[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965646] Re: pulseaudio missing even though says installed in software center. Have no audio

2022-03-25 Thread Marko Stanković
Is this bug related to 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pipewire/+bug/1963934 ?
If doing this solves the issue, then it probably is:
sudo touch /usr/share/pipewire/media-session.d/with-pulseaudio

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965646

Title:
  pulseaudio missing even though says installed in software center. Have
  no audio

Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:

  Previously: had SoundHissheadphones
  https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/700984 

  
  Messed with pulseaudio until it's totally gone even though on the software 
center it still says it is installed but unable to remove it because it says:

  "PulseAudio System Tray": no packages to remove


  Sudo apt remove pulseaudio
Removing pulseaudio (1:15.99.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu1) ...
  Setting up pipewire-pulse (0.3.48-1ubuntu1) ...
  Created symlink /etc/systemd/user/default.target.wants/pipewire-pulse.service 
→
  /usr/lib/systemd/user/pipewire-pulse.service.
  Created symlink /etc/systemd/user/sockets.target.wants/pipewire-pulse.socket 
→ /
  usr/lib/systemd/user/pipewire-pulse.socket.
  Processing triggers for man-db (2.10.1-1) ...
  Processing triggers for libglib2.0-0:amd64 (2.71.3-1) ...

  sudo apt purge

  Purging configuration files for pulseaudio (1:15.99.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu1) ...
  Processing triggers for dbus (1.12.20-2ubuntu3) .
  ___
  No audio symbol, it's gone
  Software center still says it is installed.

  Unable to remove "PulseAudio" in software center

  Unable to remove"PulseAudio Volume Control": no packages to remove

  Version 0.17.0
  ___
  mate-volume-control

  No device to configure under Hardware
  Input: unchecked Monitor of Dummy Output

  Output: unchecked Dummy Output Stereo
  __
  sudo apt-get update -y

  sudo apt-get install -y pulseaudio
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree... Done
  Reading state information... Done
  The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer 
required:
libsbc1 libssl1.1 linux-headers-5.13.0-19
  Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove them.
  Suggested packages:
pavumeter paprefs ubuntu-sounds
  The following NEW packages will be installed:
pulseaudio
  0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 7 not upgraded.
  Need to get 0 B/913 kB of archives.
  After this operation, 4,674 kB of additional disk space will be used.
  Selecting previously unselected package pulseaudio.
  (Reading database ... 321785 files and directories currently installed.)
  Preparing to unpack .../pulseaudio_1%3a15.99.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb ...
  Unpacking pulseaudio (1:15.99.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu1) ...
  Setting up pulseaudio (1:15.99.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu1) ...
  Adding user pulse to group audio
  Created symlink /etc/systemd/user/default.target.wants/pulseaudio.service → 
/usr/lib/systemd/user/pulseaudio.service.
  Created symlink /etc/systemd/user/sockets.target.wants/pulseaudio.socket → 
/usr/lib/systemd/user/pulseaudio.socket.
  Processing triggers for man-db (2.10.1-1) ...
  Processing triggers for dbus (1.12.20-2ubuntu3) ...y

  sudo apt autoremove
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree... Done
  Reading state information... Done
  The following packages will be REMOVED:
libsbc1 libssl1.1 linux-headers-5.13.0-19
  0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 3 to remove and 7 not upgraded.
  After this operation, 80.1 MB disk space will be freed.
  Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
  (Reading database ... 321976 files and directories currently installed.)
  Removing libsbc1:amd64 (1.5-3build1) ...
  Removing libssl1.1:amd64 (1.1.1l-1ubuntu1) ...
  Removing linux-headers-5.13.0-19 (5.13.0-19.19) ...
  Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.35-0ubuntu3) ...

  pulseaudio
  W: [pulseaudio] pid.c: Stale PID file, overwriting.
  E: [pulseaudio] socket-server.c: bind(): Address already in use
  E: [pulseaudio] module.c: Failed to load module "module-native-protocol-unix" 
(argument: ""): initialization failed.
  E: [pulseaudio] main.c: D-Bus name org.pulseaudio.Server already taken.


  pulseaudio -k
  E: [pulseaudio] main.c: Failed to kill daemon: No such process

  __
  ubuntu-bug -s audio

  Package pulseaudio 1:15:99.1+dgsg1-1ubuntu1 2.20.11-Outbuntu79

  
  __
  killall pulseaudio; pulseaudio -k  ; rm -r ~/.config/pulse/* ; rm -r ~/.pulse*
  rm -r ~/.pulse*
  pulseaudio: no process found
  E: [pulseaudio] main.c: Failed to kill daemon: No such process
  rm: cannot remove '/home/ptosis/.pulse*': No such file or directory

  pulseaudio --start


  
  waited 10 seconds, then reboot


  wget -O alsa-info.sh http://www.alsa-project.org/alsa-info.sh && chmod
  +x ./alsa-info.sh && ./alsa-info.sh

  bash alsa-info.sh --stdout

  

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1782854] Re: CRITICAL BUG IN initramfs-tools 0.131ubuntu1: Failed to execute /init (error -13)

2018-07-21 Thread Marko Stanković
Updating to 0.131ubuntu2 solved the problem. Thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782854

Title:
  CRITICAL BUG IN initramfs-tools 0.131ubuntu1: Failed to execute /init
  (error -13)

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  I'm running cosmic with proposed enabled (yes, I know...) and just updated 
initramfs to 0.131ubuntu1
  Upon reboot, I've got the message from summary.
  Then I rebooted into a previous kernel version (4.15) and ran 
'update-initramfs -u -k all' and that was stupid because it screwed the old 
initramfs...
  Comparing new (4.17) and old (not updated 4.15) initramfs images on another 
computer with Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 (x64), I've got this:
  sm4rk0@Aspire-5336:~$ cpio -t < /boot/initrd.img-4.17.0-5-generic
  kernel
  kernel/x86
  kernel/x86/microcode
  kernel/x86/microcode/.enuineIntel.align.0123456789abc
  kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel.bin
  98 blocks
  sm4rk0@Aspire-5336:~$ cpio -t < /boot/initrd.img-4.15.0-23-generic
  .
  kernel
  kernel/x86
  kernel/x86/microcode
  kernel/x86/microcode/AuthenticAMD.bin
  56 blocks

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1782854/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1782854] Re: CRITICAL BUG IN initramfs-tools 0.131ubuntu1: Failed to execute /init (error -13)

2018-07-20 Thread Marko Stanković
The other computer (main one I'm writing from) got the same message
after update to 0.131ubuntu1, so I booted with the older kernel (4.15),
downgraded initramfs-tools, initramfs-tools-bin and initramfs-tools-core
to 0.130ubuntu10 and successfully rebooted with the new kernel. I saved
the broken and working initrd.img-4.17.0-5-generic images. Please advise
if and where to upload them (27MB each).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782854

Title:
  CRITICAL BUG IN initramfs-tools 0.131ubuntu1: Failed to execute /init
  (error -13)

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I'm running cosmic with proposed enabled (yes, I know...) and just updated 
initramfs to 0.131ubuntu1
  Upon reboot, I've got the message from summary.
  Then I rebooted into a previous kernel version (4.15) and ran 
'update-initramfs -u -k all' and that was stupid because it screwed the old 
initramfs...
  Comparing new (4.17) and old (not updated 4.15) initramfs images on another 
computer with Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 (x64), I've got this:
  sm4rk0@Aspire-5336:~$ cpio -t < /boot/initrd.img-4.17.0-5-generic
  kernel
  kernel/x86
  kernel/x86/microcode
  kernel/x86/microcode/.enuineIntel.align.0123456789abc
  kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel.bin
  98 blocks
  sm4rk0@Aspire-5336:~$ cpio -t < /boot/initrd.img-4.15.0-23-generic
  .
  kernel
  kernel/x86
  kernel/x86/microcode
  kernel/x86/microcode/AuthenticAMD.bin
  56 blocks

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1782854/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1782854] [NEW] CRITICAL BUG IN initramfs-tools 0.131ubuntu1: Failed to execute /init (error -13)

2018-07-20 Thread Marko Stanković
Public bug reported:

I'm running cosmic with proposed enabled (yes, I know...) and just updated 
initramfs to 0.131ubuntu1
Upon reboot, I've got the message from summary.
Then I rebooted into a previous kernel version (4.15) and ran 'update-initramfs 
-u -k all' and that was stupid because it screwed the old initramfs...
Comparing new (4.17) and old (not updated 4.15) initramfs images on another 
computer with Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 (x64), I've got this:
sm4rk0@Aspire-5336:~$ cpio -t < /boot/initrd.img-4.17.0-5-generic
kernel
kernel/x86
kernel/x86/microcode
kernel/x86/microcode/.enuineIntel.align.0123456789abc
kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel.bin
98 blocks
sm4rk0@Aspire-5336:~$ cpio -t < /boot/initrd.img-4.15.0-23-generic
.
kernel
kernel/x86
kernel/x86/microcode
kernel/x86/microcode/AuthenticAMD.bin
56 blocks

** Affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: cosmic

** Tags added: cosmic

** Summary changed:

- CRITICAL BUG IN 0.131ubuntu1: Failed to execute /init (error -13)
+ CRITICAL BUG IN initramfs-tools 0.131ubuntu1: Failed to execute /init (error 
-13)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782854

Title:
  CRITICAL BUG IN initramfs-tools 0.131ubuntu1: Failed to execute /init
  (error -13)

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I'm running cosmic with proposed enabled (yes, I know...) and just updated 
initramfs to 0.131ubuntu1
  Upon reboot, I've got the message from summary.
  Then I rebooted into a previous kernel version (4.15) and ran 
'update-initramfs -u -k all' and that was stupid because it screwed the old 
initramfs...
  Comparing new (4.17) and old (not updated 4.15) initramfs images on another 
computer with Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 (x64), I've got this:
  sm4rk0@Aspire-5336:~$ cpio -t < /boot/initrd.img-4.17.0-5-generic
  kernel
  kernel/x86
  kernel/x86/microcode
  kernel/x86/microcode/.enuineIntel.align.0123456789abc
  kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel.bin
  98 blocks
  sm4rk0@Aspire-5336:~$ cpio -t < /boot/initrd.img-4.15.0-23-generic
  .
  kernel
  kernel/x86
  kernel/x86/microcode
  kernel/x86/microcode/AuthenticAMD.bin
  56 blocks

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1782854/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1649156] Re: Dependency on libdouble-conversion1 causes conflict

2016-12-12 Thread Marko Stanković
Thanks Dmitry, I did so. I know this is a development version of Ubuntu and 
rough edges like are to normal, but can't this transition be done without 
conflict in package management? Is there a general document describing the GCC5 
transition and the future of *v5 packages, aside from these two [1][2] outdated 
pages, so users can know which variant to keep in situations like this?
1: https://wiki.debian.org/GCC5
2: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/GCC5

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to qtdeclarative-opensource-
src in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1649156

Title:
  Dependency on libdouble-conversion1 causes conflict

Status in double-conversion:
  Invalid
Status in qtdeclarative-opensource-src package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hi,

  Since this change:
  
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/295556379/double-conversion_2.0.1-3ubuntu2_2.0.1-4ubuntu1.diff.gz

  libdouble-conversion1 breaks libdouble-conversion1v5 and since this change:
  
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/296573650/qtdeclarative-opensource-src_5.6.1-7ubuntu2~1_5.6.1-7ubuntu2~2.diff.gz

  I have a conflict on Zesty with 2 resolutions:
  1. Keep libqt5qml5 unupdated
  2. Remove libdouble-conversion1v5 and install libdouble-conversion1
  What should I do and isn't v5 meant to replace the original 
libdouble-conversion1?

  Cheers,
  Marko

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/double-conversion/+bug/1649156/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1649156] [NEW] Dependency on libdouble-conversion1 causes conflict

2016-12-11 Thread Marko Stanković
Public bug reported:

Hi,

Since this change:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/295556379/double-conversion_2.0.1-3ubuntu2_2.0.1-4ubuntu1.diff.gz

libdouble-conversion1 breaks libdouble-conversion1v5 and since this change:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/296573650/qtdeclarative-opensource-src_5.6.1-7ubuntu2~1_5.6.1-7ubuntu2~2.diff.gz

I have a conflict on Zesty with 2 resolutions:
1. Keep libqt5qml5 unupdated
2. Remove libdouble-conversion1v5 and install libdouble-conversion1
What should I do and isn't v5 meant to replace the original 
libdouble-conversion1?

Cheers,
Marko

** Affects: double-conversion
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: qtdeclarative-opensource-src (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: double-conversion
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to qtdeclarative-opensource-
src in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1649156

Title:
  Dependency on libdouble-conversion1 causes conflict

Status in double-conversion:
  New
Status in qtdeclarative-opensource-src package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Hi,

  Since this change:
  
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/295556379/double-conversion_2.0.1-3ubuntu2_2.0.1-4ubuntu1.diff.gz

  libdouble-conversion1 breaks libdouble-conversion1v5 and since this change:
  
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/296573650/qtdeclarative-opensource-src_5.6.1-7ubuntu2~1_5.6.1-7ubuntu2~2.diff.gz

  I have a conflict on Zesty with 2 resolutions:
  1. Keep libqt5qml5 unupdated
  2. Remove libdouble-conversion1v5 and install libdouble-conversion1
  What should I do and isn't v5 meant to replace the original 
libdouble-conversion1?

  Cheers,
  Marko

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/double-conversion/+bug/1649156/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1643129] Re: Drop system-config-printer-gnome package

2016-12-06 Thread Marko Stanković
Current state of packages in Zesty (proposed is disabled) produces a conflict 
for those with system-config-printer 1.5.7+20160812-0ubuntu2 because updating 
it to 1.5.7+20160812-0ubuntu4 breaks system-config-printer-gnome (<< 
1.5.7+20160812-0ubuntu3~) and available version of system-config-printer-gnome 
is 1.5.7+20160812-0ubuntu2
Proposed resolutions are:
1. keep system-config-printer
2. remove system-config-printer-gnome
I resolved the conflict by removing system-config-printer-gnome only after 
finding this LP bug and figuring out what's going on. I know this is a 
development version of Ubuntu, but many people will still be confused with this 
conflict.
Maybe there is a different way of making this transition that doesn't create a 
conflict?

Cheers,
Marko

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1643129

Title:
  Drop system-config-printer-gnome package

Status in Ubuntu GNOME:
  Triaged
Status in system-config-printer package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in xubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  I don't think the system-config-printer-gnome split makes sense any
  more and it would be nice to get this package closer in sync with
  Debian. In other words, let's drop system-config-printer-gnome and
  move most of its contents back to system-config-printer but a few
  files will end up in system-config-printer-common.

  The last explicit merge was almost a decade ago:
  https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/system-config-printer/0.7.70-1ubuntu1 )

  The split was done in 2008 for KDE's benefit:
  
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/system-config-printer/0.7.78+svn1799-0ubuntu2

  - system-config-printer-kde no longer exists (it appears to have been
  part of the kdeadmin source package which was removed a few years ago)

  - Kubuntu only ships system-config-printer-udev so they aren't affected now
  
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/cdimage/kubuntu/daily-live/current/zesty-desktop-amd64.manifest

  - Ubuntu GNOME does not need the files shipped in system-config-
  printer since GNOME has its own integrated Printers Settings panel.

  https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/system-config-printer/filelist

  In Ubuntu 16.10 I attempted to follow Debian's gnome-control-center
  packaging and depend on system-config-printer-common only, but it
  broke the Printers panel since Ubuntu's packaging moved the dbus
  service to the system-config-printer-gnome package (See bug 1496860 &
  bug 1623150 & bug 1637466 ).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1643129/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1374759] Re: >>>WARNING<<< Wrong ufstype may corrupt your filesystem, default is ufstype=old

2016-03-01 Thread Marko Stanković
update the remote watch

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #735169
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735169

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1374759

Title:
  >>>WARNING<<< Wrong ufstype may corrupt your filesystem, default is
  ufstype=old

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in os-prober package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in os-prober package in Debian:
  Unknown

Bug description:
  [  556.734157] SGI XFS with ACLs, security attributes, realtime, large 
block/inode numbers, no debug enabled
  [  556.746268] JFS: nTxBlock = 8192, nTxLock = 65536
  [  556.763789] ntfs: driver 2.1.30 [Flags: R/O MODULE].
  [  556.792231] QNX4 filesystem 0.2.3 registered.
  [  557.922469] EXT4-fs (sda4): unable to read superblock
  [  557.925868] EXT4-fs (sda4): unable to read superblock
  [  557.928967] EXT4-fs (sda4): unable to read superblock
  [  557.931784] FAT-fs (sda4): bogus number of reserved sectors
  [  557.931791] FAT-fs (sda4): Can't find a valid FAT filesystem
  [  557.946740] XFS (sda4): Invalid superblock magic number
  [  557.951904] FAT-fs (sda4): bogus number of reserved sectors
  [  557.951911] FAT-fs (sda4): Can't find a valid FAT filesystem
  [  557.959099] MINIX-fs: unable to read superblock
  [  557.965712] attempt to access beyond end of device
  [  557.965721] sda4: rw=16, want=3, limit=2
  [  557.965725] hfsplus: unable to find HFS+ superblock
  [  557.968487] qnx4: no qnx4 filesystem (no root dir).
  [  557.971203] You didn't specify the type of your ufs filesystem

  mount -t ufs -o ufstype=sun|sunx86|44bsd|ufs2|5xbsd|old|hp|nextstep
  |nextstep-cd|openstep ...

  >>>WARNING<<< Wrong ufstype may corrupt your filesystem, default is 
ufstype=old
  [  557.974459] hfs: can't find a HFS filesystem on dev sda4
  [  564.034208] EXT4-fs (sda4): unable to read superblock
  [  564.040322] EXT4-fs (sda4): unable to read superblock
  [  564.043485] EXT4-fs (sda4): unable to read superblock
  [  564.047076] FAT-fs (sda4): bogus number of reserved sectors
  [  564.047083] FAT-fs (sda4): Can't find a valid FAT filesystem
  [  564.059578] XFS (sda4): Invalid superblock magic number
  [  564.064473] FAT-fs (sda4): bogus number of reserved sectors
  [  564.064489] FAT-fs (sda4): Can't find a valid FAT filesystem
  [  564.072080] MINIX-fs: unable to read superblock
  [  564.074564] attempt to access beyond end of device
  [  564.074571] sda4: rw=16, want=3, limit=2
  [  564.074576] hfsplus: unable to find HFS+ superblock
  [  564.076688] qnx4: no qnx4 filesystem (no root dir).
  [  564.078847] You didn't specify the type of your ufs filesystem

  mount -t ufs -o ufstype=sun|sunx86|44bsd|ufs2|5xbsd|old|hp|nextstep
  |nextstep-cd|openstep ...

  >>>WARNING<<< Wrong ufstype may corrupt your filesystem, default is 
ufstype=old
  [  564.080902] hfs: can't find a HFS filesystem on dev sda4
  [  570.554296] EXT4-fs (sda4): unable to read superblock
  [  570.557647] EXT4-fs (sda4): unable to read superblock
  [  570.560516] EXT4-fs (sda4): unable to read superblock
  [  570.563451] FAT-fs (sda4): bogus number of reserved sectors
  [  570.563460] FAT-fs (sda4): Can't find a valid FAT filesystem
  [  570.574953] XFS (sda4): Invalid superblock magic number
  [  570.580796] FAT-fs (sda4): bogus number of reserved sectors
  [  570.580806] FAT-fs (sda4): Can't find a valid FAT filesystem
  [  570.588340] MINIX-fs: unable to read superblock
  [  570.590983] attempt to access beyond end of device
  [  570.590993] sda4: rw=16, want=3, limit=2
  [  570.590999] hfsplus: unable to find HFS+ superblock
  [  570.593321] qnx4: no qnx4 filesystem (no root dir).
  [  570.595556] You didn't specify the type of your ufs filesystem

  mount -t ufs -o ufstype=sun|sunx86|44bsd|ufs2|5xbsd|old|hp|nextstep
  |nextstep-cd|openstep ...

  >>>WARNING<<< Wrong ufstype may corrupt your filesystem, default is 
ufstype=old
  [  570.597775] hfs: can't find a HFS filesystem on dev sda4
  [  576.795014] EXT4-fs (sda4): unable to read superblock
  [  576.797554] EXT4-fs (sda4): unable to read superblock
  [  576.800063] EXT4-fs (sda4): unable to read superblock
  [  576.802647] FAT-fs (sda4): bogus number of reserved sectors
  [  576.802655] FAT-fs (sda4): Can't find a valid FAT filesystem
  [  576.813305] XFS (sda4): Invalid superblock magic number
  [  576.820257] FAT-fs (sda4): bogus number of reserved sectors
  [  576.820276] FAT-fs (sda4): Can't find a valid FAT filesystem
  [  576.830945] MINIX-fs: unable to read superblock
  [  576.834108] attempt to access beyond end of device
  [  576.834119] sda4: rw=16, want=3, limit=2
  [  576.834125] hfsplus: unable to find HFS+ superblock
  [  576.837264] qnx4: no qnx4 filesystem (no root dir).
  [  576.840408] You didn't specify the type of your ufs filesystem

  

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1539826] Re: initramfs-tools hook-functions error causes failure

2016-02-01 Thread Marko Stanković
I can confirm both the bug (with /dev/sda1 on my computers) and that
Jay's patch works. I would like to make a fix, if that's OK (and if it's
needed). This would be "my" first fix and I'm following this tutorial:
http://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/fixing-a-bug.html

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539826

Title:
  initramfs-tools hook-functions error causes failure

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  The /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hook-functions contains what appears to be a 
variable name update (from root to dev_node) error.
  It appears that one instance of root was not updated correctly; this causes 
mkinitramfs to fail with the error:

  mkinitramfs: for device /dev/vda1 missing vda1 /sys/block/ entry
  mkinitramfs: workaround is MODULES=most
  mkinitramfs: Error please report the bug

  A trivial patch that appears to resolve this is attached.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: initramfs-tools 0.120ubuntu7 [modified: 
usr/share/initramfs-tools/hook-functions]
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.3.0-7.18-generic 4.3.3
  Uname: Linux 4.3.0-7-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.19.4-0ubuntu1
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Fri Jan 29 17:44:20 2016
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-01-29 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Alpha amd64 (20160129)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: initramfs-tools
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1539826/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1539826] Re: initramfs-tools hook-functions error causes failure

2016-02-01 Thread Marko Stanković
I've tried proposing the merge but got "lp:~sm4rk0/initramfs-tools is not 
mergeable into this repository."
This is where I pushed the patched hook-functions:
git+ssh://git.launchpad.net/~sm4rk0/initramfs-tools

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539826

Title:
  initramfs-tools hook-functions error causes failure

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  The /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hook-functions contains what appears to be a 
variable name update (from root to dev_node) error.
  It appears that one instance of root was not updated correctly; this causes 
mkinitramfs to fail with the error:

  mkinitramfs: for device /dev/vda1 missing vda1 /sys/block/ entry
  mkinitramfs: workaround is MODULES=most
  mkinitramfs: Error please report the bug

  A trivial patch that appears to resolve this is attached.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: initramfs-tools 0.120ubuntu7 [modified: 
usr/share/initramfs-tools/hook-functions]
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.3.0-7.18-generic 4.3.3
  Uname: Linux 4.3.0-7-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.19.4-0ubuntu1
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Fri Jan 29 17:44:20 2016
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-01-29 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Alpha amd64 (20160129)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: initramfs-tools
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1539826/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1538707] Re: package initramfs-tools 0.120ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2016-02-01 Thread Marko Stanković
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1539826 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539826

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1539826
   initramfs-tools hook-functions error causes failure

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538707

Title:
  package initramfs-tools 0.120ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Fail after upgrade, 16.04, 27.01.16

  valera@ubuntu-home:~$ sudo apt-get install -f
  Чтение списков пакетов… Готово
  Построение дерева зависимостей   
  Чтение информации о состоянии… Готово
  Следующие пакеты устанавливались автоматически и больше не требуются:
linux-headers-4.3.0-6 linux-headers-4.3.0-6-generic
linux-image-4.3.0-6-generic linux-image-extra-4.3.0-6-generic
  Для их удаления используйте «sudo apt autoremove».
  обновлено 0, установлено 0 новых пакетов, для удаления отмечено 0 пакетов, и 
1 пакетов не обновлено.
  не установлено до конца или удалено 1 пакетов.
  После данной операции, объём занятого дискового пространства возрастёт на 0 B.
  Настраивается пакет initramfs-tools (0.120ubuntu7) …
  update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
  Обрабатываются триггеры для initramfs-tools (0.120ubuntu7) …
  update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.4.0-040400-generic
  mkinitramfs: for device /dev/sda1 missing sda1 /sys/block/ entry
  mkinitramfs: workaround is MODULES=most
  mkinitramfs: Error please report the bug
  update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-4.4.0-040400-generic with 1.
  dpkg: ошибка при обработке пакета initramfs-tools (--configure):
   подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки 1
  При обработке следующих пакетов произошли ошибки:
   initramfs-tools
  E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: initramfs-tools 0.120ubuntu7
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-040400-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.19.4-0ubuntu1
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Tue Jan 26 23:42:00 2016
  ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error 
exit status 1
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-01-17 (9 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 15.04 "Vivid Vervet" - Release amd64 (20150422)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1
   apt  1.1.10
  SourcePackage: initramfs-tools
  Title: package initramfs-tools 0.120ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to xenial on 2016-01-19 (6 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1538707/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1359439] Re: [ 7.287663] systemd-logind[1057]: Failed to start unit user@126.service: Unknown unit: user@126.service

2015-03-02 Thread Marko Stanković
Hi Romain,

Thanks for interesting observation and analysis, but I believe these two
problems are not related. As a test, try restarting the computer and
then logging in via one of the tty2-tty6 (Ctrl-Alt-F2 - Ctrl-Alt-F6).
I'm getting that line with user@1000.service only on first tty login
after a boot.

Cheers,
Marko

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1359439

Title:
  [7.287663] systemd-logind[1057]: Failed to start unit
  user@126.service: Unknown unit: user@126.service

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in systemd-shim package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in systemd source package in Utopic:
  Triaged
Status in systemd-shim source package in Utopic:
  Won't Fix
Status in systemd-shim package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  ATTENTION: This bug is fully understood, there is *no need* to add
  even more comments about me too here.

  [7.287663] systemd-logind[1057]: Failed to start unit user@126.service: 
Unknown unit: user@126.service
  [7.287677] systemd-logind[1057]: Failed to start user service: Unknown 
unit: user@126.service
  [7.293871] systemd-logind[1057]: New session c1 of user lightdm.
  [7.293902] systemd-logind[1057]: Linked /tmp/.X11-unix/X0 to 
/run/user/126/X11-display.
  [7.363706] ip_tables: (C) 2000-2006 Netfilter Core Team
  [7.421846] nf_conntrack version 0.5.0 (16384 buckets, 65536 max)
  [7.484529] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): virbr0: link is not ready
  [9.903052] wlan0: authenticate with c8:d7:19:22:21:ec
  [9.912429] wlan0: send auth to c8:d7:19:22:21:ec (try 1/3)
  [9.920181] wlan0: authenticated
  [9.924352] wlan0: associate with c8:d7:19:22:21:ec (try 1/3)
  [9.925709] wlan0: RX AssocResp from c8:d7:19:22:21:ec (capab=0x11 
status=0 aid=2)
  [9.927753] wlan0: associated
  [9.927800] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready
  [   12.677104] systemd-logind[1057]: Failed to abandon scope session-c1.scope
  [   12.677122] systemd-logind[1057]: Failed to abandon session scope: No such 
interface 'org.freedesktop.systemd1.Scope' on object at path 
/org/freedesktop/systemd1/unit/session_2dc1_2escope
  [   12.683902] systemd-logind[1057]: Failed to start unit user@1000.service: 
Unknown unit: user@1000.service
  [   12.683912] systemd-logind[1057]: Failed to start user service: Unknown 
unit: user@1000.service
  [   12.685157] systemd-logind[1057]: New session c2 of user caravena.
  [   12.685190] systemd-logind[1057]: Linked /tmp/.X11-unix/X0 to 
/run/user/1000/X11-display.
  [  234.494462] systemd-logind[1057]: Failed to abandon scope session-c2.scope
  [  234.494478] systemd-logind[1057]: Failed to abandon session scope: No such 
interface 'org.freedesktop.systemd1.Scope' on object at path 
/org/freedesktop/systemd1/unit/session_2dc2_2escope
  [  235.514349] systemd-logind[1057]: New session c3 of user lightdm.
  [  244.245908] systemd-logind[1057]: Failed to abandon scope session-c3.scope
  [  244.245923] systemd-logind[1057]: Failed to abandon session scope: No such 
interface 'org.freedesktop.systemd1.Scope' on object at path 
/org/freedesktop/systemd1/unit/session_2dc3_2escope

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10
  Package: systemd 208-7ubuntu4 [modified: 
usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.freedesktop.systemd1.service]
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-9.14-generic 3.16.1
  Uname: Linux 3.16.0-9-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.14.6-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: LXDE
  Date: Wed Aug 20 18:26:06 2014
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-27 (115 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-GNOME 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 
(20140416.2)
  SourcePackage: systemd
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1359439/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp