[Touch-packages] [Bug 1859404] Re: binutils regressed llvm-toolchain-9 and llvm-toolchain-7 bootstrap on arm64
** Changed in: binutils (Debian) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859404 Title: binutils regressed llvm-toolchain-9 and llvm-toolchain-7 bootstrap on arm64 Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in binutils package in Debian: Fix Released Bug description: Retrying builds on bileto with the release only pocket enabled worked correctly. Still trying to figure out what can have regressed it (Debian doesn't show the issue, but probably it is affected on the same way, just his CPUs can understand the new instructions? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1859404/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1859404] Re: binutils regressed llvm-toolchain-9 and llvm-toolchain-7 bootstrap on arm64
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859404 Title: binutils regressed llvm-toolchain-9 and llvm-toolchain-7 bootstrap on arm64 Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in binutils package in Debian: New Bug description: Retrying builds on bileto with the release only pocket enabled worked correctly. Still trying to figure out what can have regressed it (Debian doesn't show the issue, but probably it is affected on the same way, just his CPUs can understand the new instructions? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1859404/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1859404] Re: binutils regressed llvm-toolchain-9 and llvm-toolchain-7 bootstrap on arm64
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859404 Title: binutils regressed llvm-toolchain-9 and llvm-toolchain-7 bootstrap on arm64 Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in binutils package in Debian: New Bug description: Retrying builds on bileto with the release only pocket enabled worked correctly. Still trying to figure out what can have regressed it (Debian doesn't show the issue, but probably it is affected on the same way, just his CPUs can understand the new instructions? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1859404/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1859404] Re: binutils regressed llvm-toolchain-9 and llvm-toolchain-7 bootstrap on arm64
** Changed in: binutils (Debian) Status: Unknown => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859404 Title: binutils regressed llvm-toolchain-9 and llvm-toolchain-7 bootstrap on arm64 Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: New Status in binutils package in Debian: New Bug description: Retrying builds on bileto with the release only pocket enabled worked correctly. Still trying to figure out what can have regressed it (Debian doesn't show the issue, but probably it is affected on the same way, just his CPUs can understand the new instructions? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1859404/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1859404] Re: binutils regressed llvm-toolchain-9 and llvm-toolchain-7 bootstrap on arm64
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #948803 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948803 ** Also affects: binutils (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948803 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859404 Title: binutils regressed llvm-toolchain-9 and llvm-toolchain-7 bootstrap on arm64 Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: New Status in binutils package in Debian: Unknown Bug description: Retrying builds on bileto with the release only pocket enabled worked correctly. Still trying to figure out what can have regressed it (Debian doesn't show the issue, but probably it is affected on the same way, just his CPUs can understand the new instructions? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1859404/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1859404] Re: binutils regressed llvm-toolchain-9 and llvm-toolchain-7 bootstrap on arm64
also hedgewars, ghc, and others are having the very same SIGILL -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859404 Title: binutils regressed llvm-toolchain-9 and llvm-toolchain-7 bootstrap on arm64 Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Retrying builds on bileto with the release only pocket enabled worked correctly. Still trying to figure out what can have regressed it (Debian doesn't show the issue, but probably it is affected on the same way, just his CPUs can understand the new instructions? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1859404/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1859404] Re: binutils regressed llvm-toolchain-9 and llvm-toolchain-7 bootstrap on arm64
golang-1.13 has a really similar issue # ../misc/cgo/testshared shared_test.go:72: executing go install -installsuffix=5577006791947779410 -buildmode=shared runtime sync/atomic failed exit status 2: # /tmp/go-build097387848/b009/libruntime,sync-atomic.so /<>/pkg/tool/linux_arm64/link: running gcc failed: exit status 1 collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 4 [Illegal instruction], core dumped compilation terminated. FAILmisc/cgo/testshared 6.272s FAIL 2020/01/13 08:41:33 Failed: exit status 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859404 Title: binutils regressed llvm-toolchain-9 and llvm-toolchain-7 bootstrap on arm64 Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Retrying builds on bileto with the release only pocket enabled worked correctly. Still trying to figure out what can have regressed it (Debian doesn't show the issue, but probably it is affected on the same way, just his CPUs can understand the new instructions? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1859404/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
