[Touch-packages] [Bug 1458204] Re: removing kernels should not require a restart afterward

2018-12-05 Thread Barry Kolts
Brian,

On Dec 3rd I installed from xenial-proposed version 1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.0.
On Dec 4th unattended-upgrades installed new kernel and rebooted, as it should.
Today, Dec 5 unattended-upgrades removed old kernels, which it should do, and 
then rebooted which it shouldn't do. I have attached unattended-upgrades.log 
for the relevant days.

On a side note unattended-upgrades emailed me after it installed the new
kernel on Dec 4th, as it should, but did not email me after removing old
kernels on Dec 5th. It should have.

Let me know if I can provide any other information or do any further
testing. My system is Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS server.

Barry

** Attachment added: "unattended-upgrades.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1458204/+attachment/5219447/+files/unattended-upgrades.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1458204

Title:
  removing kernels should not require a restart afterward

Status in unattended-upgrades:
  New
Status in update notifier:
  New
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in update-notifier package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Won't Fix
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Artful:
  Won't Fix
Status in update-notifier source package in Artful:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  1. Perform a kernel upgrade normally via "apt-get dist-upgrade".
  2. Reboot.
  3. Run "apt-get autoremove" to delete the old kernel packages.
  4. "System Notification Helper" now reports that the computer requires a 
reboot.

  The "autoremove" operation shouldn't require a reboot, logically
  speaking, because it's just removing files that are unused by the OS.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  Package: apt 1.0.1ubuntu2.7
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-53.89-generic 3.13.11-ckt19
  Uname: Linux 3.13.0-53-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.11
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Sat May 23 12:47:15 2015
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-08-31 (629 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 "Raring Ringtail" - Release amd64 (20130424)
  SourcePackage: apt
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-04-26 (391 days ago)
  --- 
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.11
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=66f11ff7-00bb-4452-9168-003cf9078308
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-08-31 (632 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 "Raring Ringtail" - Release amd64 (20130424)
  MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name
  Package: linux (not installed)
  ProcFB: 0 nouveaufb
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-53-generic 
root=UUID=02741f1f-8107-4a0f-b9a6-31ef470b1389 ro libata.force=noncq quiet 
splash vt.handoff=7
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-53.89-generic 3.13.11-ckt19
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   linux-restricted-modules-3.13.0-53-generic N/A
   linux-backports-modules-3.13.0-53-generic  N/A
   linux-firmware 1.127.12
  RfKill:
   
  Tags:  trusty
  Uname: Linux 3.13.0-53-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-04-26 (395 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dialout dip fuse lightdm lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo
  WifiSyslog:
   
  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 08/12/2013
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 4210
  dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M.
  dmi.board.name: P9X79
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture
  dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr4210:bd08/12/2013:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnP9X79:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion:
  dmi.product.name: System Product Name
  dmi.product.version: System Version
  dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1458204/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1458204] Re: removing kernels should not require a restart afterward

2018-12-08 Thread Barry Kolts
@tjaalton

My 16.04 server doesn't have update-notifier installed but does have
update-notifier-common installed. If I install update-notifier from
propose it will install a slew of other packages. If I install update-
notifier-common from propose it just installs the new update-notifier-
common version 3.168.10. So should i test update-notifier-common instead
of update-notifier?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1458204

Title:
  removing kernels should not require a restart afterward

Status in unattended-upgrades:
  New
Status in update notifier:
  New
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in update-notifier package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in update-notifier source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Won't Fix
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Artful:
  Won't Fix
Status in update-notifier source package in Artful:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  The rationale behind the SRU to Xenial is that with latest unattended-
  upgrades SRU it starts removing unused kernels, but all older kernels
  are not removed in a single run. With update-notifier and u-u not
  fixed they place /var/run/reboot-required asking for a reboot when it
  is not needed.

  
  [Test Case]

  1. Perform a kernel upgrade normally via "apt-get dist-upgrade".
  2. Reboot.
  3. Run "apt-get autoremove" to delete the old kernel packages.
  4. "System Notification Helper" now reports that the computer requires a 
reboot.

  The "autoremove" operation shouldn't require a reboot, logically
  speaking, because it's just removing files that are unused by the OS.

  [ Regression Potential ]

  If the check for skipping placing the /var/run/reboot-required file is too 
broad it may make kernel upgrades fail to ask for reboot. The fix changes a 
hook called by maintainer scripts and a failure in the hook can make kernel 
package installations fail.
  The fix is simple and was tested in several releases thus regressing in these 
ways is unlikely.

  [ Original Bug Text ]

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  Package: apt 1.0.1ubuntu2.7
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-53.89-generic 3.13.11-ckt19
  Uname: Linux 3.13.0-53-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.11
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Sat May 23 12:47:15 2015
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-08-31 (629 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 "Raring Ringtail" - Release amd64 (20130424)
  SourcePackage: apt
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-04-26 (391 days ago)
  ---
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.11
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=66f11ff7-00bb-4452-9168-003cf9078308
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-08-31 (632 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 "Raring Ringtail" - Release amd64 (20130424)
  MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name
  Package: linux (not installed)
  ProcFB: 0 nouveaufb
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-53-generic 
root=UUID=02741f1f-8107-4a0f-b9a6-31ef470b1389 ro libata.force=noncq quiet 
splash vt.handoff=7
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-53.89-generic 3.13.11-ckt19
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   linux-restricted-modules-3.13.0-53-generic N/A
   linux-backports-modules-3.13.0-53-generic  N/A
   linux-firmware 1.127.12
  RfKill:

  Tags:  trusty
  Uname: Linux 3.13.0-53-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-04-26 (395 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dialout dip fuse lightdm lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo
  WifiSyslog:

  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 08/12/2013
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 4210
  dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M.
  dmi.board.name: P9X79
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture
  dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr4210:bd08/12/2013:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnP9X79:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion:
  dmi.product.name: System Product Name
  dmi.product.version: System Version
  dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1458204/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHe

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1458204] Re: removing kernels should not require a restart afterward

2018-12-22 Thread Barry Kolts
I also can verify 1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.1. Yesterday new kernels were
installed and a reboot performed. Today old kernel was removed and no
reboot performed. This test also used the new update-notifier-common
version 3.168.10.

Yesterday I received an email telling me that new kernels had been
installed and a reboot was performed, as it should, but today I received
no email stating the old kernel had been removed. I expected one. Is
this a new bug?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1458204

Title:
  removing kernels should not require a restart afterward

Status in unattended-upgrades:
  New
Status in update notifier:
  New
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in update-notifier package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in update-notifier source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Won't Fix
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Artful:
  Won't Fix
Status in update-notifier source package in Artful:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  The rationale behind the SRU to Xenial is that with latest unattended-
  upgrades SRU it starts removing unused kernels, but all older kernels
  are not removed in a single run. With update-notifier and u-u not
  fixed they place /var/run/reboot-required asking for a reboot when it
  is not needed.

  
  [Test Case]

  1. Perform a kernel upgrade normally via "apt-get dist-upgrade".
  2. Reboot.
  3. Run "apt-get autoremove" to delete the old kernel packages.
  4. "System Notification Helper" now reports that the computer requires a 
reboot.

  The "autoremove" operation shouldn't require a reboot, logically
  speaking, because it's just removing files that are unused by the OS.

  [ Regression Potential ]

  If the check for skipping placing the /var/run/reboot-required file is too 
broad it may make kernel upgrades fail to ask for reboot. The fix changes a 
hook called by maintainer scripts and a failure in the hook can make kernel 
package installations fail.
  The fix is simple and was tested in several releases thus regressing in these 
ways is unlikely.

  [ Original Bug Text ]

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  Package: apt 1.0.1ubuntu2.7
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-53.89-generic 3.13.11-ckt19
  Uname: Linux 3.13.0-53-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.11
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Sat May 23 12:47:15 2015
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-08-31 (629 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 "Raring Ringtail" - Release amd64 (20130424)
  SourcePackage: apt
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-04-26 (391 days ago)
  ---
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.11
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=66f11ff7-00bb-4452-9168-003cf9078308
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-08-31 (632 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 "Raring Ringtail" - Release amd64 (20130424)
  MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name
  Package: linux (not installed)
  ProcFB: 0 nouveaufb
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-53-generic 
root=UUID=02741f1f-8107-4a0f-b9a6-31ef470b1389 ro libata.force=noncq quiet 
splash vt.handoff=7
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-53.89-generic 3.13.11-ckt19
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   linux-restricted-modules-3.13.0-53-generic N/A
   linux-backports-modules-3.13.0-53-generic  N/A
   linux-firmware 1.127.12
  RfKill:

  Tags:  trusty
  Uname: Linux 3.13.0-53-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-04-26 (395 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dialout dip fuse lightdm lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo
  WifiSyslog:

  _MarkForUpload: True
  dmi.bios.date: 08/12/2013
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 4210
  dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M.
  dmi.board.name: P9X79
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture
  dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr4210:bd08/12/2013:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnP9X79:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion:
  dmi.product.name: System Product Name
  dmi.product.version: System Version
  dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1458204/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://laun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1702793] Re: Full backport SRU for unattended-upgrades

2019-02-05 Thread Barry Kolts
lukasz,

After a kernel update yesterday I can confirmed that the old kernel was removed 
and the was no reboot today.
apt-cache policy unattended-upgrades
unattended-upgrades:
  Installed: 1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.1
  Candidate: 1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.1
Also installed from xenial-proposed:
 apt-cache policy update-notifier-common
update-notifier-common:
  Installed: 3.168.10
  Candidate: 3.168.10
My system:
lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS
Release:16.04
Codename:   xenial

tag:verification-done

** Tags added: verification-done-xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1702793

Title:
  Full backport SRU for unattended-upgrades

Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  * I would like to propose a one-off full backport of unattended-upgrades
  1.2ubuntu1 to Bionic, Artful, Xenial and possibly Trusty releases because 
selectively backporting fixes for crashes and for issues that made u-u 
unreliable would be more risky thanks to the huge number of fixes and the
  inter-dependencies between them.

  [Test Case]

  * Since this backport involves fixing several bugs and this bug itself
  covers the full backport this is an overview of all LP bugs the upload
  fixes:

  - most important bugs (feel free to add more)
     + LP: #1615381 : apt-get autoremove may remove current kernel

  All LP bugs fixed by the backport, comments are welcome:
     + LP: #1230246 could use SRU template but seems straightforward
     + LP: #1260041 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1396787 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1446552 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1455097 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1458204 could use SRU template but seems straightforward
     + LP: #1577215 could use SRU template but seems straightforward
     + LP: #1602536 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1615381 could use SRU template but seems straightforward
     + LP: #1624644 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1649709 not affecting xenial
     + LP: #1654070 could use SRU template but seems straightforward
     + LP: #1654600 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1675079 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1680599 could use SRU template but seems straightforward
     + LP: #1686470 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1690980 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1698159 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1702793 this bug
     + LP: #1714019 just a merge request
     + LP: #1718419 just a merge request
     + LP: #1719630 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1722426 just a merge request
     + LP: #1737442 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1737635 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1737637 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1737717 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1741579 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1764797 just a merge request
     + LP: #1773033 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1775292 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1775307 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1778219 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1778800 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1779157 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1781176 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1781183 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1781446 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1781586 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1785093 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1789637 SRU template ok
     + LP: #1803749 SRU template ok

  [Regression Potential]

  * Due to this update covering the full backport unattended-upgrades
  can regress in any imaginable way including failing to install,
  upgrade, run, or removing essential packages from the system. Those
  are unlikely.* There are open bugs about u-u being slower than in the
  past, thus this may be a likely regression but IMO the pending speed
  optimizations should not be blocking the backport because the
  reliability issues are more important to fix and speed optimizations
  can be cherry-picked later.

  [Other Info]

  I asked for an exception for the package in following the SRU process:
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-May/004479.html

  I'm preparing the backport in ppa:rbalint/scratch and also run
  autopkgtests on it in addition to testing it manually in VMs.

  [Original Bug Text]

  Changes to support day-of-week patching and logging to syslog were
  added to upstream (https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades) over a
  year ago. These changes are not present in the latest Xenial nor
  Trusty packages (0.90 and 0.82.1) - requesting that these changes be
  pulled from upstream.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1702793/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1626345] Re: After rebooting for updates, reboot is still required.

2016-10-12 Thread Barry Kolts
Brian,

Yesterday we had kernel updates. My server, which is set to
automatically reboot, reboot fine and no /var/run/reboot-required. This
morning there was no second reboot, so everything was as expected. The I
ran autoremove to remove the stale kernel. Then I had /var/run/reboot-
required and /var/run/reboot-required.pkgs contained linux-base. So I
wouldn't think removing a kernel should require a reboot. So is this a
bug or am I not understand how this should work?

I confirmed this on a second 16.04 server

Attached are the /var/log/apt/history.logs from before autoremove and
after.

** Attachment added: "before_history.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1626345/+attachment/4760019/+files/before_history.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626345

Title:
  After rebooting for updates, reboot is still required.

Status in One Hundred Papercuts:
  Confirmed
Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Yesterday unattended-upgrades required a reboot for kernel updates as
  expected. But today unattended-upgrades required a reboot even though
  there were no updates.

  2016-09-20 05:20:10,409 INFO Initial blacklisted packages: 
  2016-09-20 05:20:10,410 INFO Initial whitelisted packages: 
  2016-09-20 05:20:10,411 INFO Starting unattended upgrades script
  2016-09-20 05:20:10,411 INFO Allowed origins are: 
['o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-security', 'o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-updates']
  2016-09-20 05:21:13,118 INFO Packages that will be upgraded: linux-generic 
linux-headers-generic linux-image-generic linux-libc-dev
  2016-09-20 05:21:13,119 INFO Writing dpkg log to 
'/var/log/unattended-upgrades/unattended-upgrades-dpkg.log'
  2016-09-20 05:24:17,405 INFO All upgrades installed
  2016-09-20 05:24:24,959 WARNING Found /var/run/reboot-required, rebooting
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,080 INFO Initial blacklisted packages: 
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,088 INFO Initial whitelisted packages: 
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,089 INFO Starting unattended upgrades script
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,089 INFO Allowed origins are: 
['o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-security', 'o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-updates']
  2016-09-21 05:11:02,624 INFO No packages found that can be upgraded 
unattended and no pending auto-removals
  2016-09-21 05:11:02,624 WARNING Found /var/run/reboot-required, rebooting

  On this machine (16.04 server) unattended-upgrades is configured to
  reboot automatically.

  This also happened on another 16.04 server with default unattended-
  upgrades configuration. It displayed the ***System restart
  required*** message. The same on a 14.04 server and a 14.04
  desktop.

  Expected behaviour: Not to do an unnecessary reboot.

  Let me know what other information I can provide.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1626345/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1626345] Re: After rebooting for updates, reboot is still required.

2016-10-12 Thread Barry Kolts
And the after autoremove log

** Attachment added: "after_history.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1626345/+attachment/4760020/+files/after_history.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626345

Title:
  After rebooting for updates, reboot is still required.

Status in One Hundred Papercuts:
  Confirmed
Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Yesterday unattended-upgrades required a reboot for kernel updates as
  expected. But today unattended-upgrades required a reboot even though
  there were no updates.

  2016-09-20 05:20:10,409 INFO Initial blacklisted packages: 
  2016-09-20 05:20:10,410 INFO Initial whitelisted packages: 
  2016-09-20 05:20:10,411 INFO Starting unattended upgrades script
  2016-09-20 05:20:10,411 INFO Allowed origins are: 
['o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-security', 'o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-updates']
  2016-09-20 05:21:13,118 INFO Packages that will be upgraded: linux-generic 
linux-headers-generic linux-image-generic linux-libc-dev
  2016-09-20 05:21:13,119 INFO Writing dpkg log to 
'/var/log/unattended-upgrades/unattended-upgrades-dpkg.log'
  2016-09-20 05:24:17,405 INFO All upgrades installed
  2016-09-20 05:24:24,959 WARNING Found /var/run/reboot-required, rebooting
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,080 INFO Initial blacklisted packages: 
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,088 INFO Initial whitelisted packages: 
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,089 INFO Starting unattended upgrades script
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,089 INFO Allowed origins are: 
['o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-security', 'o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-updates']
  2016-09-21 05:11:02,624 INFO No packages found that can be upgraded 
unattended and no pending auto-removals
  2016-09-21 05:11:02,624 WARNING Found /var/run/reboot-required, rebooting

  On this machine (16.04 server) unattended-upgrades is configured to
  reboot automatically.

  This also happened on another 16.04 server with default unattended-
  upgrades configuration. It displayed the ***System restart
  required*** message. The same on a 14.04 server and a 14.04
  desktop.

  Expected behaviour: Not to do an unnecessary reboot.

  Let me know what other information I can provide.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1626345/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1626345] [NEW] After rebooting for updates, reboot is still required.

2016-09-21 Thread Barry Kolts
Public bug reported:

Yesterday unattended-upgrades required a reboot for kernel updates as
expected. But today unattended-upgrades required a reboot even though
there were no updates.

2016-09-20 05:20:10,409 INFO Initial blacklisted packages: 
2016-09-20 05:20:10,410 INFO Initial whitelisted packages: 
2016-09-20 05:20:10,411 INFO Starting unattended upgrades script
2016-09-20 05:20:10,411 INFO Allowed origins are: 
['o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-security', 'o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-updates']
2016-09-20 05:21:13,118 INFO Packages that will be upgraded: linux-generic 
linux-headers-generic linux-image-generic linux-libc-dev
2016-09-20 05:21:13,119 INFO Writing dpkg log to 
'/var/log/unattended-upgrades/unattended-upgrades-dpkg.log'
2016-09-20 05:24:17,405 INFO All upgrades installed
2016-09-20 05:24:24,959 WARNING Found /var/run/reboot-required, rebooting
2016-09-21 05:10:54,080 INFO Initial blacklisted packages: 
2016-09-21 05:10:54,088 INFO Initial whitelisted packages: 
2016-09-21 05:10:54,089 INFO Starting unattended upgrades script
2016-09-21 05:10:54,089 INFO Allowed origins are: 
['o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-security', 'o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-updates']
2016-09-21 05:11:02,624 INFO No packages found that can be upgraded unattended 
and no pending auto-removals
2016-09-21 05:11:02,624 WARNING Found /var/run/reboot-required, rebooting

On this machine (16.04 server) unattended-upgrades is configured to
reboot automatically.

This also happened on another 16.04 server with default unattended-
upgrades configuration. It displayed the ***System restart
required*** message. The same on a 14.04 server and a 14.04 desktop.

Expected behaviour: Not to do an unnecessary reboot.

Let me know what other information I can provide.

** Affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: reboot

** Attachment added: "apport.unattended-upgrades.x41_ij8b.apport"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626345/+attachment/4745785/+files/apport.unattended-upgrades.x41_ij8b.apport

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626345

Title:
  After rebooting for updates, reboot is still required.

Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Yesterday unattended-upgrades required a reboot for kernel updates as
  expected. But today unattended-upgrades required a reboot even though
  there were no updates.

  2016-09-20 05:20:10,409 INFO Initial blacklisted packages: 
  2016-09-20 05:20:10,410 INFO Initial whitelisted packages: 
  2016-09-20 05:20:10,411 INFO Starting unattended upgrades script
  2016-09-20 05:20:10,411 INFO Allowed origins are: 
['o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-security', 'o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-updates']
  2016-09-20 05:21:13,118 INFO Packages that will be upgraded: linux-generic 
linux-headers-generic linux-image-generic linux-libc-dev
  2016-09-20 05:21:13,119 INFO Writing dpkg log to 
'/var/log/unattended-upgrades/unattended-upgrades-dpkg.log'
  2016-09-20 05:24:17,405 INFO All upgrades installed
  2016-09-20 05:24:24,959 WARNING Found /var/run/reboot-required, rebooting
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,080 INFO Initial blacklisted packages: 
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,088 INFO Initial whitelisted packages: 
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,089 INFO Starting unattended upgrades script
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,089 INFO Allowed origins are: 
['o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-security', 'o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-updates']
  2016-09-21 05:11:02,624 INFO No packages found that can be upgraded 
unattended and no pending auto-removals
  2016-09-21 05:11:02,624 WARNING Found /var/run/reboot-required, rebooting

  On this machine (16.04 server) unattended-upgrades is configured to
  reboot automatically.

  This also happened on another 16.04 server with default unattended-
  upgrades configuration. It displayed the ***System restart
  required*** message. The same on a 14.04 server and a 14.04
  desktop.

  Expected behaviour: Not to do an unnecessary reboot.

  Let me know what other information I can provide.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1626345/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1626345] Re: After rebooting for updates, reboot is still required.

2016-09-22 Thread Barry Kolts
Brian,
File attached.

** Attachment added: "history.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1626345/+attachment/4746383/+files/history.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626345

Title:
  After rebooting for updates, reboot is still required.

Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Yesterday unattended-upgrades required a reboot for kernel updates as
  expected. But today unattended-upgrades required a reboot even though
  there were no updates.

  2016-09-20 05:20:10,409 INFO Initial blacklisted packages: 
  2016-09-20 05:20:10,410 INFO Initial whitelisted packages: 
  2016-09-20 05:20:10,411 INFO Starting unattended upgrades script
  2016-09-20 05:20:10,411 INFO Allowed origins are: 
['o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-security', 'o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-updates']
  2016-09-20 05:21:13,118 INFO Packages that will be upgraded: linux-generic 
linux-headers-generic linux-image-generic linux-libc-dev
  2016-09-20 05:21:13,119 INFO Writing dpkg log to 
'/var/log/unattended-upgrades/unattended-upgrades-dpkg.log'
  2016-09-20 05:24:17,405 INFO All upgrades installed
  2016-09-20 05:24:24,959 WARNING Found /var/run/reboot-required, rebooting
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,080 INFO Initial blacklisted packages: 
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,088 INFO Initial whitelisted packages: 
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,089 INFO Starting unattended upgrades script
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,089 INFO Allowed origins are: 
['o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-security', 'o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-updates']
  2016-09-21 05:11:02,624 INFO No packages found that can be upgraded 
unattended and no pending auto-removals
  2016-09-21 05:11:02,624 WARNING Found /var/run/reboot-required, rebooting

  On this machine (16.04 server) unattended-upgrades is configured to
  reboot automatically.

  This also happened on another 16.04 server with default unattended-
  upgrades configuration. It displayed the ***System restart
  required*** message. The same on a 14.04 server and a 14.04
  desktop.

  Expected behaviour: Not to do an unnecessary reboot.

  Let me know what other information I can provide.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1626345/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1626345] Re: After rebooting for updates, reboot is still required.

2016-09-22 Thread Barry Kolts
Brian,
I don't have that file as it was removed by the reboot, but I do believe it 
said "Linux base", same as the day before.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626345

Title:
  After rebooting for updates, reboot is still required.

Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Yesterday unattended-upgrades required a reboot for kernel updates as
  expected. But today unattended-upgrades required a reboot even though
  there were no updates.

  2016-09-20 05:20:10,409 INFO Initial blacklisted packages: 
  2016-09-20 05:20:10,410 INFO Initial whitelisted packages: 
  2016-09-20 05:20:10,411 INFO Starting unattended upgrades script
  2016-09-20 05:20:10,411 INFO Allowed origins are: 
['o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-security', 'o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-updates']
  2016-09-20 05:21:13,118 INFO Packages that will be upgraded: linux-generic 
linux-headers-generic linux-image-generic linux-libc-dev
  2016-09-20 05:21:13,119 INFO Writing dpkg log to 
'/var/log/unattended-upgrades/unattended-upgrades-dpkg.log'
  2016-09-20 05:24:17,405 INFO All upgrades installed
  2016-09-20 05:24:24,959 WARNING Found /var/run/reboot-required, rebooting
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,080 INFO Initial blacklisted packages: 
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,088 INFO Initial whitelisted packages: 
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,089 INFO Starting unattended upgrades script
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,089 INFO Allowed origins are: 
['o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-security', 'o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-updates']
  2016-09-21 05:11:02,624 INFO No packages found that can be upgraded 
unattended and no pending auto-removals
  2016-09-21 05:11:02,624 WARNING Found /var/run/reboot-required, rebooting

  On this machine (16.04 server) unattended-upgrades is configured to
  reboot automatically.

  This also happened on another 16.04 server with default unattended-
  upgrades configuration. It displayed the ***System restart
  required*** message. The same on a 14.04 server and a 14.04
  desktop.

  Expected behaviour: Not to do an unnecessary reboot.

  Let me know what other information I can provide.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1626345/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1626345] Re: After rebooting for updates, reboot is still required.

2016-09-26 Thread Barry Kolts
Brian,
This weekend we had updates for libssl and a libssl regression. Both required a 
reboot and no second reboot. In other words worked as expected. 

Perhaps the bug only occurs for kernel updates. I have had this happen a few 
times in the past. So the next time it happens I will not run autoremove 
manually, to see what happens.
What files and logs can I provide at that time that will help?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626345

Title:
  After rebooting for updates, reboot is still required.

Status in One Hundred Papercuts:
  Confirmed
Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Yesterday unattended-upgrades required a reboot for kernel updates as
  expected. But today unattended-upgrades required a reboot even though
  there were no updates.

  2016-09-20 05:20:10,409 INFO Initial blacklisted packages: 
  2016-09-20 05:20:10,410 INFO Initial whitelisted packages: 
  2016-09-20 05:20:10,411 INFO Starting unattended upgrades script
  2016-09-20 05:20:10,411 INFO Allowed origins are: 
['o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-security', 'o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-updates']
  2016-09-20 05:21:13,118 INFO Packages that will be upgraded: linux-generic 
linux-headers-generic linux-image-generic linux-libc-dev
  2016-09-20 05:21:13,119 INFO Writing dpkg log to 
'/var/log/unattended-upgrades/unattended-upgrades-dpkg.log'
  2016-09-20 05:24:17,405 INFO All upgrades installed
  2016-09-20 05:24:24,959 WARNING Found /var/run/reboot-required, rebooting
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,080 INFO Initial blacklisted packages: 
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,088 INFO Initial whitelisted packages: 
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,089 INFO Starting unattended upgrades script
  2016-09-21 05:10:54,089 INFO Allowed origins are: 
['o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-security', 'o=Ubuntu,a=xenial-updates']
  2016-09-21 05:11:02,624 INFO No packages found that can be upgraded 
unattended and no pending auto-removals
  2016-09-21 05:11:02,624 WARNING Found /var/run/reboot-required, rebooting

  On this machine (16.04 server) unattended-upgrades is configured to
  reboot automatically.

  This also happened on another 16.04 server with default unattended-
  upgrades configuration. It displayed the ***System restart
  required*** message. The same on a 14.04 server and a 14.04
  desktop.

  Expected behaviour: Not to do an unnecessary reboot.

  Let me know what other information I can provide.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1626345/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1541730] Re: all cron.daily scripts are skipped on a day when unattended-upgrades triggers a reboot

2016-06-29 Thread Barry Kolts
I have noticed this too, at least with logrotate not running. I thought this 
was because the reboot happens right after, or during, unattended-upgrades. So 
I set the time to reboot to 7:30 AM in /etc/apt/apt.conf/50unattended-upgrades 
to give the rest of cron.daily time to run. However logrotate still did not 
run. And I assume neither did the rest of cron.daily. I believe 
unattended-upgrades issues 
shutdown -r 07:30
in my case. So I wondered if the impending shutdown was blocking logrotate, and 
the rest of cron.daily. However searching the Internet I could not confirm that 
theory. So I too think cron.daily/apt should be the last thing run in 
cron.daily.
One more issue that may be related. After the reboot /var/run/reboot-required 
and /var/run/reboot-required.pkgs still exist and the "*System restart 
required" message appearers  at logoin.

** Attachment added: "Apport report and 50unatended-upgrades file"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1541730/+attachment/4692505/+files/apport.unattended-upgrades.fttw5049.apport

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1541730

Title:
  all cron.daily scripts are skipped on a day when unattended-upgrades
  triggers a reboot

Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  When unattended-upgrades is configured to apply updates and
  Unattended-Upgrade::Automatic-Reboot is set to "true", and there's an
  update that requires a reboot, you'll find that none of the scripts in
  /etc/cron.daily were executed on that day.  (To be more precise, none
  that are alphabetically after the 'apt' script, which is most of
  them.)

  It would be good if unattended-upgrades did the reboot from
  /etc/cron.daily/zzz-unattended-upgrade-reboot, so the other scripts
  get a chance to run first.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  Package: unattended-upgrades 0.82.1ubuntu2.4
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-77.121-generic 3.13.11-ckt32
  Uname: Linux 3.13.0-77-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.19
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Thu Feb  4 10:02:38 2016
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: unattended-upgrades
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-09-16 (505 days ago)
  mtime.conffile..etc.apt.apt.conf.d.50unattended.upgrades: 2014-10-09T09:04:05

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1541730/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1541730] Re: all cron.daily scripts are skipped on a day when unattended-upgrades triggers a reboot

2016-06-29 Thread Barry Kolts
Can't seem to edit my own post. Disregard the last paragraph about
reboot-required, I need to look into that a little further,

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1541730

Title:
  all cron.daily scripts are skipped on a day when unattended-upgrades
  triggers a reboot

Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  When unattended-upgrades is configured to apply updates and
  Unattended-Upgrade::Automatic-Reboot is set to "true", and there's an
  update that requires a reboot, you'll find that none of the scripts in
  /etc/cron.daily were executed on that day.  (To be more precise, none
  that are alphabetically after the 'apt' script, which is most of
  them.)

  It would be good if unattended-upgrades did the reboot from
  /etc/cron.daily/zzz-unattended-upgrade-reboot, so the other scripts
  get a chance to run first.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  Package: unattended-upgrades 0.82.1ubuntu2.4
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-77.121-generic 3.13.11-ckt32
  Uname: Linux 3.13.0-77-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.19
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Thu Feb  4 10:02:38 2016
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: unattended-upgrades
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-09-16 (505 days ago)
  mtime.conffile..etc.apt.apt.conf.d.50unattended.upgrades: 2014-10-09T09:04:05

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1541730/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1581892] [NEW] Download fails on already athenticated site

2016-05-14 Thread Barry Kolts
Public bug reported:

I have a personal website that I use Apache's AuthType Basic to authenticate.
>From my phone ( Nexas 4 Mako OTA10 ) I can access the page and login OK. When 
>I download a file I get a HttpError: 401-Unathorized.

More in depth:
When I press the "GetFile" link Apache logs (in access.log):

192.168.0.67 - barry [14/May/2016:17:47:11 -0500] "GET
/briefcase/getfile.php?id=45 HTTP/1.1" 200 154936
"http://192.168.0.101/briefcase/index.php?tab=search"; "Mozilla/5.0
(Linux; Ubuntu 14.04 like Android 4.4) AppleWebKit/537.36
Chromium/35.0.1870.2 Mobile Safari/537.36"

On my phone the the Download Dialog pops up and I press download apache
logs

192.168.0.67 - - [14/May/2016:17:47:33 -0500] "GET
/briefcase/getfile.php?id=45 HTTP/1.1" 401 728
"http://192.168.0.101/briefcase/index.php?tab=search"; "Mozilla/5.0
(Linux; Ubuntu 14.04 like Android 4.4) AppleWebKit/537.36
Chromium/35.0.1870.2 Mobile Safari/537.36"

The difference is the first has my user name "barry" in it and the
second doesn't.

In comparison when doing the same thing from my desktop (14.04) and
FireFox Apache logs

192.168.0.2 - barry [14/May/2016:18:04:49 -0500] "GET
/briefcase/getfile.php?id=45 HTTP/1.1" 200 492086
"http://192.168.0.101/briefcase/index.php?tab=search"; "Mozilla/5.0 (X11;
Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:46.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/46.0"

and displays the "What should FireFox do with this file" dialog and
Apache logs nothing further.

On my phone this behavior is the same whether I press "Download" or
"Choose an application" from the Download dialog. Also if I long press
the link and choose "Save link" the download fails also.

When I tried to download a file from a commercial site I have to log
into, the download succeeded. I suspect the difference is the commercial
site probably uses something beside "AuthType Basic".

I'm happy to provide any logs or to do more testing.

Thanks

** Affects: webbrowser-app (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to webbrowser-app in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1581892

Title:
  Download fails on already athenticated site

Status in webbrowser-app package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I have a personal website that I use Apache's AuthType Basic to authenticate.
  From my phone ( Nexas 4 Mako OTA10 ) I can access the page and login OK. When 
I download a file I get a HttpError: 401-Unathorized.

  More in depth:
  When I press the "GetFile" link Apache logs (in access.log):

  192.168.0.67 - barry [14/May/2016:17:47:11 -0500] "GET
  /briefcase/getfile.php?id=45 HTTP/1.1" 200 154936
  "http://192.168.0.101/briefcase/index.php?tab=search"; "Mozilla/5.0
  (Linux; Ubuntu 14.04 like Android 4.4) AppleWebKit/537.36
  Chromium/35.0.1870.2 Mobile Safari/537.36"

  On my phone the the Download Dialog pops up and I press download
  apache logs

  192.168.0.67 - - [14/May/2016:17:47:33 -0500] "GET
  /briefcase/getfile.php?id=45 HTTP/1.1" 401 728
  "http://192.168.0.101/briefcase/index.php?tab=search"; "Mozilla/5.0
  (Linux; Ubuntu 14.04 like Android 4.4) AppleWebKit/537.36
  Chromium/35.0.1870.2 Mobile Safari/537.36"

  The difference is the first has my user name "barry" in it and the
  second doesn't.

  In comparison when doing the same thing from my desktop (14.04) and
  FireFox Apache logs

  192.168.0.2 - barry [14/May/2016:18:04:49 -0500] "GET
  /briefcase/getfile.php?id=45 HTTP/1.1" 200 492086
  "http://192.168.0.101/briefcase/index.php?tab=search"; "Mozilla/5.0
  (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:46.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/46.0"

  and displays the "What should FireFox do with this file" dialog and
  Apache logs nothing further.

  On my phone this behavior is the same whether I press "Download" or
  "Choose an application" from the Download dialog. Also if I long press
  the link and choose "Save link" the download fails also.

  When I tried to download a file from a commercial site I have to log
  into, the download succeeded. I suspect the difference is the
  commercial site probably uses something beside "AuthType Basic".

  I'm happy to provide any logs or to do more testing.

  Thanks

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webbrowser-app/+bug/1581892/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp