[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-05-22 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker 
This bug was fixed in the package whoopsie - 0.2.52.3

---
whoopsie (0.2.52.3) xenial-proposed; urgency=medium

  * src/whoopsie.c: Add ProcCpuinfoMinimal which can be larger than 1KB to the
list of accepted fields. (LP: #1673557)

 -- Brian Murray   Fri, 12 May 2017 10:21:20 -0700

** Changed in: whoopsie (Ubuntu Trusty)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Trusty:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie source package in Trusty:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  While some apport reports contain ProcCpuinfo not all of them do and it would 
be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386 version of Ubuntu. 
Additionally, the existing implementation gathers information about every 
processor which is quite lengthy - something smaller would be better.

  [Test Case]
  1. Run ubuntu-bug 2vcard
  2. Observe there is no report key ProcCpuinfoMinimal

  With the version of apport from -proposed you will have
  ProcCpuinfoMinimal which will contain information about your
  processor.

  To verify the whoopsie change you'll want to do the following:
  1) sudo service whoopsie stop
  2) sudo CRASH_DB_URL=https://daisy.staging.ubuntu.com whoopsie -f
  3) kill -11 a process (but not the whoopsie one!)
  4) confirm sending the report
  5) Find the OOPS ID in the whoopsie output
  6) Go to http://errors.staging.ubuntu.com/oops/$OOPSID
  7) Verify ProcCpuinfoMinimal appears in the OOPS


  [Regression Potential]
  This exists in Zesty, and Artful and there have been no issues collecting the 
information. Even if there are errors in the general ubuntu hook, which was 
modified for this SRU, apport will continue collecting information for the 
report and just add a traceback to the report about the hook error.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-05-22 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker 
This bug was fixed in the package apport - 2.20.3-0ubuntu8.3

---
apport (2.20.3-0ubuntu8.3) yakkety; urgency=medium

  * Resolve autopkgtest failures in test_backend_apt_dpkg.py due to issues
with apt key ring. Thanks to Dimitri John Ledkov for the patch.
(LP: #1651623)
  * Disable report.test_add_gdb_info_abort_glib test case for now, as the
glib assertion message is broken under current Ubuntu (LP: #1689344)
  * data/general/ubuntu.py: Collect a minimal version of /proc/cpuinfo in
every report. (LP: #1673557)

 -- Brian Murray   Wed, 10 May 2017 18:10:32 -0700

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Trusty:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie source package in Trusty:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  While some apport reports contain ProcCpuinfo not all of them do and it would 
be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386 version of Ubuntu. 
Additionally, the existing implementation gathers information about every 
processor which is quite lengthy - something smaller would be better.

  [Test Case]
  1. Run ubuntu-bug 2vcard
  2. Observe there is no report key ProcCpuinfoMinimal

  With the version of apport from -proposed you will have
  ProcCpuinfoMinimal which will contain information about your
  processor.

  To verify the whoopsie change you'll want to do the following:
  1) sudo service whoopsie stop
  2) sudo CRASH_DB_URL=https://daisy.staging.ubuntu.com whoopsie -f
  3) kill -11 a process (but not the whoopsie one!)
  4) confirm sending the report
  5) Find the OOPS ID in the whoopsie output
  6) Go to http://errors.staging.ubuntu.com/oops/$OOPSID
  7) Verify ProcCpuinfoMinimal appears in the OOPS


  [Regression Potential]
  This exists in Zesty, and Artful and there have been no issues collecting the 
information. Even if there are errors in the general ubuntu hook, which was 
modified for this SRU, apport will continue collecting information for the 
report and just add a traceback to the report about the hook error.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-05-22 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker 
This bug was fixed in the package apport - 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.24

---
apport (2.14.1-0ubuntu3.24) trusty; urgency=medium

  * data/general/ubuntu.py: Collect a minimal version of /proc/cpuinfo in
every report. (LP: #1673557)
  * data/general/ubuntu-gnome.py: The GNOME3 PPAs are no longer supported for
14.04 or 16.04 so set an UnreportableReason in those reports.
(LP: #1689093)

 -- Brian Murray   Fri, 12 May 2017 12:29:08 -0700

** Changed in: whoopsie (Ubuntu Yakkety)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Trusty:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie source package in Trusty:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  While some apport reports contain ProcCpuinfo not all of them do and it would 
be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386 version of Ubuntu. 
Additionally, the existing implementation gathers information about every 
processor which is quite lengthy - something smaller would be better.

  [Test Case]
  1. Run ubuntu-bug 2vcard
  2. Observe there is no report key ProcCpuinfoMinimal

  With the version of apport from -proposed you will have
  ProcCpuinfoMinimal which will contain information about your
  processor.

  To verify the whoopsie change you'll want to do the following:
  1) sudo service whoopsie stop
  2) sudo CRASH_DB_URL=https://daisy.staging.ubuntu.com whoopsie -f
  3) kill -11 a process (but not the whoopsie one!)
  4) confirm sending the report
  5) Find the OOPS ID in the whoopsie output
  6) Go to http://errors.staging.ubuntu.com/oops/$OOPSID
  7) Verify ProcCpuinfoMinimal appears in the OOPS


  [Regression Potential]
  This exists in Zesty, and Artful and there have been no issues collecting the 
information. Even if there are errors in the general ubuntu hook, which was 
modified for this SRU, apport will continue collecting information for the 
report and just add a traceback to the report about the hook error.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-05-22 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker 
This bug was fixed in the package apport - 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.6

---
apport (2.20.1-0ubuntu2.6) xenial; urgency=medium

  * data/general/ubuntu.py: Collect a minimal version of /proc/cpuinfo in
every report. (LP: #1673557)
  * data/general/ubuntu-gnome.py: The GNOME3 PPAs are no longer supported for
14.04 or 16.04 so set an UnreportableReason in those reports.
(LP: #1689093)
  * test_backend_apt_dpkg.py: Move tests from Ubuntu 15.10 "wily" (which is
EoL now) to 16.04 LTS "xenial". (LP: #1690437)

 -- Brian Murray   Fri, 12 May 2017 11:39:04 -0700

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Trusty)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Trusty:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie source package in Trusty:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  While some apport reports contain ProcCpuinfo not all of them do and it would 
be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386 version of Ubuntu. 
Additionally, the existing implementation gathers information about every 
processor which is quite lengthy - something smaller would be better.

  [Test Case]
  1. Run ubuntu-bug 2vcard
  2. Observe there is no report key ProcCpuinfoMinimal

  With the version of apport from -proposed you will have
  ProcCpuinfoMinimal which will contain information about your
  processor.

  To verify the whoopsie change you'll want to do the following:
  1) sudo service whoopsie stop
  2) sudo CRASH_DB_URL=https://daisy.staging.ubuntu.com whoopsie -f
  3) kill -11 a process (but not the whoopsie one!)
  4) confirm sending the report
  5) Find the OOPS ID in the whoopsie output
  6) Go to http://errors.staging.ubuntu.com/oops/$OOPSID
  7) Verify ProcCpuinfoMinimal appears in the OOPS


  [Regression Potential]
  This exists in Zesty, and Artful and there have been no issues collecting the 
information. Even if there are errors in the general ubuntu hook, which was 
modified for this SRU, apport will continue collecting information for the 
report and just add a traceback to the report about the hook error.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-05-22 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker 
This bug was fixed in the package whoopsie - 0.2.54.1

---
whoopsie (0.2.54.1) yakkety; urgency=medium

  * src/whoopsie.c: Add ProcCpuinfoMinimal which can be larger than 1KB to the
list of accepted fields. (LP: #1673557)

 -- Brian Murray   Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:03:30 -0700

** Changed in: whoopsie (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Trusty:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie source package in Trusty:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  While some apport reports contain ProcCpuinfo not all of them do and it would 
be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386 version of Ubuntu. 
Additionally, the existing implementation gathers information about every 
processor which is quite lengthy - something smaller would be better.

  [Test Case]
  1. Run ubuntu-bug 2vcard
  2. Observe there is no report key ProcCpuinfoMinimal

  With the version of apport from -proposed you will have
  ProcCpuinfoMinimal which will contain information about your
  processor.

  To verify the whoopsie change you'll want to do the following:
  1) sudo service whoopsie stop
  2) sudo CRASH_DB_URL=https://daisy.staging.ubuntu.com whoopsie -f
  3) kill -11 a process (but not the whoopsie one!)
  4) confirm sending the report
  5) Find the OOPS ID in the whoopsie output
  6) Go to http://errors.staging.ubuntu.com/oops/$OOPSID
  7) Verify ProcCpuinfoMinimal appears in the OOPS


  [Regression Potential]
  This exists in Zesty, and Artful and there have been no issues collecting the 
information. Even if there are errors in the general ubuntu hook, which was 
modified for this SRU, apport will continue collecting information for the 
report and just add a traceback to the report about the hook error.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-05-22 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker 
This bug was fixed in the package whoopsie - 0.2.24.6ubuntu4

---
whoopsie (0.2.24.6ubuntu4) trusty-proposed; urgency=medium

  * src/whoopsie.c: Add ProcCpuinfoMinimal which can be larger than 1KB to the
list of accepted fields. (LP: #1673557)

 -- Brian Murray   Fri, 12 May 2017 10:25:00 -0700

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Yakkety)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Trusty:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie source package in Trusty:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  While some apport reports contain ProcCpuinfo not all of them do and it would 
be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386 version of Ubuntu. 
Additionally, the existing implementation gathers information about every 
processor which is quite lengthy - something smaller would be better.

  [Test Case]
  1. Run ubuntu-bug 2vcard
  2. Observe there is no report key ProcCpuinfoMinimal

  With the version of apport from -proposed you will have
  ProcCpuinfoMinimal which will contain information about your
  processor.

  To verify the whoopsie change you'll want to do the following:
  1) sudo service whoopsie stop
  2) sudo CRASH_DB_URL=https://daisy.staging.ubuntu.com whoopsie -f
  3) kill -11 a process (but not the whoopsie one!)
  4) confirm sending the report
  5) Find the OOPS ID in the whoopsie output
  6) Go to http://errors.staging.ubuntu.com/oops/$OOPSID
  7) Verify ProcCpuinfoMinimal appears in the OOPS


  [Regression Potential]
  This exists in Zesty, and Artful and there have been no issues collecting the 
information. Even if there are errors in the general ubuntu hook, which was 
modified for this SRU, apport will continue collecting information for the 
report and just add a traceback to the report about the hook error.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-05-15 Thread Brian Murray 
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Trusty:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Trusty:
  Fix Committed
Status in apport source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in apport source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  While some apport reports contain ProcCpuinfo not all of them do and it would 
be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386 version of Ubuntu. 
Additionally, the existing implementation gathers information about every 
processor which is quite lengthy - something smaller would be better.

  [Test Case]
  1. Run ubuntu-bug 2vcard
  2. Observe there is no report key ProcCpuinfoMinimal

  With the version of apport from -proposed you will have
  ProcCpuinfoMinimal which will contain information about your
  processor.

  To verify the whoopsie change you'll want to do the following:
  1) sudo service whoopsie stop
  2) sudo CRASH_DB_URL=https://daisy.staging.ubuntu.com whoopsie -f
  3) kill -11 a process (but not the whoopsie one!)
  4) confirm sending the report
  5) Find the OOPS ID in the whoopsie output
  6) Go to http://errors.staging.ubuntu.com/oops/$OOPSID
  7) Verify ProcCpuinfoMinimal appears in the OOPS


  [Regression Potential]
  This exists in Zesty, and Artful and there have been no issues collecting the 
information. Even if there are errors in the general ubuntu hook, which was 
modified for this SRU, apport will continue collecting information for the 
report and just add a traceback to the report about the hook error.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-05-15 Thread Brian Murray 
Verifying the apport part for trusty:

bdmurray@upgrade-trusty-amd64:~$ grep -A4 ProcCpuinfoMinimal /tmp/test.crash
ProcCpuinfoMinimal:
 processor  : 1
 vendor_id  : GenuineIntel
 cpu family : 6
 model  : 58
bdmurray@upgrade-trusty-amd64:~$ apt-cache policy apport
apport:
  Installed: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.24
  Candidate: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.24

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Trusty:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Trusty:
  Fix Committed
Status in apport source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in apport source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  While some apport reports contain ProcCpuinfo not all of them do and it would 
be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386 version of Ubuntu. 
Additionally, the existing implementation gathers information about every 
processor which is quite lengthy - something smaller would be better.

  [Test Case]
  1. Run ubuntu-bug 2vcard
  2. Observe there is no report key ProcCpuinfoMinimal

  With the version of apport from -proposed you will have
  ProcCpuinfoMinimal which will contain information about your
  processor.

  To verify the whoopsie change you'll want to do the following:
  1) sudo service whoopsie stop
  2) sudo CRASH_DB_URL=https://daisy.staging.ubuntu.com whoopsie -f
  3) kill -11 a process (but not the whoopsie one!)
  4) confirm sending the report
  5) Find the OOPS ID in the whoopsie output
  6) Go to http://errors.staging.ubuntu.com/oops/$OOPSID
  7) Verify ProcCpuinfoMinimal appears in the OOPS


  [Regression Potential]
  This exists in Zesty, and Artful and there have been no issues collecting the 
information. Even if there are errors in the general ubuntu hook, which was 
modified for this SRU, apport will continue collecting information for the 
report and just add a traceback to the report about the hook error.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-05-15 Thread Brian Murray 
The whoopsie part of the trusty SRU can be confirmed with OOPS:

https://errors.staging.ubuntu.com/oops/16658f2c-39bf-
11e7-aa36-fa163eaf9b83

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Trusty:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Trusty:
  Fix Committed
Status in apport source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in apport source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  While some apport reports contain ProcCpuinfo not all of them do and it would 
be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386 version of Ubuntu. 
Additionally, the existing implementation gathers information about every 
processor which is quite lengthy - something smaller would be better.

  [Test Case]
  1. Run ubuntu-bug 2vcard
  2. Observe there is no report key ProcCpuinfoMinimal

  With the version of apport from -proposed you will have
  ProcCpuinfoMinimal which will contain information about your
  processor.

  To verify the whoopsie change you'll want to do the following:
  1) sudo service whoopsie stop
  2) sudo CRASH_DB_URL=https://daisy.staging.ubuntu.com whoopsie -f
  3) kill -11 a process (but not the whoopsie one!)
  4) confirm sending the report
  5) Find the OOPS ID in the whoopsie output
  6) Go to http://errors.staging.ubuntu.com/oops/$OOPSID
  7) Verify ProcCpuinfoMinimal appears in the OOPS


  [Regression Potential]
  This exists in Zesty, and Artful and there have been no issues collecting the 
information. Even if there are errors in the general ubuntu hook, which was 
modified for this SRU, apport will continue collecting information for the 
report and just add a traceback to the report about the hook error.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-05-15 Thread Brian Murray 
Verifying the apport part for xenial:

bdmurray@clean-xenial-amd64:~$ grep -A4 ProcCpuinfoMinimal /tmp/crash.txt
ProcCpuinfoMinimal:
 processor  : 1
 vendor_id  : GenuineIntel
 cpu family : 6
 model  : 58
bdmurray@clean-xenial-amd64:~$ apt-cache policy apport
apport:
  Installed: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.6
  Candidate: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.6

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Trusty:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Trusty:
  Fix Committed
Status in apport source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in apport source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  While some apport reports contain ProcCpuinfo not all of them do and it would 
be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386 version of Ubuntu. 
Additionally, the existing implementation gathers information about every 
processor which is quite lengthy - something smaller would be better.

  [Test Case]
  1. Run ubuntu-bug 2vcard
  2. Observe there is no report key ProcCpuinfoMinimal

  With the version of apport from -proposed you will have
  ProcCpuinfoMinimal which will contain information about your
  processor.

  To verify the whoopsie change you'll want to do the following:
  1) sudo service whoopsie stop
  2) sudo CRASH_DB_URL=https://daisy.staging.ubuntu.com whoopsie -f
  3) kill -11 a process (but not the whoopsie one!)
  4) confirm sending the report
  5) Find the OOPS ID in the whoopsie output
  6) Go to http://errors.staging.ubuntu.com/oops/$OOPSID
  7) Verify ProcCpuinfoMinimal appears in the OOPS


  [Regression Potential]
  This exists in Zesty, and Artful and there have been no issues collecting the 
information. Even if there are errors in the general ubuntu hook, which was 
modified for this SRU, apport will continue collecting information for the 
report and just add a traceback to the report about the hook error.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-05-15 Thread Brian Murray 
The whoopsie part of the xenial SRU can be confirmed with this OOPS:

https://errors.staging.ubuntu.com/oops/0ad9fe42-39bd-
11e7-8b26-fa163eaf9b83

** Tags added: verification-done-xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Trusty:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Trusty:
  Fix Committed
Status in apport source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in apport source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  While some apport reports contain ProcCpuinfo not all of them do and it would 
be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386 version of Ubuntu. 
Additionally, the existing implementation gathers information about every 
processor which is quite lengthy - something smaller would be better.

  [Test Case]
  1. Run ubuntu-bug 2vcard
  2. Observe there is no report key ProcCpuinfoMinimal

  With the version of apport from -proposed you will have
  ProcCpuinfoMinimal which will contain information about your
  processor.

  To verify the whoopsie change you'll want to do the following:
  1) sudo service whoopsie stop
  2) sudo CRASH_DB_URL=https://daisy.staging.ubuntu.com whoopsie -f
  3) kill -11 a process (but not the whoopsie one!)
  4) confirm sending the report
  5) Find the OOPS ID in the whoopsie output
  6) Go to http://errors.staging.ubuntu.com/oops/$OOPSID
  7) Verify ProcCpuinfoMinimal appears in the OOPS


  [Regression Potential]
  This exists in Zesty, and Artful and there have been no issues collecting the 
information. Even if there are errors in the general ubuntu hook, which was 
modified for this SRU, apport will continue collecting information for the 
report and just add a traceback to the report about the hook error.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-05-15 Thread Brian Murray 
The whoopsie part of yakkety can be confirmed with this OOPS:

https://errors.staging.ubuntu.com/oops/8ff45a12-39ba-
11e7-aa36-fa163eaf9b83

** Tags added: verification-done-yakkety

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Trusty:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Trusty:
  Fix Committed
Status in apport source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in apport source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  While some apport reports contain ProcCpuinfo not all of them do and it would 
be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386 version of Ubuntu. 
Additionally, the existing implementation gathers information about every 
processor which is quite lengthy - something smaller would be better.

  [Test Case]
  1. Run ubuntu-bug 2vcard
  2. Observe there is no report key ProcCpuinfoMinimal

  With the version of apport from -proposed you will have
  ProcCpuinfoMinimal which will contain information about your
  processor.

  To verify the whoopsie change you'll want to do the following:
  1) sudo service whoopsie stop
  2) sudo CRASH_DB_URL=https://daisy.staging.ubuntu.com whoopsie -f
  3) kill -11 a process (but not the whoopsie one!)
  4) confirm sending the report
  5) Find the OOPS ID in the whoopsie output
  6) Go to http://errors.staging.ubuntu.com/oops/$OOPSID
  7) Verify ProcCpuinfoMinimal appears in the OOPS


  [Regression Potential]
  This exists in Zesty, and Artful and there have been no issues collecting the 
information. Even if there are errors in the general ubuntu hook, which was 
modified for this SRU, apport will continue collecting information for the 
report and just add a traceback to the report about the hook error.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-05-15 Thread Brian Murray 
Verifying the apport part for yakkety:

 $ apt-cache policy apport
apport:
  Installed: 2.20.3-0ubuntu8.3
  Candidate: 2.20.3-0ubuntu8.3

 $ grep -A4 ProcCpuinfoMinimal /tmp/test.crash
ProcCpuinfoMinimal:
 processor  : 3
 vendor_id  : GenuineIntel
 cpu family : 6
 model  : 58
 ...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Trusty:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Trusty:
  Fix Committed
Status in apport source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in apport source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  While some apport reports contain ProcCpuinfo not all of them do and it would 
be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386 version of Ubuntu. 
Additionally, the existing implementation gathers information about every 
processor which is quite lengthy - something smaller would be better.

  [Test Case]
  1. Run ubuntu-bug 2vcard
  2. Observe there is no report key ProcCpuinfoMinimal

  With the version of apport from -proposed you will have
  ProcCpuinfoMinimal which will contain information about your
  processor.

  To verify the whoopsie change you'll want to do the following:
  1) sudo service whoopsie stop
  2) sudo CRASH_DB_URL=https://daisy.staging.ubuntu.com whoopsie -f
  3) kill -11 a process (but not the whoopsie one!)
  4) confirm sending the report
  5) Find the OOPS ID in the whoopsie output
  6) Go to http://errors.staging.ubuntu.com/oops/$OOPSID
  7) Verify ProcCpuinfoMinimal appears in the OOPS


  [Regression Potential]
  This exists in Zesty, and Artful and there have been no issues collecting the 
information. Even if there are errors in the general ubuntu hook, which was 
modified for this SRU, apport will continue collecting information for the 
report and just add a traceback to the report about the hook error.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-05-15 Thread Łukasz Zemczak 
Hello Brian, or anyone else affected,

Accepted whoopsie into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whoopsie/0.2.24.6ubuntu4 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the
bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to
verification-failed.  In either case, details of your testing will help
us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: whoopsie (Ubuntu Trusty)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Trusty)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Trusty:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Trusty:
  Fix Committed
Status in apport source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in apport source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  While some apport reports contain ProcCpuinfo not all of them do and it would 
be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386 version of Ubuntu. 
Additionally, the existing implementation gathers information about every 
processor which is quite lengthy - something smaller would be better.

  [Test Case]
  1. Run ubuntu-bug 2vcard
  2. Observe there is no report key ProcCpuinfoMinimal

  With the version of apport from -proposed you will have
  ProcCpuinfoMinimal which will contain information about your
  processor.

  To verify the whoopsie change you'll want to do the following:
  1) sudo service whoopsie stop
  2) sudo CRASH_DB_URL=https://daisy.staging.ubuntu.com whoopsie -f
  3) kill -11 a process (but not the whoopsie one!)
  4) confirm sending the report
  5) Find the OOPS ID in the whoopsie output
  6) Go to http://errors.staging.ubuntu.com/oops/$OOPSID
  7) Verify ProcCpuinfoMinimal appears in the OOPS


  [Regression Potential]
  This exists in Zesty, and Artful and there have been no issues collecting the 
information. Even if there are errors in the general ubuntu hook, which was 
modified for this SRU, apport will continue collecting information for the 
report and just add a traceback to the report about the hook error.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-05-15 Thread Łukasz Zemczak 
Hello Brian, or anyone else affected,

Accepted apport into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.20.1-0ubuntu2.6 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the
bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to
verification-failed.  In either case, details of your testing will help
us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Trusty:
  New
Status in whoopsie source package in Trusty:
  New
Status in apport source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in apport source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  While some apport reports contain ProcCpuinfo not all of them do and it would 
be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386 version of Ubuntu. 
Additionally, the existing implementation gathers information about every 
processor which is quite lengthy - something smaller would be better.

  [Test Case]
  1. Run ubuntu-bug 2vcard
  2. Observe there is no report key ProcCpuinfoMinimal

  With the version of apport from -proposed you will have
  ProcCpuinfoMinimal which will contain information about your
  processor.

  To verify the whoopsie change you'll want to do the following:
  1) sudo service whoopsie stop
  2) sudo CRASH_DB_URL=https://daisy.staging.ubuntu.com whoopsie -f
  3) kill -11 a process (but not the whoopsie one!)
  4) confirm sending the report
  5) Find the OOPS ID in the whoopsie output
  6) Go to http://errors.staging.ubuntu.com/oops/$OOPSID
  7) Verify ProcCpuinfoMinimal appears in the OOPS


  [Regression Potential]
  This exists in Zesty, and Artful and there have been no issues collecting the 
information. Even if there are errors in the general ubuntu hook, which was 
modified for this SRU, apport will continue collecting information for the 
report and just add a traceback to the report about the hook error.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-05-12 Thread Łukasz Zemczak 
Hello Brian, or anyone else affected,

Accepted apport into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.20.3-0ubuntu8.3 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the
bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to
verification-failed.  In either case, details of your testing will help
us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Yakkety)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

** Changed in: whoopsie (Ubuntu Yakkety)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to whoopsie in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Trusty:
  New
Status in whoopsie source package in Trusty:
  New
Status in apport source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in whoopsie source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in apport source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed
Status in whoopsie source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  While some apport reports contain ProcCpuinfo not all of them do and it would 
be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386 version of Ubuntu. 
Additionally, the existing implementation gathers information about every 
processor which is quite lengthy - something smaller would be better.

  [Test Case]
  1. Run ubuntu-bug 2vcard
  2. Observe there is no report key ProcCpuinfoMinimal

  With the version of apport from -proposed you will have
  ProcCpuinfoMinimal which will contain information about your
  processor.

  To verify the whoopsie change you'll want to do the following:
  1) sudo service whoopsie stop
  2) sudo CRASH_DB_URL=https://daisy.staging.ubuntu.com whoopsie -f
  3) kill -11 a process (but not the whoopsie one!)
  4) confirm sending the report
  5) Find the OOPS ID in the whoopsie output
  6) Go to http://errors.staging.ubuntu.com/oops/$OOPSID
  7) Verify ProcCpuinfoMinimal appears in the OOPS


  [Regression Potential]
  This exists in Zesty, and Artful and there have been no issues collecting the 
information. Even if there are errors in the general ubuntu hook, which was 
modified for this SRU, apport will continue collecting information for the 
report and just add a traceback to the report about the hook error.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-05-12 Thread Brian Murray 
** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  While some apport reports contain ProcCpuinfo not all of them do and it would 
be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386 version of Ubuntu. 
Additionally, the existing implementation gathers information about every 
processor which is quite lengthy - something smaller would be better.
  
  [Test Case]
  1. Run ubuntu-bug 2vcard
  2. Observe there is no report key ProcCpuinfoMinimal
- With the version of the package from -proposed you will have 
ProcCpuinfoMinimal which will contain information about your processor.
+ 
+ With the version of apport from -proposed you will have
+ ProcCpuinfoMinimal which will contain information about your processor.
+ 
+ To verify the whoopsie change you'll want to do the following:
+ 1) sudo service whoopsie stop
+ 2) sudo CRASH_DB_URL=https://daisy.staging.ubuntu.com whoopsie -f
+ 3) kill -11 a process (but not the whoopsie one!)
+ 4) confirm sending the report
+ 5) Find the OOPS ID in the whoopsie output
+ 6) Go to http://errors.staging.ubuntu.com/oops/$OOPSID
+ 7) Verify ProcCpuinfoMinimal appears in the OOPS
+ 
  
  [Regression Potential]
  This exists in Zesty, and Artful and there have been no issues collecting the 
information. Even if there are errors in the general ubuntu hook, which was 
modified for this SRU, apport will continue collecting information for the 
report and just add a traceback to the report about the hook error.
  
  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are gathered.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to whoopsie in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Trusty:
  New
Status in whoopsie source package in Trusty:
  New
Status in apport source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in whoopsie source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in apport source package in Yakkety:
  In Progress
Status in whoopsie source package in Yakkety:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  While some apport reports contain ProcCpuinfo not all of them do and it would 
be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386 version of Ubuntu. 
Additionally, the existing implementation gathers information about every 
processor which is quite lengthy - something smaller would be better.

  [Test Case]
  1. Run ubuntu-bug 2vcard
  2. Observe there is no report key ProcCpuinfoMinimal

  With the version of apport from -proposed you will have
  ProcCpuinfoMinimal which will contain information about your
  processor.

  To verify the whoopsie change you'll want to do the following:
  1) sudo service whoopsie stop
  2) sudo CRASH_DB_URL=https://daisy.staging.ubuntu.com whoopsie -f
  3) kill -11 a process (but not the whoopsie one!)
  4) confirm sending the report
  5) Find the OOPS ID in the whoopsie output
  6) Go to http://errors.staging.ubuntu.com/oops/$OOPSID
  7) Verify ProcCpuinfoMinimal appears in the OOPS


  [Regression Potential]
  This exists in Zesty, and Artful and there have been no issues collecting the 
information. Even if there are errors in the general ubuntu hook, which was 
modified for this SRU, apport will continue collecting information for the 
report and just add a traceback to the report about the hook error.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-05-12 Thread Brian Murray 
** Description changed:

- apport does not currently collect data from /proc/cpuinfo and this would
- be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386 version of
- Ubuntu.
+ [Impact]
+ While some apport reports contain ProcCpuinfo not all of them do and it would 
be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386 version of Ubuntu. 
Additionally, the existing implementation gathers information about every 
processor which is quite lengthy - something smaller would be better.
+ 
+ [Test Case]
+ 1. Run ubuntu-bug 2vcard
+ 2. Observe there is no report key ProcCpuinfoMinimal
+ With the version of the package from -proposed you will have 
ProcCpuinfoMinimal which will contain information about your processor.
+ 
+ [Regression Potential]
+ This exists in Zesty, and Artful and there have been no issues collecting the 
information. Even if there are errors in the general ubuntu hook, which was 
modified for this SRU, apport will continue collecting information for the 
report and just add a traceback to the report about the hook error.
  
  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are gathered.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to whoopsie in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Trusty:
  New
Status in whoopsie source package in Trusty:
  New
Status in apport source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in whoopsie source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in apport source package in Yakkety:
  In Progress
Status in whoopsie source package in Yakkety:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  While some apport reports contain ProcCpuinfo not all of them do and it would 
be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386 version of Ubuntu. 
Additionally, the existing implementation gathers information about every 
processor which is quite lengthy - something smaller would be better.

  [Test Case]
  1. Run ubuntu-bug 2vcard
  2. Observe there is no report key ProcCpuinfoMinimal
  With the version of the package from -proposed you will have 
ProcCpuinfoMinimal which will contain information about your processor.

  [Regression Potential]
  This exists in Zesty, and Artful and there have been no issues collecting the 
information. Even if there are errors in the general ubuntu hook, which was 
modified for this SRU, apport will continue collecting information for the 
report and just add a traceback to the report about the hook error.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-05-10 Thread Brian Murray 
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Yakkety)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Yakkety)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Murray (brian-murray)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to whoopsie in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Trusty:
  New
Status in whoopsie source package in Trusty:
  New
Status in apport source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in whoopsie source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in apport source package in Yakkety:
  In Progress
Status in whoopsie source package in Yakkety:
  New

Bug description:
  apport does not currently collect data from /proc/cpuinfo and this
  would be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386
  version of Ubuntu.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-05-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker 
** Branch linked: lp:whoopsie

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to whoopsie in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Trusty:
  New
Status in whoopsie source package in Trusty:
  New
Status in apport source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in whoopsie source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in apport source package in Yakkety:
  New
Status in whoopsie source package in Yakkety:
  New

Bug description:
  apport does not currently collect data from /proc/cpuinfo and this
  would be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386
  version of Ubuntu.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-05-10 Thread Brian Murray 
** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: whoopsie (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu Yakkety)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: whoopsie (Ubuntu Yakkety)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu Trusty)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: whoopsie (Ubuntu Trusty)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apport source package in Trusty:
  New
Status in whoopsie source package in Trusty:
  New
Status in apport source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in whoopsie source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in apport source package in Yakkety:
  New
Status in whoopsie source package in Yakkety:
  New

Bug description:
  apport does not currently collect data from /proc/cpuinfo and this
  would be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386
  version of Ubuntu.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-04-03 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker 
This bug was fixed in the package apport - 2.20.4-0ubuntu3

---
apport (2.20.4-0ubuntu3) zesty; urgency=medium

  * data/general/ubuntu.py: Collect a minimal version of /proc/cpuinfo in
every report. (LP: #1673557)
  * debian/control: remove build dep on libglib2.0-0-dbg since the gdb helpers
moved to libglib2.0-dev.

 -- Brian Murray   Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:16:33 -0700

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to whoopsie in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  apport does not currently collect data from /proc/cpuinfo and this
  would be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386
  version of Ubuntu.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-03-29 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker 
This bug was fixed in the package whoopsie - 0.2.55

---
whoopsie (0.2.55) zesty; urgency=medium

  * src/whoopsie.c: Add ProcCpuinfoMinimal which can be larger than 1KB to the
list of accepted fields. (LP: #1673557)

 -- Brian Murray   Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:41:31 -0700

** Changed in: whoopsie (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to whoopsie in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  apport does not currently collect data from /proc/cpuinfo and this
  would be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386
  version of Ubuntu.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-03-29 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker 
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/zesty/apport/ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to whoopsie in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  apport does not currently collect data from /proc/cpuinfo and this
  would be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386
  version of Ubuntu.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-03-29 Thread Brian Murray 
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to whoopsie in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  apport does not currently collect data from /proc/cpuinfo and this
  would be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386
  version of Ubuntu.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-03-29 Thread Brian Murray 
Here's part of a report made using the above python code to gather
ProcCpuinfo.

PackageArchitecture: amd64
ProcCpuinfoMinimal:
 processor  : 3  
 vendor_id  : GenuineIntel
 cpu family : 6  
 model  : 58 
 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz
 stepping   : 9  
 microcode  : 0x17 
 cpu MHz: 3677.661
 cache size : 6144 KB
 physical id: 0  
 siblings   : 4  
 core id: 3  
 cpu cores  : 4  
 apicid : 6  
 initial apicid : 6
 fpu: yes
 fpu_exception  : yes
 cpuid level: 13 
 wp : yes
 flags  : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov 
pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm 
constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc 
aperfmperf eagerfpu pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 
cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave 
avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm epb tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep 
erms xsaveopt dtherm ida arat pln pts
 bugs   :
 bogomips   : 6819.49
 clflush size   : 64 
 cache_alignment: 64
 address sizes  : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
 power management:
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-41.44-generic 4.8.17

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to whoopsie in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  apport does not currently collect data from /proc/cpuinfo and this
  would be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386
  version of Ubuntu.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-03-29 Thread Brian Murray 
I uploaded it to errors.u.c too to confirm that whoopsie let
ProcCpuinfoMinimal through and it did.

https://errors.ubuntu.com/oops/44d8b014-14a8-11e7-9db8-fa163ebeb28a

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to whoopsie in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  apport does not currently collect data from /proc/cpuinfo and this
  would be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386
  version of Ubuntu.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-03-28 Thread Brian Murray 
Actually given that we already have /proc/cpuinfo when the report is
being created we could just collapse that down in python with something
like:

short_list = []
for item in reversed(report['ProcCpuinfo'].split('\n')):
short_list.append(item)
if item.startswith('processor\t:'):
break

short_list = reversed(short_list)

report['ShortProcCpuinfo'] = '\n'.join(short_list)

This still ends up catching Hardware, Revision, and Serial from arm and
will display the greatest processor number instead of 0 which might be
nice too.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to whoopsie in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  apport does not currently collect data from /proc/cpuinfo and this
  would be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386
  version of Ubuntu.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-03-16 Thread Adam Conrad 
Ugly collapsing code:

sed -n '/^processor/,/^$/{/^$/q; p}' /proc/cpuinfo ; foo=$(sed
'/^processor/,/^$/d' /proc/cpuinfo); if [ -n "$foo" ]; then echo -e
"\n$foo"; fi

Prettying that into one line of sed or awk shouldn't technically be
hard, but not my top priority today. :P

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to whoopsie in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  apport does not currently collect data from /proc/cpuinfo and this
  would be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386
  version of Ubuntu.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-03-16 Thread Brian Murray 
Digging into this further the attach_hardware() function from
hookutils.py grabs /proc/cpuinfo and attach_hardware is used by a lot of
packages, its just that whoopsie uses a whitelist for attachments which
are greater than 1k which cpuinfo is.  So whoopsie would need to be
modified to allow ProcCpuinfo through.

** Also affects: whoopsie (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: whoopsie (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: whoopsie (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in whoopsie package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  apport does not currently collect data from /proc/cpuinfo and this
  would be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386
  version of Ubuntu.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673557] Re: /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

2017-03-16 Thread Brian Murray 
11:22 < infinity> bdmurray: lscpu might be more pleasant for this.  
  Need to confirm it DTRT on all platforms.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673557

Title:
  /proc/cpuinfo should be collected

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  apport does not currently collect data from /proc/cpuinfo and this
  would be useful to determine how many users can only run the i386
  version of Ubuntu.

  The general Ubuntu hook, possibly add_kernel_info() could be used,
  should be modified such that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo are
  gathered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1673557/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp