[Touch-packages] [Bug 1966800] Re: systemd locks up due to incorrect handling of time zone changes
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1941335 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941335 ** Also affects: systemd (Fedora) via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941335 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966800 Title: systemd locks up due to incorrect handling of time zone changes Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in systemd package in Fedora: Unknown Bug description: Recently on systems in Ireland, systemd became unresponsive due the change from GMT to Irish Standard Time. This is due to Ireland being unique in having their standard time during the summer, unlike most regions. Related to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941335 Fixed by: https://github.com/systemd/systemd-stable/commit/a8b66ca9af811148b67ee952ab32748f88b8bba3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1966800/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1292324] Re: Support non-root X
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1078808 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078808 ** Also affects: lightdm (Fedora) via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078808 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292324 Title: Support non-root X Status in Light Display Manager: Triaged Status in lightdm package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in lightdm package in Debian: Confirmed Status in lightdm package in Fedora: Unknown Bug description: Support running X as an unprivileged user. Currently X servers are run as root means a large complex process has access to services it might not need (i.e. potential security and stability problems). It would be nice to run each X server as either an unprivileged user or in the session they are being used in. Logind provides a system for sharing access to the display and input devices so this can be done - this seems like the most likely implementation of non-root X. For more information see Hans de Goede request: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/lightdm/2014-March/000539.html To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1292324/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1641121] [NEW] Switch packaging to "3.0 (quilt)"
Public bug reported: The packaging for Mir is in the legacy 1.0 format. Please switch to "3.0 (quilt)" format. Thanks in advance. ** Affects: mir (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: packaging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mir in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641121 Title: Switch packaging to "3.0 (quilt)" Status in mir package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: The packaging for Mir is in the legacy 1.0 format. Please switch to "3.0 (quilt)" format. Thanks in advance. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mir/+bug/1641121/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1573275] Re: ifupdown should not hard-depend upon 'mountkernfs' and 'urandom'
Yes. Actually, it might be more useful to diff between 15.10[1] and 16.04[2]. That lets you see all the differences that were required to get it working. [1]: https://build.opensuse.org/project/prjconf/Ubuntu:15.10 [2]: https://build.opensuse.org/project/prjconf/Ubuntu:16.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ifupdown in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573275 Title: ifupdown should not hard-depend upon 'mountkernfs' and 'urandom' Status in ifupdown package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: '/etc/init.d/networking' for 'ifupdown' starts with: # Required-Start:mountkernfs $local_fs urandom it would appear that 'mountkernfs' and 'urandom' are not hard- dependencies, and their presence prevents successful installation in virtual machines in some circumstances. This was reported by Neal Gompa/ on #ubuntu-devel whilst working on support for Suse Open Build System (OBS) to build Xenial packages: http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/i/ifupdown/ifupdown_0.8.10ubuntu1/changelog Full and snipped output logs are at: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/358318/61266534/ https://paste.fedoraproject.org/358315/66065146/ in particular: [ 530s] [239/256] installing ifupdown-0.8.10ubuntu1 [ 530s] Creating /etc/network/interfaces. [ 531s] insserv: Service mountkernfs has to be enabled to start service networking [ 531s] insserv: Service urandom has to be enabled to start service networking [ 531s] insserv: exiting now! [ 531s] update-rc.d: error: insserv rejected the script header [ 531s] dpkg: error processing package ifupdown (--install): [ 531s] subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 The reporter tested that commenting out 'mountkernfs' and 'urandom' allowed the ifupdown '/etc/init.d/networking' init-script to successfully complete. Ideally a hard-dependency should not be declared if it is not actually a hard-dependency, and introduces a regression by preventing successfully installation in circumstances that are reported to have worked previously for installing earlier Debian/Ubuntu versions on OBS. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1573275/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1573275] Re: ifupdown should not hard-depend upon 'mountkernfs' and 'urandom'
Paul: Unfortunately not, but you can see how the configuration is set up on build.opensuse.org[1]. Details about the prjconf format is available on the openSUSE Wiki[2]. [1]: https://build.opensuse.org/project/prjconf/Ubuntu:16.04 [2]: https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_prjconf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ifupdown in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573275 Title: ifupdown should not hard-depend upon 'mountkernfs' and 'urandom' Status in ifupdown package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: '/etc/init.d/networking' for 'ifupdown' starts with: # Required-Start:mountkernfs $local_fs urandom it would appear that 'mountkernfs' and 'urandom' are not hard- dependencies, and their presence prevents successful installation in virtual machines in some circumstances. This was reported by Neal Gompa/ on #ubuntu-devel whilst working on support for Suse Open Build System (OBS) to build Xenial packages: http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/i/ifupdown/ifupdown_0.8.10ubuntu1/changelog Full and snipped output logs are at: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/358318/61266534/ https://paste.fedoraproject.org/358315/66065146/ in particular: [ 530s] [239/256] installing ifupdown-0.8.10ubuntu1 [ 530s] Creating /etc/network/interfaces. [ 531s] insserv: Service mountkernfs has to be enabled to start service networking [ 531s] insserv: Service urandom has to be enabled to start service networking [ 531s] insserv: exiting now! [ 531s] update-rc.d: error: insserv rejected the script header [ 531s] dpkg: error processing package ifupdown (--install): [ 531s] subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 The reporter tested that commenting out 'mountkernfs' and 'urandom' allowed the ifupdown '/etc/init.d/networking' init-script to successfully complete. Ideally a hard-dependency should not be declared if it is not actually a hard-dependency, and introduces a regression by preventing successfully installation in circumstances that are reported to have worked previously for installing earlier Debian/Ubuntu versions on OBS. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1573275/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1573275] Re: ifupdown should not hard-depend upon 'mountkernfs' and 'urandom'
This is no longer a problem on the Open Build Service, as we're now ignoring the ifupdown dependency from upstart. Thus, Ubuntu 16.04 LTS build environments now work, as seen by this example[1]. [1]: https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:Pharaoh_Atem:u1604_stuff /php-libvirt/xUbuntu_16.04/x86_64 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ifupdown in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573275 Title: ifupdown should not hard-depend upon 'mountkernfs' and 'urandom' Status in ifupdown package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: '/etc/init.d/networking' for 'ifupdown' starts with: # Required-Start:mountkernfs $local_fs urandom it would appear that 'mountkernfs' and 'urandom' are not hard- dependencies, and their presence prevents successful installation in virtual machines in some circumstances. This was reported by Neal Gompa/ on #ubuntu-devel whilst working on support for Suse Open Build System (OBS) to build Xenial packages: http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/i/ifupdown/ifupdown_0.8.10ubuntu1/changelog Full and snipped output logs are at: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/358318/61266534/ https://paste.fedoraproject.org/358315/66065146/ in particular: [ 530s] [239/256] installing ifupdown-0.8.10ubuntu1 [ 530s] Creating /etc/network/interfaces. [ 531s] insserv: Service mountkernfs has to be enabled to start service networking [ 531s] insserv: Service urandom has to be enabled to start service networking [ 531s] insserv: exiting now! [ 531s] update-rc.d: error: insserv rejected the script header [ 531s] dpkg: error processing package ifupdown (--install): [ 531s] subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 The reporter tested that commenting out 'mountkernfs' and 'urandom' allowed the ifupdown '/etc/init.d/networking' init-script to successfully complete. Ideally a hard-dependency should not be declared if it is not actually a hard-dependency, and introduces a regression by preventing successfully installation in circumstances that are reported to have worked previously for installing earlier Debian/Ubuntu versions on OBS. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1573275/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1573275] Re: ifupdown should not hard-depend upon 'mountkernfs' and 'urandom'
** Package changed: ubuntu => ifupdown (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ifupdown in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573275 Title: ifupdown should not hard-depend upon 'mountkernfs' and 'urandom' Status in ifupdown package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: '/etc/init.d/networking' for 'ifupdown' starts with: # Required-Start:mountkernfs $local_fs urandom it would appear that 'mountkernfs' and 'urandom' are not hard- dependencies, and their presence prevents successful installation in virtual machines in some circumstances. This was reported by Neal Gompa/ on #ubuntu-devel whilst working on support for Suse Open Build System (OBS) to build Xenial packages: http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/i/ifupdown/ifupdown_0.8.10ubuntu1/changelog Full and snipped output logs are at: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/358318/61266534/ https://paste.fedoraproject.org/358315/66065146/ in particular: [ 530s] [239/256] installing ifupdown-0.8.10ubuntu1 [ 530s] Creating /etc/network/interfaces. [ 531s] insserv: Service mountkernfs has to be enabled to start service networking [ 531s] insserv: Service urandom has to be enabled to start service networking [ 531s] insserv: exiting now! [ 531s] update-rc.d: error: insserv rejected the script header [ 531s] dpkg: error processing package ifupdown (--install): [ 531s] subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 The reporter tested that commenting out 'mountkernfs' and 'urandom' allowed the ifupdown '/etc/init.d/networking' init-script to successfully complete. Ideally a hard-dependency should not be declared if it is not actually a hard-dependency, and introduces a regression by preventing successfully installation in circumstances that are reported to have worked previously for installing earlier Debian/Ubuntu versions on OBS. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1573275/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1325142] Re: failure to update libpam-systemd in 14.04 due to missing logind init script
This is very clearly not fixed on Ubuntu trusty, and the changelog of the package in trusty does not indicate any fix was applied. Please remove the incorrect designation of "Fix Committed" for trusty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325142 Title: failure to update libpam-systemd in 14.04 due to missing logind init script Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in systemd source package in Trusty: Fix Released Status in systemd source package in Utopic: Fix Released Bug description: Hi, while running inside an i386 lubuntu 14.04 chroot, upgrading libpam- systemd to version 204-5ubuntu20.2 fails leaving dpkg in a broken state. 'apt-get -f install' from within the chroot will not fix it, but if the build is made bootable and put into a iso/VM you can recover that way in a live session. the problem seems to be the /var/lib/dpkg/info/libpam-systemd:i386.prerm script failing to bring down the logind daemon with 'invoke-rc.d systemd-logind stop', because invoke-rd.d is only looking for the /etc/init.d/ script (doesn't exist) and not /etc/init/systemd-logind.conf (does exist). ? Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... The following packages will be upgraded: libpam-systemd 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 113 not upgraded. 3 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0 B/25.2 kB of archives. After this operation, 1024 B of additional disk space will be used. (Reading database ... 113986 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../libpam-systemd_204-5ubuntu20.2_i386.deb ... invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/systemd-logind not found. dpkg: warning: subprocess old pre-removal script returned error exit status 100 dpkg: trying script from the new package instead ... invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/systemd-logind not found. dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/libpam-systemd_204-5ubuntu20.2_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 100 invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/systemd-logind not found. dpkg: error while cleaning up: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 100 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libpam-systemd_204-5ubuntu20.2_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Our build logs available upon request, but the scripts to setup the chroot to recreate it are here: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/browser/livedvd/gisvm/trunk/bin/build_chroot_nightly.sh https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/browser/livedvd/gisvm/trunk/bin/inchroot_nightly.sh In a web-search I notice a few others running into the same bug, chatter on irc at [18:10], http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/05/28 /%23ubuntu-devel.txt someone else's build log: https://launchpad.net/~qutim/+archive/qutim/+build/6039800 launchpad bug #1323575 seems to be a duplicate of this one. perhaps related to older launchpad bug #1305395 ? note we are also suffering from a failure with update-initramfs, not sure of the root cause of that one but I thought I'd mention it in case they were related, since they both started happening about the same time, a couple weeks ago. (launchpad bug #1317602) It all worked ok after the inital releases of 14.04, so something to do with a package update since then. thanks, Hamish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1325142/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1325142] Re: failure to update libpam-systemd in 14.04 due to missing logind init script
I'm also being bitten by this issue. I can't create chroots or VM images based on trusty due to polkit-1 bringing in libpam-systemd, which breaks as other commenters have described earlier... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325142 Title: failure to update libpam-systemd in 14.04 due to missing logind init script Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in systemd source package in Trusty: Fix Released Status in systemd source package in Utopic: Fix Released Bug description: Hi, while running inside an i386 lubuntu 14.04 chroot, upgrading libpam- systemd to version 204-5ubuntu20.2 fails leaving dpkg in a broken state. 'apt-get -f install' from within the chroot will not fix it, but if the build is made bootable and put into a iso/VM you can recover that way in a live session. the problem seems to be the /var/lib/dpkg/info/libpam-systemd:i386.prerm script failing to bring down the logind daemon with 'invoke-rc.d systemd-logind stop', because invoke-rd.d is only looking for the /etc/init.d/ script (doesn't exist) and not /etc/init/systemd-logind.conf (does exist). ? Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... The following packages will be upgraded: libpam-systemd 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 113 not upgraded. 3 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0 B/25.2 kB of archives. After this operation, 1024 B of additional disk space will be used. (Reading database ... 113986 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../libpam-systemd_204-5ubuntu20.2_i386.deb ... invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/systemd-logind not found. dpkg: warning: subprocess old pre-removal script returned error exit status 100 dpkg: trying script from the new package instead ... invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/systemd-logind not found. dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/libpam-systemd_204-5ubuntu20.2_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 100 invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/systemd-logind not found. dpkg: error while cleaning up: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 100 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libpam-systemd_204-5ubuntu20.2_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Our build logs available upon request, but the scripts to setup the chroot to recreate it are here: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/browser/livedvd/gisvm/trunk/bin/build_chroot_nightly.sh https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/browser/livedvd/gisvm/trunk/bin/inchroot_nightly.sh In a web-search I notice a few others running into the same bug, chatter on irc at [18:10], http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/05/28 /%23ubuntu-devel.txt someone else's build log: https://launchpad.net/~qutim/+archive/qutim/+build/6039800 launchpad bug #1323575 seems to be a duplicate of this one. perhaps related to older launchpad bug #1305395 ? note we are also suffering from a failure with update-initramfs, not sure of the root cause of that one but I thought I'd mention it in case they were related, since they both started happening about the same time, a couple weeks ago. (launchpad bug #1317602) It all worked ok after the inital releases of 14.04, so something to do with a package update since then. thanks, Hamish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1325142/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
