[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047780] Re: BlueZ release 5.71
Daniel, I don't want you to feel burned over this. That wiki page does seem quite rational, and I appreciate that you linked it. I'm reading some mixed feelings, so let me be clear: thank you for the work you *are* able to put into this. Both Gianfranco and I are Ubuntu Core Developers but are also Debian Developers. An expectation of working with Debian is #3 of the Social Contract, "Don't Hide Problems" https://www.debian.org/social_contract If Debian has problems in their packaging that do exist, please file a bug. If the maintainer is non-responsive in Debian, there is a process for non-maintainer uploads (and I would personally help you with this). My point of disagreement is not how we are addressing the Ubuntu uploads as much as how we are working with Debian to fix them. If the Debian team is non-collaborative, that should be addressed with the appropriate governance board. Either way, there should be a clear diff, whether the community has to help or not. That being said, considerateness is part of Ubuntu's CoC. I will push my commits there in the morning. I do apologize again for any undue stress. I would rather address this head on, because it means a better Bluetooth package for our users. Jeremy, the reason evolution-data-server has uninstallable binaries is because of the binfmt-supoort i386 allowlist issue at hand. Please confirm whether you have a customer story that will be impacted by this, or if we think a user will seriously need this support on i386 in 2024. I may be an Ubuntu Core Developer, but I respect that it's not my call alone to make, and the last thing I want to do is regress something for a customer. That's why I'm being up front about these issues. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047780 Title: BlueZ release 5.71 Status in bluez package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Bug description: Release BlueZ 5.71 to noble. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/2047780/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047780] Re: BlueZ release 5.71
Thank you for working over the weekend on this. I would have resolved it myself on the Monday if someone answered the question in comment #11. Also I've sent a bug report to Debian about their orig tarball not matching the upstream release tarball. I feel that's a discussion they need to have with upstream: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060242 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047780 Title: BlueZ release 5.71 Status in bluez package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Bug description: Release BlueZ 5.71 to noble. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/2047780/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047780] Re: BlueZ release 5.71
It looks like most of you are members of ~bluetooth already via ~ubuntu- core-dev so feel free to commit directly to https://git.launchpad.net/~bluetooth/bluez in future. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047780 Title: BlueZ release 5.71 Status in bluez package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Bug description: Release BlueZ 5.71 to noble. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/2047780/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047780] Re: BlueZ release 5.71
I appreciate everyone is frustrated. BlueZ isn't really staffed, it's just something I look at once or twice a year. The diff to Debian is shrinking over the long term, but again that's something I don't look at very often. The justification for Ubuntu using a separate process for the past 6 years or so is documented in: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Bluetooth/BluezGit If this becomes contentious then I am happy for other people to own BlueZ and remove myself from ~bluetooth. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047780 Title: BlueZ release 5.71 Status in bluez package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Bug description: Release BlueZ 5.71 to noble. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/2047780/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1833322] Re: Consider removing irqbalance from default install on desktop images
Lots of good comments. I sort of agree with: > So if we're going to make a change, there > should be due diligence to demonstrate a > benefit, it should not be based on > Internet hype. However, I would have said: If irqbalance is to be included by default, then there should be due diligence to demonstrate a clear benefit. Simplier is better, and every added thing can have issues, bug 2046470 being an example for irqbalance. On my Ubuntu 20.04 test server (kernel 6.7-rc8) running a 24.04 server VM (with 4 vcpus) I ran 3 token passing ping pong pairs, monitoring power and idle states on the host with irqbalance enabled and disabled on both host and guest. The results were: irqbalance disabled: pair 1: 4.3378 uSec/loop pair 2: 4.4207 uSec/loop pair 3: 4.5144 uSec/loop Processor energy: 87,500 Joules. irqbalance enabled: pair 1: 4.5828 uSec/loop +5.6% pair 2: 4.7084 uSec/loop +6.5% pair 3: 4.7704 uSec/loop +5.7% Processor energy: 92,252 Joules. +5.43% The attached graph is processor power at 15 seconds per sample from 30 seconds before until some seconds after the test completes. The extra extra energy for the irqbalanced test is because the test took longer to complete. I also have graphs for all idle states usage and above/below stats, none of which reveal anything. Another test done was iperf3 between the guest and host forcing a small tcp window size. The test was run for 22 minutes. The command: iperf3 --interval 0 --bidir --window 1024 --time 1320 -c s19.smythies.com irqbalance enabled: 412 MBytes sent 45.1 GBytes rec'd Processor energy: 69,272 Joules. irqbalance disabled: 413 MBytes sent, 0.24% improved 45.2 GBytes rec'd, 0.22% improved Processor energy: 70,560 Joules. +1.86% The related idle graphs don't reveal anything. A third test was iperf3 between the guest and host using the default (big) tcp window size. The test was run for 22 minutes. The command: iperf3 --interval 0 --bidir --time 1320 -c s19.smythies.com irqbalance enabled: 6.99 TBytes sent 2.10 TBytes rec'd 9.09 TBytes total Processor energy: 77,888 Joules. irqbalance disabled: 7.62 TBytes sent, 9.0% improved 1.62 TBytes rec'd, 22.9% worse 9.24 TBytes total, 1.65% improved Processor energy: 80,166 Joules. +2.92% The graphs (not attached) show the main differences are in idle state 0 usage. Other notes: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-10600K CPU @ 4.10GHz HWP enabled intel_pstate CPU frequency driver powersave governor ** Attachment added: "power.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1833322/+attachment/5737186/+files/power.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833322 Title: Consider removing irqbalance from default install on desktop images Status in irqbalance package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: as per https://github.com/pop-os/default-settings/issues/60 Distribution (run cat /etc/os-release): $ cat /etc/os-release NAME="Pop!_OS" VERSION="19.04" ID=ubuntu ID_LIKE=debian PRETTY_NAME="Pop!_OS 19.04" VERSION_ID="19.04" HOME_URL="https://system76.com/pop"; SUPPORT_URL="http://support.system76.com"; BUG_REPORT_URL="https://github.com/pop-os/pop/issues"; PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://system76.com/privacy"; VERSION_CODENAME=disco UBUNTU_CODENAME=disco Related Application and/or Package Version (run apt policy $PACKAGE NAME): $ apt policy irqbalance irqbalance: Installed: 1.5.0-3ubuntu1 Candidate: 1.5.0-3ubuntu1 Version table: *** 1.5.0-3ubuntu1 500 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu disco/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status $ apt rdepends irqbalance irqbalance Reverse Depends: Recommends: ubuntu-standard gce-compute-image-packages Issue/Bug Description: as per konkor/cpufreq#48 and http://konkor.github.io/cpufreq/faq/#irqbalance-detected irqbalance is technically not needed on desktop systems (supposedly it is mainly for servers), and may actually reduce performance and power savings. It appears to provide benefits only to server environments that have relatively-constant loading. If it is truly a server- oriented package, then it shouldn't be installed by default on a desktop/laptop system and shouldn't be included in desktop OS images. Steps to reproduce (if you know): This is potentially an issue with all default installs. Expected behavior: n/a Other Notes: I can safely remove it via "sudo apt purge irqbalance" without any apparent adverse side-effects. If someone is running a situation where they need it, then they always have the option of installing it from the repositories. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irqbalance/+bug/1833322/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post t
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2046844] Re: AppArmor user namespace creation restrictions cause many applications to crash with SIGTRAP
Other packages that have been tested and found to be impacted by this bug have been added. ** Also affects: angelfish (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: angelfish (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Also affects: privacybrowser (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: privacybrowser (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Also affects: notepadqq (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: notepadqq (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Also affects: cantor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: cantor (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Also affects: pageedit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: pageedit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Also affects: rssguard (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: rssguard (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Also affects: konqueror (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: konqueror (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Also affects: kiwix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: kiwix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Also affects: kchmviewer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: kchmviewer (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Also affects: goldendict-webengine (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: goldendict-webengine (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Also affects: opam (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: opam (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Also affects: akregator (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: akregator (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Also affects: kalgebra (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: kalgebra (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Also affects: qmapshack (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: qmapshack (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Also affects: supercollider (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: supercollider (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Also affects: tellico (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: tellico (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046844 Title: AppArmor user namespace creation restrictions cause many applications to crash with SIGTRAP Status in akregator package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in angelfish package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in apparmor package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in bubblewrap package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in cantor package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in devhelp package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in digikam package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in epiphany-browser package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in evolution package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in falkon package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in freecad package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in gnome-packagekit package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in goldendict-webengine package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in kalgebra package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in kchmviewer package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in kdeplasma-addons package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in kiwix package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in konqueror package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in kontact package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in notepadqq package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in opam package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in pageedit package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in plasma-desktop package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in privacybrowser package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in qmapshack package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in qutebrowser package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in rssguard package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in steam package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in supercollider package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in tellico package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Hi, I run Ubuntu development branch 24.04 and I have a problem with Epiphany browser 45.1-1 (Gnome Web): program doesn't launch, and I get this error $ epiphany bwrap: Creating new namespace failed: Permission denied ** (epiphany:12085): ERROR **: 14:44:35.023: Failed to fully launch dbus-proxy: Le processus fils s’est terminé avec le code 1 Trappe pour point d'arrêt et de trace (core dumped) $ epiphany bwrap: Creating new namespace failed: Permission denied ** (epiphany:30878): ERROR **: 22:22:26.926: Failed to fully launch dbus-proxy: Le processus fils s’est terminé avec le code 1 Trappe pour point d'arrêt et de trace (core dumped) Thanks f
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1833322] Re: Consider removing irqbalance from default install on desktop images
I said my initial piece and recommendation here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irqbalance/+bug/2046470/comments/2 It carries through here... This was brought up as a recommendation in Launchpad (here in this bug report) back in 2019, In that bug report, I questioned why this had been ignored, and not discussed much since then. It didn't go away, and it was discussed as it should have been. I was embarrassed that it had been that way for 4 years. Since then: By then Debian had already removed it from being installed as a default. Ubuntu kept it. even after that bug report... RedHat had removed it from being default installed. SUSE, is a special case, where they kept it for their Enterprise Server Lineup... Because they have different tuning settings for them, versus their desktops and other product images. But then on page 16 of their Performance Analysis, Tuning and Tools Guide (https://documentation.suse.com/sbp/server-linux/pdf/SBP-performance-tuning_en.pdf), that chapter starts out with this quote: >>> A correct IRQ configuration – above all in multi-core architecture and >>> multi-thread >>> applications– can have a profound impact on throughput and latency >>> performance ...and further says that the first step to get there is to disable irqbalance (where they give the instructions to disable the service) and how to go through irq configuration from there. Applications vendors, which we have in our repo's, such as Vlave Steam and CpuFrq, currently recommend removing irqbalance, if installed. RE: https://github.com/ValveSoftware/Proton/issues/3243 http://konkor.github.io/cpufreq/faq/ Additional to the blog article linked to in the last comment above, I found this blog (https://blogs.oracle.com/linux/post/irqbalance-design-and-internals), that goes into how it makes decisions in load balancing and is best summed up in it's conclusion: >>> This article described the internals of the irqbalance daemon. The >>> information provided >>> here can be used to debug and better understand load balance decisions >>> taken by irqbalance. The question I have is, if Ubuntu is Debian Branch, and we long ago went from having different kernels for desktop & server in ubuntu-base, but do have ubuntu-server packages and ubuntu-desktop packages, where things could be different, why is this still a broad sweep as a default install? I am happy that this is getting discussed properly now so that we can relook at this ad what it means to us today. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833322 Title: Consider removing irqbalance from default install on desktop images Status in irqbalance package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: as per https://github.com/pop-os/default-settings/issues/60 Distribution (run cat /etc/os-release): $ cat /etc/os-release NAME="Pop!_OS" VERSION="19.04" ID=ubuntu ID_LIKE=debian PRETTY_NAME="Pop!_OS 19.04" VERSION_ID="19.04" HOME_URL="https://system76.com/pop"; SUPPORT_URL="http://support.system76.com"; BUG_REPORT_URL="https://github.com/pop-os/pop/issues"; PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://system76.com/privacy"; VERSION_CODENAME=disco UBUNTU_CODENAME=disco Related Application and/or Package Version (run apt policy $PACKAGE NAME): $ apt policy irqbalance irqbalance: Installed: 1.5.0-3ubuntu1 Candidate: 1.5.0-3ubuntu1 Version table: *** 1.5.0-3ubuntu1 500 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu disco/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status $ apt rdepends irqbalance irqbalance Reverse Depends: Recommends: ubuntu-standard gce-compute-image-packages Issue/Bug Description: as per konkor/cpufreq#48 and http://konkor.github.io/cpufreq/faq/#irqbalance-detected irqbalance is technically not needed on desktop systems (supposedly it is mainly for servers), and may actually reduce performance and power savings. It appears to provide benefits only to server environments that have relatively-constant loading. If it is truly a server- oriented package, then it shouldn't be installed by default on a desktop/laptop system and shouldn't be included in desktop OS images. Steps to reproduce (if you know): This is potentially an issue with all default installs. Expected behavior: n/a Other Notes: I can safely remove it via "sudo apt purge irqbalance" without any apparent adverse side-effects. If someone is running a situation where they need it, then they always have the option of installing it from the repositories. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irqbalance/+bug/1833322/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1833322] Re: Consider removing irqbalance from default install on desktop images
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: irqbalance (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833322 Title: Consider removing irqbalance from default install on desktop images Status in irqbalance package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: as per https://github.com/pop-os/default-settings/issues/60 Distribution (run cat /etc/os-release): $ cat /etc/os-release NAME="Pop!_OS" VERSION="19.04" ID=ubuntu ID_LIKE=debian PRETTY_NAME="Pop!_OS 19.04" VERSION_ID="19.04" HOME_URL="https://system76.com/pop"; SUPPORT_URL="http://support.system76.com"; BUG_REPORT_URL="https://github.com/pop-os/pop/issues"; PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://system76.com/privacy"; VERSION_CODENAME=disco UBUNTU_CODENAME=disco Related Application and/or Package Version (run apt policy $PACKAGE NAME): $ apt policy irqbalance irqbalance: Installed: 1.5.0-3ubuntu1 Candidate: 1.5.0-3ubuntu1 Version table: *** 1.5.0-3ubuntu1 500 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu disco/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status $ apt rdepends irqbalance irqbalance Reverse Depends: Recommends: ubuntu-standard gce-compute-image-packages Issue/Bug Description: as per konkor/cpufreq#48 and http://konkor.github.io/cpufreq/faq/#irqbalance-detected irqbalance is technically not needed on desktop systems (supposedly it is mainly for servers), and may actually reduce performance and power savings. It appears to provide benefits only to server environments that have relatively-constant loading. If it is truly a server- oriented package, then it shouldn't be installed by default on a desktop/laptop system and shouldn't be included in desktop OS images. Steps to reproduce (if you know): This is potentially an issue with all default installs. Expected behavior: n/a Other Notes: I can safely remove it via "sudo apt purge irqbalance" without any apparent adverse side-effects. If someone is running a situation where they need it, then they always have the option of installing it from the repositories. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irqbalance/+bug/1833322/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047780] Re: BlueZ release 5.71
evolution-data-server still has uninstallable binaries on i386. You can ignore bluez for the binfmt-support issue. However, for bluez, Ubuntu uses --enable-phonebook-ebook . There are other phonebook options; maybe what Debian uses works for Debian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047780 Title: BlueZ release 5.71 Status in bluez package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Bug description: Release BlueZ 5.71 to noble. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/2047780/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047982] Re: Highlighting of patches offers insufficient contrast
Is there any terminal in which the default is actually readable? ** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Quigley (tsimonq2) ** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04-feature-freeze ** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to vim in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047982 Title: Highlighting of patches offers insufficient contrast Status in vim package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: With vim 2:9.0.2189-1ubuntu1 the coloring of patches has been changed. The result is that in konsole patches have become illegible. See appendix. Deleted lines have foreground cyan #18b2b2 and background light blue #7f7fff. Kind of blue on blue. Please, provide sane color defaults. The previous release used bright white on black for deleted lines. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/+bug/2047982/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047982] Re: Highlighting of patches offers insufficient contrast
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to vim in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047982 Title: Highlighting of patches offers insufficient contrast Status in vim package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: With vim 2:9.0.2189-1ubuntu1 the coloring of patches has been changed. The result is that in konsole patches have become illegible. See appendix. Deleted lines have foreground cyan #18b2b2 and background light blue #7f7fff. Kind of blue on blue. Please, provide sane color defaults. The previous release used bright white on black for deleted lines. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/+bug/2047982/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047780] Re: BlueZ release 5.71
> In other words, asking an Archive Admin to build binfmt-support on i386. I have stopped short of this so far because I'm entirely unsure if we still need that build dependency in the first place. Debian doesn't have it, and I'm not sure I see rationale on our end for it. There is probably something I'm missing, but I don't have the justification myself to make such a request. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047780 Title: BlueZ release 5.71 Status in bluez package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Bug description: Release BlueZ 5.71 to noble. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/2047780/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1945645] Re: cups-pdf prints blank pages
** Changed in: ghostscript (Debian) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945645 Title: cups-pdf prints blank pages Status in cups package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in cups-pdf package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in ghostscript package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in ghostscript package in Debian: Fix Released Bug description: after updating from ubuntu 21.04 to ubuntu 21.10 the virtual pdf printer started to print blank pages (to create washed pdf files) printer-driver-cups-pdf, version 3.0.1-10 Description:Ubuntu Impish Indri (development branch) Release:21.10 printer-driver-cups-pdf: Installed: 3.0.1-10 Candidate: 3.0.1-10 Version table: *** 3.0.1-10 500 500 http://bg.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu impish/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10 Package: printer-driver-cups-pdf 3.0.1-10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-16.16-generic 5.13.13 Uname: Linux 5.13.0-16-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu69 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: KDE Date: Thu Sep 30 15:56:51 2021 InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-03-17 (561 days ago) InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Alpha amd64 (20200205) Lpstat: device for PDF: cups-pdf:/ Papersize: a4 PpdFiles: Error: command ['fgrep', '-H', '*NickName', '/etc/cups/ppd/PDF.ppd'] failed with exit code 2: grep: /etc/cups/ppd/PDF.ppd: Permission denied SourcePackage: cups-pdf UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to impish on 2021-09-28 (2 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1945645/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1199298] Re: package libgraphite2-3 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: libgraphite2-3:i386 1.2.1-1 (Multi-Arch
Calculating room sizes for radiators and hot water supply demands, we guarantee that the boiler we install is tailored to suit your household requirements. https://manchesterplumbingandheating.co.uk/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to graphite2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199298 Title: package libgraphite2-3 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: libgraphite2-3:i386 1.2.1-1 (Multi-Arch Status in graphite2 package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: nan ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: libgraphite2-3 (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-26.38-generic 3.8.13.2 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-26-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8.1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Jul 9 13:21:07 2013 DuplicateSignature: package:libgraphite2-3:(not installed):libgraphite2-3:i386 1.2.1-1 (Multi-Arch ErrorMessage: libgraphite2-3:i386 1.2.1-1 (Multi-Arch MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: graphite2 Title: package libgraphite2-3 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: libgraphite2-3:i386 1.2.1-1 (Multi-Arch UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2013-04-28 (72 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/graphite2/+bug/1199298/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
