[Touch-packages] [Bug 1425991] Re: Networks I have never connected to should be confined to an Unknown Networks folder

2015-04-07 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
Even if there are lots of users who do not want networks connecting
automatically was true, that wouldn't matter, as long as they were
still a small minority compared with the case I described of people
wanting to connect to a wi-fi network at a cafe, airport, university, or
other venue that they haven't visited before. That is the reason NOT to
confine networks you have never connected to the 'More networks' folder
or an 'Unknown networks' folder. And that's why having NEVER-USED,
NEVER-WILL-USE networks taking up space in the drop-down is not a smart
design choice is assuming the question: it's conflating networks that
you haven't used before with networks that you never will use, when they
are not the same thing.

If the user is forced to wade through unknown networks to single out
the network/s they have previously connected to in the past, that is a
bug. Please report it as a bug, with precise details
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingNetworkManager, rather than making a
design suggestion that might fix the bug but that has major side-
effects. It is often the case that designers and engineers, especially
those with experience in a particular component, can come up with better
solutions to a bug than the reporter can.

This is most certainly not a bug, it is a feature request

It is neither; it is a request for a change to the design of an existing
feature. It's okay to request a design change, and a bug tracker is a
reasonable place to do it; Launchpad's Opinion status is a failed
experiment (bug 772954). But a request for a design change is much less
likely to be valid than a bug report, because often it lacks rationale
or (as in this case) lacks perspective about the full range of use
cases. Any time you put should in a bug summary, or even in the first
paragraph, back away from the keyboard for a while and think: What is
the problem I'm trying to solve? What would be the tradeoff of the
solution I'm suggesting? Does the specification discuss this tradeoff?
Can I think of five other solutions?

** Changed in: indicator-network (Ubuntu)
   Status: Opinion = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to indicator-network in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1425991

Title:
  Networks I have never connected to should be confined to an Unknown
  Networks folder

Status in indicator-network package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  When a user clicks the network manager indicator, a dropdown appears
  and lists wifi networks. This menu should NOT display networks that
  the user has never connected to. Networks the user has never connected
  to should only display in a folder called Unknown Networks. At a
  mininum, the user should be given the ability to prevent networks from
  cluttering up the indicator menu.

  It is an unproductive design choice to force users to have to wade
  through networks they have never connected to (networks they will
  never connect to) in their menu. Even if a user makes use of the Auto-
  Connect setting for wireless networks, only displaying known networks
  in the indicator dropdown allows a visual reference of available
  networks the user can connect to. If the user is in the vicinity of a
  free network or at a friend's house and has the password to a network
  he/she has never connected to before, this network would be unknown
  (because it has never been connected to before). So the user would
  browse the Unknown Networks folder to identify the SSID. Once
  connected to, from then on the network would directly display in the
  Network-Indicator dropdown list. It makes sense and is more efficient
  to have the menu only display the networks the user makes active use
  of and no more.

  When I click on the Network Manager Indicator and select Edit
  Connections and then look under the Wifi heading, only a couple
  networks appear. So why do 5 or more networks (networks I have never
  connected to, networks I never will connect to) perpetually show in
  the Network Indicator menu? They should not be displayed like they
  are. They should be confined to a folder called Unknown Networks.

  In the interest of providing a visual example of what I am talking about, 
here is a picture of some networks I would like to hide/remove from my Network 
Indicator menu.
  http://a.pomf.se/fdqlnn.png

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-network/+bug/1425991/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1425991] Re: Networks I have never connected to should be confined to an Unknown Networks folder

2015-03-25 Thread Greg Williams
** Description changed:

  When a user clicks the network manager indicator, a dropdown appears and
  lists wifi networks. This menu should NOT display networks that the user
  has never connected to. Networks the user has never connected to should
- only display in the More networks folder. At a mininum, the user
- should be given the ability to confine unwanted networks in the More
- networks folder.
+ only display in a folder called Unknown Networks. At a mininum, the
+ user should be given the ability to prevent networks from cluttering up
+ the indicator menu.
  
  It is an unproductive design choice to force users to have to wade
  through networks they have never connected to (networks they will never
- connect to) in their menu. Numerous reasons exist why a user will not
- use the Auto-Connect setting for wireless networks. So it makes sense
- and is more efficient to have the menu only display the networks the
- user makes active use of and no more.
+ connect to) in their menu. Even if a user makes use of the Auto-Connect
+ setting for wireless networks, only displaying known networks in the
+ indicator dropdown allows a visual reference of available networks the
+ user can connect to. If the user is interested in connecting to an
+ unknown (or never before connected-to network), the user can explore a
+ folder that contains such networks. It makes sense and is more efficient
+ to have the menu only display the networks the user makes active use of
+ and no more.
  
  When I click on the Network Manager Indicator and select Edit
  Connections and then look under the Wifi heading, only a couple
  networks appear. So why do 5 or more networks (networks I have never
  connected to, networks I never will connect to) perpetually show in the
  Network Indicator menu? They should not be displayed like they are. They
- should be confined to the More networks folder. Alternatively, there
- should be a way to manually confine/sandbox unwanted networks to this
- folder so they no longer display in the dropdown menu.
+ should be confined to a folder called Unknown Networks.
  
  In the interest of providing a visual example of what I am talking about, 
here is a picture of some networks I would like to hide/remove from my Network 
Indicator menu.
  http://a.pomf.se/fdqlnn.png

** Description changed:

  When a user clicks the network manager indicator, a dropdown appears and
  lists wifi networks. This menu should NOT display networks that the user
  has never connected to. Networks the user has never connected to should
  only display in a folder called Unknown Networks. At a mininum, the
  user should be given the ability to prevent networks from cluttering up
  the indicator menu.
  
  It is an unproductive design choice to force users to have to wade
  through networks they have never connected to (networks they will never
  connect to) in their menu. Even if a user makes use of the Auto-Connect
  setting for wireless networks, only displaying known networks in the
  indicator dropdown allows a visual reference of available networks the
- user can connect to. If the user is interested in connecting to an
- unknown (or never before connected-to network), the user can explore a
- folder that contains such networks. It makes sense and is more efficient
- to have the menu only display the networks the user makes active use of
- and no more.
+ user can connect to. If the user is in the vicinity of a free network or
+ at a friend's house and has the password to a network he/she has never
+ connected to before, this network would be unknown (because it has never
+ been connected to before). So the user would browse the Unknown
+ Networks folder to identify the SSID. Once connected to, from then on
+ the network would directly display in the Network-Indicator dropdown
+ list. It makes sense and is more efficient to have the menu only display
+ the networks the user makes active use of and no more.
  
  When I click on the Network Manager Indicator and select Edit
  Connections and then look under the Wifi heading, only a couple
  networks appear. So why do 5 or more networks (networks I have never
  connected to, networks I never will connect to) perpetually show in the
  Network Indicator menu? They should not be displayed like they are. They
  should be confined to a folder called Unknown Networks.
  
  In the interest of providing a visual example of what I am talking about, 
here is a picture of some networks I would like to hide/remove from my Network 
Indicator menu.
  http://a.pomf.se/fdqlnn.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to indicator-network in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1425991

Title:
  Networks I have never connected to should be confined to an Unknown
  Networks folder

Status in indicator-network package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  When a user clicks the network manager indicator, a 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1425991] Re: Networks I have never connected to should be confined to an Unknown Networks folder

2015-03-25 Thread Greg Williams
@ James Anslow, no because it's not signal strength that defines the
significance of the network to the user. The user is making connection
decisions based on the identity of the network. Even in a context where
a user is trying to select between several free networks, signal
strength may or may not be an important consideration. Personally, I
value my appraisal of the trust worthiness of the network over signal
strength.

And signal strength is a non-factor in a trusted context, for example
your home. The neighbors may be blasting their WAP at max strength and
you have reduced your WAP's strength because you are in a small
apartment or something. So your network would appear at the bottom of
the list, being crowded out by the stronger signals. Yet you have never
connected to your neighbors' networks and you likely never will. So why
should these networks display perpetually in a regular-use area of
your menu?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to indicator-network in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1425991

Title:
  Networks I have never connected to should be confined to an Unknown
  Networks folder

Status in indicator-network package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  When a user clicks the network manager indicator, a dropdown appears
  and lists wifi networks. This menu should NOT display networks that
  the user has never connected to. Networks the user has never connected
  to should only display in a folder called Unknown Networks. At a
  mininum, the user should be given the ability to prevent networks from
  cluttering up the indicator menu.

  It is an unproductive design choice to force users to have to wade
  through networks they have never connected to (networks they will
  never connect to) in their menu. Even if a user makes use of the Auto-
  Connect setting for wireless networks, only displaying known networks
  in the indicator dropdown allows a visual reference of available
  networks the user can connect to. If the user is in the vicinity of a
  free network or at a friend's house and has the password to a network
  he/she has never connected to before, this network would be unknown
  (because it has never been connected to before). So the user would
  browse the Unknown Networks folder to identify the SSID. Once
  connected to, from then on the network would directly display in the
  Network-Indicator dropdown list. It makes sense and is more efficient
  to have the menu only display the networks the user makes active use
  of and no more.

  When I click on the Network Manager Indicator and select Edit
  Connections and then look under the Wifi heading, only a couple
  networks appear. So why do 5 or more networks (networks I have never
  connected to, networks I never will connect to) perpetually show in
  the Network Indicator menu? They should not be displayed like they
  are. They should be confined to a folder called Unknown Networks.

  In the interest of providing a visual example of what I am talking about, 
here is a picture of some networks I would like to hide/remove from my Network 
Indicator menu.
  http://a.pomf.se/fdqlnn.png

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-network/+bug/1425991/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1425991] Re: Networks I have never connected to should be confined to an Unknown Networks folder

2015-03-25 Thread James Anslow
Wouldn't it make more sense to simply organise network names by the
access points' signal strength, descending?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to indicator-network in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1425991

Title:
  Networks I have never connected to should be confined to an Unknown
  Networks folder

Status in indicator-network package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  When a user clicks the network manager indicator, a dropdown appears
  and lists wifi networks. This menu should NOT display networks that
  the user has never connected to. Networks the user has never connected
  to should only display in a folder called Unknown Networks. At a
  mininum, the user should be given the ability to prevent networks from
  cluttering up the indicator menu.

  It is an unproductive design choice to force users to have to wade
  through networks they have never connected to (networks they will
  never connect to) in their menu. Even if a user makes use of the Auto-
  Connect setting for wireless networks, only displaying known networks
  in the indicator dropdown allows a visual reference of available
  networks the user can connect to. If the user is in the vicinity of a
  free network or at a friend's house and has the password to a network
  he/she has never connected to before, this network would be unknown
  (because it has never been connected to before). So the user would
  browse the Unknown Networks folder to identify the SSID. Once
  connected to, from then on the network would directly display in the
  Network-Indicator dropdown list. It makes sense and is more efficient
  to have the menu only display the networks the user makes active use
  of and no more.

  When I click on the Network Manager Indicator and select Edit
  Connections and then look under the Wifi heading, only a couple
  networks appear. So why do 5 or more networks (networks I have never
  connected to, networks I never will connect to) perpetually show in
  the Network Indicator menu? They should not be displayed like they
  are. They should be confined to a folder called Unknown Networks.

  In the interest of providing a visual example of what I am talking about, 
here is a picture of some networks I would like to hide/remove from my Network 
Indicator menu.
  http://a.pomf.se/fdqlnn.png

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-network/+bug/1425991/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1425991] Re: Networks I have never connected to should be confined to an Unknown Networks folder

2015-03-25 Thread Greg Williams
** Summary changed:

- Networks I have never connected to should be confined to the More Networks 
folder
+ Networks I have never connected to should be confined to an Unknown 
Networks folder

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to indicator-network in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1425991

Title:
  Networks I have never connected to should be confined to an Unknown
  Networks folder

Status in indicator-network package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  When a user clicks the network manager indicator, a dropdown appears
  and lists wifi networks. This menu should NOT display networks that
  the user has never connected to. Networks the user has never connected
  to should only display in the More networks folder. At a mininum,
  the user should be given the ability to confine unwanted networks in
  the More networks folder.

  It is an unproductive design choice to force users to have to wade
  through networks they have never connected to (networks they will
  never connect to) in their menu. Numerous reasons exist why a user
  will not use the Auto-Connect setting for wireless networks. So it
  makes sense and is more efficient to have the menu only display the
  networks the user makes active use of and no more.

  When I click on the Network Manager Indicator and select Edit
  Connections and then look under the Wifi heading, only a couple
  networks appear. So why do 5 or more networks (networks I have never
  connected to, networks I never will connect to) perpetually show in
  the Network Indicator menu? They should not be displayed like they
  are. They should be confined to the More networks folder.
  Alternatively, there should be a way to manually confine/sandbox
  unwanted networks to this folder so they no longer display in the
  dropdown menu.

  In the interest of providing a visual example of what I am talking about, 
here is a picture of some networks I would like to hide/remove from my Network 
Indicator menu.
  http://a.pomf.se/fdqlnn.png

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-network/+bug/1425991/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1425991] Re: Networks I have never connected to should be confined to an Unknown Networks folder

2015-03-25 Thread 0xnate
This is most certainly not a bug, it is a feature request.

Splitting up the dropdown into something like Visited/Remembered
Networks and Other/Unknown Networks, which default to a collapsed
list would make sense and could possible be a useful feature. Either
way, that would need to be handled upstream by gnome.

** Changed in: indicator-network (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Opinion

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to indicator-network in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1425991

Title:
  Networks I have never connected to should be confined to an Unknown
  Networks folder

Status in indicator-network package in Ubuntu:
  Opinion

Bug description:
  When a user clicks the network manager indicator, a dropdown appears
  and lists wifi networks. This menu should NOT display networks that
  the user has never connected to. Networks the user has never connected
  to should only display in a folder called Unknown Networks. At a
  mininum, the user should be given the ability to prevent networks from
  cluttering up the indicator menu.

  It is an unproductive design choice to force users to have to wade
  through networks they have never connected to (networks they will
  never connect to) in their menu. Even if a user makes use of the Auto-
  Connect setting for wireless networks, only displaying known networks
  in the indicator dropdown allows a visual reference of available
  networks the user can connect to. If the user is in the vicinity of a
  free network or at a friend's house and has the password to a network
  he/she has never connected to before, this network would be unknown
  (because it has never been connected to before). So the user would
  browse the Unknown Networks folder to identify the SSID. Once
  connected to, from then on the network would directly display in the
  Network-Indicator dropdown list. It makes sense and is more efficient
  to have the menu only display the networks the user makes active use
  of and no more.

  When I click on the Network Manager Indicator and select Edit
  Connections and then look under the Wifi heading, only a couple
  networks appear. So why do 5 or more networks (networks I have never
  connected to, networks I never will connect to) perpetually show in
  the Network Indicator menu? They should not be displayed like they
  are. They should be confined to a folder called Unknown Networks.

  In the interest of providing a visual example of what I am talking about, 
here is a picture of some networks I would like to hide/remove from my Network 
Indicator menu.
  http://a.pomf.se/fdqlnn.png

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-network/+bug/1425991/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp