[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956062] Re: vim mis-manages modifyOtherKeys on xterms

2022-01-06 Thread Douglas Miller
What version of vim is planned for 22.04? Will these fixes be included?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to vim in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956062

Title:
  vim mis-manages modifyOtherKeys on xterms

Status in vim package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This began as question #76. I've observed odd behavior in vim
  since my upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04. One in particular is when I use
  the "r" command to replace a single character, shifted letters fail to
  work correctly and vim sputters and changes the case of letters in the
  line, instead of replace a single character. Another place is in
  search strings where I want to use the carriage-return character and
  type Ctrl-V Ctrl-M, the Ctrl-M appears as an ESC sequence instead of
  "^M" and the search fails to do what I intended.

  Analyzing the problem in question #76 revealed this:

  When vim initializes (the xterm), it sends "^[[>4;2m" which sets the
  modifyOtherKeys=2 parameter. This appears to send *any* keys that use
  modifiers (Shift, Ctrl, Alt) as ESC sequences, as we've seen. This
  explains why the un-shifted keys "r" and "s" appear normally. But, it
  appears that there are certain cases where vim is not properly
  interpreting the sequences that it requested.

  In the case of the "s" command, vim sends an "^[[>4;m"
  (modifyOtherKeys=0) before I can type the "A", so the "A" comes in as
  a normal ASCII character. It appears that vim should also be doing the
  same thing for "r" but does not. There are probably other contexts
  where vim is failing to properly manage the modifyOtherKeys setting,
  such as when I try ^V^M in search commands.

  In the case of the "r" command, vim sends no ESC sequences after the
  "r" so the "A" comes in as the ESC sequence "^[[27;2;65~" and confuses
  vim.

  In the case of search commands, vim is also failing to reset the
  modifyOtherKeys setting, so the ^V and ^M are sent as ESC sequences -
  although it appears that vim recognizes the ^V "^[[27;5;118~" and then
  (correctly) ignores the ESC in the ^M sequence "^[[27;5;109~". FYI, I
  understand that vim can now recognize "\r" in search strings, but that
  still leaves the problem of all the other control characters I must
  often manipulate in search commands.

  It is looking now as though there is actually a bug in vim, where it
  does not properly manage the modifyOtherKeys setting even though it
  explicitly requests that setting.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: vim 2:8.1.2269-1ubuntu5.4
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-91.102-generic 5.4.151
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-91-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Dec 30 15:49:03 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-02-22 (1772 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20170215.2)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: vim
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-10-04 (451 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/+bug/1956062/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956062] Re: vim mis-manages modifyOtherKeys on xterms

2022-01-05 Thread Douglas Miller
Examining the raw I/O between this new vim and my xterm, I see that the
'r' command is now turning off modifyOtherKeys (and then back on after
the replacement character is typed). So, it would appear that there is a
fix to this upstream, and Ubuntu vim is just lacking that fix.

As far as use of ^V in a ":s/" search command, it appears that vim is
simply properly interpreting "^[[27;5;109~" now, rather than inserting
the whole sequence literally.

So, it appears that the version of vim currently in 20.04 is lacking
some fixes.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to vim in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956062

Title:
  vim mis-manages modifyOtherKeys on xterms

Status in vim package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This began as question #76. I've observed odd behavior in vim
  since my upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04. One in particular is when I use
  the "r" command to replace a single character, shifted letters fail to
  work correctly and vim sputters and changes the case of letters in the
  line, instead of replace a single character. Another place is in
  search strings where I want to use the carriage-return character and
  type Ctrl-V Ctrl-M, the Ctrl-M appears as an ESC sequence instead of
  "^M" and the search fails to do what I intended.

  Analyzing the problem in question #76 revealed this:

  When vim initializes (the xterm), it sends "^[[>4;2m" which sets the
  modifyOtherKeys=2 parameter. This appears to send *any* keys that use
  modifiers (Shift, Ctrl, Alt) as ESC sequences, as we've seen. This
  explains why the un-shifted keys "r" and "s" appear normally. But, it
  appears that there are certain cases where vim is not properly
  interpreting the sequences that it requested.

  In the case of the "s" command, vim sends an "^[[>4;m"
  (modifyOtherKeys=0) before I can type the "A", so the "A" comes in as
  a normal ASCII character. It appears that vim should also be doing the
  same thing for "r" but does not. There are probably other contexts
  where vim is failing to properly manage the modifyOtherKeys setting,
  such as when I try ^V^M in search commands.

  In the case of the "r" command, vim sends no ESC sequences after the
  "r" so the "A" comes in as the ESC sequence "^[[27;2;65~" and confuses
  vim.

  In the case of search commands, vim is also failing to reset the
  modifyOtherKeys setting, so the ^V and ^M are sent as ESC sequences -
  although it appears that vim recognizes the ^V "^[[27;5;118~" and then
  (correctly) ignores the ESC in the ^M sequence "^[[27;5;109~". FYI, I
  understand that vim can now recognize "\r" in search strings, but that
  still leaves the problem of all the other control characters I must
  often manipulate in search commands.

  It is looking now as though there is actually a bug in vim, where it
  does not properly manage the modifyOtherKeys setting even though it
  explicitly requests that setting.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: vim 2:8.1.2269-1ubuntu5.4
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-91.102-generic 5.4.151
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-91-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Dec 30 15:49:03 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-02-22 (1772 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20170215.2)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: vim
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-10-04 (451 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/+bug/1956062/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956062] Re: vim mis-manages modifyOtherKeys on xterms

2022-01-05 Thread Douglas Miller
I cloned the vim github repo and did a default build (version 8.2.4014),
that version of vim does not exhibit any of this odd behavior. Seems
likely that either something has fixed this upstream or else Ubuntu
20.04 vim build enables some feature that causes this.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to vim in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956062

Title:
  vim mis-manages modifyOtherKeys on xterms

Status in vim package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This began as question #76. I've observed odd behavior in vim
  since my upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04. One in particular is when I use
  the "r" command to replace a single character, shifted letters fail to
  work correctly and vim sputters and changes the case of letters in the
  line, instead of replace a single character. Another place is in
  search strings where I want to use the carriage-return character and
  type Ctrl-V Ctrl-M, the Ctrl-M appears as an ESC sequence instead of
  "^M" and the search fails to do what I intended.

  Analyzing the problem in question #76 revealed this:

  When vim initializes (the xterm), it sends "^[[>4;2m" which sets the
  modifyOtherKeys=2 parameter. This appears to send *any* keys that use
  modifiers (Shift, Ctrl, Alt) as ESC sequences, as we've seen. This
  explains why the un-shifted keys "r" and "s" appear normally. But, it
  appears that there are certain cases where vim is not properly
  interpreting the sequences that it requested.

  In the case of the "s" command, vim sends an "^[[>4;m"
  (modifyOtherKeys=0) before I can type the "A", so the "A" comes in as
  a normal ASCII character. It appears that vim should also be doing the
  same thing for "r" but does not. There are probably other contexts
  where vim is failing to properly manage the modifyOtherKeys setting,
  such as when I try ^V^M in search commands.

  In the case of the "r" command, vim sends no ESC sequences after the
  "r" so the "A" comes in as the ESC sequence "^[[27;2;65~" and confuses
  vim.

  In the case of search commands, vim is also failing to reset the
  modifyOtherKeys setting, so the ^V and ^M are sent as ESC sequences -
  although it appears that vim recognizes the ^V "^[[27;5;118~" and then
  (correctly) ignores the ESC in the ^M sequence "^[[27;5;109~". FYI, I
  understand that vim can now recognize "\r" in search strings, but that
  still leaves the problem of all the other control characters I must
  often manipulate in search commands.

  It is looking now as though there is actually a bug in vim, where it
  does not properly manage the modifyOtherKeys setting even though it
  explicitly requests that setting.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: vim 2:8.1.2269-1ubuntu5.4
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-91.102-generic 5.4.151
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-91-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Dec 30 15:49:03 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-02-22 (1772 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20170215.2)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: vim
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-10-04 (451 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/+bug/1956062/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp