https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/private-home-
  directories-for-ubuntu-21-04-onwards/19533/13:

  A common situation is to have a central set of users (e.g. in LDAP)
  and use pam_mkhomedir.so to create the home directory when the user
  first logs in.

  These changes do not cover this situation. The default configuration
  of pam_mkhomedir.so will result in a home directory created with 0755
  permissions.

  To make pam_mkhomedir.so create a home directory by default with
  permissions consistent with the other tools then a umask argument can
  be added to the pam_mkhomedir.so module in the file /usr/share/pam-
  configs/mkhomedir. I believe this would have to be done before
  enabling the module. The file is part of the libpam-modules package.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1957024/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956412] Re: crash reports don't go to proper dev team

2022-01-10 Thread Brian Murray
There are frequently modifications made to Ubuntu packages which
upstream developers are not aware of or the Ubuntu version of a package
can be one or more versions behind the latest upstream version. For
these reasons the crash reports first come to Ubuntu and ideally are
then forwarded to the upstream developers. I say ideally as we don't
have the manpower to test and forward every bug report to the upstream
developers.

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956412

Title:
  crash reports don't go to proper dev team

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  i'm on 21.10.  i was reporting a crash to a gnome dev team and they informed 
me that the crash report dialog that submits coredumps, etc. never makes it to 
the actual responsible party.
  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-remote-desktop/-/issues/80#note_1346891

  you need a process that forwards these to the proper team

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1956412/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951519] Re: ubiquity 20.04.15.17 fails to build (test_timezone)

2022-01-10 Thread Brian Murray
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu Focal)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-20.04.4

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tzdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951519

Title:
  ubiquity 20.04.15.17 fails to build (test_timezone)

Status in tzdata package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in ubiquity package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in tzdata source package in Focal:
  Invalid
Status in ubiquity source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in tzdata source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in ubiquity source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Description:  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS
  Release:  20.04

  When trying to build ubiquity from source,

  sudo apt update
  sudo apt -y dist-upgrade
  sudo apt-get build-dep ubiquity
  sudo apt install -y fakeroot
  apt source ubiquity
  cd ubiquity-*
  dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc
  [...]
  test_has_battery (test_upower.UPowerTests) ... ok
  test_check_hostname (test_usersetup.UserSetupTests) ... ok
  test_check_username (test_usersetup.UserSetupTests) ... ok
  test_default_username (test_usersetup.UserSetupTests) ... ok
  test_default_username_strips_invalid_characters 
(test_usersetup.UserSetupTests) ... ok
  test_hostname_check (test_usersetup.UserSetupTests) ... ok
  test_hostname_check_bogus_dns (test_usersetup.UserSetupTests) ... ok
  test_hostname_check_exists (test_usersetup.UserSetupTests) ... ok
  test_unicode (test_usersetup.UserSetupTests) ... ok

  ==
  FAIL: test_city_entry (test_timezone.TimezoneTests)
  --
  Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/mock/mock.py", line 1330, in patched
  return func(*args, **keywargs)
    File "/home/ark/ubiquity-20.04.15.17/tests/test_timezone.py", line 58, in 
test_city_entry
  self.assertEqual(set(results), set(expected))
  AssertionError: Items in the first set but not the second:
  ('Eastern', 'Bahamas')
  Items in the second set but not the first:
  ('Eastern', 'Canada')

  --
  Ran 89 tests in 19.319s

  FAILED (failures=1)
  xauth/Xrdb output:
  make: *** [debian/rules:228: tests] Error 1
  dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary subprocess returned 
exit status 2

  It keeps failing regardless of release.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1951519/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1954311] Re: Daily cron job script unnecessarily executes `find` with `rm` instead of using its '-delete' action

2022-01-10 Thread Akbarkhon Variskhanov
Also removed -prune primary as it conflicted with -depth, which is
automatically turned on by -delete.

** Patch added: "removed_prune_primary.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1954311/+attachment/5553122/+files/removed_prune_primary.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1954311

Title:
  Daily cron job script unnecessarily executes `find` with `rm` instead
  of using its '-delete' action

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Executing `rm` as a separate process each time for every single file
  is unnecessary and inefficient. The option '-delete' should be used
  instead.

  Patch is included below.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1954311/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1955997] Re: The airplane hotkey has no function on a HP platform

2022-01-10 Thread Lukas Märdian
What series is this needed for? Does it already work as expected in
Jammy?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955997

Title:
  The airplane hotkey has no function on a HP platform

Status in OEM Priority Project:
  Triaged
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  The airplane hokey doesn't work on HP new generation machines.

  [Test Plan]
  Press airplane hokey.

  Before the patch, nothing happens.
  After the patch, the rfkill works as expected.

  [Where problems could occur]
  In non-gnome ubuntu, if the specific dmi contains HPQ6001, then airplane will 
not work but HP confirmed the new HP generation won't contain the HPQ6001 and 
also each DM still need to deal with multi-rfkill events because upstream 
changes[2].

  ---

  In the last year, HP mentions HP machines need to use hp-wireless
  (HPQ6001) as the rfkill source[1].

  However, HP confirms the HPQ6001 has been retired in the platforms
  since 2022.

  In the platforms after 2022, there are two sources of rkfill events 
(intel-hid, atkbd) and HP only guarantee the intel-hid works.
  Therefore, the upstream already accept the patch[2] to unmask intel-hid and 
mention this big change in the NEWS.

  This change makes the pre-2022 HP platforms meet the regression since they 
have two rfkill events (HPQ6001 and intel-hid) be triggered if pressing 
function key.
  Thus, there is a patch[3] to make sure the GNOME could deal with this case 
smoothly.
  However, the systemd change will still cause other DEs meet the regression 
(xfce, KDE, lxde, etc..).
  Backport systemd change to make HP 2022 platforms work is not the best choice 
on stable version (focal in this case).

  We still need a solution to make airplane key works on 2022 HP platforms 
(intel-hid and atkbd only).
  The potential solution from my mind that is to maintain a whitelist to unmask 
intel-hid in ubuntu-patch in focal, something like:
  ```
  evdev:name:Intel HID events:dmi:bvn*:bvr*:bd*:svnHP*:pnHPZBookFury16inchG9*:*
   KEYBOARD_KEY_8=wlan # Use hp-wireless instead
  ```
  after "KEYBOARD_KEY_8=unkown".

  [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883846
  [2] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20219
  [3] 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-settings-daemon/-/commit/f4dbcf3d7b0f951fe44b29229206c97b625dbfda

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1955997/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956915] Please test proposed package

2022-01-10 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted mesa into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/21.2.6-0ubuntu0.1~20.04.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956915

Title:
  New bugfix release 21.2.6

Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in mesa source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in mesa source package in Impish:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  This is the last point-release of the 21.2.x-series, we should put it
  in impish so latest bugfixes would get there, and in focal for 20.04.4
  image.

  [Test case]

  Install the updates, test desktop use and some basic games etc on at
  least AMD and Intel hw.

  [Where things could go wrong]

  It's possible that some apps (like games) might regress on some hw,
  but there should not be a big risk for more wider bugs appearing in
  this update, since upstream and vendor (Intel) CI machinery have
  tested these.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1956915/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956915] Re: New bugfix release 21.2.6

2022-01-10 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted mesa into impish-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/21.2.6-0ubuntu0.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
impish to verification-done-impish. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-impish. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-impish

** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956915

Title:
  New bugfix release 21.2.6

Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in mesa source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in mesa source package in Impish:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  This is the last point-release of the 21.2.x-series, we should put it
  in impish so latest bugfixes would get there, and in focal for 20.04.4
  image.

  [Test case]

  Install the updates, test desktop use and some basic games etc on at
  least AMD and Intel hw.

  [Where things could go wrong]

  It's possible that some apps (like games) might regress on some hw,
  but there should not be a big risk for more wider bugs appearing in
  this update, since upstream and vendor (Intel) CI machinery have
  tested these.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1956915/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949553] Re: Backport packages for 20.04.4 HWE stack

2022-01-10 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,

Accepted mesa into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/21.2.6-0ubuntu0.1~20.04.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949553

Title:
  Backport packages for 20.04.4 HWE stack

Status in libdrm package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in xorg-server package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in libdrm source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in mesa source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in xorg-server source package in Focal:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  These are needed for 20.04.4 images.

  [Test case]

  Boot a daily image, see that it still has the necessary stack
  installed and working.

  [What could go wrong]

  libdrm: adds some new api, no changes to old stuff

  llvm-13: a new package, no regression potential on it's own

  mesa: a new major release, but we'll pull the final stable release of
  21.2.x series, so there shouldn't be any regressions left at that
  point

  xserver: a new point-release, 1.20.x series is in deep maintenance
  mode, so there should be little chance of breakage

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1949553/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1955566] Re: iris driver doesn't load correctly on intel pci_id 0x4688

2022-01-10 Thread Timo Aaltonen
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1949553 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949553

focal will get this via impish backport

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1956915
   New bugfix release 21.2.6

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1956915
   New bugfix release 21.2.6

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1949553
   Backport packages for 20.04.4 HWE stack

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955566

Title:
  iris driver doesn't load correctly on intel pci_id 0x4688

Status in OEM Priority Project:
  Triaged
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * iris driver doesn't load with pci_id 4688. Instead, it uses llvm.
  we expect the Intel GPU uses iris driver.

  [Test Plan]

   * $ DISPLAY=:0 glxinfo | grep -i opengl
  OpenGL vendor string: Mesa/X.org
  OpenGL renderer string: llvmpipe (LLVM 12.0.0, 256 bits)
  ...
  OpenGL version string: 3.1 Mesa 21.0.3

   * After applying the fix, it shows:

   * $ DISPLAY=:0 glxinfo | grep -i opengl
  OpenGL vendor string: Intel
  OpenGL renderer string: Mesa Intel(R) Graphics (ADL-S GT1)
  ...
  OpenGL version string: 4.6 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 21.0.3 
(git-d4975a0dbc)

  [Where problems could occur]

   * This patch is backport the PCI ID mapping for enabling iris driver which 
is expected when users have a GPU.
   * If there is any issue occur then we need to fix it with iris driver.

  [Other Info]

   * It already in upstream and we have a platform which using ADL-HX in OEM 
project. Thus, we need to enable iris on it at least on focal.
   * The patch is simple as to add "CHIPSET(0x4688, adl_gt1, "ADL-S GT1", 
"Intel(R) Graphics")" in "include/pci_ids/iris_pci_ids.h".
   * Patch backported from df5b14969f9869f363bcc8b2a564c85aaa481597

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1955566/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1932579] Re: snap pt_BR locale shows warning every time

2022-01-10 Thread Miguel Pires
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Miguel Pires (miguelpires1)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to language-pack-pt-base in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932579

Title:
  snap pt_BR locale shows warning every time

Status in snapd:
  Fix Committed
Status in language-pack-pt-base package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in snapd package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  The following warning appears every time I type a snap command, and
  thus breaks auto-completion.

  2021/06/18 13:15:24.372374 main.go:176: description of prepare-image's
  "" is lowercase in locale "pt_BR": "o directório de
  destino"

  The problem seems locale dependent, since "LANG=C snap" doesn't show
  this warning. I'm currently using Ubuntu 21.04, and this bug happens
  since I upgraded from 20.10. (I don't know if this is off-topic or
  where I can help, but "directório" is more pt_PT than pt_BR, which
  could be "pasta/diretório")

  echo $LANG output:
  pt_BR.UTF-8

  lsb_release -rb output:
  Description:  Ubuntu 21.04
  Release:  21.04

  apt-cache policy snapd output:
  snapd:
Instalado: 2.49.2+21.04ubuntu1
Candidato: 2.49.2+21.04ubuntu1
Tabela de versão:
   *** 2.49.2+21.04ubuntu1 500
  500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu hirsute/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

  snap list output:
  ...[other packages]...
  snap-store 3.38.0-64-g23c4c77  547latest/stable
canonical✓   -
  snapd  2.5112159  latest/stable
canonical✓   snapd

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1932579/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938998] Re: [vmwgfx] Update to mesa and xorg-server causes Cinnamon desktop to not render properly

2022-01-10 Thread Vinay Sajip
Ah, OK. I'll re-test and report back.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938998

Title:
  [vmwgfx] Update to mesa and xorg-server causes Cinnamon desktop to not
  render properly

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in xorg-server package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  On a VMWare Workstation VM running Linux Mint 20.1 (64-bit) with
  Cinnamon 4.8.6 or Linux Mint 20.2 (64-bit) with Cinnamon 5.0.5,
  upgrading to a specific mesa and xorg-server version, followed by a
  system restart, led to the Cinnamon desktop not rendering correctly,
  such that the desktop was unusable. The rendering problem is that
  icons and menus are displayed as grey rectangles and it's not possible
  to see what they are.

  I believe the problem is in one of these packages:

  * mesa 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.2-20.04.1
  * xorg-server 2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1-20.04.2

  Restoring the system from backup, and then upgrading but omitting the above 
two updates and restarting, the system behaves as expected. It's not 
immediately clear which of these packages is causing the problem.
  --- 
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  vinay  1218 F pulseaudio
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: X-Cinnamon
  DistroRelease: Linux Mint 20.1
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-01-30 (187 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Linux Mint 20.1 "Ulyssa" - Release amd64 20210103
  IwConfig:
   lono wireless extensions.
   
   ens33 no wireless extensions.
   
   tailscale0  no wireless extensions.
  Lsusb:
   Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
   Bus 002 Device 003: ID 0e0f:0002 VMware, Inc. Virtual USB Hub
   Bus 002 Device 002: ID 0e0f:0003 VMware, Inc. Virtual Mouse
   Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
  Lsusb-t:
   /:  Bus 02.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=uhci_hcd/2p, 12M
   |__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 0, Class=Human Interface Device, Driver=usbhid, 12M
   |__ Port 2: Dev 3, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/7p, 12M
   /:  Bus 01.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=ehci-pci/6p, 480M
  MachineType: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform
  Package: linux (not installed)
  ProcFB: 0 svgadrmfb
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-80-generic 
root=UUID=681c361f-49a2-4943-94c0-abb7554046f8 ro quiet splash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-80.90-generic 5.4.124
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   linux-restricted-modules-5.4.0-80-generic N/A
   linux-backports-modules-5.4.0-80-generic  N/A
   linux-firmware1.187.15
  RfKill:
   
  Tags:  ulyssa
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-80-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 05/20/2014
  dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies LTD
  dmi.bios.version: 6.00
  dmi.board.name: 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
  dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.board.version: None
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 1
  dmi.chassis.vendor: No Enclosure
  dmi.chassis.version: N/A
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLTD:bvr6.00:bd05/20/2014:svnVMware,Inc.:pnVMwareVirtualPlatform:pvrNone:rvnIntelCorporation:rn440BXDesktopReferencePlatform:rvrNone:cvnNoEnclosure:ct1:cvrN/A:
  dmi.product.name: VMware Virtual Platform
  dmi.product.version: None
  dmi.sys.vendor: VMware, Inc.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1938998/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956967] [NEW] package libpython2.7-minimal (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: no package named 'libpython2.7-minimal' is installed, cannot configure

2022-01-10 Thread goost otb
Public bug reported:

what this proplim

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: libpython2.7-minimal (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-44.48~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-44-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Mon Jan 10 04:39:44 2022
DuplicateSignature:
 package:libpython2.7-minimal:(not installed)
 Unpacking libpython2-stdlib:amd64 (2.7.17-2ubuntu4) ...
 dpkg: error processing package libpython2.7-minimal (--configure):
  no package named 'libpython2.7-minimal' is installed, cannot configure
ErrorMessage: no package named 'libpython2.7-minimal' is installed, cannot 
configure
InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-01-10 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia:
 
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.10, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
PythonDetails: N/A
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
 apt  2.0.6
SourcePackage: python2.7
Title: package libpython2.7-minimal (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: 
no package named 'libpython2.7-minimal' is installed, cannot configure
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: python2.7 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal need-duplicate-check

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python2.7 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956967

Title:
  package libpython2.7-minimal (not installed) failed to
  install/upgrade: no package named 'libpython2.7-minimal' is installed,
  cannot configure

Status in python2.7 package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  what this proplim

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: libpython2.7-minimal (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-44.48~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-44-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Mon Jan 10 04:39:44 2022
  DuplicateSignature:
   package:libpython2.7-minimal:(not installed)
   Unpacking libpython2-stdlib:amd64 (2.7.17-2ubuntu4) ...
   dpkg: error processing package libpython2.7-minimal (--configure):
no package named 'libpython2.7-minimal' is installed, cannot configure
  ErrorMessage: no package named 'libpython2.7-minimal' is installed, cannot 
configure
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-01-10 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia:
   
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.10, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
  PythonDetails: N/A
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
   apt  2.0.6
  SourcePackage: python2.7
  Title: package libpython2.7-minimal (not installed) failed to 
install/upgrade: no package named 'libpython2.7-minimal' is installed, cannot 
configure
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python2.7/+bug/1956967/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956957] [NEW] package initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6.6 failed to install/upgrade: installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status

2022-01-10 Thread J R
Public bug reported:

3 weeks after installing 20.04.3

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6.6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-44.48~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-44-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Mon Jan 10 13:03:11 2022
ErrorMessage: installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script 
subprocess returned error exit status 1
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-12-22 (19 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819)
PackageArchitecture: all
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.10, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.18, python-is-python2, 2.7.17-4
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
 apt  2.0.6
SourcePackage: initramfs-tools
Title: package initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6.6 failed to install/upgrade: 
installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script subprocess returned 
error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956957

Title:
  package initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6.6 failed to install/upgrade:
  installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script subprocess
  returned error exit status 1

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  3 weeks after installing 20.04.3

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6.6
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-44.48~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-44-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Mon Jan 10 13:03:11 2022
  ErrorMessage: installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script 
subprocess returned error exit status 1
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-12-22 (19 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.10, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
  PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.18, python-is-python2, 2.7.17-4
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
   apt  2.0.6
  SourcePackage: initramfs-tools
  Title: package initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6.6 failed to install/upgrade: 
installed initramfs-tools package post-installation script subprocess returned 
error exit status 1
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1956957/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956954] [NEW] Can't load seccomp filter

2022-01-10 Thread Nino Škopac
Public bug reported:

After migrating from Ubuntu 20 amd64 to aarch64 I started experiencing
"can't load seccomp filter" when doing `apt update && apt upgrade` and
"Kernel refuses to turn on BPF filters" when using Puppeteer.

I wrote about it more extensively here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69892137/after-a-few-days-i-can-no-
longer-start-puppeteer-until-i-restart-the-server


lsb_release -rd
---
Description:Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS
Release:20.04

apt-cache policy seccomp
---
seccomp:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 2.5.1-1ubuntu1~20.04.2
  Version table:
 2.5.1-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 500
500 http://us-east-1.ec2.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports 
focal-updates/main arm64 Packages
500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports focal-security/main arm64 
Packages
 2.4.3-1ubuntu1 500
500 http://us-east-1.ec2.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports focal/main arm64 
Packages

** Affects: libseccomp (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libseccomp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956954

Title:
  Can't load seccomp filter

Status in libseccomp package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  After migrating from Ubuntu 20 amd64 to aarch64 I started experiencing
  "can't load seccomp filter" when doing `apt update && apt upgrade` and
  "Kernel refuses to turn on BPF filters" when using Puppeteer.

  I wrote about it more extensively here:
  https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69892137/after-a-few-days-i-can-
  no-longer-start-puppeteer-until-i-restart-the-server

  
  lsb_release -rd
  ---
  Description:  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS
  Release:  20.04

  apt-cache policy seccomp
  ---
  seccomp:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 2.5.1-1ubuntu1~20.04.2
Version table:
   2.5.1-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 500
  500 http://us-east-1.ec2.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports 
focal-updates/main arm64 Packages
  500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports focal-security/main arm64 
Packages
   2.4.3-1ubuntu1 500
  500 http://us-east-1.ec2.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports focal/main 
arm64 Packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/+bug/1956954/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1955797] Re: [SRU] network-manager can’t modify MTU automatically based on what ModemManager exposes for WWAN modems.

2022-01-10 Thread Jerry Lee
Hi Lukasz,

Carrier network providers use bearer information to carry the MTU
setting, this can be received by the modem then exposed to its host
system either via NetworkManager's ipv4_config or ipv6_config.

I think ipv4_config is the must supported setting in carrier's network,
that may be why this upstream patch has not considered ipv6_config. (MTU
should be the same(per device) for both ipv4 and ipv6)

Our customer has used this patch in the field testing and this patch worked as 
expected.
There should be no concern to get MTU only via ipv4_config.

Thanks for highlight this question.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955797

Title:
  [SRU] network-manager can’t modify MTU automatically based on what
  ModemManager exposes for WWAN modems.

Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in network-manager source package in Focal:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  Some 4G/5G mobile networks(for ex., AT) requires a specific MTU
  setting, this setting will be exposed by the ModemManager for network-
  manger to configure the MTU of the modem network interface .

  The current modem-manager v1.22.10-1ubuntu2.2  in focal can’t pass
  AT’s modem system certification.

  [Fix]

  This upstream patch can resolve this bug:
  
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/-/merge_requests/499/diffs?commit_id=212758ea05a4c13d65f36b55c90aee7919642631

  [Test Plan]

  1. Use a Lenovo platform SE30 including 4G Quectel EM160 modem and an
  AT SIM card in US

  2. Enable 4G modem and connect to AT apn

  $ sudo mmcli -i 0 --pin=
  $ sudo mmcli --modem 0 --enable
  $ sudo mmcli -m 0 --simple-connect="pin=,apn=emome"
  $ sudo nmcli radio wwan on
  $ sudo nmcli connection add type gsm ifname wwan0p2MBIM con-name mymodem apn 
emome
  $ sudo nmcli connection up id mymodem

  3. Check if the MTU got from the following results are the same:

  $ sudo mmcli --bearer 5 | mtu
  $ ifconfig mhi_mbim0 | grep mtu

  * Expected result:
  Both MTUs are the same value 1430
  * Actual tested result:
  Different values (one is 1430 , another is 1500)

  [Where problems could occur]

  Very low.
  This is a simple fix: network-manager gets the MTU from the ModemManager then 
sets the MTU of the modem interface.

  [Other info]

  1. Network-manager v1.30.0-1ubuntu3 in hirsute has included the fix.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1955797/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1955797] Re: [SRU] network-manager can’t modify MTU automatically based on what ModemManager exposes for WWAN modems.

2022-01-10 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hey Jerry! This looks good and I can certainly sponsor it for you.

One question before I do that though. Looking at the original source commit:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/-/merge_requests/499?commit_id=212758ea05a4c13d65f36b55c90aee7919642631
It is mentioned there by some user that MM can also expose this via MTU from 
the IPv6 bearer, not only IPv4. Not sure if this is an use case we are 
concerned about, and if there was a follow up patch for this use case.
Can you take a look and give me a sign if we should still continue as-is? 
Thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955797

Title:
  [SRU] network-manager can’t modify MTU automatically based on what
  ModemManager exposes for WWAN modems.

Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in network-manager source package in Focal:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  Some 4G/5G mobile networks(for ex., AT) requires a specific MTU
  setting, this setting will be exposed by the ModemManager for network-
  manger to configure the MTU of the modem network interface .

  The current modem-manager v1.22.10-1ubuntu2.2  in focal can’t pass
  AT’s modem system certification.

  [Fix]

  This upstream patch can resolve this bug:
  
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/-/merge_requests/499/diffs?commit_id=212758ea05a4c13d65f36b55c90aee7919642631

  [Test Plan]

  1. Use a Lenovo platform SE30 including 4G Quectel EM160 modem and an
  AT SIM card in US

  2. Enable 4G modem and connect to AT apn

  $ sudo mmcli -i 0 --pin=
  $ sudo mmcli --modem 0 --enable
  $ sudo mmcli -m 0 --simple-connect="pin=,apn=emome"
  $ sudo nmcli radio wwan on
  $ sudo nmcli connection add type gsm ifname wwan0p2MBIM con-name mymodem apn 
emome
  $ sudo nmcli connection up id mymodem

  3. Check if the MTU got from the following results are the same:

  $ sudo mmcli --bearer 5 | mtu
  $ ifconfig mhi_mbim0 | grep mtu

  * Expected result:
  Both MTUs are the same value 1430
  * Actual tested result:
  Different values (one is 1430 , another is 1500)

  [Where problems could occur]

  Very low.
  This is a simple fix: network-manager gets the MTU from the ModemManager then 
sets the MTU of the modem interface.

  [Other info]

  1. Network-manager v1.30.0-1ubuntu3 in hirsute has included the fix.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1955797/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938998] Re: [vmwgfx] Update to mesa and xorg-server causes Cinnamon desktop to not render properly

2022-01-10 Thread Daniel van Vugt
The bug has not been confirmed by another human. That's just the status
used by the kernel bot.

Since all the relevant packages (mesa, xorg-server and kernel) have been
updated since this bug was logged we would appreciate it if you could
retest.

If the problem still occurs then please consider:

 * Testing a newer kernel because you're currently on the old kernel
series. You can change that with 'sudo apt install linux-generic-
hwe-20.04'.

 * Reporting the problem to Cinnamon
(https://github.com/linuxmint/cinnamon/issues) if it is specific to that
environment.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938998

Title:
  [vmwgfx] Update to mesa and xorg-server causes Cinnamon desktop to not
  render properly

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in xorg-server package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  On a VMWare Workstation VM running Linux Mint 20.1 (64-bit) with
  Cinnamon 4.8.6 or Linux Mint 20.2 (64-bit) with Cinnamon 5.0.5,
  upgrading to a specific mesa and xorg-server version, followed by a
  system restart, led to the Cinnamon desktop not rendering correctly,
  such that the desktop was unusable. The rendering problem is that
  icons and menus are displayed as grey rectangles and it's not possible
  to see what they are.

  I believe the problem is in one of these packages:

  * mesa 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.2-20.04.1
  * xorg-server 2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1-20.04.2

  Restoring the system from backup, and then upgrading but omitting the above 
two updates and restarting, the system behaves as expected. It's not 
immediately clear which of these packages is causing the problem.
  --- 
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  vinay  1218 F pulseaudio
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: X-Cinnamon
  DistroRelease: Linux Mint 20.1
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-01-30 (187 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Linux Mint 20.1 "Ulyssa" - Release amd64 20210103
  IwConfig:
   lono wireless extensions.
   
   ens33 no wireless extensions.
   
   tailscale0  no wireless extensions.
  Lsusb:
   Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
   Bus 002 Device 003: ID 0e0f:0002 VMware, Inc. Virtual USB Hub
   Bus 002 Device 002: ID 0e0f:0003 VMware, Inc. Virtual Mouse
   Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
  Lsusb-t:
   /:  Bus 02.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=uhci_hcd/2p, 12M
   |__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 0, Class=Human Interface Device, Driver=usbhid, 12M
   |__ Port 2: Dev 3, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/7p, 12M
   /:  Bus 01.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=ehci-pci/6p, 480M
  MachineType: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform
  Package: linux (not installed)
  ProcFB: 0 svgadrmfb
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-80-generic 
root=UUID=681c361f-49a2-4943-94c0-abb7554046f8 ro quiet splash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-80.90-generic 5.4.124
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   linux-restricted-modules-5.4.0-80-generic N/A
   linux-backports-modules-5.4.0-80-generic  N/A
   linux-firmware1.187.15
  RfKill:
   
  Tags:  ulyssa
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-80-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 05/20/2014
  dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies LTD
  dmi.bios.version: 6.00
  dmi.board.name: 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
  dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.board.version: None
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 1
  dmi.chassis.vendor: No Enclosure
  dmi.chassis.version: N/A
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLTD:bvr6.00:bd05/20/2014:svnVMware,Inc.:pnVMwareVirtualPlatform:pvrNone:rvnIntelCorporation:rn440BXDesktopReferencePlatform:rvrNone:cvnNoEnclosure:ct1:cvrN/A:
  dmi.product.name: VMware Virtual Platform
  dmi.product.version: None
  dmi.sys.vendor: VMware, Inc.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1938998/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938998] Re: [vmwgfx] Update to mesa and xorg-server causes Cinnamon desktop to not render properly

2022-01-10 Thread Vinay Sajip
Has this (now confirmed) problem been identified and fixed, and if so,
which versions of the package(s) contain the fix? With this information,
one could update to the version containing the fix and seeing if the
system actually works as expected. I now generally turn off the updates
for these packages when the update manager suggests them, as I don't
want to interrupt my workflow by having to restore from backup if the
fix isn't in there.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938998

Title:
  [vmwgfx] Update to mesa and xorg-server causes Cinnamon desktop to not
  render properly

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in xorg-server package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  On a VMWare Workstation VM running Linux Mint 20.1 (64-bit) with
  Cinnamon 4.8.6 or Linux Mint 20.2 (64-bit) with Cinnamon 5.0.5,
  upgrading to a specific mesa and xorg-server version, followed by a
  system restart, led to the Cinnamon desktop not rendering correctly,
  such that the desktop was unusable. The rendering problem is that
  icons and menus are displayed as grey rectangles and it's not possible
  to see what they are.

  I believe the problem is in one of these packages:

  * mesa 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.2-20.04.1
  * xorg-server 2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1-20.04.2

  Restoring the system from backup, and then upgrading but omitting the above 
two updates and restarting, the system behaves as expected. It's not 
immediately clear which of these packages is causing the problem.
  --- 
  ProblemType: Bug
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  vinay  1218 F pulseaudio
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: X-Cinnamon
  DistroRelease: Linux Mint 20.1
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-01-30 (187 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Linux Mint 20.1 "Ulyssa" - Release amd64 20210103
  IwConfig:
   lono wireless extensions.
   
   ens33 no wireless extensions.
   
   tailscale0  no wireless extensions.
  Lsusb:
   Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
   Bus 002 Device 003: ID 0e0f:0002 VMware, Inc. Virtual USB Hub
   Bus 002 Device 002: ID 0e0f:0003 VMware, Inc. Virtual Mouse
   Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
  Lsusb-t:
   /:  Bus 02.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=uhci_hcd/2p, 12M
   |__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 0, Class=Human Interface Device, Driver=usbhid, 12M
   |__ Port 2: Dev 3, If 0, Class=Hub, Driver=hub/7p, 12M
   /:  Bus 01.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=ehci-pci/6p, 480M
  MachineType: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform
  Package: linux (not installed)
  ProcFB: 0 svgadrmfb
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-80-generic 
root=UUID=681c361f-49a2-4943-94c0-abb7554046f8 ro quiet splash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-80.90-generic 5.4.124
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   linux-restricted-modules-5.4.0-80-generic N/A
   linux-backports-modules-5.4.0-80-generic  N/A
   linux-firmware1.187.15
  RfKill:
   
  Tags:  ulyssa
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-80-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 05/20/2014
  dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies LTD
  dmi.bios.version: 6.00
  dmi.board.name: 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
  dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corporation
  dmi.board.version: None
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 1
  dmi.chassis.vendor: No Enclosure
  dmi.chassis.version: N/A
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLTD:bvr6.00:bd05/20/2014:svnVMware,Inc.:pnVMwareVirtualPlatform:pvrNone:rvnIntelCorporation:rn440BXDesktopReferencePlatform:rvrNone:cvnNoEnclosure:ct1:cvrN/A:
  dmi.product.name: VMware Virtual Platform
  dmi.product.version: None
  dmi.sys.vendor: VMware, Inc.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1938998/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946621] Re: Crash in libegl-mesa0 (eglReleaseThread)

2022-01-10 Thread Timo Aaltonen
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1956915 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956915

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1956915
   New bugfix release 21.2.6

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946621

Title:
  Crash in libegl-mesa0 (eglReleaseThread)

Status in Mesa:
  Unknown
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in mesa source package in Focal:
  New
Status in mesa source package in Impish:
  New

Bug description:
  Crash in libegl-mesa0 (in eglReleaseThread API), please find the
  backtrace:

  #0  0xf7c86ac4 in __GI___pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=mutex@entry=0x8) 
at pthread_mutex_lock.c:67
  #1  0xf4a7d110 in mtx_lock (mtx=0x8) at 
../include/c11/threads_posix.h:223
  #2  eglReleaseThread () at ../src/egl/main/eglapi.c:1713
  #3  0xf6c115b8 in eglReleaseThread () at 
/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libEGL.so.1
  #4  0xf7fdac00 in  () at /lib/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1
  #5  0xf7b4284c in __run_exit_handlers
  (status=0, listp=0xf7c76680 <__exit_funcs>, 
run_list_atexit=run_list_atexit@entry=true, run_dtors=run_dtors@entry=true) at 
exit.c:108
  #6  0xf7b429dc in __GI_exit (status=) at exit.c:139
  #7  0xf7b2d094 in __libc_start_main (main=
  0x3530 , argc=13, argv=0xf488, init=, fini=, rtld_fini=, stack_end=)
  at ../csu/libc-start.c:342
  #8  0x4014 in _start ()

  It crashes at:
  https://github.com/mesa3d/mesa/blob/mesa-21.0.3/src/egl/main/eglapi.c#L1713.
  'disp' pointer is being NULL in this case.

  Actually nvidia's EGL backend is being loaded by glvnd in this case.
  But the eglReleaseThread() implementation of glvnd calls the
  eglReleaseThread() API of all the vendors, that's how it end-up
  calling the eglReleaseThread() API of Mesa backend. Refer:
  https://github.com/NVIDIA/libglvnd/blob/master/src/EGL/libegl.c#L806

  lsb_release -a
  No LSB modules are available.
  Distributor ID: Ubuntu
  Description:Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS
  Release:20.04
  Codename:   focal

  apt-cache policy libegl-mesa0
  libegl-mesa0:
Installed: 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.3~20.04.2
Candidate: 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.3~20.04.2
Version table:
   *** 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.3~20.04.2 500
  500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports focal-updates/main arm64 
Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
   20.0.4-2ubuntu1 500
  500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports focal/main arm64 Packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mesa/+bug/1946621/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939455] Re: Upgrading from 20.0.4-2ubuntu1 to 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.2~20.04.1 breaks vlc video output

2022-01-10 Thread Timo Aaltonen
So what about impish? Focal will soon get 21.2.x from impish.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939455

Title:
  Upgrading from 20.0.4-2ubuntu1 to 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.2~20.04.1 breaks vlc
  video output

Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Hello!

  As reported here
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1939447 upgrading
  mesa-vdpau-drivers package from 20.0.4-2ubuntu1 to
  21.0.3-0ubuntu0.2~20.04.1 breaks vlc video hardware acceleration.

  Thanks!

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: mesa-vdpau-drivers 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.2~20.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-80.90-generic 5.4.124
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-80-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  Date: Wed Aug 11 02:21:08 2021
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: focal
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
  GraphicsCard:
   Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Mullins [Radeon R4/R5 Graphics] 
[1002:9851] (rev 40) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Mullins [Radeon R4/R5 Graphics] 
[103c:81e5]
  MachineType: HP HP 245 G5 Notebook PC
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-80-generic 
root=UUID=e8820090-c9e5-4245-bcb4-92818bd91e34 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: mesa
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 04/21/2016
  dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde
  dmi.bios.version: F.08
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: 81E5
  dmi.board.vendor: HP
  dmi.board.version: KBC Version 73.14
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Chassis Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: HP
  dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnInsyde:bvrF.08:bd04/21/2016:svnHP:pnHP245G5NotebookPC:pvrType1ProductConfigId:rvnHP:rn81E5:rvrKBCVersion73.14:cvnHP:ct10:cvrChassisVersion:
  dmi.product.family: 103C_5336AN G=N L=SMB B=HP S=245
  dmi.product.name: HP 245 G5 Notebook PC
  dmi.product.sku: Y9Q66PC#ACJ
  dmi.product.version: Type1ProductConfigId
  dmi.sys.vendor: HP
  modified.conffile..etc.default.apport:
   # set this to 0 to disable apport, or to 1 to enable it
   # you can temporarily override this with
   # sudo service apport start force_start=1
   enabled=0
  mtime.conffile..etc.default.apport: 2020-08-12T15:11:08.785042
  version.compiz: compiz N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.105-3~20.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.2~20.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1~20.04.2
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200226-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.16-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1939455/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940545] Re: Update Mesa to mesa-21.1.7 on Ubuntu 20.04

2022-01-10 Thread Timo Aaltonen
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1956915 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956915

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1956915
   New bugfix release 21.2.6

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940545

Title:
  Update Mesa to mesa-21.1.7 on Ubuntu 20.04

Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  With the recent MR
  https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9902 to
  Mesa, we (NVIDIA) have added ability to GBM to dynamically load the
  backends. So we request to upgrade mesa libs to its latest version
  (mesa-21.1.7) on Ubuntu 20.04 to use the added feature for our
  development.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1940545/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1950044] Re: REGRESSION with version 21.0.3, please backport 21.2.x to Focal

2022-01-10 Thread Timo Aaltonen
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1956915 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956915

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1956915
   New bugfix release 21.2.6

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950044

Title:
  REGRESSION with version 21.0.3, please backport 21.2.x to Focal

Status in Mesa:
  Unknown
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Hi,
  I was running into this problem:
  https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50864

  The current workaround is:
  sudo add-apt-repository ppa:savoury1/display && sudo apt upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mesa/+bug/1950044/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956915] Re: New bugfix release 21.2.6

2022-01-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956915

Title:
  New bugfix release 21.2.6

Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in mesa source package in Focal:
  Confirmed
Status in mesa source package in Impish:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  This is the last point-release of the 21.2.x-series, we should put it
  in impish so latest bugfixes would get there, and in focal for 20.04.4
  image.

  [Test case]

  Install the updates, test desktop use and some basic games etc on at
  least AMD and Intel hw.

  [Where things could go wrong]

  It's possible that some apps (like games) might regress on some hw,
  but there should not be a big risk for more wider bugs appearing in
  this update, since upstream and vendor (Intel) CI machinery have
  tested these.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1956915/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956915] Re: New bugfix release 21.2.6

2022-01-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956915

Title:
  New bugfix release 21.2.6

Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in mesa source package in Focal:
  Confirmed
Status in mesa source package in Impish:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  This is the last point-release of the 21.2.x-series, we should put it
  in impish so latest bugfixes would get there, and in focal for 20.04.4
  image.

  [Test case]

  Install the updates, test desktop use and some basic games etc on at
  least AMD and Intel hw.

  [Where things could go wrong]

  It's possible that some apps (like games) might regress on some hw,
  but there should not be a big risk for more wider bugs appearing in
  this update, since upstream and vendor (Intel) CI machinery have
  tested these.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1956915/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956915] Re: New bugfix release 21.2.6

2022-01-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956915

Title:
  New bugfix release 21.2.6

Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in mesa source package in Focal:
  Confirmed
Status in mesa source package in Impish:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  This is the last point-release of the 21.2.x-series, we should put it
  in impish so latest bugfixes would get there, and in focal for 20.04.4
  image.

  [Test case]

  Install the updates, test desktop use and some basic games etc on at
  least AMD and Intel hw.

  [Where things could go wrong]

  It's possible that some apps (like games) might regress on some hw,
  but there should not be a big risk for more wider bugs appearing in
  this update, since upstream and vendor (Intel) CI machinery have
  tested these.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1956915/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956915] Re: New bugfix release 21.2.6

2022-01-10 Thread Timo Aaltonen
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu Focal)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)

** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu Impish)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956915

Title:
  New bugfix release 21.2.6

Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in mesa source package in Focal:
  New
Status in mesa source package in Impish:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  This is the last point-release of the 21.2.x-series, we should put it
  in impish so latest bugfixes would get there, and in focal for 20.04.4
  image.

  [Test case]

  Install the updates, test desktop use and some basic games etc on at
  least AMD and Intel hw.

  [Where things could go wrong]

  It's possible that some apps (like games) might regress on some hw,
  but there should not be a big risk for more wider bugs appearing in
  this update, since upstream and vendor (Intel) CI machinery have
  tested these.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1956915/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956915] [NEW] New bugfix release 21.2.6

2022-01-10 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Public bug reported:

[Impact]

This is the last point-release of the 21.2.x-series, we should put it in
impish so latest bugfixes would get there, and in focal for 20.04.4
image.

[Test case]

Install the updates, test desktop use and some basic games etc on at
least AMD and Intel hw.

[Where things could go wrong]

It's possible that some apps (like games) might regress on some hw, but
there should not be a big risk for more wider bugs appearing in this
update, since upstream and vendor (Intel) CI machinery have tested
these.

** Affects: mesa (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: mesa (Ubuntu Focal)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: mesa (Ubuntu Impish)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: mesa (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: mesa (Ubuntu Impish)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956915

Title:
  New bugfix release 21.2.6

Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in mesa source package in Focal:
  New
Status in mesa source package in Impish:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  This is the last point-release of the 21.2.x-series, we should put it
  in impish so latest bugfixes would get there, and in focal for 20.04.4
  image.

  [Test case]

  Install the updates, test desktop use and some basic games etc on at
  least AMD and Intel hw.

  [Where things could go wrong]

  It's possible that some apps (like games) might regress on some hw,
  but there should not be a big risk for more wider bugs appearing in
  this update, since upstream and vendor (Intel) CI machinery have
  tested these.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1956915/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp