[Touch-packages] [Bug 911206] Re: /etc/init.d/ondemand unconditionally overrules /etc/init.d/cpufrequtils
This also led to the problem in bug 1579278 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sysvinit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/911206 Title: /etc/init.d/ondemand unconditionally overrules /etc/init.d/cpufrequtils Status in cpufrequtils package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in sysvinit package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: /etc/init.d/ondemand *always* sets the cpu scaling governor to ondemand, and is executed after /etc/init.d/cpufrequtils. This causes two problems: 1. Confusion, because it seems as if /etc/init.d/cpufrequtils is being run, but has no effect 2. Possible problems down the road, because /etc/init.d/ondemand has no /etc/default/ondemand, so either editing or deleting /etc/init.d/ondemand. I just discovered that updating initscripts will fail if /etc/init.d/ondemand has been deleted (dpkg complains about this file missing and aborts) Suggested fixes: a) Remove /etc/init.d/ondemand, make the ondemand governor the default for /etc/init.d/cpufrequtils, install package cpufrequtils by default. b) If this is not desired, make absolutely sure that /etc/init.d/ondemand is executed *before* /etc/init.d/cpufrequtils, maybe by making /etc/init.d/cpufrequtils depend on /etc/init.d/ondemand. I'm looking forward to your responses, Daniel ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: initscripts 2.88dsf-13.10ubuntu4.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-14.23-generic 3.0.9 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-14-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Jan 3 13:13:59 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64 (20111012) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: sysvinit UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-12-10 (23 days ago) modified.conffile..etc.init.d.ondemand: [modified] mtime.conffile..etc.init.d.ondemand: 2012-01-03T13:13:33.783902 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cpufrequtils/+bug/911206/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1480320] Re: ondemand init script sets governor "powersave" when only "powersave" and "performance" available
This is also the problem behind bug 1579278 which recently affected an IS machine. Forcing "powersave" on all newer x86 CPUs is a bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sysvinit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1480320 Title: ondemand init script sets governor "powersave" when only "powersave" and "performance" available Status in sysvinit package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: My system seems to have governors "powersave" and "performance" available. No others. So by ondemand, I end up with "powersave", which makes my workstation excruciatingly slow. I think that in this case, "performance" should be preferred. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.10 Package: initscripts 2.88dsf-59.2ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.1.0-2.2-generic 4.1.3 Uname: Linux 4.1.0-2-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.18-0ubuntu5 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: XFCE Date: Fri Jul 31 17:08:08 2015 InstallationDate: Installed on 2010-10-12 (1752 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007) SourcePackage: sysvinit UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to wily on 2014-11-11 (262 days ago) mtime.conffile..etc.init.d.ondemand: 2015-07-31T16:51:58.391407 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysvinit/+bug/1480320/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1579278] Re: Consider changing default CPU frequency scaling governor back to "performance" (Ubuntu Server)
It looks like /etc/init.d/ondemand doesn't have any support for the performance governor at all. On systems that only have "performance" and "powersave" the only thing /etc/init.d/ondemand will do is set the governor to powersave. I'll file the appropriate bug against the initscripts package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sysvinit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579278 Title: Consider changing default CPU frequency scaling governor back to "performance" (Ubuntu Server) Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in sysvinit package in Ubuntu: New Status in linux source package in Xenial: Invalid Status in sysvinit source package in Xenial: New Bug description: Hi, With the new Ubuntu archive servers, we saw constantly high load and after some tinkering, we found that it was mostly CPUs being woken up to see if they should enter idle states. Changing the CPU frequency scaling governor to "performance" saw a considerable drop. Perf report using the following commands: | perf record -g -a sleep 10 | perf report | Samples: 287K of event 'cycles:pp', Event count (approx.): 124776998906 | Children Self Command Shared Object Symbol | + 55.24% 0.20% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cpu_startup_entry | + 53.51% 0.00% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] start_secondary | + 53.02% 0.08% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] call_cpuidle | + 52.94% 0.02% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cpuidle_enter | + 31.81% 0.67% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cpuidle_enter_state | + 29.59% 0.12% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] acpi_idle_enter | + 29.45% 0.05% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] acpi_idle_do_entry | + 29.43%29.43% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_enter | + 20.51% 0.04% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] ret_from_intr | + 20.47% 0.12% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] do_IRQ | + 19.30% 0.07% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] irq_exit | + 19.18% 0.07% apache2 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath | + 18.80% 0.17% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __do_softirq | + 16.45% 0.11% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] net_rx_action | + 16.25% 0.43% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] be_poll | + 14.74% 0.21% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] be_process_rx | + 13.61% 0.07% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] napi_gro_frags | + 12.58% 0.04% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] netif_receive_skb_internal | + 12.48% 0.03% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __netif_receive_skb | + 12.42% 0.24% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __netif_receive_skb_core | + 12.41% 0.00% apache2 [unknown] [k] 0x7f27983b5028 | + 12.41% 0.00% apache2 [unknown] [k] 0x7f2798369028 | + 11.49% 0.16% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] ip_rcv | + 11.29% 0.09% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] ip_rcv_finish | + 10.77% 0.05% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] ip_local_deliver | + 10.70% 0.06% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] ip_local_deliver_finish | + 10.55% 0.22% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] tcp_v4_rcv | + 10.10% 0.00% apache2 [unknown] [k] | + 10.01% 0.04% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] tcp_v4_do_rcv Expanding in a few of those, you'll see: | - 55.24% 0.20% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cpu_startup_entry |- 55.04% cpu_startup_entry | - 52.98% call_cpuidle | + 52.93% cpuidle_enter | + 0.00% ret_from_intr |0.00% cpuidle_enter_state |0.00% irq_entries_start | + 1.14% cpuidle_select | + 0.47% schedule_preempt_disabled | 0.10% rcu_idle_enter | 0.09% rcu_idle_exit | + 0.05% ret_from_intr | + 0.05% tick_nohz_idle_enter | + 0.04% arch_cpu_idle_enter | 0.02% cpuidle_enter | 0.02% tick_check_broadcast_expired | + 0.01% cpuidle_reflect | 0.01% menu_reflect | 0.01% atomic_notifier_call_chain | 0.01% local_touch_nmi | 0.01% cpuidle_not_available | 0.01% menu_select | 0.01% cpuidle_get_cpu_driver | + 0.01% tick_nohz_idle_exit | + 0.01% sched_ttwu_pending | 0.00% set_cpu_sd_state_idle
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1564426] Re: Import problem - Spanish (es) - glib20 in Ubuntu Xenial package "glib2.0"
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Milestone: wily-updates => xenial-updates -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564426 Title: Import problem - Spanish (es) - glib20 in Ubuntu Xenial package "glib2.0" Status in glib2.0 package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Looks like there was an accidental word-wrap problem in po/es.po. Line 13 is really the end of line 12. I've included a patch to send upstream. Here's a copy of the email that IS has been getting for a while now: Hello Launchpad Translations Administrators, On 2016-03-18 13:50z (12 days 14 hours 16 minutes ago), you uploaded a file with Spanish (es) translations for glib20 in Ubuntu Xenial package "glib2.0" to Launchpad. We were unable to import the file because of errors in its format: Line 13: Invalid content: u', 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016.' If you use gettext, you can check your file for correct formatting with the 'msgfmt -c' command. Please fix any errors raised by msgfmt and upload the file again. If you check the file and you don't find any error in it, please look for an answer or file a question at https://answers.launchpad.net/rosetta/ For your convenience, you can get the file you uploaded at: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/250464407/es.po Thank you, The Launchpad team To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/1564426/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1564426] [NEW] Import problem - Spanish (es) - glib20 in Ubuntu Xenial package "glib2.0"
Public bug reported: Looks like there was an accidental word-wrap problem in po/es.po. Line 13 is really the end of line 12. I've included a patch to send upstream. Here's a copy of the email that IS has been getting for a while now: Hello Launchpad Translations Administrators, On 2016-03-18 13:50z (12 days 14 hours 16 minutes ago), you uploaded a file with Spanish (es) translations for glib20 in Ubuntu Xenial package "glib2.0" to Launchpad. We were unable to import the file because of errors in its format: Line 13: Invalid content: u', 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016.' If you use gettext, you can check your file for correct formatting with the 'msgfmt -c' command. Please fix any errors raised by msgfmt and upload the file again. If you check the file and you don't find any error in it, please look for an answer or file a question at https://answers.launchpad.net/rosetta/ For your convenience, you can get the file you uploaded at: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/250464407/es.po Thank you, The Launchpad team ** Affects: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: "fix invalid comment line." https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564426/+attachment/4618276/+files/fix_es.po_invalid_line.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564426 Title: Import problem - Spanish (es) - glib20 in Ubuntu Xenial package "glib2.0" Status in glib2.0 package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Looks like there was an accidental word-wrap problem in po/es.po. Line 13 is really the end of line 12. I've included a patch to send upstream. Here's a copy of the email that IS has been getting for a while now: Hello Launchpad Translations Administrators, On 2016-03-18 13:50z (12 days 14 hours 16 minutes ago), you uploaded a file with Spanish (es) translations for glib20 in Ubuntu Xenial package "glib2.0" to Launchpad. We were unable to import the file because of errors in its format: Line 13: Invalid content: u', 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016.' If you use gettext, you can check your file for correct formatting with the 'msgfmt -c' command. Please fix any errors raised by msgfmt and upload the file again. If you check the file and you don't find any error in it, please look for an answer or file a question at https://answers.launchpad.net/rosetta/ For your convenience, you can get the file you uploaded at: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/250464407/es.po Thank you, The Launchpad team To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/1564426/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
