[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946343] Re: Stale os-release file after possible upgrade from 20.04.2 to 20.04.3

2021-10-08 Thread Vivek
@Dimitri, thank you for looking into this issue. This is the output of
apt-cache policy:

$ apt-cache policy oem-release
oem-release:
  Installed: 20.04ubuntu2
  Candidate: 20.04ubuntu2
  Version table:
 *** 20.04ubuntu2 100
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

As per synaptic package manager, the maintainer of oem-release package
is:

"Commercial Engineering "

This package also has dependencies with 'lsb-release'.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946343

Title:
  Stale os-release file after possible upgrade from 20.04.2 to 20.04.3

Status in Dell Ubuntu Project:
  New
Status in OEM Priority Project:
  New
Status in base-files package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Refer: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/698949

  I recently bought a Dell laptop with Ubuntu pre-installed in it. Looks
  like it came with Ubuntu 20.04.2 and OEM Linux Kernel in it. After my
  initial login (on October 1, 2021), the 'Software Updater' GUI
  prompted me for updates, which I went ahead with.

  However at the end of it, I noticed that I was still at 20.04.2 with
  Linux Kernel at 5.10.0-1045-oem.

  lsb_release -a
  ---

  No LSB modules are available.
  Distributor ID: Ubuntu
  Description:Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS (fossa-bulbasaur X55.1)
  Release:20.04
  Codename:   focal

  uname -a
  -
  Linux dev-linux 5.10.0-1045-oem #47-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 18 10:41:03 UTC 2021 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  Then I manually tried sudo apt update and sudo apt upgrade / dist-
  upgrade from the terminal, but nothing got upgraded. When I invoked
  the GUI 'Software Updater' again, it showed me that my system was
  already up-to-date. However, as 20.04.3 was released end of Aug 2021,
  I was expecting that I should be at that release after my initial
  updates.

  Since that didn't happen, I asked a question regarding this in
  askubuntu followed by launchpad
  https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/698949, thinking my
  update had failed for some unknown reason.

  However, based on some inputs from other users, we were able to narrow
  down the problem to /usr/lib/os-release file not having the right
  contents in it. Every other file including /usr/lib/os-release.oem-
  release, /etc/issue, /etc/issue.net specifies that I am on 20.04.3.
  Whereas only /usr/lib/os-release (and its symlink /etc/release)
  specifies my current release as 20.04.2.

  Even the lsb_release -a command always displays the output of
  /usr/lib/os-release file only.

  $ cat /usr/lib/os-release
  NAME="Ubuntu"
  VERSION="20.04.2 LTS (Focal Fossa)"
  ID=ubuntu
  ID_LIKE=debian
  PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS (fossa-bulbasaur X55.1)"
  VERSION_ID="20.04"
  HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
  SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
  BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
  
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
  VERSION_CODENAME=focal
  UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal

  $ cat /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release
  NAME="Ubuntu"
  VERSION="20.04.3 LTS (Focal Fossa)"
  ID=ubuntu
  ID_LIKE=debian
  PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS"
  VERSION_ID="20.04"
  HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
  SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
  BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
  
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
  VERSION_CODENAME=focal
  UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal

  $ cat /etc/issue
  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS \n \l

  $ cat /etc/issue.net
  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS

  If you look at the timestamp of these files, strangely os-release had
  a newer timestamp of Oct 1 compared to other files.

  $ ls -l /usr/lib/os-release
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 406 Oct 1 20:31 /usr/lib/os-release

  $ ls -l /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 382 Aug 4 07:53 /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release

  $ ls -l /etc/issue
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 26 Aug 4 07:53 /etc/issue

  $ ls -l /etc/issue.net
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19 Aug 4 07:53 /etc/issue.net

  Please note that, other software package updates, and linux kernel
  updates are happening automatically without any issues so far for me.
  Few days back even got a new kernel update.

  $ uname -a
  Linux vivek-dev-linux 5.10.0-1049-oem #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Sep 27 11:01:10 UTC 
2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  Workarounds Attempted
  -
  1. Commented out all non-ubuntu external sources from /etc/apt/*.list. Then 
performed an apt clean + update + upgrade. But still nothing happened and the 
same issue remained. 

  2. Tried performing apt-install --reinstall base-files. But still
  nothing changed:

  $ sudo apt install --reinstall base-files
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependen

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946343] Re: Stale os-release file after possible upgrade from 20.04.2 to 20.04.3

2021-10-07 Thread Vivek
This is the output of my dpkg-query for os-release:

$ dpkg-query --search os-release
systemd: /usr/share/man/man5/os-release.5.gz
diversion by oem-release from: /usr/lib/os-release
diversion by oem-release to: /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release
base-files: /etc/os-release
diversion by oem-release from: /usr/lib/os-release
diversion by oem-release to: /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release
base-files: /usr/lib/os-release

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946343

Title:
  Stale os-release file after possible upgrade from 20.04.2 to 20.04.3

Status in base-files package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Refer: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/698949

  I recently bought a Dell laptop with Ubuntu pre-installed in it. Looks
  like it came with Ubuntu 20.04.2 and OEM Linux Kernel in it. After my
  initial login (on October 1, 2021), the 'Software Updater' GUI
  prompted me for updates, which I went ahead with.

  However at the end of it, I noticed that I was still at 20.04.2 with
  Linux Kernel at 5.10.0-1045-oem.

  lsb_release -a
  ---

  No LSB modules are available.
  Distributor ID: Ubuntu
  Description:Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS (fossa-bulbasaur X55.1)
  Release:20.04
  Codename:   focal

  uname -a
  -
  Linux dev-linux 5.10.0-1045-oem #47-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 18 10:41:03 UTC 2021 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  Then I manually tried sudo apt update and sudo apt upgrade / dist-
  upgrade from the terminal, but nothing got upgraded. When I invoked
  the GUI 'Software Updater' again, it showed me that my system was
  already up-to-date. However, as 20.04.3 was released end of Aug 2021,
  I was expecting that I should be at that release after my initial
  updates.

  Since that didn't happen, I asked a question regarding this in
  askubuntu followed by launchpad
  https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/698949, thinking my
  update had failed for some unknown reason.

  However, based on some inputs from other users, we were able to narrow
  down the problem to /usr/lib/os-release file not having the right
  contents in it. Every other file including /usr/lib/os-release.oem-
  release, /etc/issue, /etc/issue.net specifies that I am on 20.04.3.
  Whereas only /usr/lib/os-release (and its symlink /etc/release)
  specifies my current release as 20.04.2.

  Even the lsb_release -a command always displays the output of
  /usr/lib/os-release file only.

  $ cat /usr/lib/os-release
  NAME="Ubuntu"
  VERSION="20.04.2 LTS (Focal Fossa)"
  ID=ubuntu
  ID_LIKE=debian
  PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS (fossa-bulbasaur X55.1)"
  VERSION_ID="20.04"
  HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
  SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
  BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
  
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
  VERSION_CODENAME=focal
  UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal

  $ cat /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release
  NAME="Ubuntu"
  VERSION="20.04.3 LTS (Focal Fossa)"
  ID=ubuntu
  ID_LIKE=debian
  PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS"
  VERSION_ID="20.04"
  HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
  SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
  BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
  
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
  VERSION_CODENAME=focal
  UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal

  $ cat /etc/issue
  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS \n \l

  $ cat /etc/issue.net
  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS

  If you look at the timestamp of these files, strangely os-release had
  a newer timestamp of Oct 1 compared to other files.

  $ ls -l /usr/lib/os-release
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 406 Oct 1 20:31 /usr/lib/os-release

  $ ls -l /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 382 Aug 4 07:53 /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release

  $ ls -l /etc/issue
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 26 Aug 4 07:53 /etc/issue

  $ ls -l /etc/issue.net
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19 Aug 4 07:53 /etc/issue.net

  Please note that, other software package updates, and linux kernel
  updates are happening automatically without any issues so far for me.
  Few days back even got a new kernel update.

  $ uname -a
  Linux vivek-dev-linux 5.10.0-1049-oem #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Sep 27 11:01:10 UTC 
2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  Workarounds Attempted
  -
  1. Commented out all non-ubuntu external sources from /etc/apt/*.list. Then 
performed an apt clean + update + upgrade. But still nothing happened and the 
same issue remained. 

  2. Tried performing apt-install --reinstall base-files. But still
  nothing changed:

  $ sudo apt install --reinstall base-files
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree
  Reading state information... Done
  0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinst

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946343] Re: Stale os-release file after possible upgrade from 20.04.2 to 20.04.3

2021-10-07 Thread Vivek
@Steve, thank you for looking into this. If this is not a base-files
issue, where could the problem be? I have not installed any other
package myself. This is just the Ubuntu installation that the laptop
came with.

As an end user I am unable to see whether upgrade to 20.04.3 is
successful or not. Clearly lsb_release is not saying so.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946343

Title:
  Stale os-release file after possible upgrade from 20.04.2 to 20.04.3

Status in base-files package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Refer: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/698949

  I recently bought a Dell laptop with Ubuntu pre-installed in it. Looks
  like it came with Ubuntu 20.04.2 and OEM Linux Kernel in it. After my
  initial login (on October 1, 2021), the 'Software Updater' GUI
  prompted me for updates, which I went ahead with.

  However at the end of it, I noticed that I was still at 20.04.2 with
  Linux Kernel at 5.10.0-1045-oem.

  lsb_release -a
  ---

  No LSB modules are available.
  Distributor ID: Ubuntu
  Description:Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS (fossa-bulbasaur X55.1)
  Release:20.04
  Codename:   focal

  uname -a
  -
  Linux dev-linux 5.10.0-1045-oem #47-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 18 10:41:03 UTC 2021 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  Then I manually tried sudo apt update and sudo apt upgrade / dist-
  upgrade from the terminal, but nothing got upgraded. When I invoked
  the GUI 'Software Updater' again, it showed me that my system was
  already up-to-date. However, as 20.04.3 was released end of Aug 2021,
  I was expecting that I should be at that release after my initial
  updates.

  Since that didn't happen, I asked a question regarding this in
  askubuntu followed by launchpad
  https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/698949, thinking my
  update had failed for some unknown reason.

  However, based on some inputs from other users, we were able to narrow
  down the problem to /usr/lib/os-release file not having the right
  contents in it. Every other file including /usr/lib/os-release.oem-
  release, /etc/issue, /etc/issue.net specifies that I am on 20.04.3.
  Whereas only /usr/lib/os-release (and its symlink /etc/release)
  specifies my current release as 20.04.2.

  Even the lsb_release -a command always displays the output of
  /usr/lib/os-release file only.

  $ cat /usr/lib/os-release
  NAME="Ubuntu"
  VERSION="20.04.2 LTS (Focal Fossa)"
  ID=ubuntu
  ID_LIKE=debian
  PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS (fossa-bulbasaur X55.1)"
  VERSION_ID="20.04"
  HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
  SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
  BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
  
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
  VERSION_CODENAME=focal
  UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal

  $ cat /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release
  NAME="Ubuntu"
  VERSION="20.04.3 LTS (Focal Fossa)"
  ID=ubuntu
  ID_LIKE=debian
  PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS"
  VERSION_ID="20.04"
  HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
  SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
  BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
  
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
  VERSION_CODENAME=focal
  UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal

  $ cat /etc/issue
  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS \n \l

  $ cat /etc/issue.net
  Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS

  If you look at the timestamp of these files, strangely os-release had
  a newer timestamp of Oct 1 compared to other files.

  $ ls -l /usr/lib/os-release
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 406 Oct 1 20:31 /usr/lib/os-release

  $ ls -l /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 382 Aug 4 07:53 /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release

  $ ls -l /etc/issue
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 26 Aug 4 07:53 /etc/issue

  $ ls -l /etc/issue.net
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19 Aug 4 07:53 /etc/issue.net

  Please note that, other software package updates, and linux kernel
  updates are happening automatically without any issues so far for me.
  Few days back even got a new kernel update.

  $ uname -a
  Linux vivek-dev-linux 5.10.0-1049-oem #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Sep 27 11:01:10 UTC 
2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  Workarounds Attempted
  -
  1. Commented out all non-ubuntu external sources from /etc/apt/*.list. Then 
performed an apt clean + update + upgrade. But still nothing happened and the 
same issue remained. 

  2. Tried performing apt-install --reinstall base-files. But still
  nothing changed:

  $ sudo apt install --reinstall base-files
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree
  Reading state information... Done
  0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded.
  Need to get 60.6 kB of archives.
  Af

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946343] [NEW] Stale os-release file after possible upgrade from 20.04.2 to 20.04.3

2021-10-07 Thread Vivek
Public bug reported:

Refer: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/698949

I recently bought a Dell laptop with Ubuntu pre-installed in it. Looks
like it came with Ubuntu 20.04.2 and OEM Linux Kernel in it. After my
initial login (on October 1, 2021), the 'Software Updater' GUI prompted
me for updates, which I went ahead with.

However at the end of it, I noticed that I was still at 20.04.2 with
Linux Kernel at 5.10.0-1045-oem.

lsb_release -a
---

No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS (fossa-bulbasaur X55.1)
Release:20.04
Codename:   focal

uname -a
-
Linux dev-linux 5.10.0-1045-oem #47-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 18 10:41:03 UTC 2021 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Then I manually tried sudo apt update and sudo apt upgrade / dist-
upgrade from the terminal, but nothing got upgraded. When I invoked the
GUI 'Software Updater' again, it showed me that my system was already
up-to-date. However, as 20.04.3 was released end of Aug 2021, I was
expecting that I should be at that release after my initial updates.

Since that didn't happen, I asked a question regarding this in askubuntu
followed by launchpad
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/698949, thinking my
update had failed for some unknown reason.

However, based on some inputs from other users, we were able to narrow
down the problem to /usr/lib/os-release file not having the right
contents in it. Every other file including /usr/lib/os-release.oem-
release, /etc/issue, /etc/issue.net specifies that I am on 20.04.3.
Whereas only /usr/lib/os-release (and its symlink /etc/release)
specifies my current release as 20.04.2.

Even the lsb_release -a command always displays the output of
/usr/lib/os-release file only.

$ cat /usr/lib/os-release
NAME="Ubuntu"
VERSION="20.04.2 LTS (Focal Fossa)"
ID=ubuntu
ID_LIKE=debian
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS (fossa-bulbasaur X55.1)"
VERSION_ID="20.04"
HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
VERSION_CODENAME=focal
UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal

$ cat /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release
NAME="Ubuntu"
VERSION="20.04.3 LTS (Focal Fossa)"
ID=ubuntu
ID_LIKE=debian
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS"
VERSION_ID="20.04"
HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
VERSION_CODENAME=focal
UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal

$ cat /etc/issue
Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS \n \l

$ cat /etc/issue.net
Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS

If you look at the timestamp of these files, strangely os-release had a
newer timestamp of Oct 1 compared to other files.

$ ls -l /usr/lib/os-release
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 406 Oct 1 20:31 /usr/lib/os-release

$ ls -l /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 382 Aug 4 07:53 /usr/lib/os-release.oem-release

$ ls -l /etc/issue
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 26 Aug 4 07:53 /etc/issue

$ ls -l /etc/issue.net
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19 Aug 4 07:53 /etc/issue.net

Please note that, other software package updates, and linux kernel
updates are happening automatically without any issues so far for me.
Few days back even got a new kernel update.

$ uname -a
Linux vivek-dev-linux 5.10.0-1049-oem #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Sep 27 11:01:10 UTC 
2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Workarounds Attempted
-
1. Commented out all non-ubuntu external sources from /etc/apt/*.list. Then 
performed an apt clean + update + upgrade. But still nothing happened and the 
same issue remained. 

2. Tried performing apt-install --reinstall base-files. But still
nothing changed:

$ sudo apt install --reinstall base-files
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded.
Need to get 60.6 kB of archives.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates/main amd64 base-files 
amd64 11ubuntu5.4 [60.6 kB]
Fetched 60.6 kB in 1s (55.7 kB/s)
(Reading database ... 191154 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../base-files_11ubuntu5.4_amd64.deb ...
Warning: Stopping motd-news.service, but it can still be activated by:
  motd-news.timer
Unpacking base-files (11ubuntu5.4) over (11ubuntu5.4) ...
Setting up base-files (11ubuntu5.4) ...
motd-news.service is a disabled or a static unit, not starting it.
Processing triggers for cracklib-runtime (2.9.6-3.2) ...
Processing triggers for plymouth-theme-ubuntu-text 
(0.9.4git20200323-0ubuntu6.2) ...
update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
Processing triggers for install-info (

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938623] Re: Audio output & input routes to usb-c hub (where audio jack is disconnected) instead of laptop speakers

2021-07-31 Thread Vivek Gani
Realizing this likely has more to do with the lack of driver support for
usb-c hubs on linux - per pulseaudio's documentation (
https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/PulseAudio/Documentation/User/Modules/#module-
switch-on-port-available ) :

"# module-switch-on-connect

Earlier this module was required to automatically switch to a newly
plugged in USB sound card, but nowadays USB sound cards have higher
priority than internal sound cards, so they automatically become the
default sink (unless you have manually configured the default sink to be
something else) and the need for this module is greatly reduced."

"#module-switch-on-port-available

(not on USB sound cards, though, since they don't support jack
detection)"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938623

Title:
  Audio output & input routes to usb-c hub (where audio jack is
  disconnected) instead of laptop speakers

Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  Opinion

Bug description:
  I'm using Ubuntu 21.04 with an intel tablet and a lenovo usb-c hub
  that has an audio adapter: See https://linux-
  hardware.org/?probe=09f8c72d80/

  I never have anything hooked into the audio jack on usb-c hub, yet
  every time I plug my tablet into the usb-c hub the sound output
  switches to the usb-c hub instead of staying routed to the tablet
  speakers. I then have to go either into settings or use a sound output
  extension to switch it back to the speakers.

  This issue does not happen when using Windows 10 - audio stays routed
  through the tablet speakers - my guess is that it goes a step further
  and detects whether an audio jack actually has a cable plugged in or
  not.

  What package handles determining default audio routing for Ubuntu
  21.04 / Gnome 3.38.5? I'd like to file a bug about this / possibly see
  if I can help make the defaults work better.

  See also OS confusion about default audio sink - pulse:
  https://askubuntu.com/questions/1231935/os-confusion-about-default-
  audio-sink-pulse

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1938623/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938623] Re: Audio output & input routes to usb-c hub (where audio jack is disconnected) instead of laptop speakers

2021-07-31 Thread Vivek Gani
realized this has more to do with pulseaudio settings

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: New => Opinion

** Package changed: ubuntu => pulseaudio (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938623

Title:
  Audio output & input routes to usb-c hub (where audio jack is
  disconnected) instead of laptop speakers

Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  Opinion

Bug description:
  I'm using Ubuntu 21.04 with an intel tablet and a lenovo usb-c hub
  that has an audio adapter: See https://linux-
  hardware.org/?probe=09f8c72d80/

  I never have anything hooked into the audio jack on usb-c hub, yet
  every time I plug my tablet into the usb-c hub the sound output
  switches to the usb-c hub instead of staying routed to the tablet
  speakers. I then have to go either into settings or use a sound output
  extension to switch it back to the speakers.

  This issue does not happen when using Windows 10 - audio stays routed
  through the tablet speakers - my guess is that it goes a step further
  and detects whether an audio jack actually has a cable plugged in or
  not.

  What package handles determining default audio routing for Ubuntu
  21.04 / Gnome 3.38.5? I'd like to file a bug about this / possibly see
  if I can help make the defaults work better.

