Launchpad has imported 7 comments from the remote bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451616.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-06-16T08:04:25+00:00 Dan wrote: Description of problem: Using nspr header gives a warning in the prlink.h file when -Wstrict-prototypes is included in the CFLAGS. And when -Werror is used, then it is not possible to compile at all. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): nspr-devel-4.6.7-3.fc8 but the header was not changed since Apr/06/2006, so all current Fedora and RHEL versions are affected. How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. run the script from attachments Actual results: In file included from /usr/include/nspr4/nspr.h:55, from nspr-test.c:2: /usr/include/nspr4/prlink.h:52: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype /usr/include/nspr4/prlink.h:209: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype Expected results: No warnings Additional info: There was a thread in gcc mailing list about the meaning of the warning - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2006-07/msg00033.html Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspr/+bug/180179/comments/8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-06-16T08:04:25+00:00 Dan wrote: Created attachment 309468 test case Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspr/+bug/180179/comments/9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-06-16T08:08:50+00:00 Dan wrote: Created attachment 309471 patch to remove the warnings Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspr/+bug/180179/comments/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-07-01T13:33:41+00:00 Kai wrote: Wan-Teh, what do you think about the proposed patch? I should probably file an upstream bug. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspr/+bug/180179/comments/11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-11-26T10:52:33+00:00 Bug wrote: This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 8. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '8'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspr/+bug/180179/comments/20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-01-09T06:36:21+00:00 Bug wrote: Fedora 8 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-01-07. Fedora 8 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspr/+bug/180179/comments/23 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-08-16T14:40:02+00:00 Elio wrote: See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410677 When we next re-base to NSPR 4.8.6 we will pick-up the fix. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspr/+bug/180179/comments/38 ** Changed in: nspr (Fedora) Status: Won't Fix => Fix Released ** Changed in: nspr (Fedora) Importance: Unknown => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nspr in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180179 Title: [PATCH] Fix nspr warnings with -Wstrict-prototypes Status in NSPR: Fix Released Status in nspr package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Status in pidgin package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in nspr package in Fedora: Fix Released Bug description: I compiled Pidgin with -Wstrict-prototypes and got some warnings from NSPR. Attached is a patch to fix those warnings. I haven't done any more looking into NSPR to find other instances of this problem, so I can't say for sure if this is it or not. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nspr/+bug/180179/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
