** Description changed:
- systemd v232+ journals aren't compatible with journalctrl from 229
+ In my attempt to snap gnome-logs, I've run into an issue where gnome-
+ logs fails to get the journal when run on an artful host. The snap is
+ built in a xenial chroot against xenial + gnome-3-24 backports PPA. The
+ same snap does work when run on a 16.04 host.
- This normally isn't a problem, but in trying to create a snap for gnome-
- logs I've run into a situation where we need to build the snap for 16.04
- which has libsystemd0=229. This snap works fine if the host is running
- 16.04 as well. But on an artful host, the snap fails to access the
- journal. I've tested backporting v232 from zesty to xenial and building
- my snap with libsystem0 232. This works fine on 16.04 and 17.10 hosts.
+ artful has libsystemd0 234 and xenial has libsystemd0 229. I took a
+ stab at building libsystemd0 232 on xenial then build the snap with
+ libsystemd0 232. The resulting snap works fine on 16.04 and 17.10
+ hosts.
+
+ To summarize, we need a libsystemd0 built for xenial bundled in the
+ gnome-logs snap that is compatible with the running systemd on the host.
+ The basic rebuild of 232 for xenial is compatible with systemd from
+ xenial through artful. But we want to be sure backporting that in a
+ supported PPA is not a bad idea. Ideally we would just cherry pick
+ whatever 229 is lacking in our PPA.
@xnox suggested v232+ journals are built with more features enabled.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715719
Title:
systemd v232+ journals aren't compatible with journalctrl from 229
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
In my attempt to snap gnome-logs, I've run into an issue where gnome-
logs fails to get the journal when run on an artful host. The snap is
built in a xenial chroot against xenial + gnome-3-24 backports PPA.
The same snap does work when run on a 16.04 host.
artful has libsystemd0 234 and xenial has libsystemd0 229. I took a
stab at building libsystemd0 232 on xenial then build the snap with
libsystemd0 232. The resulting snap works fine on 16.04 and 17.10
hosts.
To summarize, we need a libsystemd0 built for xenial bundled in the
gnome-logs snap that is compatible with the running systemd on the
host. The basic rebuild of 232 for xenial is compatible with systemd
from xenial through artful. But we want to be sure backporting that
in a supported PPA is not a bad idea. Ideally we would just cherry
pick whatever 229 is lacking in our PPA.
@xnox suggested v232+ journals are built with more features enabled.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1715719/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