  See also OS confusion about default audio sink - pulse:
  https://askubuntu.com/questions/1231935/os-confusion-about-default-
  audio-sink-pulse

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1938623/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872287] [NEW] I'm getting CPU freezing issues.

2020-04-12 Thread vivek gangwar
Public bug reported:

The bugs are related to CSGO, getting fps drops after few minutes of
usage.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-46.38~18.04.1-generic 5.3.18
Uname: Linux 5.3.0-46-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
.proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..01.00.0: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/gpus/:01:00.0'
.proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
.proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
.proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
.proc.driver.nvidia.version:
 NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  430.50  Thu Sep  5 22:36:31 
CDT 2019
 GCC version:  gcc version 7.5.0 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04)
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.14
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sun Apr 12 16:23:27 2020
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: bionic
DistroVariant: ubuntu
DkmsStatus:
 acpi-call, 1.1.0, 5.3.0-46-generic, x86_64: installed
 nvidia, 430.50, 5.3.0-46-generic, x86_64: installed
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, including running git bisection searches
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation Device [8086:591b] (rev 04) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:15e0]
   Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. GP107M [GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile] [1043:15e0]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-10 (1 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20200203.1)
MachineType: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GL553VD
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.3.0-46-generic 
root=UUID=e042896c-2375-42c9-9d7d-2af9ed9e2121 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=1
SourcePackage: xorg
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 01/02/2018
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: GL553VD.306
dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567
dmi.board.name: GL553VD
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
dmi.board.version: 1.0
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No  Asset  Tag
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
dmi.chassis.version: 1.0
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrGL553VD.306:bd01/02/2018:svnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:pnGL553VD:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnGL553VD:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:ct10:cvr1.0:
dmi.product.family: GL
dmi.product.name: GL553VD
dmi.product.version: 1.0
dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.2
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 19.2.8-0ubuntu0~18.04.3
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 19.2.8-0ubuntu0~18.04.3
version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers-* N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core N/A
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau N/A

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872287

Title:
  I'm getting CPU freezing issues.

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The bugs are related to CSGO, getting fps drops after few minutes of
  usage.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-46.38~18.04.1-generic 5.3.18
  Uname: Linux 5.3.0-46-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..01.00.0: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: 
'/proc/driver/nvidia/gpus/:01:00.0'
  .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: ""
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume
  .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm
  .proc.driver.nvidia.version:
   NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  430.50  Thu Sep  5 22:36:31 
CDT 2019
   GCC version:  gcc version 7.5.0 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04)
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.14
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun Apr 12 16:23:27 2020
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: bionic
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus:
   acpi-call, 1.1.0, 5.3.0-46-generic, x86_64: installed
   nvidia, 430.50, 5.3.0-46-generic, x86_64: installed
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, including running git bisection searches
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation Device [8086:591b] (rev 04) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:15e0]
 Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. GP107M [GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile] 
[1043:15e0]
  

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1865254] [NEW] After fresh installation 19.10 on Dell vostro 15 3568 it is showing screen blinking when I try to unlock and locking with Super+L

2020-02-28 Thread Vivek Sharma
Public bug reported:

I am new to report such issues so I just don't know what to share here.
though below is the kernel and syslog of the system.

I having this issue with this model only as many of this model to test.

Kernel: 5.3.0-18-generic #19-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 8 20:14:06 UTC 2019
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Syslog:-

Feb 29 12:01:16 Bigstep-Vostro-15-3568 gnome-shell[1779]: == Stack trace for 
context 0x5603df1c4330 ==
Feb 29 12:01:16 Bigstep-Vostro-15-3568 gnome-shell[1779]: #0   5603e0fd7930 i   
resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/workspace.js:709 (7fdf75972e50 @ 15)
Feb 29 12:01:16 Bigstep-Vostro-15-3568 gnome-shell[1779]: #1   7ffceebe4f80 b   
self-hosted:975 (7fdf75834160 @ 392)
Feb 29 12:01:17 Bigstep-Vostro-15-3568 gnome-shell[1779]: Object St.Button 
(0x5603e0eaccd0), has been already deallocated — impossible to get any property 
from it. This might be caused by the object having been destroyed from C code 
using something such as destroy(), dispose(), or remove() vfuncs.
Feb 29 12:01:17 Bigstep-Vostro-15-3568 gnome-shell[1779]: == Stack trace for 
context 0x5603df1c4330 ==
Feb 29 12:01:17 Bigstep-Vostro-15-3568 gnome-shell[1779]: #0   5603e0fd7930 i   
resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/workspace.js:709 (7fdf75972e50 @ 15)
Feb 29 12:01:17 Bigstep-Vostro-15-3568 gnome-shell[1779]: #1   7ffceebe4f80 b   
self-hosted:975 (7fdf75834160 @ 392)
Feb 29 12:01:17 Bigstep-Vostro-15-3568 gnome-shell[1779]: Object St.Button 
(0x5603e0eaccd0), has been already deallocated — impossible to get any property 
from it. This might be caused by the object having been destroyed from C code 
using something such as destroy(), dispose(), or remove() vfuncs.
Feb 29 12:01:17 Bigstep-Vostro-15-3568 gnome-shell[1779]: == Stack trace for 
context 0x5603df1c4330 ==
Feb 29 12:01:17 Bigstep-Vostro-15-3568 gnome-shell[1779]: #0   7ffceebe4540 b   
resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/workspace.js:709 (7fdf75972e50 @ 15)
Feb 29 12:01:17 Bigstep-Vostro-15-3568 gnome-shell[1779]: #1   7ffceebe4f80 b   
self-hosted:975 (7fdf75834160 @ 392)
Feb 29 12:01:18 Bigstep-Vostro-15-3568 gnome-shell[1779]: Object St.Button 
(0x5603e0eaccd0), has been already deallocated — impossible to get any property 
from it. This might be caused by the object having been destroyed from C code 
using something such as destroy(), dispose(), or remove() vfuncs.
Feb 29 12:01:18 Bigstep-Vostro-15-3568 gnome-shell[1779]: == Stack trace for 
context 0x5603df1c4330 ==
Feb 29 12:01:18 Bigstep-Vostro-15-3568 gnome-shell[1779]: #0   7ffceebe4ed0 b   
resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/workspace.js:709 (7fdf75972e50 @ 15)
Feb 29 12:01:18 Bigstep-Vostro-15-3568 gnome-shell[1779]: #1   7ffceebe4f80 b   
self-hosted:975 (7fdf75834160 @ 392)
Feb 29 12:01:19 Bigstep-Vostro-15-3568 gnome-shell[1779]: Object St.Button 
(0x5603e0eaccd0), has been already deallocated — impossible to get any property 
from it. This might be caused by the object having been destroyed from C code 
using something such as destroy(), dispose(), or remove() vfuncs.
Feb 29 12:01:19 Bigstep-Vostro-15-3568 gnome-shell[1779]: == Stack trace for 
context 0x5603df1c4330 ==
Feb 29 12:01:19 Bigstep-Vostro-15-3568 gnome-shell[1779]: #0   7ffceebe4ed0 b   
resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/workspace.js:709 (7fdf75972e50 @ 15)
Feb 29 12:01:19 Bigstep-Vostro-15-3568 gnome-shell[1779]: #1   7ffceebe4f80 b   
self-hosted:975 (7fdf75834160 @ 392)

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu12
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-18.19-generic 5.3.1
Uname: Linux 5.3.0-18-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu8
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sat Feb 29 11:49:13 2020
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: eoan
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation Skylake GT2 [HD Graphics 520] [8086:1916] (rev 07) (prog-if 
00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Dell Skylake GT2 [HD Graphics 520] [1028:0793]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-02-28 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
MachineType: Dell Inc. Vostro 15-3568
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.3.0-18-generic 
root=UUID=e4c9da5a-c5ed-4509-ac83-acf0ed89a193 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
Symptom: display
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 03/23/2017
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 01.08.00
dmi.board.name: 05HRPP
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.board.version: A00
dmi.chassis.type: 9
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr01.08.00:bd03/23/2017:svnDellInc.:pnVostro15-3568:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn05HRPP:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct9:cvr:
dmi.product.family: Vostro
dmi.product.name: Vostro 15-3568
dmi.product.sku: 0793
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.99-1ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1759836] Re: systemd-udevd consumes 100% of CPU

2018-05-19 Thread Vivek Agrawal
I also faced the same issue and thanks to the Lumar's comment, workaround 
mentioned in the link worked for me too:
https://dev.solus-project.com/T5224

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1759836

Title:
  systemd-udevd consumes 100% of CPU

Status in Bluez Utilities:
  Unknown
Status in linux:
  Unknown
Status in bluez package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  The systemd-udevd proccess consumes 100% of a thread everytime, but
  i'm not noticing any difference in my computer.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: systemd 237-3ubuntu6
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-13.14-generic 4.15.10
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-13-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: wl
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Mar 29 08:52:54 2018
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-03-05 (23 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Alpha amd64 (20180304)
  MachineType: Dell Inc. Inspiron N5010
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.15.0-13-generic 
root=UUID=3c29e292-f1ae-45e1-a0ed-a82524278ce1 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=1
  SourcePackage: systemd
  SystemdDelta:
   [EXTENDED]   /lib/systemd/system/rc-local.service → 
/lib/systemd/system/rc-local.service.d/debian.conf
   [EXTENDED]   /lib/systemd/system/user@.service → 
/lib/systemd/system/user@.service.d/timeout.conf

   2 overridden configuration files found.
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 01/25/2011
  dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: A12
  dmi.board.name: 08R0GW
  dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.board.version: A12
  dmi.chassis.type: 8
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.chassis.version: A12
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA12:bd01/25/2011:svnDellInc.:pnInspironN5010:pvrA12:rvnDellInc.:rn08R0GW:rvrA12:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvrA12:
  dmi.product.name: Inspiron N5010
  dmi.product.version: A12
  dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bluez/+bug/1759836/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1692001] [NEW] package vim-common 2:7.4.1689-3ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/fr/man1/vimdiff.1.gz', which is also in package vim 2017050

2017-05-19 Thread Vivek Kumar
Public bug reported:

When I update using apt update, these errors started to come.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: vim-common 2:7.4.1689-3ubuntu1.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-78.99-generic 4.4.62
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-78-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.5
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri May 19 15:24:50 2017
DuplicateSignature:
 package:vim-common:2:7.4.1689-3ubuntu1.2
 Unpacking vim-common (2:7.4.1689-3ubuntu1.2) ...
 dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/vim-common_2%3a7.4.1689-3ubuntu1.2_amd64.deb (--unpack):
  trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/fr/man1/vimdiff.1.gz', which is also in 
package vim 20170503-1
ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/fr/man1/vimdiff.1.gz', which 
is also in package vim 20170503-1
InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-02-01 (107 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160719)
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1.2
 apt  1.2.20
SourcePackage: vim
Title: package vim-common 2:7.4.1689-3ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: 
trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/fr/man1/vimdiff.1.gz', which is also in 
package vim 20170503-1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: vim (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package package-conflict xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to vim in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692001

Title:
  package vim-common 2:7.4.1689-3ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade:
  trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/fr/man1/vimdiff.1.gz', which is
  also in package vim 20170503-1

Status in vim package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  When I update using apt update, these errors started to come.

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: vim-common 2:7.4.1689-3ubuntu1.2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-78.99-generic 4.4.62
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-78-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.5
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Fri May 19 15:24:50 2017
  DuplicateSignature:
   package:vim-common:2:7.4.1689-3ubuntu1.2
   Unpacking vim-common (2:7.4.1689-3ubuntu1.2) ...
   dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/vim-common_2%3a7.4.1689-3ubuntu1.2_amd64.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/fr/man1/vimdiff.1.gz', which is also in 
package vim 20170503-1
  ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/fr/man1/vimdiff.1.gz', 
which is also in package vim 20170503-1
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-02-01 (107 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20160719)
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1.2
   apt  1.2.20
  SourcePackage: vim
  Title: package vim-common 2:7.4.1689-3ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: 
trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/fr/man1/vimdiff.1.gz', which is also in 
package vim 20170503-1
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/+bug/1692001/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1642507] [NEW] Not internet after waking from suspend

2016-11-17 Thread Vivek Raj
Public bug reported:

Release Information:
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 16.10
Release:16.10
Codename:   yakkety

Package Information:
network-manager:
  Installed: 1.2.4-0ubuntu1
  Candidate: 1.2.4-0ubuntu1
  Version table:
 *** 1.2.4-0ubuntu1 500
500 http://se.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu yakkety/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

System Information:
Dell XPS 15 9550
Wireless: Network controller: Broad com Limited BCM43602 802.11ac Wireless LAN 
SoC (rev 01)
Wired: Wired Ethernet via Apple USB Ethernet Adapter (ID 05ac:1402 Apple, Inc. 
Ethernet Adapter [A1277])

Problem Description:
I have noticed the problem on both wired and wireless. Ever since upgrading to 
16.10(from 16.04), the system loses internet after waking from suspend. 
Internet works fine after a reboot or when powering on normally.

"service network-manager restart" fixes the problem.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10
Package: network-manager 1.2.4-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-27.29-generic 4.8.1
Uname: Linux 4.8.0-27-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.3-0ubuntu8
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Thu Nov 17 09:37:30 2016
IfupdownConfig:
 # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
 auto lo
 iface lo inet loopback
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-05-31 (169 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160420.1)
IpRoute:
 default via 192.168.80.1 dev enx7cc3a187f0f2  proto static  metric 100 
 default via 192.168.80.1 dev wlp2s0  proto static  metric 600 
 169.254.0.0/16 dev wlp2s0  scope link  metric 1000 
 192.168.80.0/24 dev enx7cc3a187f0f2  proto kernel  scope link  src 
192.168.80.209  metric 100 
 192.168.80.0/24 dev wlp2s0  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.80.225  
metric 600
NetworkManager.state:
 [main]
 NetworkingEnabled=true
 WirelessEnabled=true
 WWANEnabled=true
SourcePackage: network-manager
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to yakkety on 2016-10-28 (19 days ago)
nmcli-dev:
 DEVICE   TYPE  STATE  DBUS-PATH
  CONNECTION  CON-UUID  CON-PATH
   
 enx7cc3a187f0f2  ethernet  connected  
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/2  Wired connection 1  
e6493319-b925-3b33-92a7-259922dccdaa  
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection/1 
 wlp2s0   wifi  connected  
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/1  whymusticry_fast 1  
b51f9098-d053-45d7-ba42-97bf2e87bda2  
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection/0 
 lo   loopback  unmanaged  
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/0  --  --   
 --
nmcli-nm:
 RUNNING  VERSION  STATE  STARTUP  CONNECTIVITY  NETWORKING  WIFI-HW  WIFI  
   WWAN-HW  WWAN
 running  1.2.4connected  started  full  enabled enabled  
enabled  enabled  enabled

** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug yakkety

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1642507

Title:
  Not internet after waking from suspend

Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Release Information:
  Distributor ID:   Ubuntu
  Description:  Ubuntu 16.10
  Release:  16.10
  Codename: yakkety

  Package Information:
  network-manager:
Installed: 1.2.4-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 1.2.4-0ubuntu1
Version table:
   *** 1.2.4-0ubuntu1 500
  500 http://se.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu yakkety/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

  System Information:
  Dell XPS 15 9550
  Wireless: Network controller: Broad com Limited BCM43602 802.11ac Wireless 
LAN SoC (rev 01)
  Wired: Wired Ethernet via Apple USB Ethernet Adapter (ID 05ac:1402 Apple, 
Inc. Ethernet Adapter [A1277])

  Problem Description:
  I have noticed the problem on both wired and wireless. Ever since upgrading 
to 16.10(from 16.04), the system loses internet after waking from suspend. 
Internet works fine after a reboot or when powering on normally.

  "service network-manager restart" fixes the problem.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10
  Package: network-manager 1.2.4-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-27.29-generic 4.8.1
  Uname: Linux 4.8.0-27-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.3-0ubuntu8
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Thu Nov 17 09:37:30 2016
  IfupdownConfig:
   # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
   auto lo
   iface lo inet loopback
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-05-31 (169 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1569342] [NEW] Airplane Mode cannot be turned off

2016-04-12 Thread Vivek
Public bug reported:

My hp laptop has a rt3290 chipset which stopped working while I used
ubuntu 15.10 although it works on Windows 10 which I dual boot. I bought
a usb wifi with a rt2870 chipset, which worked out of the box with
ubuntu 15.10 but has stopped working since I upgraded to 16.04. Also,
the airplane mode in connection settings is fixed at on and cannot be
turned off.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: network-manager 1.1.93-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-18.34-generic 4.4.6
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-18-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: i3
Date: Wed Apr 13 05:28:34 2016
IfupdownConfig:
 # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
 auto lo
 iface lo inet loopback
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-04-11 (1 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Beta amd64 (20160323)
IpRoute:
 default via 10.109.250.1 dev eno1  proto static  metric 100 
 10.109.0.0/16 dev eno1  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.109.141.50  metric 
100 
 169.254.0.0/16 dev eno1  scope link  metric 1000
NetworkManager.state:
 [main]
 NetworkingEnabled=true
 WirelessEnabled=true
 WWANEnabled=false
 WimaxEnabled=true
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_IN:en
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_IN
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: network-manager
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
nmcli-con:
 NAMEUUID  TYPE
TIMESTAMP   TIMESTAMP-REAL   AUTOCONNECT  
AUTOCONNECT-PRIORITY  READONLY  DBUS-PATH   
ACTIVE  DEVICE  STATE  ACTIVE-PATH
 Wired connection 1  9d39a0f7-8bf2-4a7c-a64d-4cb5a359a51a  802-3-ethernet  
1460505238  Wednesday 13 April 2016 05:23:58 AM IST  yes  4294966297
no/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Settings/0  yes eno1
activated  /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection/0
nmcli-dev:
 DEVICE   TYPE  STATEDBUS-PATH  
CONNECTION  CON-UUID  CON-PATH  
 
 eno1 ethernet  connected
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/1  Wired connection 1  
9d39a0f7-8bf2-4a7c-a64d-4cb5a359a51a  
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection/0 
 wlo1 wifi  unavailable  
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/0  --  --   
 -- 
 wlxc83a35ca4110  wifi  unavailable  
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/3  --  --   
 -- 
 lo   loopback  unmanaged
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/2  --  --   
 --
nmcli-nm: Error: command ['nmcli', '-f', 'all', 'nm'] failed with exit code 2: 
Error: Object 'nm' is unknown, try 'nmcli help'.

** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug third-party-packages xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569342

Title:
  Airplane Mode cannot be turned off

Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  My hp laptop has a rt3290 chipset which stopped working while I used
  ubuntu 15.10 although it works on Windows 10 which I dual boot. I
  bought a usb wifi with a rt2870 chipset, which worked out of the box
  with ubuntu 15.10 but has stopped working since I upgraded to 16.04.
  Also, the airplane mode in connection settings is fixed at on and
  cannot be turned off.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: network-manager 1.1.93-0ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-18.34-generic 4.4.6
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-18-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu1
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: i3
  Date: Wed Apr 13 05:28:34 2016
  IfupdownConfig:
   # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
   auto lo
   iface lo inet loopback
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-04-11 (1 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Beta amd64 (20160323)
  IpRoute:
   default via 10.109.250.1 dev eno1  proto static  metric 100 
   10.109.0.0/16 dev eno1  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.109.141.50  metric 
100 
   169.254.0.0/16 dev eno1  scope link  metric 1000
  NetworkManager.state:
   [main]
   NetworkingEnabled=true
   WirelessEnabled=true
   WWANEnabled=false
   WimaxEnabled=true
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_IN:en
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_IN
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: network-manager
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)